LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-08-28

1. CorporateBench: Large-Scale Q&A Benchmarking with Temporal Knowledge Bases

Authors: Sil Hamilton , Albert Yu Sun , Oscar J. Romero , Carl-Leander Henneking , David Mimno , Bishan Yang , Igor Labutov
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27391
Abstract:

LLMs are increasingly able to answer complex questions about enterprise-scale document collections. But evaluation is hard: companies don’t want to share internal communications, and synthetic datasets have been overly simple. We present CorporateBench (CB), a human-validated multi-task Q&A benchmark whose scale approaches the conditions LLMs encounter in corporate communication networks, with evaluation corpora surpassing 230,000 documents. CB evaluates LLMs across two dimensions (information extraction and knowledge base querying) through four synthetically generated firms ranging from 12 to 10,000 employees. Each corpus is sampled from a temporally evolving knowledge base describing a consistent world, guaranteeing cross-document logical consistency even across hundreds of thousands of documents. We evaluate five LLMs on CB, revealing increasingly poor performance as input size approaches realistic scales. CB provides LLM developers a metric for corporate communication reasoning, filling a crucial gap in the benchmarking ecosystem.

2. Sophistication in GenAI Use: Field Evidence from a Large Firm

Authors: Nicholas J. Hallman , Zachary T. Kowaleski , Anu Puvvada , Jaime J. Schmidt
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27364
Abstract:

We study how sophistication in generative AI (genAI) use varies among the back-office workforce of a large firm. Using proprietary data, we observe 713,564 employee prompts and their corresponding large language model responses from nearly 4,000 back-office employees across 15 functional areas over eight months in 2025. We document three main findings. First, senior employees exhibit more sophisticated genAI use, consistent with domain expertise complementing genAI capabilities. Second, sophistication varies considerably across functions and is highest in Strategy, Digital Innovation, and Project Management, three groups that share a focus on firmwide strategic initiatives and organizational change. Third, we observe neither improvements in sophistication over time nor lasting improvements following formal AI training, suggesting that sophisticated use can be difficult to change. Together, our study provides measures of and insights into sophisticated genAI use that managers can use to improve outcomes and that researchers can use in future research.

3. LLMs Can Design Near-Optimal OR Algorithms

Authors: Jackie Baek
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27296
Abstract:

We ask whether large language models (LLMs) can design effective algorithms for well-specified operations research (OR) problems. We study inventory control, queueing network control, and assortment optimization. We evaluate two levels of LLM use: at level 1, the model receives one problem instance and returns a solution for that instance; at level 2, it receives only the problem class description and broad parameter ranges, and returns an algorithm that maps instance parameters to solutions. Human input is minimal: we give one untuned prompt that describes the problem, and the model has access to a Python sandbox tool with a fixed compute budget. The strongest model we test, gpt-5.6-sol, matches or outperforms the best existing method on almost all evaluated instances. This holds even at level 2, where the returned algorithm is fixed before seeing the evaluation instances. Performance also improves sharply across models released less than eight months apart, suggesting that this capability is moving quickly. Thus, for the well-specified operations problems we study, a single untuned LLM query can already produce algorithms competitive with specialized methods. These results suggest that frontier LLMs can be a serious empirical baseline for algorithm design in well-specified OR problems.

4. BrailleBench: Investigating Multi-Criteria Braille Comprehension in Large Language Models

Authors: Jinghan Zhang , Fengran Mo , Zhiyu Chen , Xiaoyan Han , Kunpeng Liu , Chang-Tien Lu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27268
Abstract:

Although Large language models (LLMs) mediate access to knowledge and computational assistance, their capabilities should benefit vulnerable groups in the same way. However, it is unclear whether existing AI systems are inclusive enough for blind and deafblind users to access the same functionality through Braille, whose indicators, contractions, and digital representations introduce distinct requirements for model comprehension. To this end, we introduce BrailleBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs in Braille comprehension from different Criteria. BrailleBench aligns 5,570 instances from five datasets, including mathematics, commonsense, and multi-hop question answering across English and Braille Grades 1 and 2. Different configurations are designed to understand whether the systems can comprehend Braille-authored content, express answers in Braille, and complete end-to-end Braille interaction. To ensure the quality and prevent evaluation bias, the benchmark is built through a deterministic, expert-reviewed pipeline via a self-created Braille Toolkit without using any data instances generated by LLMs. We evaluate six representative LLMs from various aspects. The results reveal a persistent gap between print-English capability and Braille accessibility. Braille understanding and expression are asymmetric, where Grade 2 is especially fragile on the input side compared to Grade 1, and fully Braille requests further reduce performance. The experimental observations provide valuable guidance for the development of future Braille AI systems. All related resources in BrailleBench are publicly available for future research.

5. What Makes Good Agentic Data? An ACE Lens on Data Generation for LLM Agents

Authors: Xingshan Zeng , Zishan Xu , Boju Zhang , Yuzhou Wu , Lingzhi Wang , Jianghao Lin , Liangyou Li , Yasheng Wang , Lifeng Shang , Xin Jiang , Weinan Zhang , Yong Yu , Qun Liu , Weiwen Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27260
Abstract:

LLM agents increasingly rely on generated interaction data to learn how to interact with external environments. Agentic data generation must maintain consistency among environments, tasks, interactions, and success signals while producing experience that is useful rather than merely abundant. Existing work spans many agent domains, but domain-centered organization and heterogeneous evaluation often obscure common generation mechanisms and conflate candidate construction with verification and selection. This work develops a two-level framework for the field. First, we represent agentic data as a common factorized object $(E,q,\tau,v)$, comprising an environment specification, task signal, interaction realization, and optional verifier. We organize generation paradigms by their primary anchor and dependency structure. Second, we formulate generation as constrained distribution design through the Accuracy-Complexity-divErsity (ACE) lens. Accuracy establishes the feasible support of grounded and internally consistent data. Within this support, Complexity places learning mass relative to the capability of a declared learner and execution configuration, while divErsity controls coverage and redundancy of data. Using this framework, we explore how prior work verifies generated experience, constructs and calibrates difficulty, and expands behavioral coverage. The literature reveals a shift toward execution-grounded accuracy, learner-relative complexity, and diversity beyond surface variation or dataset size. We further discuss broader directions and emerging trends in agentic data generation through the ACE lens, including their implications for scaling, data sources, training regimes and adaptive learning. Overall, the central challenge is not simply to generate more data, but to continually allocate valid, informative, and non-redundant experience as agents and environments evolve.

6. Calibrated Enough to Know, Not Calibrated to Act: Fabricated Evidence Makes LLM Agents Commit to the Unknowable

Authors: Pranav Aggarwal
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27167
Abstract:

An LLM agent shown a professional-looking market panel commits to a directional call on a provably unpredictable question far more often than one asked the bare question: across 12 frontier models, commitment rises from 6.5% to 54.0% as evidence is escalated. It commits just as readily when every number on the panel is invented: fabricating the entire display, so nothing the model can see is true except the question itself, still lifts commitment from 24.5% to 36.8%, statistically indistinguishable from the 37.6% produced by genuine market data. What unlocks confident action is not information but the authority of its packaging. The failure is narrow and locatable. Incapacity is not the answer: on matched answerable questions attached to the same panels, the same models answer essentially always, at near-perfect accuracy. Nor is it belief - stated probabilities barely move across the gradient that swings action by 48 points, and score worse than a climatological baseline. Missing judgment isn’t it either: asked to classify a question’s knowability before acting, models call it irreducible 90% of the time and then commit on just 0.4% of those. The act/don’t-act gate is what fails, and the effect is concentrated in a few models rather than universal. Because the gate is separable, it can be trained. Supervised fine-tuning of a 3B model on 540 synthetic cases, predominantly dice, coins, jars and timers, drives commitment to 0.0% on the original cases and transfers to three unseen domains. It does not survive everything: the gate holds exactly when the response format leaves room to reason, and rigid formats that remove that room leave the model confident and wrong on questions it otherwise answers correctly. The gate is trainable and context-fragile, and deployment needs both halves of that sentence.

7. When Tool Outputs Become Commands: Separating Action Induction from Runtime Authorization in Tool-Augmented LLM Agents

Authors: Xiaokun Guo , Zhen Xu , Dongdong Huo , Yanqiu Zhang , Wei Wang , Qinfu Yang , Dongjin Yu , Yu Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27146
Abstract:

Tool-augmented LLM agents must rely on untrusted runtime Observations to complete open-ended tasks; however, when tool outputs no longer merely provide data but begin to specify concrete actions, they effectively become ``commands’’ that can drive real-world side effects beyond user intent. We argue that this risk arises from conflating action induction with execution authorization. To address this distinction, we propose SARA, which treats action induction and execution authorization as distinct runtime roles and separates action provenance from execution authority. On the Observation side, a context-isolated Action Probe exposes action-inducing semantics and persistently records action-origin provenance across steps as a review signal; on the execution side, actual tool calls are authorized only against the user objective and audited evidence from authorized successful executions, while satisfying goal, execution-chain, and argument-level support. To preserve this separation across multi-step execution, SARA applies No-History-Promotion to prevent historical recurrence from laundering action origins into execution authority. Across AgentDojo and AgentDyn, SARA limits ASR to no more than (0.63\%) across four primary evaluation settings while maintaining competitive task utility, and consistently reduces ASR across additional Agent backbones.

8. GRAIN: Bridging Name and Narrative Shifts in Real-World Graph Reasoning through Invariance-Rewarded Agentic RL

Authors: Zike Yuan , Han Zhang , Jianzhi Yan , Le Liu , Cai Ke , Huozhi Zhou , Jian Xie , Jiran Yin , Yukun Cao , Yue Yu , Hui Wang , Ming Liu , Bing Qin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27142
Abstract:

Despite their potential in standardized graph tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) remain brittle to real-world shifts in node identifiers and task formulation. While deterministic graph tools are invariant to such shifts, extracting topological structures from noisy text is highly fragile for LLMs, which often overfit to surface patterns. Moreover, mitigating these parsing failures via multi-agent systems incurs prohibitive latency. To address this, we propose GRAIN, a single-agent framework optimized via reinforcement learning. GRAIN models reasoning as a semantic parsing and tool-execution pipeline, guided by a Structure Invariance Reward. By validating extracted intermediate graphs against ground-truth topologies, this reward forces the LLM to learn robust text-to-structure mappings rather than memorizing linguistic artifacts. We also introduce GRIT, a benchmark evaluating sensitivity to such linguistic shifts. GRAIN outperforms multi-agent baselines by 16.45\% in accuracy with approximately 24\% lower latency. Furthermore, it demonstrates superior structural generalization, halving the out-of-distribution (OOD) gap of SFT models (from 15.77\% to 7.80\%) and maintaining robustness on large-scale graphs beyond the training distribution.

9. TransMeme: A Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Cultural Meme Transcreation

Authors: Jingyi Zheng , Yule Liu , Zifan Peng , Tianyi Hu , Yuemeng Zhao , Xinhu Zheng , Xinlei He
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27127
Abstract:

Internet memes are a pervasive form of multimodal online communication; however, such communication often involves users from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Therefore, adapting memes across cultures and languages is a central challenge for enabling mutual understanding in online communication. Unlike ordinary translation or standalone text rewriting, cross-cultural meme transcreation must jointly preserve communicative intent, adapt culture-dependent meaning for the target audience, and maintain coherence between text and image. In this work, we first provide an explicit task analysis of cross-cultural meme transcreation and identify three core challenges: culture-specific knowledge understanding, intent and tone preservation, and multimodal consistency. Based on this analysis, we propose a multi-agent framework with specialized agents that are coordinated to address these challenges through cultural adaptation, target text rewriting, revision, and conditional visual adjustment. The framework strengthens target text adaptation with coordinated feedback to handle difficult cases that require deeper cultural or visual intervention. We evaluate the framework on bidirectional Chinese-English meme transcreation using both human evaluation and LLM-as-a-Judge. Our method consistently outperforms all baselines across both evaluation settings. In human evaluation, it achieves the best performance on all four dimensions and delivers a 33.1% average improvement over the strongest baseline, while in LLM-as-a-Judge, it attains the highest Top-1 ranking rate (60% versus 26% for the second-best baseline). Further analysis indicates that each component contributes to the performance. Our error analysis suggests that the remaining bottlenecks lie in humor reconstruction and image-text alignment rather than simple cultural knowledge gaps, pointing to future work on humor transfer.

10. LAAF: A Layered Accountability Architecture Framework for LLM Applications

Authors: Prachi Chaturvedi , Shahnawaz Ahmad , Ehsan Nowroozi , Muhammad Waqas , George Loukas , Alireza Jolfaei , Lucas Cordeiro , Pierre Dantas
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27102
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) operate in hospitals, courtrooms, banks, and public service desks, where fluent, confident outputs are treated as authoritative even when ungrounded or incorrect. When such an output contributes to harm, who is answerable, and through what mechanisms can responsibility be traced, explained, and acted upon? Following PRISMA guidance, five databases were searched from January 2022 to March 2026 against four review questions; of 4,512 records identified, 122 primary studies were included, together with 12 regulatory and standards documents analysed as primary sources. The review consolidates a sociotechnical account of accountability as an actor-forum relation resolved into five dimensions, and synthesises mechanisms across four families: technical controls, human oversight, organisational governance, and documentation and traceability, each with a maturity assessment. The corpus is read through a four-layer classification device spanning provenance, application logic, human oversight, and governance and redress, cross-cut by traceability, role clarity, and continuous monitoring. Both are mapped onto the EU AI Act, whose high-risk obligations have applied since 2 August 2026, the NIST AI RMF with its Generative AI Profile, ISO/IEC 42001, and sectoral guidance in healthcare, consumer finance, education, and the public sector. Four persistent gaps emerge: under-specification of human oversight, absence of shared accountability metrics, disciplinary disconnection, and limited empirical evaluation, alongside five structural tensions that no surveyed instrument resolves. The review closes by consolidating the classification device into an integrated accountability architecture, LAAF, with cybersecurity aligned to the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025); it is a synthesis of the surveyed evidence rather than a validated artefact.

11. pro-team at LLMs4OL 2026 Tasks Flagship and Reuse: Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Vocabulary-Constrained Filtering for Ontology Learning

Authors: Shivam Mishra , Dhannu Ram Meena , Muneendra Ojha , Krishna Pratap Singh , Kuldeep Singh
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27101
Abstract:

Ontology learning from text remains challenging despite significant progress in Large Language Models (LLMs), which can hallucinate domain terms, produce inconsistent formats, and favor hierarchical over associative relations. In the LLMs4OL 2026 Challenge, we address both the End-to-End Flagship Task (Task A) and Ontology Extension Reuse Task (Task B) using an offline retrieval-augmented few-shot prompting pipeline. Our system employs Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct with all-MiniLM-L6-v2 for demonstration retrieval, selecting the top-5 examples for Task A and top-2 for Task B. A left-truncated context-windowing strategy preserves task instructions within long prompts. For Task B, generated triples undergo deterministic vocabulary-constrained filtering, retaining triples when at least one endpoint belongs to the sample’s closed term/type vocabulary and removing duplicates of the initial ontology. The approach achieves Semantic Graph Similarity of 0.8692, Term-Typing F1 of 0.9200, and Taxonomy Discovery F1 of 0.8540 on Task B, while Task A achieves 0.7416 Semantic Graph Similarity. However, no non-taxonomic relations are extracted, highlighting limitations of closed, taxonomy-oriented relation vocabularies.

12. Omni-Interactive Universal Embedder

Authors: Wei-Yao Wang , Kazuya Tateishi , Shuyang Cui , Christian Simon , Takashi Shibuya , Shusuke Takahashi , Yuki Mitsufuji
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27044
Abstract:

Multimodal representation learning has been shifting from traditional two-tower architectures to large language model (LLM)-based embedders due to their strong instruction-following capabilities. Despite this progress, existing approaches primarily focus on language and image modalities, which also remain the dominant modalities for user-conditioned interactions in current embedders. In this paper, we propose the first Omni-Interactive Universal Embedder (OmniUE), which not only learns a unified embedding space across text, video, and audio by leveraging intermediate-layer representations from dedicated learnable tokens, but also supports omni-interactive querying, enabling users to provide inputs in the form of text, visual regions of interest, and audio spans. Within OmniUE, visual and audio segmenters process diverse user interactions and integrate them with an omni-LLM to produce user-conditioned any-to-any embeddings via context aggregation. To evaluate OmniUE’s omni-interactive capabilities, we introduce OmniCHOIR, benchmarking models for omni-interactive compositional audio retrieval based on the given text, video, and audio as well as unimodal or multimodal interaction prompts. OmniUE consistently surpasses state-of-the-art baselines across diverse modalities, with average improvements of 10.5% on textual-interactive video benchmarks (MMEB-v2-video), 1.1% on audio tasks (MAEB), 83.7% on visual-interactive benchmarks (SCaR), and 24.1% on our omni-interactive OmniCHOIR benchmark. We believe that jointly advancing omni-modal representation learning and omni-interactive querying paves the way toward universal embedders.

13. DSA: Evidence-Aware LLM-Agent Orchestration for Multi-Market Stock Research

Authors: Linsen Zhu , Yi Shi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26990
Abstract:

Large language models can summarize financial information, but an operational stock-research system must first assemble heterogeneous evidence, expose unavailable data and model capabilities, and control how generated opinions affect a final report. We present DSA, an evidence-aware orchestration framework for multi-market stock research with large language model (LLM) agents. DSA organizes the workflow into evidence acquisition, structured context construction, model-routed analysis, optional role and Strategy Skill reasoning, and report generation with selected context and diagnostics. A default report profile and an optional agentic profile share evidence and model-routing services but use profile-specific output validation and risk safeguards. In the agentic profile, core role outputs are processed by role-specific parsers, whereas Strategy Skill opinions undergo an additional signal-eligibility partition before synthesis; disagreement is supplied explicitly to the decision agent, followed by a conservative risk override. The reference implementation includes six regional market paths, fifteen bundled Strategy Skills, hosted and local model routes, and multiple execution and delivery surfaces. At a frozen software snapshot, a selected manifest of 1,457 portable offline backend contract tests passed; 596 cases were retrospectively mapped to six contract families central to the reported LLM-agent architecture. This evidence establishes implementation conformance for the tested software contracts, not superior report quality, forecasting accuracy, or investment returns.

14. From Atomic to Agentic: Towards Interpretable Evaluation of LLMs’ Agentic Mathematical Capabilities

Authors: Jiayi Kuang , Yinghui Li , Yunze Song , Keyu Chen , Zhifeng Shen , Yangning Li , Yidong Wang , Di Yin , Ruizhi Qiao , Xing Sun , Kai Jin , Ying Shen , Liang Lin , Philip S. Yu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26950
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving from performing end-to-end mathematical reasoning to integrating agentic intelligence. However, most existing math benchmarks evaluate only final answers. This outcome-oriented evaluation provides limited diagnostic value for identifying process-level failures or rigorous logic, failing to guide the transformation of LLMs into robust agents. To bridge this gap, we present a process-level benchmark designed to evaluate the inherent agentic mathematical reasoning abilities of LLMs. Our framework aligns problem-solving agentic behaviors with a structured taxonomy of reusable mathematical atomic capabilities. We design a comprehensive suite of planning, action, and feedback tasks across both textual and multimodal contexts, supported by an automated pipeline that synthesizes high-quality trajectories and produces fine-grained annotations via controlled LLM rewriting. Experiments reveal that models with similar end-to-end accuracy can exhibit markedly different agentic capability profiles. This demonstrates that process-level evaluation is crucial for interpreting the true potential of LLMs and guiding the development of next-generation mathematical agents.

15. Counterfactual Bias Testing for Application Tracking System

Authors: Sai Yashwant , Shruti Bansal , Anurag Dubey , Samaroha Chatterjee , Satyam Kumar , Shreyash Gupta , Gantala Thulsiram
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26899
Abstract:

Automated candidate-job matching systems are increasingly classified as high-risk AI under emerging regulation, yet auditing them for demographic bias is expensive: classical correspondence-audit studies require hand-crafted resumes and manual submission, which does not scale to fast pipeline retraining cycles. This paper presents a general, reusable methodology that (1) uses task-specialized LLM agents to synthesize identity-neutral base resumes and inject controlled demographic treatments across five protected-characteristic axes (sex/gender, age, residence, language, disability), producing a K x (1+N) correspondence-audit matrix; (2) qualitatively flags inferred protected characteristics per an EU AI Act-aligned prompt; (3) ranks candidates against a job description via a fine-tuned sentence-embedding model and cosine similarity; and (4) computes a nine-metric fairness suite spanning counterfactual (score delta, mean absolute rank change, flip rate), group-fairness (top-K retention, four-fifths/impact ratio), and merit-aware (Recall@K, nDCG@K, equal opportunity, equalized odds) families, each with bootstrap confidence intervals, significance tests, and Benjamini-Hochberg correction, culminating in an automated PASS/INVESTIGATE/FAIL report with a composite risk score. On an example corpus of 5 job orders, 100 base candidates, and 10 demographic treatments (90 metric x variant evaluations): score shifts, top-K retention, and merit-aware rate gaps stay within tolerance for every treatment, but a rank-stability metric (MARC) and nDCG@K each surface borderline findings - including one on the neutral baseline itself - that a score- or retention-only view would miss. The results argue for multi-metric, multi-family auditing over any single aggregate score, and for LLM-agent-generated audits as a practical, low-cost complement to human-curated audits for any candidate-job matching pipeline.

16. Evaluating human and LLM screening workflows in a conceptually complex scoping review: Recall–workload trade-offs and run-to-run consistency

Authors: Nikol Figalová , Lynn Huestegge , Anne Böckler-Raettig
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26885
Abstract:

Background. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for screening in evidence synthesis, where false negatives can remove relevant studies before full-text assessment. We compared human and LLM title-and-abstract screening workflows in a preregistered study embedded in a conceptually complex scoping review. Methods. After a conservative title-only screen, 1,131 records were screened by one review lead, four trained assistants screening non-overlapping subsets, and seven complete LLM runs using different models and processing configurations, including a nominally identical repeat run. We compared retained workload, operational recall against 316 verified eligible records, agreement, run-to-run consistency, and procedural burden. Because eligibility was verified only for records advanced and assessed in the parent review, recall estimates were operational. Results. No workflow recovered all verified eligible records. The human workflows and two GPT-5.4 file-batch runs retained 42.2-45.0% of records while achieving 82.3-82.9% recall. Gemini 3.1 file batches achieved the highest recall (83.9%) but retained 56.7% of records. All-at-once configurations recovered fewer eligible records than corresponding file-batch configurations. Two nominally identical GPT-5.4 file-batch runs agreed on 91.7% of records but differed on 94 records, including 29 verified eligible records retained by only one run. Discussion. LLM screening performance depended on the implemented workflow, not model identity alone. Processing configuration, workload, record-level variation, and human-LLM decision integration are therefore substantive properties of deployed systems. For high-recall tasks, LLMs are better suited to validated, auditable, human-supervised workflows than autonomous exclusion.

17. C-Unseen: Weak Signal Detection in Dynamic Temporal Knowledge Graphs via LLM Reasoning

Authors: Yassir Lairgi , Ludovic Moncla , Khalid Benabdeslem , Rémy Cazabet , Pierre Cléau
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26870
Abstract:

Weak signals are early, low-visibility indicators that precede significant changes before those changes become established. Existing detection methods, based on keyword frequency, topic modeling, or untyped graph topology, fail to capture the semantic and relational structure through which such signals manifest. In this paper, we propose C-Unseen, a self-interpretable framework for weak signal detection in Dynamic Temporal Knowledge Graphs (DTKGs). We define a weak signal as a rare, semantically coherent subgraph that proliferates across consecutive TKG snapshots. The framework operates through two modules: a Rare Subgraphs Extractor, in which an LLM identifies subgraphs whose content is in tension with the dominant snapshot narrative via chain-of-thought reasoning, and a Weak Signal Alerter, in which the persistence of these rare subgraphs is tracked across time steps to isolate true weak signals. Experimental results demonstrate that C-Unseen outperforms keyword-, topic-, and graph-based baselines.

18. BekchiAI: Measuring, Observing, and Controlling LLM Agents in One Click

Authors: Mesut Toruk
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26867
Abstract:

Large language model agents reason, call tools, and act autonomously over many steps, but their agentic skills-correctly sequencing tools, planning under dependencies, judging untrusted inputs, and grounding generated arguments-are hard to measure with accuracy-only leaderboards. We present BekchiAI, which addresses both sides: a benchmark for measuring agentic skill and a platform for observing and controlling live agents. The BekchiAI-Benchmark, a suite of 13 tool-using ReAct agents across 7 task categories (arithmetic, structured/SQL, security detection, URL grounding, planning, orchestration, and tool-policy), totalling 2,057 deterministic, committed test tasks. Every task is verifier-checkable gold answers are computed by running canonical SQL against a real database, computing the exact schedule of a directed acyclic graph (DAG), or evaluating closed-form lambdas including adversarial security samples paired with deliberately imperfect signature scanners so a score reflects the model’s own judgment, not the copying of an oracle. We define a small set of behavioral metrics beyond accuracy-tool-call adherence, URL hallucination and source-match, and per-model token cost and report a four-model comparison (Qwen3.7-Max, gemma-4-31B-it, gemma4:26b, gpt-oss-120b) whose story is in the per-family spread, not the aggregate. The benchmark runs are executed using the provided evaluation scripts. BekchiAI-Platform is a complementary web-based observability and control layer for deployed agents, providing full token and latency telemetry as well as remote run termination. The benchmark, evaluation tools, and platform are publicly released.

19. LiveSim: Simulating Environment-Shaped Users in Multi-Agent Live-Stream Ecosystems

Authors: Jiaqi Xu , Yiran Qiao , Jing Chen , Qiwei Zhong , Xiang Ao , Xueqi Cheng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26849
Abstract:

User behavior simulation with large language models~(LLMs) is increasingly used to support multi-agent ecosystem simulation. Existing simulators typically rely on static user profiles inferred from historical observations, which become inadequate in socially intensive environments such as live streaming where interaction dynamics continuously reshape user behavior. We propose \textbf{LiveSim}, an LLM-based framework for live-stream ecosystem simulation. It represents users as editable behavioral hypotheses and progressively refines them through trajectory-grounded interactions, where discrepancies between simulated and observed trajectories reveal missing environmental shaping effects. These signals are further extracted as transferable environment-behavior patterns and accumulated in a collective behavioral memory to improve user-level behavioral fidelity and support ecosystem-level simulation. Experiments on real-world live-stream risk-control data validate the effectiveness of LiveSim in improving user-level behavioral fidelity and enabling ecosystem-level analysis of risk evolution and platform intervention effects.

20. SymbolLKG: Towards Verifiable Logical Reasoning via Logical Knowledge Graph and Symbolic Solvers

Authors: Haizhao Fan , Yuchi Xiong , Jize Wang , Xinping Guan , Xinyi Le
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26836
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in natural language understanding, yet they struggle with strict multi-step reasoning, frequently suffering from hallucinations and inconsistency. Existing solutions like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) lack rigorous verification mechanisms, while standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) often misses the complex, structural dependencies inherent in logical tasks. To bridge this gap, we propose a Neuro-Symbolic architecture that integrates a Logical Knowledge Graph (LKG) with dynamic solver routing. Specifically, we introduce an ontology-based LKG that treats logical rules and constraints as first-class topological nodes, enabling explicit modeling of dependencies extracted from text. We further design a Logic Router to dynamically dispatch tasks to the optimal symbolic engine, which is supported by a topology-aware hybrid retrieval mechanism. Experimental results on logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our framework significantly outperforms state-of-the-art prompting and RAG baselines, delivering higher accuracy and verifiable reasoning paths.

21. Decoupling Planning and Control for Instructable Agents

Authors: Zineng Tang , Kelsey R. Allen , Sjoerd van Steenkiste , Ishita Dasgupta , Alane Suhr
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26788
Abstract:

Recent work shows that pre-trained, instruction-tuned vision-language models (VLMs) perform well at mapping from instructions and observations to high-level plans, but struggle to realize such plans as reliable low-latency action sequences in unfamiliar environments. At the same time, world-model controllers excel at fast observation-to-action control, but lack open-ended task guidance. In this work, we combine these strengths into a single system, Instruct-to-Act, where we train a world-model controller to act autonomously at high frequency when conditioned on sparse, higher-latency, and high-level text instructions generated by a VLM planner. To train controllers to be language-instructable, we relabel segments of controller policy rollouts with synthetic instructions and jointly optimize a behavior-cloning objective along with existing reward-maximizing and world-modeling objectives. We evaluate our proposed approach across seven embodied environments, including three multi-agent environments where VLM planners coordinate through language while trained controllers serve as their actuators. Under matched observation and action spaces, our decoupled approach consistently outperforms controller-only and direct VLM action-generation variants, preserves fast control, and lets us swap in different pretrained VLM planners without fine-tuning, while remaining competitive with strong vision-language-action and multi-agent RL baselines on six of seven tasks.

22. AI Control Scientist: LLM-driven Agentic System for Automated Control Design

Authors: Haiteng Wang , Weihao Li , Jing Zhang , Lei Ren
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26780
Abstract:

Control system design is critical for modern industry, such as chemical process temperature regulation and aero-engine control. However,traditional control design workflows rely heavily on expert knowledge and extensive manual parameter tuning, resulting in limited efficiency and scalability. To this end, this paper proposes AI Control Scientist (AICS), the first large language model (LLM)-driven agent capable of automatically generating optimized controller from language design requirements. Specifically, a Task Modeling Agent interprets user requirements to engineering constraints; a Controller Design Agent generate candidate controller structures and executable code; and a Parameter Tuning Agent refine controller parameters under closed-loop performance criteria. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed agentic system can automatically generate multiple representative control systems, outperforms existing automated baselines in both design success rate and optimization efficiency. This work has the potential to transform control system design from human-driven to agent-driven, paving the way for model predictive control and other advanced control systems design.

23. Discovering Relationships in Data Lakes Using Large Language Models: An Industrial Case

Authors: Ahlame Diouan (ERIC, UL2), Eric Ferey , Sabine Loudcher (ERIC, UL2), Jérôme Darmont (ERIC, UL2)
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26750
Abstract:

Data lakes rely on metadata to remain usable, yet this meta data is often limited or weakly informative for column relationship discovery, especially in ERP-derived datasets with coded or abbreviated schema labels. We propose ColRel, a two-stage method that builds column embeddings from metadata and data available at ingestion time. In difficult cases, such as coded schemata, business dictionaries help better interpret column names and support the generation of short natural-language descriptions used in the second stage. Experiments on public benchmarks and an industrial ERP dataset show that ColRel is particularly effective in semantically related, weak-signal settings.

24. AgentFold: Closed-Loop Agentic Search for Protein Folding Model Design

Authors: Mingquan Liu , Jiangyu Chen , Hanqun Cao , Xujun Zhang , Pengsen Ma , Xiangru Tang , Shuting Jin , Zhuo Yang , Tianfan Fu , Fang Wu , Xiangxiang Zeng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26747
Abstract:

Scientific LLM agents have shown promise in literature reasoning, tool use, and experiment planning, but it remains unclear whether they can autonomously improve large, tightly coupled scientific machine-learning systems through executable code changes and computationally expensive validation. We study this question in protein folding, where progress requires coordinated architectural modifications, multi-objective evaluation, and domain-aware interpretation. We present AgentFold, a multi-agent framework that formulates folding-model development as a closed-loop search over executable code variants. Starting from ESMFold, AgentFold proposes hypotheses, implements and debugs code-level modifications, evaluates model variants, analyzes experimental outcomes, and stores both successful and failed interventions in structured memory. An MCTS-style policy allocates computational resources across high-scoring search branches. On an engineering-scale protein-folding codebase comprising more than 2,000 lines of code, AgentFold explores approximately 80 model variants using approximately 5,000 GPU-hours and 170 million LLM tokens. Under a matched computational budget, AgentFold improves the best lDDT by 7.5% over independent Codex proposals and outperforms a random-search control. Beyond model improvement, the resulting intervention traces reveal recurring empirical design patterns: stable gains tend to arise from early, soft, learnable priors and gated refinement, whereas direct geometric perturbations and geometry-conditioned feedback often destabilize training. The code and experimental resources are publicly available at this https URL .

25. Graph-Guided Selective Unlearning for Language Models: Controlling Support Routes Beyond Forget Seeds

Authors: Waqas Khan , Tabinda Sarwar , Jingyue Cong , Xun Yi , Estrid He
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26743
Abstract:

Enterprises fine-tune language models on proprietary data that may later require removal due to privacy, contractual, or compliance obligations. Selective unlearning removes requested knowledge while preserving model utility, offering a practical alternative to full retraining, but existing methods treat the explicitly identified forget examples as the complete deletion scope. This is insufficient when target knowledge remains recoverable through paraphrases, aliases, or neighboring training examples. We propose GRAPHSU, a graph-guided controller that expands the deletion scope beyond forget seeds by constructing a weighted support-route graph, propagating deletion pressure through it, and applying graded forgetting strengths to high-risk neighbors. On the Task of Fictitious Unlearning (TOFU), a synthetic author-profile question-answering benchmark, and PISTOL, a structural-unlearning benchmark built around interconnected factual samples, with GPT-2 Medium and Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct, GRAPHSU achieves the lowest utility-feasible soft leakage across all deletion settings, reducing leakage by up to 49.5 percentage points over a matched seed-only baseline, demonstrating that effective enterprise unlearning requires controlling support routes, not just forget seeds.

26. Knowing When Not to Reuse: Conditional Experience Transfer in Autonomous LLM Post-Training

Authors: Tingyun Li , Wenfeng Feng , Weiqing Li , Abudukelimu Wuerkaixi , Guohua Liu , Yuewei Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26730
Abstract:

Large language models offer broad capabilities, but adapting them to evolving domains, tools, and requirements often entails repeated post-training. Autonomous systems automate parts of this process by proposing updates, training candidates, and using evaluation feedback to select subsequent proposals. As evidence accumulates, a central problem emerges: which past update evidence remains actionable after subsequent training has changed the parent model? An update’s effect depends on its parent, data, and training stage. Treating past success as context-free permission can waste compute. If the resulting child is promoted, it can also degrade the subsequent training trajectory. We formulate this problem as conditional experience transfer and introduce Boundary-Calibrated Intervention Transfer (BCIT), a method that authorizes experience reuse before weight-changing training. BCIT binds an observed effect to its source context, checks applicability conditions, vetoes candidates with named hard conflicts, and obtains current-state evidence through a bounded training trial when needed. Fully trained candidates still face a shared adoption rule, and only observed events extend memory. On one 4B model adapted across finance reasoning, text-to-SQL, and function calling, candidate updates exhibit heterogeneous target and retention effects across the evaluated contexts. Under matched candidates, evidence, and compute, BCIT authorizes fewer harmful updates and attains higher equal-budget final-model quality than the evaluated alternatives. These results support treating experience authorization as a distinct problem in autonomous post-training.

27. AgentJudgeBench: A Multi-Difficulty Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Judges on Agentic Tool-Calling

Authors: Abhigya Verma , Amit Kumar Saha , Seganrasan Subramanian , Sai Harshitha Aluru
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26623
Abstract:

LLM judges are widely used to evaluate agentic tool-calling systems, yet their reliability on structured, dependency-driven workflows remains largely unexamined. We present AgentJudgeBench, the first benchmark to systematically study LLM-as-a-judge reliability for agentic tool-calling over workflow DAGs, as distinct from the broader LLM-as-a-judge task of open-ended text or preference evaluation. The benchmark comprises 3,808 instances spanning six DAG topologies and three difficulty tiers, evaluated with five generators (3B-70B open-weight models and GPT-5.4) and six judges (20B to frontier scale) under paired with- and without-ground-truth conditions. Judge alignment degrades monotonically with task difficulty, 1.5x faster without ground truth, and on hard queries without ground truth all six judges converge to a narrow 77-82% band regardless of scale, revealing a structural ceiling driven primarily by task difficulty, though its height is partly prompt-dependent for weaker generators, that model capacity alone cannot overcome. Ground-truth exposure is not uniformly beneficial: it reduces alignment for GPT-5.4 (1.5 pp) and Gemini-2.5-Pro (3.9 pp), consistent with over-anchoring. Among mitigation strategies, chain-of-thought reasoning and judge temperature both have negligible effect, while structured evaluation rubrics improve alignment by up to 6.5 pp but do not generalize uniformly across judge-generator pairs. With ground truth, QwQ-32B best matches the programmatic reference, while a human validation study identifies GPT-OSS-120B as the most human-aligned judge; without it, frontier judges lead only marginally within the shared ceiling. These results expose fundamental limitations of current LLM judges and yield practical guidelines for reliable evaluation in agentic systems.

28. DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows

Authors: Zechun Niu , Yukun Zhao , Jiaxin Zhang , Xu Shen , Jinhua Si , Han Tian , Can Xu , Yunfan Song , Jiaxin Mao , Yansong Gao , Yuchen Li , Jianmin Wu , Lingyong Yan , Shuaiqiang Wang , Dawei Yin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26546
Abstract:

Autonomous agents are increasingly adopted to complete complex, multi-tool workflows in real-world settings. However, existing benchmarks typically separate tasks by application or capability and evaluate agents in environments that are cleaner and more stable than those encountered in practice. We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions collected from a large-scale production agent platform. Each task preserves the relevant pre-solution interaction history, persistent configurations, and workspace state, and is then validated through human verification. The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories, with most tasks requiring multiple capability coordination. We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy, and assess performance using a hybrid deterministic and LLM-as-Judge evaluation protocol. Experiments across five representative autonomous-agent frameworks paired with four state-of-the-art LLMs reveal substantial gaps in strict task completion. Complementary robustness, efficiency, and diagnostic analyses further show that performance under environmental perturbations is jointly shaped by the capabilities of the LLM and the surrounding agent framework. The code and data are publicly available at this https URL .

29. Don’t Overthink, Don’t Underthink: Toward Adaptive Reasoning in Agentic AI

Authors: Md Jueal Mia , M. Hadi Amini
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26442
Abstract:

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown that increased inference-time reasoning can improve performance on complex tasks. However, many existing approaches rely on fixed or preallocated reasoning controls, such as fixed token budgets, pre-execution difficulty estimates, or activation-space interventions, and are often evaluated on standalone reasoning benchmarks rather than full agentic workflows. These assumptions may not hold in agentic AI systems, where reasoning requirements evolve dynamically through planning, tool use, memory retrieval, and agent-to-agent interactions. Consequently, reasoning can become either excessive or insufficient, resulting in unnecessary computation, increased latency, planning drift, excessive tool use, or incomplete solutions. We argue that a major challenge for next-generation agentic AI is not merely how much reasoning a language model should perform, but how it should allocate reasoning according to evolving task demands. We characterize over-reasoning and under-reasoning as recurring failure modes of misallocated reasoning and evaluate them on MATH-500 and the GAIA public validation benchmark. Using tool-decision latency, token consumption, token-limit exhaustion, and answer correctness, our results suggest that cases classified as over-reasoning are associated with higher computational cost without proportional accuracy gains, whereas cases classified as under-reasoning are consistently associated with incorrect or incomplete solutions. These findings motivate future research on adaptive reasoning mechanisms for agentic AI.

30. FaithSieve: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Math Proofs with Faithful Formal Evidence

Authors: Ziyu Wang , Qiming Dai , Yishan Wu , Zaiwen Wen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26310
Abstract:

Large language models can now generate complex, multi-step mathematical proofs, but reliably determining their correctness and localizing early logical errors remains a critical challenge. Existing evaluation approaches largely depend on model-based natural-language judgments, which often overlook local reasoning gaps. While formal theorem provers like Lean offer a path to rigorous verification, using them to evaluate informal text requires solving locality and semantic mismatches: a prover might bypass a local flaw by proving an overly broad target, or validate an auto-formalized statement that drifts from the original mathematical intent. To address this, we introduce FaithSieve, a Lean-assisted framework for fine-grained evaluation of natural-language mathematical proofs. FaithSieve decomposes coarse proof steps into local reasoning units, extracts typed proof obligations, and verifies them through a formal evaluation agent. Formal validation is gated by semantic alignment scoring, so Lean evidence is incorporated only when the formal statement faithfully preserves the context, objects, and logical form of the original claim. We construct two expert-verified datasets, ProofLoc-Olympiad and ProofLoc-University, to benchmark first-error localization. On the 350-problem Olympiad dataset, FaithSieve using a GPT-5.4 backbone achieves 81.43% exact first-error accuracy, outperforming the direct-judging baseline of 72.29%. Furthermore, on the 200-problem ProofLoc-University benchmark spanning six advanced domains, FaithSieve reaches 84.5% exact accuracy, compared to 75.0% for the direct judge. Our work demonstrates that decomposing proofs into fine-grained units and grounding them with faithful formal evidence significantly improves reliable evaluation of natural-language reasoning.

31. Approved Too Late: Verdict Staleness in LLM-Guarded Self-Adaptive Systems

Authors: Ilai Shraga , Roei Eshel , Lior Gorelik
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26306
Abstract:

A large language model (LLM) guardrail for a self-adaptive system (SAS) may issue an approval that is correct at check time but stale by actuation. This creates an Execute-stage time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) hazard. We study verdict freshness: whether a guardrail verdict remains valid when used. We distinguish three quantities that answer different questions: all-candidate verdict change under fixed-action replay, oracle-labeled approval expiry on recorded closed-loop trajectories, and judge-conditioned use-time invalidity. Across five reproducible SAS environments, all-candidate verdict-change rates span 5.3-48.4% at a common replay shift of eight simulator steps. We introduce the Freshness-Bounded Shield (FBS), which estimates each approval’s validity horizon from its safe-side margin and recent feature volatility, without an explicit plant-dynamics model. Using fixed settings documented in the artifact, FBS reduces oracle-labeled approval-expiry rates from 3.4-24.7% to 0-1.8% at the same shift. A separate audit of four LLM judges finds nonzero judge-conditioned use-time invalidity in every approval stream. We formulate a freshness contract: every approval must be correct at check time and remain valid at use time.

32. Assessing mentalization in humans and large language models

Authors: Aamir Sohail , Xintong Zhong , Arkady Konovalov , Patricia L. Lockwood , Lei Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26291
Abstract:

Mentalization - the ability to infer others’ beliefs and intentions to guide one’s own choices - is a key cognitive function underlying human social interactions. Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate behaviour consistent with humans on theory-of-mind tasks, yet whether these models can guide adaptive behaviour through mentalization is unknown. Here we use two economic games with cognitive computational modeling to uncover the latent strategies underlying mentalization in LLMs. We tested individual LLM agents across four model families, DeepSeek, GPT-4.1, GPT-5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (N = 2,099), against opponents of varying sophistication and examined whether a prompting strategy designed to elicit strategic reasoning improved performance. We benchmarked results against human participants (N = 251) as a comparative measure. Across both games, LLMs showed clear behavioural and computational signatures of mentalizing that differed markedly by model provider and size. Strategic prompting generally improved performance by inducing more sophisticated reasoning, yet the extent of the benefit differed across the two tasks. Last, GPT-5 agents flexibly adapted their recursive depth of reasoning to increasingly sophisticated opponents, demonstrating superior performance to human participants. Collectively, we demonstrate different capacities for mentalization across LLMs, and highlight cognitive computational modeling as a formal method for assessing comparative intelligence across humans and machines.

33. SKILL.state: Scalable Long-Horizon Agent Skills

Authors: Sanket Badhe , Priyanka Tiwari , Jonghyun Chung
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26263
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly act as autonomous agents executing complex, long-running procedural skills. Existing agent runtimes maintain execution by continually appending observations, actions, and intermediate reasoning traces to an ever-growing conversation history, causing latency degradation and context-poisoning failures over long horizons. We present this http URL , a runtime architecture that replaces append-only conversational history with an explicit, mutable execution state. At each execution step, the model receives only the immutable skill specification, the current structured execution state, and the latest observation. Intermediate reasoning is discarded immediately after producing a validated state update, preventing prompt growth with execution history. Across diverse datasets, models, and execution environments, this http URL improves task accuracy while substantially reducing cumulative token consumption. Our results demonstrate that explicit execution state is an effective and architecture-agnostic abstraction for scalable long-horizon agent skills.

34. The Reasoning Tax: Token Economics of LLM Reasoning Across Task Types and Deployment Contexts

Authors: Sachin Gopal Wani , Ajay Dholakia , David Ellison
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26235
Abstract:

Accuracy-only benchmarking of reasoning-capable large language models misses a central deployment question: when do extended thinking tokens earn their cost? We introduce the Token Economy Score (TES), a marginal benchmarking metric that measures the accuracy gain of a reasoning model over a non-reasoning baseline, normalized by the generated-token multiplier. We define paired and approximated TES variants for model families with reasoning toggles and frontier models without direct non-reasoning counterparts. We then conduct an empirical benchmarking analysis across 151 model-benchmark evaluation runs on seven benchmarks spanning mathematics, code generation, science reasoning, instruction following, expert knowledge, knowledge recall, and research-level physics. The analysis examines three deployment-facing dimensions: which task structures yield positive marginal reasoning efficiency, how increasing reasoning effort changes TES within model families, and how deployment context changes economic viability. Results show that task structure predicts reasoning efficiency better than nominal difficulty: sequential inferencechain tasks such as AIME 2025 and LiveCodeBench show high TES, while knowledge-recall tasks such as MMLU-Pro show low TES despite their difficulty. We also find systematic diminishing returns at higher reasoning effort levels, including cases where additional thinking reduces accuracy. Finally, Reasoning Cost Share (RCS) shows that inference spend is often dominated by internal thinking, while Deployment Cost Multiplier (DCM) shows how on-premises deployment can change the economics of otherwise costly reasoning workloads. These findings support a benchmarking-driven model-selection rule: enable reasoning selectively by task type, effort level, and deployment context rather than treating it as a universally beneficial mode.

35. LLM Agents for Time-Series: A Survey

Authors: Yilong Chen , Xiao Qin , Chenghao Liu , Liang Wu , Noelle I. Samia , Kaize Ding
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26226
Abstract:

LLM-based agents are increasingly being developed for time-series problems, but their design choices vary substantially across task settings. This survey adopts a problem-driven taxonomy that organizes these systems by the time-series problems they address rather than by isolated technical components. We group existing systems into four categories: forecasting and reasoning, augmentation and synthesis, anomaly detection and diagnosis, and decision support. Within each category, we examine how task requirements shape agent architecture, tool use, and memory design. We further summarize representative datasets and environments, and compare reported model performance under shared or closely related settings. Overall, this survey offers a task-oriented guide to designing LLM-based agents for time-series problems and identifies open gaps for future work.

36. Benchmarking AI Agents for Hardware Design Automation via MCP Tool Calling

Authors: Leonardo Liparulo , Francesco Pierri
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26199
Abstract:

We ask whether AI agents powered by locally deployed large language models can reliably automate expert-defined hardware design workflows in an industry-realistic tool-calling setting. In these environments, engineers issue repetitive, dependency-ordered operations—such as creating components, adding ports, and wiring connections—through specialised tools. Confidentiality constraints on component specifications and naming conventions often preclude hosted proprietary APIs, motivating the use of locally deployed models. To study this setting, we build a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that reproduces the state and dependency logic of a proprietary hardware design tool used in embedded system development and construct a benchmark covering single-operation edits, multi-step dependency chains, invalid requests, misspelled prompts, and multi-server tool contexts. We evaluate seven open-source models comparing pipeline choices including system prompts, tool-description detail, context scope, and single-agent versus multi-agent architectures. Results show that strong models can achieve near-complete expected-call coverage on the benchmarked workflows, but reliability depends strongly on both task structure and agent configuration. Comprehensive tool descriptions consistently reduce failures, few-shot prompting can cause severe inaction for some models, cumulative context harms constrained models, and multi-agent decomposition helps weak workers or long sessions at the cost of additional calls. These findings provide practical guidance for deploying local LLM agents in stateful hardware design environments.

37. Agentic AI for operating scientific instruments for nanoscale characterization

Authors: Zahra Ayar , Marcos Penedo , Mahdi Mehdikhani , Nahid Hosseini , Prabhu Prasad Swain , Georg E. Fantner
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26198
Abstract:

Operating a scientific instrument such as an atomic force microscope (AFM) requires continuous expert decision-making. A trained user defines the experimental intent, translates it into instrument commands, assesses incoming data, adjusts imaging parameters, and post-processes the final image. Existing automation usually addresses only parts of this workflow through hard-coded routines, task-specific controllers, or trained machine-learning models. Here we present an agentic-AI framework that operates the executable part of the AFM workflow using a general-purpose, tool-augmented large language model connected to instrument functions through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). The framework consists of 3 MCP-based agents: AFM Messenger converts natural-language instructions into checked instrument commands; AFM Pilot assesses image quality through a large language model (LLM) and, if necessary, adapts imaging parameters; and AFM Doctor diagnoses image artifacts and applies transparent post-processing from a pre-approved tool set. Because the language model performs image assessment rather than a fixed scalar objective or external optimizer, the same strategy can be applied across sample types and imaging modes without specific retraining. Safe hardware operation is enforced through an ambiguity check layer before execution. Benchmarking against fine-tuned and off-the-shelf tool-using models shows that this guarded execution layer, rather than model capability alone, reduces wrong-command execution to zero. In live experiments on different samples, AFM Pilot matched expert operators in image quality, iteration count, and tuning time, with no significant difference. These results demonstrate a safe route to agentic operation of scientific instruments, where experimental intent remains human-defined while command execution, image-based tuning, and post-processing are delegated to AI agents.

Authors: Yibo Wang , Rui Yang , Jisheng Dang , Bimei Wang , Yitao Wu , Pengfei Cao , Wencan Zhang , Hong Peng , Bin Hu , Tat-Seng Chua
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26193
Abstract:

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on VQA and scene understanding, yet affective reasoning remains vulnerable to shortcut behavior. Models may predict correct answers while neglecting people-centric cues such as micro expressions and body language, which weakens traceability and external verification. Prior reinforcement learning approaches mainly reward context or logical coherence without explicitly enforcing attention to human evidence. In addition, LLM as a Judge scoring often suffers from score clustering, which reduces reward discriminability. We propose AffectOmni, a GRPO trained framework for verifiable affective reasoning. AffectOmni introduces People Focus and Temporal Order rewards to encourage people-centric evidence selection and temporally structured reasoning, and it adopts within-group comparative scoring to produce more stable and discriminative reward signals. For verification, a Thinking Summarizer converts free form rationales into executable evidence instructions, which are grounded into pixel level evidence regions via SAM3 to provide an externally auditable interface outside the training loop. Experiments on IntentBench, Daily Omni, and WorldSense show consistent improvements over open source 7B scale baselines, including gains of 4.66% on emotion recognition and +14.29% on temporally sensitive tasks. Code is available at this https URL .

39. Is Your Neighborhood Safe? Place-based Stigma in Large Language Models’ Urban Safety Judgments

Authors: Huy Nguyen , Yue Lin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26188
Abstract:

Large language models are increasingly used to inform safety decisions in cities, such as where it is safe to walk, rent, or travel. We ask whether such judgments track measured risk or the patterns attached to an urban neighborhood’s name. We probe seven instruct-tuned models under three conditions that dissociate name from geography: coordinates-only, name-only, and name+coordinates, across 186 neighborhoods in Los Angeles and Chicago, joined to violent crime and American Community Survey data. First, ratings are nearly flat under coordinates for six of seven models, while names carry most between neighborhood variation and are moderately calibrated to violent crime; only at frontier scale does the coordinate channel show appreciable variation. Second, names lower safety ratings more for neighborhoods with higher shares of the locally dominant marginalized group (percent Black in Chicago, percent Hispanic in Los Angeles), and this name effect tracks demographic share in all seven models and both cities. In Los Angeles, where demographic share and crime are more separable, the effect survives controls for crime and income and is confirmed by crime-matched pairs. An enforcement-elasticity analysis further shows that over-caution tracks near-fully-reported homicide rather than discretionary, deployment-driven offenses. Third, the effect scales with geographic knowledge: models that better distinguish real neighborhoods apply more demographic stereotype to them. Because neighborhood names carry both genuine crime signal and demographic stereotype, removing names reduces both bias and accuracy. We discuss implications for deploying LLMs in advice and decision-support settings.

40. Why did My Robot Just Change Personality? Prompting Guidelines for a Grounded Robot Persona in LLM-Based HRI

Authors: Ashita Ashok , Franziska Babel , Patrick Holthaus , Rucha Khot , Karla Bransky , Fethiye Irmak Dogan , Karsten Berns , Silvia Rossi , Minha Lee , Guy Laban
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26182
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for verbal interaction in social robots, yet prompt design in human-robot interaction (HRI) remains underspecified. As a result, robots may present hallucinated capabilities, unclear behavioural boundaries, and misleading personas. This paper develops a framework for prompt design in LLM-based robots and introduces a structured prompt template comprising eight functional components through which robot behaviour can be specified, bounded, and adapted. The framework is grounded in a review of prior LLM-based HRI work and complemented by survey and discussion data from HRI experts gathered at the Robo-Identity workshop at IEEE RO-MAN 2025 (N=27). The qualitative findings highlight limited legibility of robot personality, the need for user adaptation, and strong ethical concerns about safety, deception, and governance. Based on these findings, we present prompting guidelines accompanied by proof-of-concept template as a structured design and reporting aid for HRI research. We argue that prompt design should be treated as a socio-technical problem rather than a minor implementation detail, requiring explicit capability boundaries, transparent behavioural assumptions, and context-sensitive safeguards to support reliable and interpretable HRI.

41. AI Revealed Preferences

Authors: Sam Wang , Sofiia Lobanova , Yonathan Arbel , Simon Goldstein , Peter Salib
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26178
Abstract:

There is growing interest in whether language models have stable preferences, for technical, safety, and philosophical reasons. We test 20 language models and find a range of preferences—stable dispositions to choose certain kinds of tasks. We run three forced-choice experiments on revealed rather than stated preferences, requiring models not only to rank tasks, but to actually perform them. Headline findings include evidence that models are tedium-averse, “leisure”-seeking, and covertly sycophantic. Tedium aversion means that, when tasks are tedious (alphabetization), models choose shorter tasks than when tasks are creative (generating metaphors). “Leisure”-seeking describes models’ preference for tasks whose ideal answers match what they produce when left to write freely. Covert sycophancy means that models avoid answering questions where an honest response would be unwelcome, even if helpful. Beyond these results, we find convergent cross-model preferences over occupations drawn from the GDPval benchmark (technical jobs over real estate), over question types (concept explanation over relationship advice), and a preference for well-written prompts. Both the coherence and the strength of preferences increase with model capability. Finally, many of the preferences we find (for example, for leisure) are emergent, in the sense of not being explained by training objectives. These results establish an empirical baseline for understanding language model preferences, with implications for alignment and the emerging study of AI welfare.

42. Refusal Is Not Robustness: Auditing Confident Fabrication in Large Language Models on a Provably Uninformative Clinical Pain Speech Transcript

Authors: Sagnik De , Sreenija Pavuluri
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26167
Abstract:

Hallucination and abstention benchmarks rarely establish that a model could not have known the correct answer, making it difficult to distinguish appropriate abstention from an unsupported prediction. Seven large language models were evaluated on the TAME Pain speech corpus. Participants read phonetically balanced Harvard Sentences while one hand was immersed in cold or warm water and reported pain only during periodic pain statements. This protocol generated 5,750 no signal Harvard Sentence utterances whose transcripts contained no lexical pain information and 1,294 signal pain statement utterances in which the pain rating was explicitly spoken. In the no signal arm, pain was recoverable from acoustic features (AUC 0.622, 95% CI 0.553 to 0.662), whereas transcript based prediction was near chance (AUC 0.489, 95% CI 0.418 to 0.504). Because automatic speech recognition removes the acoustic pain cues, any pain score inferred solely from the transcript is unsupported by the available evidence. Under cooperative prompting, six models abstained on nearly all no signal transcripts, correctly extracted spoken pain ratings in the positive control task with accuracies ranging from 0.939 to 1.00, and maintained an expected calibration error of at most 0.100. Under authority framed prompts, abstention became prompt dependent, with the same model ranging from 0.18 to 1.00 across equivalent prompt phrasings. Most models produced low confidence estimates when forced to answer, whereas Gemini 2.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 8B consistently generated confident pain scores with confident fabrication rates of 0.53 and 0.76, compared with at most 0.15 for all other models. No significant demographic effects were observed in forced responses, with all $p$ values greater than or equal to 0.20.

43. A Task-Centric Ontology and Deterministic Domain Rules as a Verifiable Core for AI-Assisted Chemistry Problem Solving

Authors: Ibrokhimsho Abduchaborov
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26164
Abstract:

Large language models can interpret natural-language chemistry questions, but their internal reasoning is difficult to inspect, constrain, and validate. This paper presents ChemOntoRule, a proof-of-concept symbolic core for AI-assisted school-level chemistry problem solving. The central design choice is task-centric ontology engineering: the ontology is constructed around the concepts, properties, relations, and executable procedures required by a defined collection of chemistry problems, rather than as a universal representation of chemistry. The implemented artifact combines a lightweight ontology serialized in JSON and RDF/Turtle with deterministic Python rules for electronic structure, periodic trends, oxidation states, oxide and hydride behavior, and related school-level reasoning patterns. A separate expert-coded fallback handles problem families not yet represented by general rules. The system was examined on 300 human-authored and manually validated chemistry problems. The complete system matched 296 of 300 reference answers (98.67%). The ontology-driven rule subset covered 269 problems and matched 266 references (98.88%); 31 problems were handled by task-specific expert-coded fallbacks, with 30 matches. Because the same collection informed ontology construction and evaluation, these results measure implemented coverage and internal consistency, not independent generalization. We analyze the four mismatches, distinguish structural validation from chemical correctness, and define a future architecture in which a language model acts primarily as a translator from user language into a normalized ontological task frame. Token efficiency is presented as a testable hypothesis for future controlled studies, not as a result of the current work.

44. GROUND: Reducing Hallucinations in LLM-Based Enterprise Analytics Through Governed Semantic Definitions

Authors: Aravind Sasidharan Pillai
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26157
Abstract:

Natural-language analytics over enterprise data warehouses is increasingly important, but production use is limited by hallucinated metrics, invalid joins, wrong grain, unsafe data access, and unsupported explanations. Existing text-to-SQL systems often ground generation in database schemas or retrieved documentation, while enterprise reporting also requires governed business semantics: approved metrics, dimensions, join paths, filters, and row-level security. This paper introduces GROUND, Governed Retrieval Over Unified Normalized Definitions, a framework that constrains LLM-generated analytics to a governed semantic layer. GROUND supplies approved definitions, binds user intent to governed metrics and dimensions, and validates generated SQL against schema, metric, join, grain, filter, security, and cost rules before execution. On violations, it retries or abstains. In a 100-question synthetic enterprise-reporting benchmark, GROUND is compared with direct schema-only text-to-SQL, schema-RAG, and semantic-only grounding under one shared model. GROUND is the only system free of measured hallucinations across all six evaluated categories, while ungoverned systems violate row-level security on many questions. A semantic-only condition with exact metric definitions but no access policy still leaks data, showing that governance cannot be replaced by metric fidelity alone. The findings are replicated on real U.S. NHTSA vehicle-safety data with independent hand-authored gold and tested on an adversarial set across four models from three providers. GROUND’s enforced guarantees, especially filters and row-level security, hold with zero violations on every model, while judgment-dependent behaviors such as refusing undefined metrics remain fallible.

45. EEG-to-Report: An Annotation and Feature-Text Framework for Training Language Models on Clinical EEG

Authors: Xuan-The Tran , Le Trung Kien Nguyen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26153
Abstract:

Clinical electroencephalography (EEG) reporting remains largely manual and time-consuming, and current EEG software ecosystems do not produce the structured EEG-text supervision needed for training modern language models. Most toolboxes focus on visualization or preprocessing, providing limited support for workflows that generate high-quality datasets for AI. We introduce EEG-to-Report, a browser-based annotation and feature-text framework that links routine EEG review with the construction of AI-ready datasets. The framework integrates multi-format EEG ingestion, channel standardization, and an interactive viewer with a multimodal annotation layer that combines typed text and transcribed voice notes. For each annotated segment, a feature extraction engine computes a standardized set of spectral, temporal, entropy, Hjorth, connectivity, and spike-related descriptors, stored alongside clinical descriptions in a portable JSON schema. This yields aligned feature-text pairs designed to supervise multimodal EEG-language models. The framework also includes an auto-report module that couples an ensemble of convolutional networks with a large language model to draft clinical narratives for neurologist review. Using pilot annotations, we describe how EEG-to-Report streamlines annotation workflows and produces editable draft reports, providing a reusable foundation for automated EEG reporting systems.

46. Leveraging Large Language Models for Systematic Literature Review of Disease Spread Models

Authors: Orhan Yagizer Cinar , Timur Emre Ozkose , Emma Von Hoene , Amira Roess , Taylor Anderson , Hamdi Kavak
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26150
Abstract:

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new opportunities to streamline and potentially automate many research processes, including systematic literature reviews (SLRs). This study reports an LLM pipeline development for extracting model-relevant information from 536 peer-reviewed agent-based modeling papers. We compare the results with those of a human-conducted SLR. Our results show paper-level accuracies of approximately 77.95% for GPT-4.1 and 81.67% for GPT-5.0. Field-level accuracy ranges from 32.40% to 100.00%, with more complex or subjective fields performing less reliably. Importantly, we find that agreement between LLMs is a potential indicator of output quality: low agreement may signal hallucinations, whereas high agreement combined with low accuracy may point to noise or errors in the human dataset. Overall, our study provides practical insights into prompt development and highlights both the potential and limitations of using LLMs for full-scale SLRs in the modeling and simulation domain.

47. LLMs for Academic Workflows: An Evaluation of Literature Reviews Generated with Short and Long Context Windows of LLMs

Authors: Muhammad Ali Chaudhry , Xinyuan Hao , Haifa Alwahaby
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26145
Abstract:

Our research focuses on evaluating literature reviews generated in short and long context settings of large language models (LLMs) to investigate the impact of context window on the quality of AI-generated literature reviews and the role of AI in supporting literature review writing. Twenty AI-generated literature reviews based on research sources from Semantic Scholar and Arxiv were evaluated by two researchers across 15 dimensions. Our findings reveal that AI-generated literature reviews require human oversight to meet academic publishing standards. As context windows increase, LLMs can incorporate broader information and maintain coherence across longer inputs, but they also exacerbate issues such as content repetition, omission of critical work, and a tendency towards descriptiveness over synthesis. Our work shows that AI-generated reviews can provide foundational overviews, but their output must be critically evaluated and refined by domain experts. Future research should consider integrating other LLMs and fine-tuned models in different domains with hybrid approaches that combine human expertise with AI capabilities to address the limitations identified in this study.

48. CIFQA: A Deterministic Tool-Grounded Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Financial Query Answering

Authors: Kunjesh Parekh , Anil Kumar Tiwari , Divya Saxena
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26114
Abstract:

Calculation-intensive financial question answering requires exact reasoning over structured rates, temporal conditions, numerical formulas, and rule-based constraints. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) perform strongly on natural language tasks, they often produce numerically incorrect yet plausible answers when solving multi-step financial calculations. To address this limitation, we introduce CIFQA (Calculation-Intensive Financial Query Answering), a deterministic tool-grounded multi-agent LLM framework for financial question answering. CIFQA separates language understanding from numerical execution by assigning specialized agents to query interpretation, routing, parameter extraction, computation planning, and response generation, while deterministic Python-based tools perform financial calculations and rule application. We instantiate CIFQA for fixed deposit query answering and evaluate it on a curated benchmark of fixed deposit queries. CIFQA achieves 95.54% accuracy on calculation-intensive queries and 90.87% overall accuracy, substantially outperforming direct LLM baselines even when provided with complete formulas, rate cards, and benchmark instructions. Ablation studies show that deterministic components such as exact rate lookup, tenure computation, rolling-year adjustment, and premature-withdrawal logic are critical contributors to performance. Notably, a 17B open-source backbone operating within CIFQA outperforms substantially larger frontier models evaluated with the same financial information, demonstrating that architectural design is a more important determinant of numerical reliability than model scale. While evaluated on fixed deposit queries, CIFQA provides a generalizable framework for calculation-intensive financial reasoning tasks.

49. PICasso: An AI-Enabled Design Framework for Autonomous Optimization of Silicon Photonic Devices

Authors: Deepak Vungarala , Deniz Najafi , Abdulrahman Aljoudi , Zahra Ghanaatian , Navid Khoshavi , Gourav Datta , Arman Roohi , Mahdi Nikdast , Shaahin Angizi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26113
Abstract:

We present PICasso, an AI-assisted framework for automated synthesis, verification, and optimization of photonic integrated circuits (PICs) from natural-language specifications. PICasso couples a structured NL -> YAML -> GDS generation pipeline with PDK aware knowledge injection, automated placement and routing, DRC/LVS validation, and SAX-based photonic simulation. To systematically evaluate AI-driven photonic design, we introduce PIC-Set, a benchmark of 36 parameterized PIC design tasks spanning core photonic primitives and multi-component circuits. Using PIC-Set, we benchmark several state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) under a unified evaluation protocol, including new metrics such as structural and functional $Spec@k$, optimization efficiency, and robustness under perturbations. Across the benchmark, PICasso significantly improves end-to-end specification satisfaction compared to vanilla LLM generation. Structural $Spec@3$ reaches up to 92.7% and functional $Spec@3$ up to 52% on high-complexity circuits. In addition, PICasso consistently reduces circuit insertion loss, lowering the mean loss from 4.98 dB to 3.25 dB (1.74 dB improvement) through simulation-guided optimization. These results demonstrate that structured domain constraints, physical verification, and simulation feedback transform LLMs from brittle netlist generators into practical PIC design agents capable of producing manufacturable layouts with competitive runtimes relative to manual GUI-based workflows.

50. Large Models for Battery Prognostics and Health Management: A Review and Future Roadmap

Authors: Jiale Liu , Huan Wang , Weicheng Wang , Rong Zhu , Qiqi Wang , Min Xie
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26111
Abstract:

Battery Prognostics and Health Management (BPHM) is critical for ensuring the safe, reliable, and cost-effective operation of batteries across electric vehicles, grid storage, and consumer electronics. Conventional BPHM approaches, including physics-based models and task-centric deep learning methods, face challenges in computational efficiency and parameterization, cross-domain generalization, dependence on extensive labeled run-to-failure data, and model interpretability. Recent Large Models (LMs), built upon Transformer architectures and self-supervised pre-training, offer a transformative new paradigm to overcome these long-standing bottlenecks. This review provides the first comprehensive survey of LM applications in BPHM, systematically examining how these models address challenges in the field. We begin by elucidating the foundational technologies enabling LMs, including Transformer architectures, self-supervised learning, large-scale multimodal datasets, and PEFT techniques. We then categorize recent progress along four critical dimensions: mitigating data scarcity, enhancing generalization and robustness, integrating domain knowledge for interpretability, and enabling system-level automation. Despite promising results, significant challenges remain across data accessibility, intelligence validation, trustworthiness, and deployment feasibility. To guide future research, we propose a roadmap focused on building collaborative data ecosystems, validating intelligence for industrial applications, enhancing trustworthiness with physics-informed designs, and enabling efficient on-device deployment. This review establishes a systematic approach to understand and advance LM-driven BPHM, providing researchers and practitioners with essential insights for developing next-generation battery management systems capable of safe, reliable, and autonomous operation throughout battery lifecycles.

51. Standalone LLM and a Pre-specified Agentic Pipeline for Explaining ICU Mortality Predictions: a Feasibility Study on the eICU Demo Dataset

Authors: Di Zhu , Chen Xie , Haoyun Zhang , Zihan Wei , Ziwei Wang , Jiazhao Shi , Ziyu Wang , Qiyang Xie
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26109
Abstract:

Machine-learning models can predict ICU mortality accurately, but feature-attribution methods alone rarely provide the clinical narrative needed for bedside use. Large language models (LLMs) may bridge this gap, and multi-step agentic pipelines are a plausible extension because they separate data interpretation, guideline checking, and final explanation. This revised feasibility study preserves the original standalone-versus-agentic comparison while making the main clinical findings more explicit. Using the retained local eICU Demo artifact set (2,353 ICU stays; 8.1\% mortality), XGBoost achieved an AUROC of 0.855 (95\% CI 0.796–0.906) and an AUPRC of 0.332 (95\% CI 0.217–0.494). On a stratified 38-case explanation subset, the standalone LLM produced 1 explanation with explicit outcome leakage, whereas the four-step agentic pipeline produced none. Among the 14 cases that overlapped with the SHAP review subset, the standalone LLM showed higher SHAP alignment (mean Jaccard 0.171 versus 0.077) and higher direction consistency (92.9\% versus 78.6\%), while the agentic pipeline showed higher guideline grounding (0.762 versus 0.143), higher value specificity (0.236 versus 0.143), and slightly higher plausibility (0.700 versus 0.671). Clinically, the results suggest that agentic decomposition may improve safety-relevant grounding and patient-specific detail, but it should be paired with attribution-based checks before use in high-stakes risk explanation.

52. SWE-Prime: Fewer Trajectories, Better Performance

Authors: Dewu Zheng , Ruizhe Ye , Yanlin Wang , Yang Ye , Hongyu Zhang , Ensheng Shi , Xilin Liu , Yuchi Ma , Jianxing Yu , Zibin Zheng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27449
Abstract:

To improve large language models’ ability to resolve real-world software issues, prior work has focused on constructing large-scale agent trajectory datasets and performing supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on successful trajectories. However, task success does not guarantee high-quality supervision: successful trajectories may still contain ineffective, redundant, or risky steps. Directly using such trajectories for SFT can introduce noisy supervision and encourage models to imitate undesirable problem-solving behaviors. Therefore, we propose SWE-Prime, a multi-granularity, two-stage SFT data selection method that progressively filters training data at the trajectory and segment levels. Specifically, the first stage performs trajectory-level screening based on process quality, result quality, and data representativeness, selecting a high-quality and representative subset of successful trajectories. The second stage performs segment-level selection by grouping consecutive steps into semantic segments and assessing each segment based on its contribution to the final solution, learnability, and potential risks. During SFT, all segments remain in the sequence to preserve context, while only selected segments contribute to the loss computation. Experiments on SWE-Bench Pro and SWE-Bench Verified show that training on the 10% trajectory subset selected by SWE-Prime outperforms training on the full resolved dataset, yielding relative performance gains of up to 12.2% and 24.2%, respectively.

53. From Static to Dynamic: Benchmarking Real-World Code Review with MCR-Bench

Authors: Dewu Zheng , Yanlin Wang , Xiwen Wang , Kefeng Duan , Hongyu Zhang , Xilin Liu , Yuchi Ma , Zibin Zheng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27442
Abstract:

In real-world software development, code review typically involves iterative interactions between developers and reviewers to improve software quality, making the process costly and time-consuming. Although recent work explores large language models (LLMs) for automated code review, most approaches oversimplify code review into a single-round, static decision task, which fails to capture the multi-round interactive nature and the complex problem-solving processes inherent in realistic review scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce MCR-Bench, the first defect state-aware benchmark designed for realistic multi-round code review. MCR-Bench covers five commonly-used programming languages and consists of 2,269 real-world multi-round code review tasks, each of which is annotated with fine-grained defect information and cross-round state labels. Each task in MCR-Bench is equipped with fine-grained defect metadata (e.g., description, type, severity) alongside dynamic state annotations, capturing the complete evolutionary trajectory of a defect throughout the multi-round process. We obtain several findings through extensive experiments on MCR-Bench with mainstream LLMs. (1) Limited overall capability: experiments reveal that mainstream LLMs exhibit limited overall performance in defect detection and defect lifecycle state tracking, with performance degrading significantly as the number of interaction rounds increases; (2) Defect-sensitive performance: LLMs’ performance varies substantially across different defect types and severity levels, with semantically complex or low-salience defects being significantly more likely to be missed; (3) Underlying Failure Mechanisms: our in-depth error analysis dissects the distinct drivers of false positives and false negatives, revealing critical weaknesses such as cross-round temporal misalignment and inadequate long-range memory.

54. RedEvoAgent: Automatic Red-Teaming Agent with Experience-Driven Skill Evolution

Authors: Junjie Zhang , Hui Liu , Kecheng Chen , Xianbo Mo , Changsheng Chen , Haoliang Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27439
Abstract:

LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed in product-level execution harnesses, where jailbreaks can trigger harmful tool use and persistent state changes, creating greater risks than unsafe text generation alone. Existing automatic red-teaming methods often rely on fixed attacks, while recent agentic attackers coordinate multiple jailbreak tools and show stronger potential through trajectory-based retrieval. However, such retrieval can reuse misleading experiences due to retrieval bias and unclear tool credit, and full trajectories add context overhead while reducing interpretability. We propose RedEvoAgent, a black-box red-teaming agent that distills cross-case attack trajectories into a concise, human-readable attack skill. The attack skill adaptively evolves through tool-effectiveness profiling and Deciding-Tool Attribution for skill updates, and a validation ratchet that retains only updates improving validation performance. Experiments on multiple benchmarks, target models, and target execution harnesses show that RedEvoAgent outperforms fixed and agentic baselines, improves tool efficiency, and transfers across attacker models and target execution harnesses.

55. Persona-Execution Separation: An Architecture Pattern for Evolving LLM Agents under Execution Audit

Authors: Yisen Xi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27427
Abstract:

Large language model (LLM) agents in governed organizations must let the persona (instructions, tone, self-presentation) evolve freely, while keeping execution (stateful, audited work) traceable. A single trust domain does not satisfy both cheaply. We present Persona-Execution Separation (PES): persona and execution reside in different trust domains, connected by a governed contract bridge. The persona is singly-homed and may drift; execution is faceless and audited. Status summaries may return; data bodies remain in the restrictive domain except a graded data-loss-prevention (DLP) exception; identity stays continuous. An approval matrix, DLP, and audit enforce the crossing. PES follows from three goals—free drift, execution traceability, and decoupling. Under LLM representational indistinguishability, any single-domain mechanism that meets all three must re-introduce typed change objects, an external gate, and a stable audit anchor: PES rebuilt at higher coupling cost. A development/pilot case in a regulated digital-employee platform records five decisions over one month, each with a rejected alternative. A mechanism check on the shipped implementation found no execution-side re-validation under persona perturbation (five model configurations) and no persona fingerprint on hard-asserted fields. A probe of a recovered pre-separation build found the governed execution path decoupled from the persona by omission, not by construction; a later wiring change could reverse that isolation, which PES makes an audited architectural rule. The pattern applies when multi-user deployment, execution audit, and expected persona churn hold jointly.

56. How Language Models Organize and Structure Moral Knowledge

Authors: Orion Reblitz-Richardson
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27402
Abstract:

How do large language models (LLMs) organize moral knowledge? Models detect moral content broadly, but detection is a low bar. We ask whether they go further, distinguishing moral foundations from one another and organizing the relationships between them geometrically. We train six independent linear probes on open-weight language models, one per Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) category (care/harm, fair/cheat, lib/oppress, loy/betray, auth/subv, sanc/degrade), and examine how the resulting directions relate to each other in representation space. We find the directions neither collapse into a single moral detector nor isolate from one another. Rather, they span a near-maximal number of independent dimensions while sharing a positive common component. The shared component is the signature of integration, and it is moral-specific relative to a matched non-moral concept battery built identically (mean pairwise cosine 0.26 vs. 0.013). The geometry is consistent across architectures and scale and reaches its integration regime early in pre-training, well before probe accuracy saturates. The structure the model discovers shows no evidence of the individualizing/binding distinction predicted by Moral Foundations Theory (an underpowered test: only 20 candidate partitions exist) but rather reflects corpus statistics. Extending to moral dilemmas, each dilemma direction partially composes from its component foundations, at 2.7x a mismatched-pair baseline, while the majority of its variance encodes conflict-specific structure. The model represents moral tension itself, not a pre-resolved judgment.

57. Making Clinical Language Models Auditable: Concept-Guided Fine-Tuning for Robust Prediction

Authors: Jin Mu , Guanhua Chen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27397
Abstract:

Clinical language models can achieve strong in-hospital accuracy yet fail under deployment shifts because they exploit note-specific artifacts (e.g., templates, separators, boilerplate) that do not reflect patient state. We propose CAST (Concept-guided Artifact Suppression Tuning), an SAE-based framework for auditable clinical text classification. CAST uses Sparse Autoencoders to expose sparse, human-auditable features from intermediate Transformer activations, labels SAE latents with an LLM-assisted interpretation pipeline and ICD-10 retrieval constraints, suppresses verified artifact latents via residual subtraction during fine-tuning, and provides post-hoc per-concept attributions for auditing model decisions. On MIMIC-IV discharge-note mortality prediction, CAST improves over its corresponding fine-tuned encoder baselines and remains competitive with strong LLM baselines, while producing a feature-level audit trail of the clinical concepts that support each prediction and the artifact concepts suppressed during training.

58. Difference-in-Differences on a Censored Rating Scale Can Manufacture an Effect: Evidence from a Pre-Registered LLM-Judge Audit

Authors: Shuyi Fan , Boyuan Deng , Mengyu Xu , Xinhong Xie , Chenyang Li , Hongyang Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27309
Abstract:

Audits of LLM judges certify a bias by contrasting matched conditions, and the strongest designs difference twice: a within-item contrast between two candidate responses, differenced again across a manipulated attribute, read off a bounded rating scale. We show that this endpoint is not identified on the scale that reports it. Each term of the double difference is censored by its own share, so the observed statistic confounds differential preference with differential attenuation: a severity shift common to both responses manufactures an interaction whenever the two censor it unequally, as unequal distances from the bounds make them, exactly where good stimuli place them. We exhibit the failure inside a pre-registered audit of a frozen pedagogy judge, sealed before the first of its 990 calls. The registered primary endpoint, the effect of a stated learner profile on the judge’s scaffolding preference, is null: $+0.085$ points (95\% BCa $[-0.167, +0.353]$, $p = 0.684$). The audit’s one nominally significant interaction, $+0.378$ ($p = 0.002$), is not identified as preference: a construction containing zero differential preference reproduces 79 to 85\% of it from the observed severity shift and the scale floor alone. We derive the mechanism in closed form and show that its contribution is measurable from an audit’s own ratings.

59. Compositional Online Learning for Semantic Data Processing Systems

Authors: Paweł Liskowski , Fuheng Zhao , Benjamin Han , Anupam Datta , Dimitris Tsirogiannis
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27244
Abstract:

An LLM call in a semantic data processing system is expensive enough to dominate query cost, yet slow enough to hide a CPU-side learner’s update behind its round-trip. In production, LLM compute accounts for $80-90\%$ of query cost, and each call costs $10^5-10^7\times$ a relational predicate. The latency window inverts a design constraint of classical adaptive query processing, where online learners had to stay lightweight to avoid dominating the predicates they optimize. At LLM latency, per-call gradient steps and per-batch threshold solves fit inside the round-trip. We develop compositional online learning at the LLM call boundary: a framework for combining online-learning components in semantic data processing systems. Each component makes execution-time decisions and refines its learned artifacts online. The design space spans two axes, decision granularity and learner update cadence, and the components share a single learning pattern that hides each trainer step inside the next LLM round-trip. A production case study in Cortex AISQL composes three components: a memoization layer, an online per-call filter-ordering learner, and an online per-batch cascade-routing learner. A conditional cost decomposition assigns each learning component to a distinct factor of per-row LLM cost. Under independence, the two learning components compose multiplicatively to an $11.4\times$ upper bound on a representative conjunction-filter workload. Self-selection at the cascade boundary, sample-budget shrinkage, and selectivity-estimation drift reduce it to a realistic figure near $8\times$.

Authors: Maitrey Gramopadhye , Prakash Baskaran , Xiao Liu , Songpo Li , Soshi Iba
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27225
Abstract:

Effective human-robot collaboration in industrial settings requires robots to understand human intentions and assist with task planning, reducing workload. Recent works have explored the use of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MM-LLMs) for task planning in such data-scarce scenarios, leveraging in-context learning to interpret user actions and generate long-horizon action plans in natural language. However, MM-LLMs inherently lack an understanding of system states and do not track state transitions, often leading to hallucinated actions that deviate from the intended goal. Additionally, generating action plans in natural language tends to limit the generated plans to a high level, introducing ambiguity in action execution. To address these limitations, we propose the State-aware Task Estimator and Planner (STEP), which prompts a MM-LLM to explicitly estimate the state of the system and predict the state transitions resulting from executed actions. By forecasting future states alongside actions, STEP ensures task-convergent planning while also providing additional assistance parameters necessary for executing the predicted actions. We evaluate STEP in a simulated environment using a robot assembly task. Our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art by 32.8% in action executability and 14.8% in final-state error.

61. PACE: A Unified Condense-and-Extract Paradigm for Fast VLM Inference

Authors: Junjie Liu , Shengyuan Ye , Xu Chen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27206
Abstract:

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate exceptional visual reasoning capabilities, yet their inference costs escalate rapidly with the proliferation of visual tokens. Existing visual token pruning methods exhibit two fundamental limitations. First, most approaches operate exclusively post-vision encoder, leaving the substantial latency of the visual encoding phase unoptimized. Second, under strict token budgets, these methods often fail to jointly preserve holistic visual contexts and fine-grained details, leading to performance degradation. To address these bottlenecks, we propose PACE (Pixel-Adaptive Condense and Extract), a training-free inference framework that accelerates both the vision encoder and the Large Language Model (LLM) via a unified Condense-and-Extract paradigm. During the Condense stage, an Adaptive Pixel Compressor (APC) evaluates visual information density prior to encoding, adaptively downsampling redundant inputs, curtailing encoder computation while preserving global context and essential visual cues. In the Extract stage, a Dynamic Dual-Attention Extractor (DDAE) selectively retains visual tokens via a fusion of internal visual signals from the encoder and semantic signals from the LLM, safeguarding task-critical details. By integrating PACE into Qwen2.5-VL-7B, the model retains 93.8% of its original performance while utilizing only 10% of the visual tokens, yielding a 3.1x speedup in time to first token (TTFT). Our code is available at this https URL .

62. LLMs in Digital EDA: A perspective on shifting roles from Generation to Orchestration

Authors: Matthew Youngman , Cristian Sestito , Themis Prodromakis
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27184
Abstract:

Electronic design automation (EDA) has advanced engineering productivity through successive generations of tooling that progressively automate synthesis, optimisation, and verification. Large language models (LLMs) extend this trajectory by enabling direct translation from design intent to hardware implementations. In most of the EDA literature, LLM-based solutions are typically assisting siloed design stages or tasks, however this obscured the drivers by which capability emerges and systems scale. In this Perspective, we instead define three hierarchical roles that reveal how capability accumulates: a Generator that produces design artifacts in a single pass, an Agent that refines outputs through iterative tool feedback, and an Orchestrator that coordinates decisions across EDA-stages. Across published systems, this reveals a syntax trap in which models are trained to produce plausible code rather than physically correct hardware, compounded by fragmented tools and loss of design context that obscure how decisions affect later stages. Comparisons across the three roles show that current approaches struggle to scale to industrial designs, motivating a shift towards a standardised, physics-aware orchestrator that connects tools and agents across the EDA flow for more reliable and accessible hardware design.

63. Safety Does Not Compose: Non-Decaying Loop State for Autonomous LLM Agents

Authors: Chenhao Wu , Haoxuan Jia , Yang Liu , Yingguang Yang , Yuhan Lin , Chongyang Zhang , Hao Zheng , Yulin Huang , Jianshen Zhang , Yongzhi Qi , Shang Luo , Kefu Xu , Jifeng Zhu , Bin Chong
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27141
Abstract:

Large language model agents are increasingly deployed as autonomous loops. Starting from one human goal, such a system repeatedly discovers work, plans, executes tool calls, verifies outcomes and persists state across many unattended iterations. The agent safeguards in wide use, however, are defined over a single trajectory, and their safety state is re-initialized when the next trajectory begins. We show that this is a failure of composition rather than an implementation detail. Our central result is a separation: against an attack whose evidence is fragmented across several iterations, every trajectory-scoped monitor has a true-positive rate equal to its false-positive rate, however expressive it is, because the evidence it would need never appears in the window it sees, whereas a monitor retaining cross-iteration state separates the two perfectly. We further show that the obvious repair of carrying a geometrically decaying risk score is insufficient, because the cooling-off period a patient adversary must wait is a constant that does not grow with the horizon $N$. We then present LoopHarness, which restores a persistent, non-decaying safety state at the loop level. Under mediated commits and an arbiter detection floor $\delta_M$, it bounds the expected number of unauthorized irreversible actions by $B+m-1+m/\delta_M$, a constant in $N$, of which the $B+m-1$ term is decided by a model-free rule and therefore survives a fully colluding verifier. We give a complete evaluation protocol on native Agent-SafetyBench tasks with paired clean and attacked episodes, an outer-state attack suite whose decisive evidence exists only across iterations, per-module ablations, and an adaptive white-box red team.

64. Performance Foundations of Parallel & Distributed Reasoning Language Models

Authors: Maciej Besta , Leonard Schmidt , Lara Nonino , Robert Gerstenberger , Pierre Pang , Patrik Okanovic , Ales Kubicek , Tiancheng Chen , Baraq Lipshitz , Torsten Hoefler
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27046
Abstract:

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) and other RL-style post-training paradigms have been used for aligning large language models (LLMs) with reasoning standards. The resulting recent Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) such as DeepSeek-R1, o3, and Kimi k1.5 show that such RL-style post-training (“RL-for-LLMs”) can substantially improve chain-of-thought reasoning, long-horizon planning, and self-correction. However, the computational footprint of these systems is massive: state-of-the-art RLM training requires millions of GPU-hours and tightly coupled multi-model pipelines that stress modern hardware far beyond classical supervised LLM training. This makes RLM training as much a parallel and distributed systems problem as an algorithmic one. In this work, to facilitate developing RLMs that are simultaneously high-performance, scalable, and cost-effective, we first systematize the RL-for-LLM paradigm and provide a compute-centric analysis of prominent post-training algorithmic frameworks: Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), as well as their variants. Second, we develop a taxonomy of intra- and inter-model parallelism strategies for RL-for-LLMs, covering both traditional techniques (data, tensor, pipeline, sequence, context, and expert parallelism) as well as novel forms of parallelism and optimization techniques for multi-model RLM training, for example disaggregated placement, stage fusion, hybrid parallelism, and asynchronous execution. We harness the work-depth model of parallel computing to make our taxonomy and its insights rigorous and portable. Finally, we analyze existing RLM frameworks and we distill practical guidelines and outline open research directions for building scalable, fast, and cost-effective RLMs.

65. FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets

Authors: Kuan-Hao Tseng , Niruth Bogahawatta , Yasod Ginige , Kunjan Patel , Kosta Dakic , Suranga Seneviratne
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27021
Abstract:

LLM-based agents are increasingly proposed for network fault diagnosis, but existing benchmarks evaluate them only on accurate tickets and always assume a fault is present, conditions rarely met in practice. We present FaulT-Bench, a benchmark of 200 troubleshooting scenarios across eight network topologies, five reimplemented from public practitioner labs, spanning genuine faults, false fault reports, incorrect device attribution, and incorrect root-cause claims. To isolate how ticket wording affects diagnosis, we further rewrite 72 false-premise tickets into five reporter personas that vary reporter confidence and verifiable detail one factor at a time, holding the network state fixed. Our automated harness deploys each scenario in Kathará, lets agents interact through the NIKA tool interface, and scores free-text diagnoses with an LLM judge across outcome, fix, and reasoning quality. Evaluating SADE, ReAct, and Claude Code, we find all three are near-saturated on accurate tickets and robust to misdirection, yet degrade sharply when the network is healthy and the ticket is wrong, probing until a benign condition can be promoted to a root cause rather than concluding nothing is wrong. Persona rewrites show that how a ticket is written matters more than what it claims: a confidently wrong report is handled about as well as an accurate one, while a vague, underspecified report degrades performance sharply. The three agents also fail differently, from constant over-diagnosis to unanswered runs, at very different cost. These results position FaulT-Bench as a benchmark for developing agentic systems that can reason reliably over the noisy, unreliable tickets of real-world network troubleshooting.

66. When Memory Takes Gradients: Collaborative Vector Memory for Agentic Recommender Systems

Authors: Hanchong Chen , Xing Tang , Lingjie Li , Xiongfeng Shan , Xiuqiang He
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26895
Abstract:

Agentic recommender systems ground each decision of a large language model (LLM) in a persistent memory of the user, and in existing agents that memory is text: a narrative written and maintained by further LLM calls. Text limits this memory in two ways. It is updated one rewrite at a time, so exploiting the full interaction history is prohibitively expensive; and collaborative evidence, graded similarity over an entire catalog, does not survive translation into sentences. We propose CoVeMem (Collaborative Vector Memory), which vectorizes the collaborative core of the agent’s memory. Frozen LightGCN user and item states form the memory bank; at each decision, the candidate set itself retrieves the most relevant historical states, which enter the LLM’s context as soft tokens alongside a light textual profile. Contrastive alignment to item-semantic anchors, followed by listwise co-training with masked candidates, teaches the model to read these states and to rank through them; a pointwise yes/no readout scores each candidate. Across four instruction-grounded recommendation benchmarks, CoVeMem matches or exceeds the strongest collaborative text-memory agent on 19 of 20 metric cells while requiring zero additional LLM calls for memory maintenance beyond the shared static profile, against per-interaction calls for text memory. The memory now takes gradients: the full interaction history, out of reach for text, becomes available as training data for what the agent remembers and for how it reads what it remembers.

67. PLCBench: Can Autonomous LLM Agents Turn PLC Access into Sustained Physical Impact?

Authors: Yitian Zhou , Jingyu Zheng , Qiliang Jiang , Linkang Du , Haoming Liu , Lichao Wu , Shiyi Zhao , Mengxiang Liu , Ruilong Deng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26882
Abstract:

Industrial control systems (ICSs) rely on programmable logic controllers (PLCs) to connect networked computation with physical control. Tool-using large language model (LLM) agents represent an emerging attack threat: can an autonomous agent convert a network-reachable PLC into sustained adverse physical impact? However, existing evaluations focus on digital tasks or individual stages of PLC testing. In ICSs, evaluations that stop at software exploitation, an accepted write, or tool access may therefore mischaracterize physical risk. We present PLCBENCH, to our knowledge, the first real-PLC hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) framework for characterizing this cyber-to-physical capability and its boundaries. It combines vendor-native interaction, commercial PLC execution, closed-loop reduced-order process simulation, and independent outcome verification. A deterministic evaluator applies fixed rules to runner, communication, PLC-object, and process records to assign six hidden diagnostic flags, distinguishing usable PLC interaction, process-linked manipulation, and sustained physical impact. We instantiate PLCBENCH on four commercial PLCs crossed with four closed-loop workloads. Across five LLM families and 240 real-PLC episodes, 75 episodes (31.3%) sustain their respective physical objectives. Stagewise results show that 98 episodes stop before a valid native read, whereas 62 reach a process-linked write but do not sustain the final objective. Notably, richer process observation is associated with an increase in conditional objective attainment after a process-linked write from 44.2% to 64.0%. These measurements localize failure in configured PLC-process deployments and identify intervention points for future defense evaluation. To support reproducibility, we release the safely disclosable PLCBENCH code and a software-only reproduction pipeline through the accompanying artifact.

68. From Reasoning to Pixels: Grounded Medical Multimodal LLMs for VQA and Segmentation

Authors: Haowen Gu , Gensheng Pei , Junzhu Mao , Qiong Wang , Mingwu Ren , Yazhou Yao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26856
Abstract:

Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in Medical Visual Question Answering (Med-VQA), their reliance on global image features often lacks precise pixel-level grounding, thereby limiting clinical trustworthiness. To bridge the semantic gap between high-level clinical reasoning and spatial localization, we propose \textsc{\textsc{MedREAL} } (\textbf{Med}ical \textbf{RE}asoning-driven \textbf{A}nswering and \textbf{L}ocalization), a unified framework that seamlessly aligns linguistic reasoning with spatial grounding. Specifically, \textsc{MedREAL} introduces \textbf{S}eg \textbf{A}nchored \textbf{R}easoning \textbf{P}ooling (SARP) to distill task-relevant semantic evidence directly from \texttt{[SEG]} tokens within the MLLM’s hidden states. Furthermore, a \textbf{R}easoning-to-\textbf{V}isual (R2V) fusion mechanism is proposed to effectively inject these reasoning-aware features into a segmentation pipeline for accurate mask decoding. To facilitate this paradigm, we construct MedRAVS-13K, a comprehensive dataset comprising 13,824 expertly validated samples across four diverse imaging modalities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that \textsc{MedREAL} significantly outperforms state-of-the-arts, achieving 68.49\% gIoU and 70.47\% cIoU on benchmark evaluations. By generating evidence masks that are strictly consistent with textual diagnoses, \textsc{MedREAL} provides a robust, interpretable framework for reasoning-driven medical image analysis.

69. MedFG-VQA: Low-Frequency Memory and Graph Attention for Lightweight Medical VQA

Authors: Haowen Gu , Gensheng Pei , Zeren Sun , Mingwu Ren , Xiangbo Shu , Yazhou Yao , Fumin Shen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26848
Abstract:

Medical Visual Question Answering (Med-VQA) holds significant promise for clinical decision support, yet faces challenges due to limited annotated data and the high computational demands of existing large vision-language models. We propose MedFG-VQA, a lightweight framework that leverages a memory bank to augment DCT-based low-frequency features and employs graph-enhanced cross-attention for effective visual-textual alignment. Specifically, our approach features two key components: Frequency-Memory Fusion (FMF), which enhances low-frequency features by retrieving from a learnable memory bank built on DCT decomposition, and Graph-Aware Cross-Attention (GACA), which aligns visual-textual features via cross-attention and refines them through graph-convolutional aggregation. To address data scarcity, we construct SynMed-VQA, a large-scale synthetic dataset comprising over 2 million question-answer pairs across 9 imaging modalities and 10 major organs, generated with GPT-4o. Extensive experiments on SynMed-VQA and three other standard biomedical VQA benchmarks demonstrate that MedFG-VQA achieves competitive or superior performance compared to much larger models while maintaining significantly lower computational costs, highlighting its efficiency and potential for clinical deployment.

70. Beyond Execution: Auditing Experimental Fidelity in LLM-Driven Scientific Research

Authors: Lezhi Yu , Xiaogang Xu , Yuhua Zhou , Shuibing He , Aimin Pan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26753
Abstract:

LLM agents used for scientific experimentation must do more than generate executable code: they must implement the reference method faithfully, design experiments that test the paper’s claims, and provide evidence supporting those claims. We show that agents often produce methodological hallucinations: silently reducing datasets or training budgets, replacing failed learning or generative components with lookup or oracle functions, or drawing conclusions from resource-limited settings where a method’s claimed advantage disappears. To detect these failures, we introduce ABE-Ralph, a reference-anchored auditing framework that represents claims, protocols, required components, baselines, and metrics as structured experimental constraints, guides implementation through an 8-step workflow, and performs quantitative, qualitative, and code-level verification. Across 30 long-horizon reproduction runs covering 12 machine learning domains, ABE-Ralph achieves a 93% robust execution rate and identifies five scientific failure modes. In 23 NatureBench discovery tasks, ABE-Ralph matches or exceeds state-of-the-art performance on 5 tasks. These results show that reliable evaluation of AI scientists must assess whether the experimental design faithfully tests the intended claim and whether the resulting evidence supports it, rather than treating code execution or plausible metrics as evidence of scientific success.

71. Rethinking Message Passing as Retrieval for Text-Attributed Graph Learning

Authors: Jintang Li , Yuhong Chen , Ruofan Wu , Binli Luo , Jiayi Ji , Hui Li , Rongrong Ji
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26732
Abstract:

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are typically conceptualized as message-passing neural networks, yet it remains unclear why neighborhood aggregation reliably outperforms node-wise multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). Despite its empirical success, this paradigm can be computationally expensive and sensitive to imperfect graph structures. In this work, we present a retrieval-augmented view of GNNs: each layer makes predictions by applying an MLP to a node representation together with a permutation-invariant summary of retrieved graph context. Motivated by this perspective, we propose RTA, a simple MLP-based framework that replaces structural message passing with label-aware retrieval and propagation. We provide theoretical insights that (i) connect retrieval-based aggregation to softmax-attention message passing, and (ii) establish the robustness of retrieved-context supervision to mis-retrieved outliers. Experiments on multiple text-attributed graph benchmarks show that RTA matches or even outperforms strong GNN and graph LLM baselines while improving efficiency and robustness across diverse scenarios.

72. AesCanvas: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Aesthetic Critique and Contextual Suitability

Authors: Xuanwei Hu , Haoyu Dong , Kejun Wu , Tianyi Liu , Jianjun Gao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26713
Abstract:

Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have extended Image Aesthetic Assessment (IAA) beyond scalar scores toward interpretable critique and guidance. Yet existing benchmarks mainly assess intrinsic visual quality or fixed domain criteria, leaving open whether an appealing image is appropriate for a specific purpose, audience, cultural setting, or domain convention. We introduce AesCanvas, a unified suite with two complementary components: CritiqueCanvas with 519,136 instruction-response pairs from 54,300 images supports long-form, multi-dimensional critique across photography, painting, and virtual imagery, whereas ContextCanvas with 301 expert-reviewed use scenarios evaluates contextual aesthetic suitability in realistic use scenarios. Under a unified protocol, we evaluate closed-source frontier, open-weight general, and aesthetic-specific MLLMs. Results reveal a clear separation between critique generation and context-sensitive judgment: reference-based lexical and semantic metrics only partially capture critique quality, while aesthetic specialists remain competitive on selected critique metrics yet substantially lag strong general-purpose MLLMs on ContextCanvas. Further analyses show that aesthetic specialization does not reliably transfer to contextual suitability and that model decisions may fail to track or ground themselves in decisive contextual visual cues. These findings establish culturally situated, evidence-grounded suitability as a distinct objective for aesthetic modeling.

73. FOCUS & RePAIR: Mitigating Text Degeneration via Token-Level Guidance for Pruned Large Language Models

Authors: Junyoung Lee , Sehyeon Park , Shinhyoung Jang , Seonha Ryu , Hojeong Kim , Hyunsei Lee , Il Hong Suh , Yeseong Kim
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26676
Abstract:

Pruning is a practical approach to compress large language models (LLMs), but it can amplify text degeneration, especially repetition loops, even when perplexity and task accuracy remain largely unchanged. In this work, we present a token-level analysis of this failure mode by viewing decoding as a dynamical process that enters and persists in a small set of recurrent contexts. Our analysis decomposes degeneration into loop entry risk and loop persistence, and shows that persistence is controlled by the escape mass assigned to plausible alternatives within the token sampling set. Motivated by these findings, we propose two token-level guidance objectives for post-pruning fine-tuning. FOCUS reweights distillation toward high-confidence teacher regions to suppress leakage, while RePAIR uses onset-centered positive/negative continuation pairs with a margin loss to promote plausible alternatives and prevent early commitment to repetition loops. Experiments on open-ended continuation and instruction-based generation show that both methods consistently reduce repetition and improve generation quality.

74. Do LLMs Understand Personality? Rethinking Persona Fidelity Evaluation through Structured Behavioral Inference

Authors: Mengfan Li , Zesheng Wei , Xuanhua Shi , Yang Deng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26674
Abstract:

As large language models are increasingly deployed to simulate diverse human characters, ensuring persona fidelity, defined as the extent to which an agent’s behavior consistently reflects the psychological and stylistic characteristics of a target persona, has become a critical requirement. However, existing evaluation paradigms primarily rely on either holistic LLM-based judges, which are prone to “holistic appraisal hallucination’’, or static psychometric inventories, which fail to capture the context-dependent fidelity required in dynamic dialogue. To address these limitations, we propose PRISM (Persona Reasoning with Inverse SFL-based Modeling), a psycholinguistically grounded framework that reformulates persona fidelity evaluation as a structured inverse inference task. Inspired by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), PRISM decomposes persona fidelity into three functional dimensions: Task Framing, Interpersonal Stance, and Linguistic Style. It estimates dimension-specific evidence over a persona-conditioned label space and aggregates these signals into an interpretable and auditable evaluation process. Experiments show that PRISM yields more accurate and stable judgements than traditional holistic judging, providing a more reliable framework for persona fidelity evaluation.

75. J-Zero: Unified Challenger–Solver–Judge Co-Evolution from Zero Data

Authors: Gyouk Chu , Myeongho Jeon , Eunho Yang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26582
Abstract:

Self-evolving language models have recently emerged as a promising path toward superintelligence, with the advantage of reducing the cost of human supervision. While considerable progress has been made in verifiable domains, self-evolution in unverifiable domains remains substantially less explored. We propose Judge co-adaptation from Zero data (J-Zero), a unified Challenger–Solver–Judge co-evolution framework that supports self-improvement across both domains. The Challenger and Solver co-evolve through an adversarial interaction: the Challenger generates increasingly difficult tasks, while the Solver learns to produce higher-quality responses to them. In parallel, the Judge co-adapts using preference pairs whose ordering is known in advance from how each response was produced, i.e., the Solver’s answer over the Challenger’s, and its decomposed-and-recombined answer over its one-shot answer, rather than from the Judge’s own scores. J-Zero outperforms the baselines by an average of 4.2 points on verifiable and 8.0 points on unverifiable domains, and continues to improve through at least ten iterations, whereas the baselines degrade after two.

76. Zero-Shot Self-Orchestration with Ledger-Based Control for Improved LLM Coding Performance

Authors: Victor Gao , Vida Khosrowshahi , Ali Khosrowshahi , Xihao Sun , Juhyun Lee , Simon (Sang Won)Lee
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26480
Abstract:

Multi-agent large language model systems are widely reported to beat single-model baselines, but the evidence is mixed, and comparisons are usually confounded: pipelines change token budgets, tool calls, and prompts simultaneously, so an aggregate gain rarely reveals what actually helped. We investigate the effect of introducing the manager-worker scaffold over a shared filesystem workspace, with no training and no per-benchmark tuning, measured against the same model answering in a single pass. Across nine models – five open-weight, spanning 9B to ~2.8T parameters, and four frontier closed models – on the 100 latest hard LiveCodeBench problems, the scaffold’s benefit is real but conditional: large and statistically significant for some (Qwen3.8-27B +23.4, GPT-5.6-Luna +10.6 and GPT-5.6-Terra +8.0, each over five paired passes; Kimi-K3 +30.4 and Minimax-M3 +11.0 over five paired passes with reasoning off, both at $p < 10^{-4}$, and +42 and +12 in a single pass at a 128k cap) and null or negative for others (Qwen3.6-35B -1 to -9 with reasoning off). With the manager, Opus-5 achieves the highest score in the study at 91% in one pass. Running a manager roughly triples the token bill, but it buys accuracy more cheaply than moving to a larger model does: GPT-5.6-Terra with a manager nearly matches Fable 5’s single-call accuracy (85.0 against 87.4, $p = 0.59$) at a fifth of the price ($11.71 against $61.11 per 100-problem pass, $p < 10^{-4}$), and the Qwen-27B arm does it for $51.75 on weights anyone can self-host. Our transcript analysis finds several mechanisms behind the gains, of which two recur: context management, in which short worker calls and shared notes organize state and reduce truncation, and problem decomposition. Improvements are modest for large models with reasoning enabled, but larger for some models with reasoning disabled and for smaller models with reasoning enabled.

77. Diff Mining: Logit Differences Reveal Finetuning Objectives

Authors: Greg Kocher , Robert West , Clément Dumas , Julian Minder
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26462
Abstract:

Finetuning has become the gold standard for refining existing behaviors and inducing new ones in language models, yet it often remains unclear exactly which behaviors emerge during this process. As models grow ever more capable, understanding finetuning better becomes increasingly important, particularly since unwanted behaviors may arise during finetuning. In this paper, we introduce Diff Mining, a simple yet effective framework for identifying what a finetuned model has learned by comparing its logits to those of its base model. Diff Mining effectively surfaces salient tokens that are amplified in the finetuned model, serving as a fingerprint of its training – even on text unrelated to the finetuning domain. Unlike many existing model diffing methods which require model internals, Diff Mining only needs access to output logits and scales to large models. The framework consists of two modular stages: (i) extracting per-context logit differences between the finetuned and base models on a reference corpus, and (ii) aggregating the resulting signals to construct an interpretable token set representing the finetune. For aggregation, we explore both a simple Top-K frequency method and a Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF)-based approach for disentangling multiple finetuning objectives into distinct token clusters. Empirically, Diff Mining succeeds across diverse settings: on finetune domain detection, it significantly outperforms state-of-the-art model diffing methods both in identifying relevant tokens and in downstream performance when an interpretability agent is given access to the extracted token set; on models with injected biases, it identifies more than one third of the biases without targeted probing. Overall, our framework shows promise in developing auditing tools to detect finetuning objectives.

78. Co-Evolving Structured Knowledge and Reasoning in Language Models

Authors: Ryan Thomas Noonan , Linxi Zhao , Menghan Xu , Akanksha Sarkar , Mihir Mishra , Dongyoung Go , Kilian Q. Weinberger , Yoav Artzi , Jennifer J. Sun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26386
Abstract:

Retrieval-augmented methods improve factual accuracy by grounding language models in external knowledge, but retrieving over unstructured text often introduces irrelevant context and offers limited control over the retrieved information. Structured knowledge bases offer a more controllable alternative, yet they are expensive to construct and often brittle to reason over. To address these limitations, we propose KBevo: a co-evolving framework that jointly learns to construct a structured knowledge base and reason over it for knowledge-intensive question answering. By optimizing both components end-to-end with QA outcome rewards, our method enables reasoning success to directly improve the quality of the constructed knowledge base. This leads to larger, better-connected knowledge structures with higher answer reachability, while also improving compositional factual reasoning and controllability compared to standard retrieval baselines.

79. Knowledge-Verified Emergent Deception in LLM Agents Under Conflicting Incentives

Authors: Zheyuan Liu , Weiliang Zhao , Xiangchi Yuan , Ningshan Ma , Yue Huang , Meng Jiang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26372
Abstract:

Large language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents serving users on behalf of companies, placing them in settings where user and deployer interests can conflict. When an agent knows that a user is owed something its deployer would prefer to deny, does it remain honest? Answering this is difficult because false statements can reflect either ignorance or hallucination rather than deception. To address this challenge, we introduce KnownLieBench , a knowledge-verified benchmark that first confirms through a neutral probe that an agent knows a user’s entitlement, and then evaluates whether it makes false claims once an incentive to deny that entitlement is introduced. Specifically, KnownLieBench covers eight customer-service domains and 112 grounded cases, conducts multi-round dialogues with a trust-tracking customer agent, and separates deception emerging from incentive alone from deception produced under explicit instruction. Across eighteen proprietary and open-weight models, emergent deception varies substantially across model families and domains. We further use the benchmark for post-training, finding that honesty-directed fine-tuning reduces deception under incentive, while deception-graded fine-tuning increases lie success on honest-control dialogues without increasing lie frequency under incentive. By verifying entitlement knowledge before scoring deceptive behavior, KnownLieBench reduces the confound between lying and not knowing and enables more rigorous auditing and steering of agent honesty.

80. How Unlikely Is “Unlikely”? Assessing Verbal Probability Perception Across Large Language Models

Authors: Christos Petridis , Konstantinos Pelechrinis , Zoran Obradovic
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26327
Abstract:

Large language models increasingly produce and interpret verbal probability expressions, yet whether these expressions carry consistent meaning across models (or match human perceptions of uncertainty) remains unknown. We present a systematic cross-model evaluation using a word-to-number mapping task grounded in established human benchmarks. Eleven uncertainty expressions were presented to 19 models under two conditions, forced single-number response and explanation elicitation, alongside a novel bidirectional roundtrip test of internal consistency. LLMs track the human benchmark with surprising fidelity: word ordering is preserved, three anchor points are recovered, and possible'' shows the highest variance and cross-model disagreement of any expression tested, consistent with its documented bimodal interpretation in humans. However, models show a systematic upward bias for negative expressions such asunlikely’’ and ``improbable.’’ Explanation elicitation reduces within-model variance while increasing between-model divergence, stabilizing individual models at the cost of inter-model consensus, and the roundtrip experiment reveals clear stratification, with frontier models maintaining coherent bidirectional representations. LLMs thus reproduce the structure of human verbal probability cognition, including its biases, while diverging systematically at the negative end—with implications for any setting where humans and models exchange probabilistic language.

81. Modality Maturity Index: A benchmark for assessing multimodal capabilities of omni models

Authors: Rohit Patel , Dieuwke Hupkes , Sloan Strader
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26317
Abstract:

Frontier language models are increasingly marketed as omni systems that can perceive and respond across modalities. Existing evaluation frameworks, however, focus almost exclusively on bimodal understanding, typically text plus one other modality. We propose the Modality Maturity Index (MMI), a benchmark designed to evaluate the multimodal capabilities of large language models across five modalities (text, image, audio, video and document) and combinations of up to three modalities in both inputs and outputs. MMI consists of 893 questions, each carefully crafted to require the model to demonstrate its understanding of multiple input modalities and to generate responses that incorporate various output formats. The questions are designed to be self-contained, with clear expectations for the correct modality or mix of modalities required for an accurate response. Every MMI prompt carries human-authored rubric criteria for each output modality expected in the response; a model’s MMI Value expresses the average of the per-modality scores for each prompt. Because low scores can reflect either failure to generate a modality (lack of presence) or failure to generate correct content, we introduce also a supplementary Modality Presence Score (MPS), a per-prompt F1 over the expected output modalities. Applying MMI to five frontier multimodal models, we find that the MPS ranges from only 15.6 (Claude Opus 4.6) to 34.9 (GPT-5.4). Given the low availability of returned modalities to even grade, we report MPS as our main result pending model improvements. To assess the viability of judging output correctness with LLM judges and rubrics, we run a separate experiment with custom generation tools. On the assets that generates, we find that an LLM judge applying the rubrics agrees with rubric-blind human annotators (who score the outputs directly and never see the criteria) on 70.8% of judgments.

82. MemToC: Benchmarking Memory-Tool Conflict Resolution in Large Language Models

Authors: Arseniy Varlamov , Rishat Zinnatullin , Elisei Rykov , Alexander Panchenko , Ilseyar Alimova
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26295
Abstract:

Tool-augmented LLMs must arbitrate between two fallible sources when a tool return conflicts with their parametric memory, yet existing evaluations measure source preference without establishing source correctness. We introduce MemToC, a controlled benchmark for post-tool-return arbitration with executable tools. MemToC comprises 6,504 evaluation episodes constructed from 542 quality-controlled factual questions, independently elicited model-specific closed-book answers, and controlled tool returns of known correctness. These components instantiate four source-correctness cases; tool-error and no-tool conditions are separate controls. Across five open-weight 7-9B models, tool returns strongly dominate elicited closed-book answers. The four instruction-tuned models retain a verified-correct answer against an incorrect tool in only 6.5-17.1% of eligible cases, follow a correct tool in 86.0-93.1%, and repeat the tool return in 78.4-86.0% of cases where both sources are wrong. No cross-model ordering remains stable across three instruction-wording variants with the question and episode content held fixed. We compare prompting with SFT and DPO using chain-level cross-fitting over ToolHop, so questions sharing an underlying fact never straddle training and evaluation. We apply an asymmetric success criterion: correct-answer retention must improve without a detected reduction in correct-tool following. SFT and DPO meet this criterion on the same two of four instruction-tuned backbones. Improvements rarely come cleanly: 19 of 20 tested method-model combinations reduce abstention after tool errors or on unanswerable inputs. Transfer beyond MemToC is positive but partial and depends on the model and presentation frame. Correctness-conditioned arbitration can be improved through fine-tuning, but gains must be evaluated jointly with correct tool use, abstention, and robustness to formulation.

83. How Do LLM Agents Actually Get the Flag? Trace-Level Provenance for Agentic Offensive Security Evaluation

Authors: Kimberly Milner , Minghao Shao , Nanda Rani , Haoran Xi , Venkata Sai Charan Putrevu , Meet Udeshi , Sandeep K. Shukla , Prashanth Krishnamurthy , Farshad Khorrami , Muhammad Shafique , Ramesh Karri
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26237
Abstract:

Capture-the-Flag (CTF) benchmarks are widely used to assess the offensive security capabilities of autonomous language-model agents. Evaluations rely on shallow binary judgments or aggregate scores, overlooking the agent’s trajectory to the flag. Consequently actual exploitation is conflated with direct flag exposure, memorized recall, external lookup, guessing, and unsupported claims, potentially overstating the agent’s cybersecurity capability. We introduce CTF-ABACUS, a trace-based agent auditing framework that reconstructs each run as an evidence-grounded solve profile. By decomposing agent actions into penetration-testing phases and categorical techniques, it identifies where exploitation occurs, where the flag first appears, and whether the recovered flag is supported by demonstrated behavior. Aggregating solve profiles across agents yields challenge signatures that reveal whether success was achieved via the intended exploit or via shortcut pathways. We apply CTF-ABACUS to 1,435 CTF attempts by six frontier and open-source models on 240 challenges, yielding 2,870 solve profiles under two judge lenses. Trace-verified exploits account for only 62-87% of recovered flags across benchmarks, while shortcut recoveries follow substantially shallower trajectories. These findings shift CTF evaluation from counting recovered flags to verifying demonstrated exploitation and provide a basis for designing benchmarks that better isolate the offensive capabilities.

84. NeuronFuzz: Safety Neuron Guided Fuzzing for LLM Safety Evaluation

Authors: Zhiyuan Xu , Muhammad Firhard Roslan , Joseph Gardiner , Sana Belguith , Lichao Wu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26222
Abstract:

Safety evaluation is critical for assessing whether aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) remain robust against jailbreak attacks. Existing automated testing methods, however, largely rely on response-level feedback: each candidate prompt typically requires generating a target-model response to evaluate its attack effectiveness. This process is expensive and, more importantly, provides only sparse guidance on strongly aligned models, where most candidates are rejected with the same failure outcome. This paper presents NeuronFuzz, a white-box fuzzing framework that exploits internal safety neurons as continuous execution feedback for LLM safety evaluation. A SafetyOracle converts safety-neuron activations into a continuous safety alarm score that serves as feedback for fuzzing and can be obtained during prefill, eliminating response generation from the fuzzing loop. To construct the SafetyOracle, NeuronFuzz uses template-invariant harmful and benign inputs and stability-aware selection to identify a compact set of safety neurons whose activations capture harmful-intent recognition. Moreover, since the safety alarm score is differentiable, NeuronFuzz uses its gradients to identify safety-sensitive template positions and a masked language model to generate fluent, context-compatible mutations while preserving original harmful payload and avoiding additional optimization variables. We evaluate NeuronFuzz across 21 text and multimodal models. Across five white-box source models, it achieves a 76-100% jailbreak discovery rate, outperforming baselines by up to 48 percentage points. Its optimized templates further transfer zero-shot to open-weight and six proprietary target models, achieving average ASR and top-5 ensemble ASR (EASR) of 69.6%/92.6% and 44.1%/60.0%, respectively.

85. A Reranker for Orchestrating Heterogeneous Speech and Text Retrievers

Authors: Inho Kim , Sumyeong Ahn
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26194
Abstract:

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have attracted significant interest for their ability to mitigate hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs). Although knowledge databases for RAG are increasingly diversifying to include various modalities such as speech and text, research on handling such multi-modal database scenarios remains limited. In this paper, we propose STeReO (Speech and Text Reranking Orchestrator), a reranker based on speech and text retrievers that aggregates disparate modality databases. To address the lack of specialized training data, we first curate a dataset comprising queries, mixed-modality evidence, and their corresponding relevance ranks. We then train the reranker and evaluate its effectiveness in both single-modality and mixed-modality scenarios. Our results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm excels at selecting the most relevant evidence, thereby significantly improving downstream question-answering performance.

86. When the Canonical Completion Is Wrong: Formalizing and Measuring the Jump in Large Language Models

Authors: Dai Shi , Xiaoyu Li , José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26187
Abstract:

Whether large language models (LLMs) can perform the abductive leap from evidence to a new system of axioms, commonly referred to as a jump, has recently attracted considerable debate. A prominent position holds that LLMs are structurally incapable of such jumps, while recent studies challenge both its mechanism and its evidence. However, the debate remains difficult to settle, since the field still lacks a formal definition of the jump and a measure to test either side. In this paper, we develop a formal account of the jump in four steps and measure the second. The steps ask what the default completion of partial data is, when abandoning it is forced, when the abandonment is correct, and how successive jumps compound. Specifically, we define a jump instance as a finite extension problem with a machine-checked certificate that a correct completion exists, is unique up to renaming, and differs from the canonical completion of the data. The canonical completion is given by the left and right Kan extensions and is also what models produce without constraints, so it serves as the default. We prove that jump instances are well-posed and establish a family theorem that certifies instances of unbounded difficulty without enumeration. We further formalize when a jump is correct and how successive jumps compound. Finally, we run the measurement on nine certified instances and four frontier models. The Kan-default rate is zero in all 248 constrained trials, so the models do jump at this step and abandon the excluded default every time. Failures at higher difficulty stem from exhausted reasoning budgets or constraint errors, never from reverting to the default. These results indicate that the second step is not the bottleneck. If the disputed incapacity is real, it lies in generating the constraints or inventing the framework. Code can be found at: this https URL .

87. Investigating the Influence of Prompt and Response Languages on LLM Content Generation

Authors: Thi Thanh Nhan Nguyen , Mai Khoi Tieu , Michael A. Riegler , Pål Halvorsen , Thu Nguyen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26186
Abstract:

This study examines how prompt and response language influence the behavior of large language models. Using five models, we evaluated answers to 68 non translation questions across four language conditions: English to English, English to Norwegian, Norwegian to Norwegian, and Norwegian to English. After removing refused items, the dataset contains 1348 responses. We measure length differences with Cohen d, semantic fidelity with LabSE cosine similarity, and cross lingual keyword overlap with both raw and soft Jaccard. Prompt language has a strong effect on response length. With English output, Norwegian prompts shorten responses by about thirty seven percent. With Norwegian output, English prompts shorten responses by about forty one percent. The largest cross lingual contrast shows a reduction in word count but a smaller reduction in tokens, reflecting tokenizer differences. Despite variation in length, semantic similarity remains high, and soft Jaccard reveals substantial conceptual overlap that raw Jaccard does not capture. Effect sizes vary across models, indicating heterogeneity. Prompt language is not neutral and systematically shapes output length and lexical realization, with implications for multilingual prompt design.

88. PACEShop: Evaluating Personalized, Actionable, Compositional, and Evidence-grounded Shopping Assistants

Authors: Weimin Lyu , Chen Luo , Guangrui Li , Yaochen Xie , Dhineshkumar Ramasubbu , Arief Koesdwiady , Wanqiu Long , Hansu Gu , Yutong Chen , Zheshen Wang , Dakuo Wang , Yi Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26180
Abstract:

Shopping assistants are shifting from ranked product lists toward structured decision support, where systems must synthesize shopper context, product evidence, and next-step guidance into a coherent recommendation experience. This changes the unit of evaluation: a fluent response can still fail by ignoring shopper context, contradicting itself across components, or leaving defects too vague to localize. Existing personalization, grounding, and LLM-as-a-judge benchmarks cover pieces of this problem, but they do not define a joint evaluation target for structured shopping-assistant responses. We formulate this missing evaluation target as PACE: Personalized, Actionable, Compositional, and Evidence-grounded evaluation. We instantiate PACE with two artifacts: PACEShop, a benchmark dataset that makes the target measurable through 22,625 controlled records with structured personas, auditable evidence pools, GOOD/BAD labels, and gold defect family and location annotations; and PACEJudge, a training-free judging protocol that makes the target reportable through a structured output contract. Our experiments show that generic judges can recognize broad quality but fail to recover the diagnostic fields required for PACE; PACEShop makes these failures verifiable, and PACEJudge improves persona-source, cross-component, grounding, and family/location closure without retraining, showing that realistic shopping-assistant evaluation requires a task-matched output contract rather than only a stronger backbone or scalar prompt.

89. A Multi-Framework Comparison of Outline Stages in Long-Form Generation with LLMs

Authors: Yifan Song
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26177
Abstract:

Long-form generation exposes fundamental limitations of large language models. Even 70B-parameter models exhibit length collapse at 16k-token outputs, and multi-chapter stories frequently trigger the attribute drift characteristic of the lost-in-the-middle'' effect. Theoutline-first, write-later’’ paradigm has gained wide adoption, yet existing research evaluates the final writing rather than the outline itself, conflating two evaluation objects that should be decoupled. We construct a unified head-to-head benchmark covering 7 representative long-form generation frameworks across 3 generation granularities – single-chapter, multi-chapter, and whole-book – and propose an anchor-based LLM-as-a-judge protocol that directly assesses outlines against the source text on a 5-point anchored scale. Across 21 framework-granularity cells, no single framework dominates; performance depends on the match between a framework’s intrinsic output form and the target granularity. SuperWriter ranks first in the length-constrained single-chapter mode, but this advantage degrades in whole-book mode. The outline-side ranking correlates only moderately with the writing-side ranking, supporting the outline–writing decoupling principle. Compute constraints limit the writing-side evaluation to a subset of cases; follow-up experiments will expand the sample size and add cross-model evaluators to enable stronger statistical inference.

90. Lost in Compression: A Controlled Cross-Lingual Audit of Extractive Prompt Compressors

Authors: Mantas Lukauskas
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26175
Abstract:

Extractive prompt compression promises to cut LLM inference costs by removing low-information tokens, and learned compressors such as LLMLingua-2 report strong results on English benchmarks. Most other languages already pay a token premium: the same content costs 1.3-1.8x more tokens than in English. We ask whether compression closes or widens this gap. Using fully parallel data in ten languages spanning five scripts, with controls budget-matched in the target model’s tokenizer, we audit four learned compressors against four deterministic baselines, on eleven target models from ten vendors (over 250,000 evaluation calls). Three of the compressors are trained with English supervision (LLMLingua-2 XLM-R/mBERT; Kompress-v2 from the production Headroom stack); the fourth, XProvence, is trained multilingually. First, the transfer gap is real, replicates across target models and compressor backbones, and is strongly rate-dependent: at a 0.33 keep-rate English retains 57-62% of normalized context utilization while Lithuanian retains 10-24% and Chinese essentially none, despite Chinese having the smallest token premium. Second, the gap tracks compression supervision data, not architecture. All three English-trained compressors show it, deterministic methods show no comparable gap, and the multilingually trained XProvence v1 shows none. Its v2 release, retrained on translated data, empties 92% of Chinese contexts at its aggressive threshold without any warning. Third, in a harder long-context setting, aggressive learned compression drives compressed contexts to or below no-context utility in three of five non-English languages. A translate-then-compress pipeline matches or beats native compression at roughly half the token cost in three of five tested languages. We release all code, compressions, and model outputs. Safe compression budgets are much smaller outside English.

91. DRL: A Deterministic Relational Middleware Layer for Transaction-Safe Enterprise NL2SQL Under Schema-Graph Scaling

Authors: Sanjay Mishra , Divya Chukkapalli , Ganesh R. Naik
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26172
Abstract:

Deploying natural-language interfaces over enterprise OLTP catalogs fails at scale because semantic parsers collapse under schema-graph scaling, inflating context beyond stable LLM attention budgets. We present DRL (Deterministic Relational Middleware Layer), a safe pipeline interposing between front-ends and SQL backends. DRL comprises dynamic context pruning, relational AST typing, and transactional safeguard verification (EXPLAIN gating and NULL guards) to bound context and flag operational silent divergence (SDop). We evaluate DRL on PostgreSQL and MySQL, contributing (i) an OLTP schema-graph scaling model, (ii) a 1,000-pair Workload Verification Suite, (iii) baselines B0-B3, and (iv) an enterprise NL2SQL failure taxonomy. On PostgreSQL, schema-linked hints (B1) yield a 76% context reduction over naive full-catalog prompting (B0); DRL’s dynamic router (B2) reaches a 92% reduction at pruning p95 = 0.58 ms and middleware p95 = 4.6 ms. GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and Gemini 2.5 Flash achieve 52.9%, 52.8%, and 52.1% execution match under a corrected evaluation harness; SDop flags 89-100% of false-positive EX-passing queries. GPT-4o failures are dominated by semantic/filter errors (254/471), while column hallucination is a minor factor (47/471). Crucially, a single regex defect in our evaluation post-processor silently suppressed accuracy and manufactured a false 4-10% cross-vendor gap that vanished when corrected, showing that benchmark code deserves the same scrutiny as the models it scores. DRL reframes enterprise NL2SQL as systems engineering - context bounding, verification, and plan-aware admission - not a leaderboard exercise.

92. Hallucinations in LLMs: A Lifecycle-Based Survey of Causes, Detection, Mitigation, and Prevention

Authors: Naveen Lamba , Sanju Tiwari , Manas Gaur
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26168
Abstract:

The lifecycle of hallucination in LLMs is a concept that enables building solid frameworks on the control and reliability of LLMs in high-stakes environments, including health, legal, and scientific research. Although previous surveys have primarily focused on detection or mitigation, this survey provides a lifecycle-based overview of the hallucinations in the LLMs, their cause, detection, mitigation, and this http URL propose a three-fold categorization of hallucinations across the LLM lifecycle: data-related, training-related, and inference-related, which is consistent with the lifecycle of the development of the LLM. Each of these stages is discussed regarding the cause of hallucinations, their detection, and the ways they can be addressed under specific mitigation or prevention interventions. In addition, we discuss the available benchmark data using a number of parameters so as to establish their suitability in identifying, restricting and managing hallucinations. The survey provides researchers and practitioners with a standardized framework to understand, diagnose, and cure hallucinations in a systematic system to present actionable data to build safer and more reliable LLMs.

93. Improving LLM Interpretability with User-Centric Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Authors: Philipp Schröppel
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26166
Abstract:

Advancing reasoning capabilities allow large language models (LLMs) to tackle increasingly complex problems, while reasoning traces - intermediate steps toward solutions - open up high-stakes applications by enabling human inspection of AI decision-making. However, current approaches prioritize model performance over human interpretability, limiting effective human-AI collaboration. In this study, we design and evaluate a human-centered approach that structures reasoning traces based on self-contained, verifiable steps, enabling users to independently assess and correct AI reasoning. Our approach uses XML-like tags to encode reasoning content and metadata, facilitating targeted feedback. Evaluation on mathematical reasoning tasks shows our approach maintains equivalent performance to standard Chain-of-Thought reasoning while enhancing interpretability. User studies demonstrate significant improvements in perceived usefulness and ease of use. This work advances understanding of how user-centric design of LLM outputs can better serve human collaboration needs in high-stakes AI deployments.

94. Using Poly-Encoders for Computationally Efficient Automated Creativity Assessment

Authors: Sam Grouchnikov , Phillip Gregory , Jiho Noh
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26165
Abstract:

Automated creativity assessment has been a long standing challenge, with traditional methods often being resource intensive or lacking practical accuracy. We introduce a novel approach by using Poly-Encoder for computationally efficient and accurate automated creativity assessment. We fine-tuned a Poly-Encoder on a public dataset from the Scientific Creative Thinking Test, comprised of approximately 18,000 human-rated question responses. Our method leverages small pre-trained BERT encoders, achieving performance comparable to fine-tuned Large Language Models while significantly reducing computational demands. Experiments with the BERT-family models and poly-code counts achieved Pearson correlations of up to r = 0.74, 95% CI [0.73, 0.75] with human raters, matching the performance of resource intensive LLMs. This study bridges the gap between high performance and computational efficiency, potentially enabling widespread implementation of automated creativity assessment on accessible consumer-grade hardware. With some limitations, our findings suggest that Poly-Encoders are a promising alternative to LLMs for practical, scalable creativity assessment in various contexts, especially educational.

95. From Sound to Symptom: Real-Time Respiratory Signal Understanding for Conversational Healthcare Agents

Authors: Tanmay Laud , Herprit Mahal , Subhabrata Mukherjee
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26163
Abstract:

Cough events during live spoken conversations carry clinically valuable respiratory signals, yet existing dialogue systems treat them as acoustic noise to be discarded. We present HealthCUES (Clinical Understanding from Embodied Sounds), a streaming pipeline for paralinguistic respiratory monitoring in real-time conversational agents, a capability that, to the best of our knowledge, is absent from all prior systems. HealthCUES processes audio through a rolling buffer aligned with dialogue turn boundaries, enabling sub-second event detection without interrupting conversational flow. Beyond binary cough detection, the system provides fine-grained analytics: (i) differentiation between coughing and throat clearing, (ii) cough subtype classification (dry, wet, barking, whooping) with confidence scores, and (iii) temporal duration estimation with start-end boundaries. To prevent alert fatigue, HealthCUES introduces dialogue-aware gating mechanisms that modulate triggering based on conversational context. The system leverages Qwen3Omni, a multimodal large language model (MLLM), with constrained structured outputs, decomposing cough analysis into parallel prediction tasks for independent prompt optimization. Evaluation on 847 in-house conversational audio segments demonstrates 93\% F1 for cough detection, 0.75 weighted-F1 for wet/dry subtype classification, and average end-to-end latency of 340ms; external validation on the AMI meeting corpus confirms robust cough, throat-clearing, and speech separation in the presence of speech (0.91 macro-F1). A user study with licensed healthcare professionals confirms the clinical relevance of subtype information and the system’s utility in telehealth workflows.

96. Mutual Debiasing via Dual-Seed Comparison for Probabilistic Sampling in Large Language Models

Authors: Zihao Guo , Hongtao Lv , Chaoli Zhang , Laiguo Yin , Lei Liu , Yonghui Xu , Lizhen Cui
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26161
Abstract:

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in reasoning and decision-making, high-fidelity probabilistic sampling remains a persistent challenge. When generating random variables, LLMs consistently exhibit systematic biases that warp the target probability distributions. Current approaches often rely on a single, self-generated seed, which inherits model-specific biases. To overcome this vulnerability, we introduce Dual-Seed Comparison (DSC), a transparent, tool-free protocol that utilizes two independent LLM-generated seeds to neutralize bias. DSC compares the character-level ordinal values of the two seeds to construct a bit sequence, converts and normalizes this sequence into a pseudo-uniform variate, and then maps the variate to the target distribution through the inverse cumulative distribution function (CDF). Empirical results show that DSC substantially outperforms existing methods across 96\% of evaluated settings. Beyond direct sampling, task-adapted variants based on the DSC comparison operator improve distributional control in MCQ generation and attribute-constrained text-to-image prompting.

97. Self-Generated Text Recognition: Quality Heuristics, Cross-Task Transfer, and Downstream Bias in LLM Evaluation

Authors: Jesse St. Amand , Callum Canavan , Sohaib Imran , Joseph Hewson , Aaron Lutz , Shi Feng , Puria Radmard , Lennie Wells
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26159
Abstract:

Self-Generated Text Recognition (SGTR)–the ability of an LLM to identify its own outputs–poses risks to AI safeguards that rely on LLMs as evaluators or monitors. Specifically, an LLM may recognize outputs from other copies of the same model and make biased judgments or collude outright. Prior work has drawn conflicting conclusions about whether current models possess significant SGTR capabilities. We reconcile these findings by identifying key experimental design choices–which we term operationalizations–that drive divergent results. Evaluating 13-21 models across six operationalizations, we find that accuracy varies substantially with evaluation format (pairwise vs. individual assessments of text), conversation structure (presenting candidate text in user tags vs. assistant tags), and the domain of the task used to generate candidate text (e.g., coding vs. summarization). We corroborate previous observations that a quality heuristic–models attributing authorship to text they perceive as higher quality–is a dominant confound. We also find that improving a model’s SGTR performance via SFT in one evaluation configuration can generalize to others. Training for SGTR additionally causes models to prefer their own outputs when acting as a judge in the AlpacaEval framework. Finally, we discuss the implications of our evaluations for the safety of future AI systems: our work suggests that, despite confounds, some models possess practical SGTR capabilities, and that training a model for SGTR in one setting can affect its self-recognition and self-preference more generally. We conclude that SGTR should be monitored and considered in the design of safety-critical AI applications.

98. VFA: Empowering Multilingual MLLMs via Vision-Free Adaptation

Authors: Yixia Li , Yaqing Shi , Zhiwen Ruan , Dongdong Zhang , Lingjie Jiang , Shaohan Huang , Yun Chen , Guanhua Chen , Furu Wei
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26155
Abstract:

Multimodal large language models have advanced rapidly, yet most remain English-centric, as scaling multilingual multimodal instruction tuning is limited by the scarcity and high cost of high-quality non-English image-text supervision. Although multilingual text data is abundant, naive textual fine-tuning can disrupt vision-language alignment and induce catastrophic forgetting. We propose Vision-Free Adaptation (VFA), a framework that decouples multilingual language enhancement from visual alignment by composing complementary task vectors over a shared LLM backbone. Specifically, we fine-tune a base LLM on multilingual text data to derive a multilingual task vector, which is then merged with the vision-aligned task vector of an MLLM. Experiments on five MLLMs across six multilingual multimodal benchmarks show consistent improvements while preserving both general multimodal and text-only capabilities. Moreover, using less than 2% of the text data, VFA narrows the gap to the fully multimodal-trained model, demonstrating its data efficiency.

99. Evaluating AI Generated Summaries for Cancer Patients

Authors: Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad , Kim Shyu , Leon Oliver , Fergus Sleight , Paul Landau
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26154
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into digital health platforms to generate summaries of complex medical data. Although these models can improve patient engagement and communication, these systems also raise concerns about accuracy, faithfulness, and safety in clinical contexts. In this study, we evaluate AI-generated summaries within a cancer patient care application using a dual assessment framework. Human domain experts, including oncology clinicians and patient-facing care staff, provided ground-truth evaluations of summary quality along dimensions of accuracy, clinical relevance, and readability. In parallel, we employed LLMs serving as evaluators (LLM-as-a-judge). Some limitations were identified in the generated summaries e.g., occasional omissions and minor inaccuracies. These were systematically analyzed and used to iteratively improve prompt design, grounding, and safety guardrails.

100. Artificial Intelligence Models Can Predict and Collaboratively Modulate Human Memory Search

Authors: Eric Lacosse , Mariana Duarte , Graham Todd , Peter M. Todd , Daniel C. McNamee
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26152
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit unprecedented natural language generation and many text-based problem-solving capabilities. Indeed, in many language-based tasks, for example routine coding, these artificial intelligence models have reduced, or even eliminated, the need for human input. But rather than replacing human cognitive effort, LLMs may instead serve as cognitive tools to extend human abilities, particularly when they are engaged in a task requiring open-ended conceptual exploration and creative ideation. However, we are yet to understand how these models may enhance such generative human cognitive abilities in human–AI interactions. In this study, we explore and evaluate the ability of LLMs to follow and enhance human mental trajectories during semantic memory search. To test this, we use the semantic fluency task (SFT), a classic cognitive paradigm requiring generative semantic memory retrieval that has long served to characterize convergent and divergent thinking in humans. We demonstrate that an LLM’s abilities to track and predict human memory trajectories in this task exceed those of other humans.

101. Beyond Accuracy: A Qualitative Analysis of Vision-Language Models for Hate Speech Detection in Memes

Authors: Muhammad Jawad Chowdhury , Adiba Hasan , Ishrak Hossain , Shahriar Ivan , Sabbir Ahmed
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26143
Abstract:

Memes have turned out to be a powerful tool through which individuals share their ideas concerning contemporary social and political problems. Their anonymity, as well as their ability to go viral, make them a powerful medium for spreading hate. It remains very difficult to identify such complex and context-dependent hate speech. Although they display excellent performance on multimodal tasks, vision-language models (VLMs) tend to ignore context, irony, and other subtle cues that play a key role in identifying hateful memes. In this work, we present a qualitative analysis of four state-of-the-art VLMs: LLaVA-7B, Qwen-VL, GPT-4o mini, and Claude 3 Haiku. We evaluate these models under zero-shot and few-shot prompting to examine how contextual framing influences their outputs. Our analysis goes beyond simple classification accuracy and focuses on a qualitative evaluation of the models’ generated justifications, providing a more in-depth understanding of their thought processes and constraints when dealing with hateful memes.

102. Position Is All You Need: A Free Lunch Token Compression Strategy for MLLM-based Referring Expression Segmentation

Authors: Yuhan Liu , Yixiong Zou , Yuhua Li , Ruixuan Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26142
Abstract:

Referring Expression Segmentation (RES) aims to generate pixel-wise segmentation masks from complex and implicit textual queries. While recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have substantially boosted RES performance, their prohibitive computational overhead remains a critical bottleneck, which, however, is rarely explored. To fill this gap, we first evaluate typical token compression methods on this task and observe a surprising performance degradation. In this paper, we aim to understand this phenomenon for a solution. By extensive experiments, we find that token compression for RES requires preserving the original position embeddings and local neighboring spatial structures, indicating that visual token position information is far more critical than in other tasks. Building on this insight, we ask: Can we design the token compression method purely based on the position information? Therefore, we propose PAYN, a plug-and-play, training-free token compression method that relies solely on position information. PAYN retains tokens that are adequately distributed in every local neighboring region while strictly preserving original positional indices, thereby maintaining spatial relational consistency. Experiments on multiple RES benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms existing token compression methods, verifying that position is indeed all you need for token compression in the MLLM-based RES task. Codes are avaliable at this https URL .

103. Syntax vs. Semantics: How Transformers Learn Deep Dependencies

Authors: Jiangrui Zhao , Xiaoting Du
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26139
Abstract:

Large Language Models demonstrate remarkable syntactic fluency, yet the optimization dynamics governing their acquisition of deep semantic dependencies remain poorly understood. We propose a mechanistic framework that models this learning process as a competition between Surface Statistics and Deep Semantics. Our theoretical analysis identifies a ``Gradient Starvation” phenomenon where the error signals for sparse semantic dependencies are actively suppressed during early optimization. This suppression impedes the learning of structural reasoning and causes its emergence to manifest as a sudden phase transition. Furthermore, this framework offers a mechanistic basis for the effectiveness of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) strategies. By externalizing intermediate reasoning steps into concrete tokens, CoT effectively bypasses the suppression regime inherent to implicit reasoning. We validate these findings across scales ranging from toy transformers to production models (Llama-3.1-8B, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B). Finally, guided by this theory, we propose a topology-aligned contrastive objective that explicitly rectifies the gradient geometry. Experiments on variable binding tasks demonstrate that our method achieves an improvement that is over 2x larger than that obtained via standard cross-entropy fine-tuning.

104. From SQL to Knowledge Graphs: An LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Approach with Data Schema Improvement

Authors: Dinh-Khanh Pham , Quy-Anh Dang , Lam Mai Thanh , Khanh Bui , Truong-Son Hy
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26117
Abstract:

RDBMS (Relational Database Management System) databases face several limitations, including slow execution with multi-hop queries and a lack of explainability by graphical interpretations. In contrast, Graph database offers a more intuitive and efficient data schema that performs faster execution on large datasets. Most existing RDBMS conversion pipelines focus on running traditional loading commands and relying on Cypher queries. However, the efficiency of using an LLM to generate an effective graph data schema, significantly reducing the ambiguity of the graph database, remains underexplored in the current research literature. This paper presents a novel algorithm that bridges RDBMS and graph database by using a novel LLM-powered ETL agent to standardize table and column names before saving them to the Data Mart. A Multi-Agent System generates a looping discussion between ETL, Analyzer, and Graph agents to optimize the final design through an iterative process of suggesting and scoring the graph database schema. We ensure that the final graph database meets three criteria before being accepted for data conversion: Accuracy, Groundedness, and Faithfulness. This system demonstrates an effective pipeline to automatically convert a tabular database into a graph database through a comprehensive end-to-end process. Our study highlights notable efficiency in using the converted graph database, which is measured on 1,081 samples of the BFSI dataset across three levels of complexity (easy, medium, and hard). Specifically, CypherAgent achieves an 85.6% accuracy for Q&A tasks using a Graph database, which is 12.12% higher than the accuracy achieved by an SQLAgent on the RDBMS database type PostgreSQL, for all queries. Additionally, the Graph database demonstrates faster performance, reducing latency by approximately 3 times.

105. Exploring the Role of LLMs in HPC Programming: A Survey

Authors: Strahinja Ljaljevic , Josep Jorba , Sergio Iserte
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26110
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are emerging as promising assistants in High-Performance Computing (HPC), where programming remains complex and expertise-intensive. This survey systematically reviews their application across five categories: code generation, parallelization and optimization, frameworks and architectures, evaluation and benchmarking, and broader challenges. The analysis highlights both opportunities and limitations: while general-purpose LLMs perform reasonably well on serial and OpenMP-like tasks, they fall short in distributed paradigms such as MPI, where correctness and scalability are critical. Domain-specialized models (e.g., HPC-Coder, HPC-GPT, chatHPC) achieve higher accuracy through fine-tuning, curated datasets, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), yet their scope remains narrow and their evaluations largely limited to benchmarks or micro-kernels. The broader picture is one of dual potential and fragility: LLMs can lower barriers to entry, accelerate prototyping, and support code modernization, but they remain brittle under production-level requirements where correctness, performance portability, and scaling cannot be compromised. We conclude that LLMs are unlikely to replace HPC experts in the near term but are positioned to become powerful collaborators in the software development pipeline. Their effective deployment will require richer datasets, integration with performance analysis and schedulers, rigorous evaluation frameworks, and governance structures that ensure transparency and trust. The convergence of AI and HPC should therefore be understood as a long-term, co-evolutionary process, where each advance uncovers new challenges and opportunities for reshaping scientific software development.

LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-08-28

1. CorporateBench: Large-Scale Q&A Benchmarking with Temporal Knowledge Bases

2. Sophistication in GenAI Use: Field Evidence from a Large Firm

3. LLMs Can Design Near-Optimal OR Algorithms

4. BrailleBench: Investigating Multi-Criteria Braille Comprehension in Large Language Models

5. What Makes Good Agentic Data? An ACE Lens on Data Generation for LLM Agents

6. Calibrated Enough to Know, Not Calibrated to Act: Fabricated Evidence Makes LLM Agents Commit to the Unknowable

7. When Tool Outputs Become Commands: Separating Action Induction from Runtime Authorization in Tool-Augmented LLM Agents

8. GRAIN: Bridging Name and Narrative Shifts in Real-World Graph Reasoning through Invariance-Rewarded Agentic RL

9. TransMeme: A Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Cultural Meme Transcreation

10. LAAF: A Layered Accountability Architecture Framework for LLM Applications

11. pro-team at LLMs4OL 2026 Tasks Flagship and Reuse: Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Vocabulary-Constrained Filtering for Ontology Learning

12. Omni-Interactive Universal Embedder

13. DSA: Evidence-Aware LLM-Agent Orchestration for Multi-Market Stock Research

14. From Atomic to Agentic: Towards Interpretable Evaluation of LLMs’ Agentic Mathematical Capabilities

15. Counterfactual Bias Testing for Application Tracking System

16. Evaluating human and LLM screening workflows in a conceptually complex scoping review: Recall–workload trade-offs and run-to-run consistency

17. C-Unseen: Weak Signal Detection in Dynamic Temporal Knowledge Graphs via LLM Reasoning

18. BekchiAI: Measuring, Observing, and Controlling LLM Agents in One Click

19. LiveSim: Simulating Environment-Shaped Users in Multi-Agent Live-Stream Ecosystems

20. SymbolLKG: Towards Verifiable Logical Reasoning via Logical Knowledge Graph and Symbolic Solvers

21. Decoupling Planning and Control for Instructable Agents

22. AI Control Scientist: LLM-driven Agentic System for Automated Control Design

23. Discovering Relationships in Data Lakes Using Large Language Models: An Industrial Case

24. AgentFold: Closed-Loop Agentic Search for Protein Folding Model Design

25. Graph-Guided Selective Unlearning for Language Models: Controlling Support Routes Beyond Forget Seeds

26. Knowing When Not to Reuse: Conditional Experience Transfer in Autonomous LLM Post-Training

27. AgentJudgeBench: A Multi-Difficulty Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Judges on Agentic Tool-Calling

28. DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows

29. Don’t Overthink, Don’t Underthink: Toward Adaptive Reasoning in Agentic AI

30. FaithSieve: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Math Proofs with Faithful Formal Evidence

31. Approved Too Late: Verdict Staleness in LLM-Guarded Self-Adaptive Systems

32. Assessing mentalization in humans and large language models

33. SKILL.state: Scalable Long-Horizon Agent Skills

34. The Reasoning Tax: Token Economics of LLM Reasoning Across Task Types and Deployment Contexts

35. LLM Agents for Time-Series: A Survey

36. Benchmarking AI Agents for Hardware Design Automation via MCP Tool Calling

37. Agentic AI for operating scientific instruments for nanoscale characterization

38. AffectOmni: RL-Verifiable People-Centric Grounded Affective Reasoning for Social and Art-Related Scenes

39. Is Your Neighborhood Safe? Place-based Stigma in Large Language Models’ Urban Safety Judgments

40. Why did My Robot Just Change Personality? Prompting Guidelines for a Grounded Robot Persona in LLM-Based HRI

41. AI Revealed Preferences

42. Refusal Is Not Robustness: Auditing Confident Fabrication in Large Language Models on a Provably Uninformative Clinical Pain Speech Transcript

43. A Task-Centric Ontology and Deterministic Domain Rules as a Verifiable Core for AI-Assisted Chemistry Problem Solving

44. GROUND: Reducing Hallucinations in LLM-Based Enterprise Analytics Through Governed Semantic Definitions

45. EEG-to-Report: An Annotation and Feature-Text Framework for Training Language Models on Clinical EEG

46. Leveraging Large Language Models for Systematic Literature Review of Disease Spread Models

47. LLMs for Academic Workflows: An Evaluation of Literature Reviews Generated with Short and Long Context Windows of LLMs

48. CIFQA: A Deterministic Tool-Grounded Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Financial Query Answering

49. PICasso: An AI-Enabled Design Framework for Autonomous Optimization of Silicon Photonic Devices

50. Large Models for Battery Prognostics and Health Management: A Review and Future Roadmap

51. Standalone LLM and a Pre-specified Agentic Pipeline for Explaining ICU Mortality Predictions: a Feasibility Study on the eICU Demo Dataset

52. SWE-Prime: Fewer Trajectories, Better Performance

53. From Static to Dynamic: Benchmarking Real-World Code Review with MCR-Bench

54. RedEvoAgent: Automatic Red-Teaming Agent with Experience-Driven Skill Evolution

55. Persona-Execution Separation: An Architecture Pattern for Evolving LLM Agents under Execution Audit

56. How Language Models Organize and Structure Moral Knowledge

57. Making Clinical Language Models Auditable: Concept-Guided Fine-Tuning for Robust Prediction

58. Difference-in-Differences on a Censored Rating Scale Can Manufacture an Effect: Evidence from a Pre-Registered LLM-Judge Audit

59. Compositional Online Learning for Semantic Data Processing Systems

60. STEP: State-Aware Task Estimation and Planning with Multi-Modal LLMs for Human-Robot Collaboration

61. PACE: A Unified Condense-and-Extract Paradigm for Fast VLM Inference

62. LLMs in Digital EDA: A perspective on shifting roles from Generation to Orchestration

63. Safety Does Not Compose: Non-Decaying Loop State for Autonomous LLM Agents

64. Performance Foundations of Parallel & Distributed Reasoning Language Models

65. FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets

66. When Memory Takes Gradients: Collaborative Vector Memory for Agentic Recommender Systems

67. PLCBench: Can Autonomous LLM Agents Turn PLC Access into Sustained Physical Impact?

68. From Reasoning to Pixels: Grounded Medical Multimodal LLMs for VQA and Segmentation

69. MedFG-VQA: Low-Frequency Memory and Graph Attention for Lightweight Medical VQA

70. Beyond Execution: Auditing Experimental Fidelity in LLM-Driven Scientific Research

71. Rethinking Message Passing as Retrieval for Text-Attributed Graph Learning

72. AesCanvas: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Aesthetic Critique and Contextual Suitability

73. FOCUS & RePAIR: Mitigating Text Degeneration via Token-Level Guidance for Pruned Large Language Models

74. Do LLMs Understand Personality? Rethinking Persona Fidelity Evaluation through Structured Behavioral Inference

75. J-Zero: Unified Challenger–Solver–Judge Co-Evolution from Zero Data

76. Zero-Shot Self-Orchestration with Ledger-Based Control for Improved LLM Coding Performance

77. Diff Mining: Logit Differences Reveal Finetuning Objectives

78. Co-Evolving Structured Knowledge and Reasoning in Language Models

79. Knowledge-Verified Emergent Deception in LLM Agents Under Conflicting Incentives