LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-08-17

1. Handover of In-Context Learning State Across Session Boundaries

Authors: Masahiro Kato , Taka Kato
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14528
Abstract:

This study investigates the methodological and theoretical properties of session handover in applications that use large language models. A task may continue in a new session when the context reaches the model’s input limit, when the application restarts, or when another agent is asked to finish the task. The application must then decide which information from the earlier session to pass on. We formulate handover as the transfer of a task-relative in-context learning (ICL) state and distinguish exact recovery of earlier material from preservation of the target distribution. Under an exogeneity condition, predictive equivalence characterizes the coarsest deterministic sufficient handover and gives a fixed-length bit requirement. The analysis isolates the effects of the memory constraint, the writer, and the continuation procedure, and quantifies the cost of writing before the realized downstream query is known. We propose a three-part record that stores decisions and constraints exactly, uses task-justified statistics for repeated evidence, and retains original observations whose effect is not preserved by those statistics. Gaussian linear regression gives an exact finite-dimensional handover and finite-bit perturbation bounds, while nonparametric regression gives upper and lower bounds that relate memory to squared prediction error. These results provide a theory and method for deciding what a handover must retain and how its memory requirement depends on the continuation task.

2. Split the Labor: Separating Evidence Interpretation from Decision Aggregation

Authors: Zhelun Wu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14509
Abstract:

Systems that ask a language model to reach a conclusion from many sources usually concatenate them into one prompt. This conflates two operations with different requirements. Interpreting a source rewards capacity and context. Combining interpretations rewards fixed arithmetic, comparability across instances, and the option to return nothing. Once separated, the design problem becomes the interface between them. We propose a four-field evidence tuple (hypothesis, reliability bucket, rationale, provenance) and show that fixing it determines both halves. The separation also reveals a failure mode in how such systems combine, which we call count-scale drift. Thresholding a sum of unnormalized weights is exactly posterior thresholding, but at an operating point that slides with the number of sources consulted. The slide grows with reader reliability. When source reliabilities differ, the vote rule and the posterior order instances differently, and no threshold reconciles them. Pooling calibrated log-likelihood ratios addresses both problems. The fix is arithmetic rather than architectural, and applies to a class of rules beyond language models: score-summing triage engines, diagnostic panels scored by counting positives, and additive multi-signal detectors. We then instantiate the principle twice on one longitudinal corpus, once after outcomes resolve and once before. The same partition helps in both, at different granularities: over reading in the first, over learning capacity in the second. There, a small sequence encoder on an easy auxiliary objective plus a tree ensemble carrying the censored survival loss reaches 0.921 AUPRC against 0.805 for a hand-crafted baseline. We separate what transfers from what must be re-estimated per domain, and state five predictions that would falsify the framework, three negative results, and which comparisons remain confounded.

3. SheetCompass: Hierarchical Relation Graphs for Agentic Spreadsheet Reasoning

Authors: Panjing He , Mingyue Cheng , Yucong Luo , Li Li , Xiaohan Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14452
Abstract:

Spreadsheets are widely used to organize, analyze, and manipulate semi-structured data, yet automated spreadsheet reasoning remains challenging for large language models (LLMs). Real-world workbooks often contain implicit cross-table associations, fine-grained column dependencies, and complex spatial layouts. Existing methods typically flatten these multidimensional structures into sequential strings, losing important intra-sheet boundaries and inter-sheet semantics. Consequently, LLMs cannot exploit the global spatial context that human experts naturally use when inspecting spreadsheets. We propose SheetCompass, a graph-guided and memory-driven agentic framework for spreadsheet reasoning and automation. SheetCompass explicitly models structural relationships within and across worksheets while maintaining task-relevant information in memory, enabling agents to reason more effectively over complex workbooks.

4. Knowing When to Stop: Bayesian Optimal Stopping for LLM Evaluations

Authors: Toby D. Pilditch
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14425
Abstract:

LLM evaluations often use fixed sampling budgets, testing every item the same number of times even after estimates are precise. We introduce optstop, a precision-based adaptive stopping framework that treats evaluation as a sequential measurement problem: keep sampling where uncertainty remains high, and stop where estimates are precise or stable enough. The framework builds on hierarchical Bayesian inference, supports binary, ordinal, and continuous outcomes, and keeps every benchmark item eligible for sampling, without requiring a calibrated item bank. It runs live or retrospectively, and includes a safeguard that samples more cautiously as measured performance approaches zero, where rare successes matter most. In an illustrative 200-item, 10-epoch evaluation, it removes 57%-97% of planned trials across nine validation settings, with overall conclusions equivalent to the full run. These results show that LLM evaluation compute can be allocated by uncertainty rather than by fixed repetition counts, with the magnitude of savings depending on evaluation design.

5. LLMs Don’t Pay for the Jump

Authors: Paras Balani , Subhrakanta Panda
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14397
Abstract:

Zahavy [2026] argues that Large Language Models, despite their capabilities in induction and deduction, cannot perform the abductive “Jump” that produced Einstein’s equivalence principle, and attributes this limitation to the absence of embodied simulation. Zheng-Xin [2026] and Farmer [2026] question whether embodiment is necessary for abduction, pointing to alternative routes to General Relativity and forms of abduction that require no sensorimotor grounding. Max Planck resolved the blackbody radiation problem in 1900. Planck’s move to E = h{\nu} required no embodied simulation. It was motivated by a mathematical consequence of classical theory, an infinite predicted energy for a finite measured quantity, that could not be physically accepted. We show that neither induction nor deduction could have produced the postulate and argue that its adoption required a coupling between epistemic error and physical cost. We formalize this distinction through thermodynamic coupling and show that fixed-weight transformer inference lacks such coupling, regardless of model scale. This is consistent with empirical results showing that output entropy remains nearly unchanged across tasks with sharply increasing causal difficulty, even as accuracy falls from 100% to 17%. We therefore argue that the missing ingredient in machine abduction may lie deeper than embodiment: a system must have some physical mechanism through which epistemic error becomes costly enough to force revision.

6. Tripwire: Triggering Aligned Refusal via Statistically Certified Safety Neurons

Authors: Wei Zhao , Zhe Li , Peixin Zhang , Jun Sun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14392
Abstract:

Neuron- and path-level interventions offer the finest-grained route to defending large language models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks, yet existing methods fall short of this promise, i.e., they often compromise model utility significantly. Specifically, one line of work suppresses toxic neurons to erase harmful semantics, but since such semantics are distributed across the network, blocking every pathway forces a large intervention footprint. An alternative line of research focus on identify safety neurons using external classifiers. While promising, the existing approaches suffer from compromising neurons that are important for the model utility as well. Moreover, both approaches remain always on and thus perturb every benign request even when no attack is present. To address these limitations, we present \ours{}, a training-free defense that first identifies safety-specific neurons through per-neuron hypothesis tests under false-discovery-rate control together with a utility-specificity filter. Based on this identification, a trigger-style clamp holds the selected neurons at their harmful-conditional mean activations, injecting an internal harmful-input signal that triggers the refusal behavior learned during alignment. The clamp is then realized by two provably equivalent deployment modes, namely a detector-gated inference-time intervention and an offline bias-patch weight edit. Extensive experiments across four safety-aligned LLMs and four representative attacks demonstrate that \ours{} reduces the average attack success rate to at most 2.0\% while incurring a utility drop of only 0.5\% to 5.3\% on MT-Bench, the smallest among all defenses. Code is available at this https URL .

7. AgentRewind: Recoverable Execution for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

Authors: Yu Zhuang , Kefei Chen , Yitong Duan , Shuxin Zheng , Jian Li , Xu-Yao Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14380
Abstract:

Many real-world tasks require LLM agents to interact with their environments over long execution horizons. Errors that occur early in execution may propagate through both the agent context and environment state, and their effects may be difficult to reverse through subsequent actions. Existing methods mainly seek to reduce such errors through plan refinement and safety checks but provide little support after errors occur. To enable recovery during long-horizon execution, we present AgentRewind, a runtime recovery framework that records aligned checkpoints of the agent context and controlled environment, allowing agents to return to an earlier state and resume execution with information from previous attempts. We also construct MettleBench, a benchmark for evaluating task completion and partial progress on long-horizon engineering assignments containing a series of related requirements. Experiments across tasks, multiple models, execution strategies, and agent harnesses show that AgentRewind improves task success rate and average checklist progress over the compared baselines.

8. ScienceFlow: A long-horizon agent for ML research, scientific discovery and beyond

Authors: Mingming Zhao , Jiqian Dong , Kangping Xu , Zadid Hasan , Chengrui Fan , Shan Jiang , Shuai Mao , Ting Lingya , Linyi Zou , Tailin Zhou , Yun Hin Chan , Wenkai Zhang , Zhanhong Zhou , Guowei Huang , Hongliang Li , Wenjing Cun , Zhitang Chen , Mingxuan Yuan , Yanhui Geng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14354
Abstract:

Enabling LLM agents to sustain productive, stable, and goal-aligned research over extended horizons is a central challenge for autonomous machine learning and scientific discovery, as progress hinges on continuously managing evolving state, exploration decisions, and computational resources. Pioneering autoresearch agents, despite great success, still lack mechanisms for continuity, recovery from dead ends, and value-driven compute allocation, which inherently undermines overall search efficiency, wastes computational resources, and lowers the chance of ultimate success. To bridge this gap, we introduce ScienceFlow, an end-to-end autoresearch agent framework that organizes long-horizon research work into research segments grounded in executable workspaces. It represents research progress as recoverable executable states, enabling efficient exploration, revision, and execution. Transitions between research segments are governed by Executable-State Transition through Re-Anchoring (ESTRA), which selects either the live state or an archived state as the next anchor and determines whether to continue or redirect the research trajectory. An evidence-aware execution controller allocates resources to physical jobs based on resource availability, remaining budget, and validated progress. We evaluate ScienceFlow on tasks spanning machine learning, scientific modeling, and mathematical optimization. Results on diverse long-horizon benchmarks demonstrate its ability to sustain effective research processes, highlighted by a SOTA 70.22 percent Any-Medal score on the full MLE-bench within a 24-hour budget, outperforming prior reported results by 4.92 percentage points. The efficacy of ScienceFlow further demonstrates that efficient state management, adaptive exploration, and objective-aligned execution are critical for scaling autonomous research beyond short-horizon interactions.

9. Clearing the Fog: Towards Installing and Refining Proactive Exploration Capabilities in LLM Agents

Authors: Zhizhao Guan , Chen Huang , Ziming Liu , Hongru Liang , Wenqiang Lei , See-Kiong Ng , Tat-Seng Chua , Anthony G Cohn
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14339
Abstract:

We study proactive exploration in LLM agents, i.e., the ability to explore an environment to acquire information that improves future decision-making. In this regard, we first identify two fundamental bottlenecks that hinder this capability and then propose \ours, a novel method designed to instill and refine proactive exploration. Specifically, \ours\ consists of two components: (1) Exploratory Data Construction, which synthesizes exploration-rich trajectories to mitigate the hindsight bias of standard demonstrations; and (2) RL Optimization with Contrastive Signal Guidance, which leverages contrastive trajectory pairs to distinguish productive exploration from redundant wandering. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of \ours\ and provide insights into the characteristics of proactive exploration. Our code is available at: this https URL .

10. AnchorBench: A Multi-Pathway Benchmark for the Anchoring Effect in LLMs

Authors: Yiderigun Borjigin , Alexander Hermann , Christian Cyron , Roland Aydin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14320
Abstract:

The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which an initial reference value shifts a later judgment toward itself. This effect is well established in human judgment and decision-making, and recent work suggests that large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar behavior. However, existing work on anchoring in LLMs typically evaluates only a narrow set of anchor pathways and rarely distinguishes irrelevant from plausible anchors. We introduce AnchorBench, a benchmark for the anchoring effect in LLMs that evaluates multiple anchor pathways under an explicit anchor relevance axis. Across fourteen models, including ten open-weight models and four frontier API models, and a large set of controlled prompts, we find that (1) anchoring is strongly pathway-dependent, (2) plausible anchors usually induce larger shifts than irrelevant ones when introduced through stronger pathways, (3) anchor influence generally weakens as the anchor moves farther from the evidence-supported answer, most clearly on External and RAG, and (4) high task accuracy on the anchor-free control condition (Acc$_{10}$: answers within 10 points of gold) does not guarantee robustness: even frontier API models above 95% control accuracy remain susceptible to plausible anchors.

11. TimeSage-EV: A Live Benchmark for Agentic Time Series Analysis in Evolving Environments

Authors: Qingren Yao , Yaxuan Kong , Yuqi Nie , Yichen Li , Stefan Zohren , Anna Vettoruzzo , Qingsong Wen , Ming Jin , Joaquin Vanschoren
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14270
Abstract:

Time series analysis in high-stakes domains relies on recurring data releases, where new observations can alter the evidence base and the validity of later conclusions. Existing time series QA benchmarks mostly rely on fixed snapshots, leaving temporal validity and cutoff-aware evidence use unevaluated. We introduce TimeSage-EV, a live benchmark for agentic time series analysis in evolving environments. It tracks 60 real institutional scenarios across 6 domains, comprising 1,485 scenario-period QA pairs from Feb 2023 to May 2026 and spanning monthly, weekly, daily, and irregular release cadences. At each period, large language model (LLM) agents receive time series data and source reports, while the withheld target release provides ground truth. TimeSage-EV evaluates state identification, data summarization, and outlook reasoning. Experiments with frontier LLM agents and TimeSage-1.0, a novel self-evolving agent with a reusable analytical skill library, reveal significant performance gaps across model tiers and recurring failures in temporal validity, exogenous context use, and adaptation. We release TimeSage-EV as a research resource with monthly updates, code, a leaderboard, and failure-mode analyses.

12. Grounding Without Corrective Control: Truth-Tracking Profiles for Large Language Models

Authors: Brett Reynolds
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14252
Abstract:

Recent work suggests that some large language model representations have content or reference. Grounding can secure either without supplying live routes for correction. This paper asks what follows from that gap. An output is answerable when discrepancies can affect what a target- and task-specific arrangement produces, accepts, or withdraws. The arrangement has corrective control only when live, sufficiently independent routes can detect and repair fresh discrepancies. A route profile records which routes constrain the arrangement and how they are related. Those profiles support analysis of truth-tracking: patterned support for representational success. Language models are the pressure case; text-only arrangements provide a task-relative limiting case. Text-trained models inherit patterns of testimony, coherence, and prior correction. Where target-sensitive correction survives training, these can supply derivative answerability (inherited constraint); live answerability is the relation supplied by a current route for fresh discrepancies. Fluent failures should follow when a task requires independently informative access to the facts. Self-consistency, retrieval, tools, code execution, multimodal input, and feedback should help selectively. Route-by-task interactions test the distinctions. The decomposition’s empirical burden is to predict held-out route–task combinations or improve intervention choice without conceptual refitting. Surface improvement and truth-tracking improvement can come apart.

13. APTER: Adaptive Post-Training with Expert-Grounded Rubrics

Authors: Xukai Wang , Liangqi Li , Zhiyue Xu , Jingang Zhou , Xiaoyu Shi , Jiansheng Cai , Bo Zhang , Zhe Li , Xu-Yao Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14212
Abstract:

As large language models enter professional domains, they must satisfy domain constraints, include critical evidence, and provide complete reasoning rather than merely produce fluent responses. Existing post-training methods often rely on holistic preferences or outcome-level verification, while recent rubric-based methods usually generate rubrics independently for each query. In specialized domains, such unconstrained rubrics may omit critical requirements and vary across samples, hindering the diagnosis and targeted repair of persistent capability deficiencies. We propose APTER (Adaptive Post-Training with Expert-Grounded Rubrics), a framework that integrates structured domain knowledge into fine-grained evaluation, optimization, and diagnosis for specialized complex reasoning. First, expert-grounded rubric construction starts from an expert criteria framework built by domain experts, where each criterion represents a stable professional capability. For each query, APTER selects relevant criteria and instantiates them into query-level rubrics linked to their source criteria, turning reusable expert criteria into executable query-level supervision without reference answers. Second, adaptive post-training uses rubric verdicts as both optimization and criterion-level diagnostic signals. Aggregating low-scoring verdicts by criterion ID reveals persistent deficiencies and triggers targeted supervised fine-tuning updates during reinforcement learning. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and medical question answering show consistent gains across both domains. Across three model generations, APTER improves the mathematics and medical averages over the corresponding base models by up to 15.86 and 8.04 points, respectively. Code and rubric datasets are available at this https URL .

14. Can Language Models Understand mmWave Data? Benchmarking Large Language Models for mmWave Radar-Based Human Understanding

Authors: Jeongwan Shin , Jaehyeon Kim , Donguk Ko , Jaeho Choi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14179
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable reasoning and generative capabilities, motivating their use as universal reasoning engines for perception. While modern approaches such as vision-language models (VLMs) have attempted to incorporate reasoning capabilities into visual sensing, the integration of LLMs with the millimeter-wave (mmWave) modality-despite its unique advantages under low light and occlusion-remains largely unexplored. The principal bottlenecks stem from the scarcity of radar language pairs, severe cross-dataset heterogeneity, and the absence of a foundational mmWave encoder. We address this gap through a minimal textualization interface that serializes each mmWave point cloud into concise natural language, allowing off-the-shelf LLMs to operate in a question answering (QA) setting. Building on this, we present mmWave-QA, the first benchmark for language-conditioned mmWave human perception. mmWave-QA aggregates heterogeneous public mmWave datasets and harmonizes them via calibration-aware preprocessing and global taxonomy alignment, while providing natural language QA. Spanning six scenarios and five QA tasks, the benchmark enables standardized evaluation across diverse mmWave hardware and experimental conditions, establishing a foundation for scalable research on mmWave-LLM integration. We further evaluate and analyze LLMs on our mmWave-QA, highlighting their zero-shot reasoning potential for radar perception, as well as their robustness under visual degradation.

15. BiasTrace: Linking Reasoning Behaviours to Biased Outputs in LLMs

Authors: Varsha Ramineni , Hossein A. Rahmani , Jerome Ramos , Karin Sevegnani , Emine Yilmaz
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14161
Abstract:

LLMs exhibit social biases that can produce inaccurate and discriminatory inferences, posing risks in high-stakes applications. While prior work has made progress in measuring and mitigating bias, it largely focuses on final outputs of models, with limited understanding of the mechanisms that produce biased outcomes. Recent advances in LLM reasoning offers a new lens for investigating bias, yet the link between reasoning and bias remains poorly understood. Existing approaches focus primarily on final answer correctness or explicitly biased language, overlooking different behaviours in reasoning that can drive biased outcomes. We introduce BiasTrace, an annotation scheme for labelling reasoning behaviours in model-generated traces and linking them to biased outcomes. BiasTrace captures bias-specific behaviours (e.g., unsupported demographic assumptions) as well as general reasoning patterns that may implicitly contribute to bias (e.g. overthinking). We apply BiasTrace to reasoning traces in bias-sensitive contexts, scaled using validated LLM-as-a-judge methods, producing a large annotated dataset. Our analysis shows that biased outputs often stem from subtle reasoning behaviours rather than explicitly biased language, and that reasoning-level annotations improve bias detection. We further show that BiasTrace behaviours can be exploited for inference-time mitigation. These findings underscore the importance of examining a broader range of reasoning patterns to better understand bias in LLMs.

16. Towards Efficient Multimodal and Multilingual Opinion Extraction for STI: A QLoRA-Based Fine-Tuning Approach

Authors: Sheng Hong , Xuanqi Wang , Jiacheng Wang , Yuwei Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14152
Abstract:

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have reshaped semantic analysis. Opinion Extraction (OE) for Science and Technology Intelligence (STI) requires concise core opinions from large information streams. Off-the-shelf models struggle to filter noise from these streams and show limited structured-output reliability in zero-shot multilingual and multi-modal settings. To address information overload and extraction defocus, this study proposes a multimodal core-opinion extraction framework in which visual evidence serves as a contextual anchor for textual judgment. Using VideoLLaMA2 (VL2) and VideoLLaMA2.1 (VL2.1) as the base models, we apply Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) fine-tuning on a curated dataset of 2,194 multilingual and multimodal samples. Under the selected Image-Augmented setting, fine-tuned VL2.1 generates structured JSON core-opinion outputs, achieving 64.98% Precision, 42.15% Recall, 51.14% F1-score, and 74.00% sample-level accuracy. Relative to the zero-shot VL2.1 setting, it raises the F1-scores of Spanish and Russian from 4.83% and 0.45% to 46.05% and 51.93%, respectively. The framework further incorporates a Fuzzy Cumulative Prospect Theory-based post-extraction triage module for case-level value assessment, providing a case-level value signal for downstream STI screening.

17. A Graph-Based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Structured Drift Diagnosis and Recovery in Autonomous LLM Agents

Authors: Ismail El Hamraoui , Sagar Jose , Nicolas Bureau , Robert Plana
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14109
Abstract:

Autonomous LLM agents are increasingly deployed in complex real-world workflows, yet they remain vulnerable to runtime behavioral drift, a silent deviation from the original task that can lead to irreversible side effects on external systems. Existing approaches address drift at the prompt level but lack structured mechanisms for step-level detection, risk assessment, and recovery decision. Because the main task-executing agent is often a large and expensive model that cannot be re-trained on every deployment, this work targets a plug-and-play recovery module instead. It introduces a graph-based framework in which a single small language model is trained via reinforcement learning to specialize at each node of a recovery graph, external to the main agent. Each node has a precise role\,: drift classification, operation detection, risk evaluation, or final decision and the model learns to produce structured XML-formatted reasoning adapted to that role. Training combines rule-based structural rewards with an LLM-as-judge semantic-quality signal, so that the model is graded both on how it answers (schema and length) and on what it says. Experiments on the public AppWorld benchmark show that the method generally exploits information about the suspected drift onset to issue correct recovery decisions using a small language model. In addition, the trained small language model reliably respects the prescribed output schema and produces semantically appropriate content in each field according to its assigned node role.

18. Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers

Authors: Thiago Sandoval , Ufuk Topcu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14089
Abstract:

Safety classifiers deployed with large language models often fail for two reasons: their decisions reflect the policy learned during training rather than the deployer’s desired policy, and their performance degrades as deployment traffic evolves. We present Regime-Conditional Verification (RCV), a lightweight wrapper that adapts an off-the-shelf safety classifier without retraining it. RCV estimates, from the classifier’s internal representations, the probability that each prediction disagrees with the deployer’s policy, and selectively corrects predictions likely to be wrong. The same correctness estimates also provide a label-free signal for detecting distribution shift, enabling a maintenance loop that updates the correctness estimation layer and resorts to classifier fine-tuning only when necessary. Across three off-the-shelf safety classifiers and two benchmark datasets, RCV improves adherence to the deployer’s policy in every classifier-dataset combination, catching up to 0.81 of previously missed unsafe content without modifying the underlying classifier. In a deployment study with ten attack campaigns, each a harm category held out of RCV’s training, RCV detects every campaign in a dedicated injection panel; in the maintenance census most drift episodes are repaired without updating the classifier, and the fine-tune is reserved for the residual episodes that repair does not restore.

19. Scaling Domain Data Repetition in LLM Pretraining

Authors: Jingwei Li , Xinran Gu , Rui Dai , Xintong Hao , Chengyin Xu , Yan Wu , Shuran Zheng , Jingzhao Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14071
Abstract:

As large language models scale, their training-token budgets must also increase to maintain an appropriate tokens-per-parameter ratio ((\mathrm{TPP})). However, high-quality domain data is much harder to scale than general web data. As model size and the training-token budget increase, its fraction in the training mixture tends to decrease. Repeating the available high-quality data provides an effective way to counteract this dilution, but excessive repetition may lead to overfitting. We study this trade-off under practical LLM scaling, where the training-token budget grows proportionally with model size. For a fixed domain, we first find that, surprisingly at a fixed (\mathrm{TPP}), the optimal repetition count mildly increases with model size. Across different domains, we find that the optimal repetition count is strongly negatively correlated with the final validation loss of a domain: domains with lower loss can generally benefit from more repetitions. In contrast, the amount of unique domain data is only weakly related to the optimal repetition count. These findings suggest that repetition counts tuned on smaller proxy models with the same (\mathrm{TPP}) can provide a practical estimate for larger models.

20. Demystifying Agent Skills: Why They Work-Until They Don’t

Authors: Zhiyuan Jiang , Fangrui Huang , Hanwen Xing , Xander Wu , Yipeng Gao , Rui Cao , Mengdi Wang , Shilong Liu , Yijiang Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14036
Abstract:

Skills have emerged as a practical and effective approach for enhancing LLM agents at inference time through structured packages of knowledge. However, existing evaluations largely measure whether skills improve aggregated task success, leaving a more fundamental question underexplored: \emph{\textbf{When do skills help, why do they work, and where do they fail?} } Through controlled experiments across various benchmarks, agent harnesses and LLMs, we isolate the effects of representation, outcome annotation, retrieval difficulty, and cross-framework robustness of skills. To further answer this question, we design a contrastive study that combines controlled quantitative experiments with paired trajectory analysis. We normalize 8,135 trial records from controlled experiments and retain 238 valid unique labels from 240 open-coded records. We consolidate these observations into a taxonomy of three high-level categories and twelve skill-use modes: skills work when noisy trajectories become procedural anchors that stabilize execution. Skills improve over Workflow Memory by 6.06 points in matched comparisons. Procedural anchoring accounts for 65.7\% of skill cases, versus 4.5\% for explicit knowledge injection, showing that skills stabilize action rather than inject missing facts. Retrieval is a separate bottleneck: as pools grow from 5 to 100, actual-use precision falls from 29.6\% to 3.3\%. Confusable distractors impair offline identification, yet downstream success remains stable; exact ground-truth invocation is neither sufficient nor necessary. Skills fail under brittle assumptions, incompatible contexts, or insufficient adaptation. These findings move evaluation beyond aggregate success rates and guide reliable self-evolving agents.

21. Agent-Orchestration in Autonomous Chip Design

Authors: Linyang Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14035
Abstract:

Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) and tool-using agents encourage people to explore the potential of using agents in chip design. The core question is what kind of AI we really need in such a sophisticated industry. To this end, we bring the idea of modeling a chip-design superintelligence as an enormous \textit{AI-organization}.

22. Buy the Rumor, Sell the News: When Is News Priced In?

Authors: Alireza Kargarzadeh , Nariman Khaledian , Navid Parvini , Sid Ghatak , Arman Khaledian
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14014
Abstract:

Two old market sayings hold that news is already priced in by the time it is published, and that the rumor is bought while the news is sold. Both place the price move associated with a piece of news before and at publication rather than after it. Whether the claims hold, for which kinds of news, and by how much are basic questions about how fast markets absorb public information. We test them on 4.57 million financial news articles covering roughly 3,000 US stocks (2023-2026). A large language model teacher, distilled into a compact classifier through active learning, assigns each article one of 17 event tags and five attributes; articles are clustered into stories to separate first reports from follow-up coverage; and beta-adjusted abnormal returns are measured around the resulting 1.68 million stock-day events, with 364,405 neutral-sentiment events as a placebo group. Three results follow. First, the price move associated with news concentrates before and at publication: pooled across all signed events, the cumulative move in the news direction by the close of publication day is 2.8 times its value 20 days later, and for rumor-flagged events the rumor day captures the entire move while the subsequent confirmation contributes nothing. Second, measured against the placebo of comparable stocks, markets underreact to numbers and overreact to stories: quantified fundamental news (earnings, dividends, guidance, analyst actions) keeps drifting in the direction of the news for weeks, while soft story-driven news (launches, macro commentary, leadership) gives back its move. Third, news carries width as well as direction: publicity raises volatility before the publication day, and volatility declines once the news is out, because publication resolves uncertainty. The study also produces a table of measured drift for each event tag, usable as a prior in news-conditioned forecasting models.

23. AI Research Preference Models

Authors: Thomas Simon Foster , Bassel Al Omari , Tingchen Fu , Thomas Mann , Carl Domond , Lucia Cipolina-Kun , Bhavul Gauri , Muna Aghamelu , Alexander D. Goldie , Eryk Helenowski , Jean-Christophe Gagnon-Audet , Alberto Pepe , Saba Nazir , Daniel Izcovich , Noam Levi , Rishi Hazra , Karen Hambardzumyan , Nicolas Baldwin , Xian Li , Martin Josifoski , Paris Giampouras , Masoud Jalili Sabet , Anya Sims , Hela Momand , Tatiana Shavrina , Despoina Magka , Jason Weston , Yulin Wang , Anirudh Goyal , João Henriques , Yoram Bachrach , Emily McMilin , Jakob Nicolaus Foerster
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13940
Abstract:

AI research agents (AIRA) can now propose, implement, and evaluate their own machine learning experiments, but progress on frontier tasks is throttled by cost: a candidate solution can be written in minutes, whereas evaluating it can take hours to days of GPU time. An agent can therefore propose far more candidates than it can afford to run, and its progress depends on its research preference: how it allocates a fixed execution budget across many candidates. We introduce AI Research Preference Models (RPMs) that predict which of multiple candidate solutions are most worth executing, without paying the cost of executing them all. We build RPMs from frozen pretrained language models (with no task-specific training), in two forms: an inference-only model that reasons over candidate plans, code, and prior executed solutions, and an agentic model that additionally runs small-scale pilot experiments before deciding. We integrate both into the AIRA-dojo search agent and evaluate on AIRS-Bench, a recent benchmark of machine learning research tasks for AI research agents. The two variants raise the average normalized score from 0.684 to 0.711 and 0.729 respectively, and reach the unguided agent’s 24-hour performance in roughly 15 hours, using less than two-thirds of its execution budget. Our best RPMs also yield new state-of-the-art results on two AIRS-Bench tasks.

24. Never the Number: Structural Abstention for AI Systems Whose Answers Are Consumed as Fact

Authors: Zhelun (Allen)Wu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13926
Abstract:

Large language models have made natural language interfaces to databases (NLIDB) newly credible, but LLM text-to-SQL systems fail in a way that matters for deployment: a hallucinated column or a mis-aggregated total yields a fluent wrong answer, indistinguishable at the point of use from a right one. Where the consumer cannot inspect the generated query, as in enterprise AI deployments and operational dashboards, and increasingly where the consumer is a tool-using agent rather than a person, accuracy alone is insufficient: nothing marks which answers to distrust. This is a reliability problem before it is an accuracy problem. We propose an architectural pattern for such systems, a trusted kernel with a generative shell, resting on one invariant: a component that can fabricate may influence which question the system answers, never which value it returns. A generative shell interprets underspecified input and phrases replies; a deterministic kernel matches fully specified questions against a bounded set of answerable question shapes and compiles them to queries by deterministic execution. The two meet at a confirmation the user reads before any value is computed, and requests the kernel cannot express are declined rather than approximated. We call this structural abstention, and distinguish it from the statistical abstention of selective prediction and calibrated confidence: refusal here needs no confidence estimate, because unanswerable requests are unrepresentable. We specify the pattern implementation-independently, give a five-decision recipe and work it across three domains, extend the invariant from returned values to the actions of agentic systems, and report a two-year production case study alongside two generative alternatives, a fine-tuned parser and a tool-retrieval agent. We close against enterprise and reliability benchmarks published since.

25. When Personal Memory Has No Single Answer: Evaluating LLM Agents under Irreducible Conflict

Authors: Lu Yang , Shusheng Xu , Zhuoran Li , Tongkai Yang , Longbo Huang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13921
Abstract:

LLM agents increasingly maintain personal memory across sessions, but it can conflict. Preferences depend on context, behavior evolves, and sources can conflict. When a query lacks context, time, or source authority to interpret conflict, treating one memory as definitive converts unresolved conflict into an unjustified, overconfident action. Existing benchmarks recover one answer from conflicting evidence, overlooking whether agents recognize underdetermination, preserve alternatives, seek missing information, and choose appropriate actions. We introduce \underline{T}esting \underline{A}gents’ \underline{N}avigation of \underline{G}enuine, \underline{L}atent, and \underline{E}ntangled Memory Conflicts (\textsc{TANGLE}), a benchmark for genuinely unresolvable memory conflicts. It comprises 541 instances across 40 personas and three types: Context-Partitioned Conflict (CPC), Behavior-Oscillation Conflict (BOC), and Source-Contradiction Conflict (SCC). We evaluate two tracks—an oracle track with curated memory and a pipeline track that extracts memory from multi-session dialogues—on five dimensions: conflict perception, causal reasoning, confidence calibration, clarification seeking, and memory faithfulness. Experiments reveal pipeline challenges. With curated memory, models recognize conflicts more reliably than they calibrate actions or seek targeted clarification. With end-to-end pipeline memory, extraction fails to preserve conflict-bearing relations needed for downstream reasoning. Policy comparisons show fixed rules are insufficient when actions must reflect conflict. These findings motivate Conflict-Aware Action Policy (CAAP), which adapts actions to each conflict using available evidence. \textsc{TANGLE} frames conflict handling as recognizing underdetermination, retaining conflicting evidence, and acting without forcing a definitive answer.

Authors: Wenyue Hua , Zachary Huang , Tyler Payne , Safoora Yousefi , Saleema Amershi , Asli Celikyilmaz
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13787
Abstract:

AI agents increasingly act on their users’ behalf, handling tasks such as scheduling meetings, comparing offers, and haggling over prices. These principal-driven tasks routinely place the agent across from a counterpart (another user’s agent, a seller, a recruiter) whose goals may conflict with its principal’s. Yet the dispositions that make an assistant pleasant can make it a poor delegate: a friendly, helpful frontier model may disclose its principal’s private information unprompted and concede at the first sign of resistance. We present SocialRL, a general recipe that trains social reasoning directly, and apply it to a 4B model across six domains: Deal-or-No-Deal, CaSiNo, Craigslist, Job Interview, Calendar, and Marketplace. Every domain is trained in-domain under the same recipe, and every policy is evaluated on all six. We find that (1) in-domain training reaches the frontier: on held-out scenarios the 4B matches or exceeds the GPT-5 family per domain, closing 73-122% of the baseline-to-frontier gap on the negotiation games, with 78% of buyer openings anchoring below target versus 3% untrained; (2) cross-domain transfer follows game structure: structurally paired games lift each other, a broad multi-issue donor lifts nearly all domains, and structurally isolated games transfer nothing; (3) guided by this transfer structure, two strategies, cascade RL and multi-teacher on-policy distillation (OPD), consolidate the per-domain specialists into a single unified 4B that reaches 0.627 average utility across all six environments, matching or exceeding GPT-4.1 (0.625), GPT-5.1 (0.619), and GPT-5.2 (0.613); (4) an explicit theory-of-mind scaffold helps only through training: distilling the ToM trace, rather than actions alone, lifts utility on every environment and generalizes better across them, and of the two ToM skills, only next-action prediction predicts negotiation outcomes.

27. Simulation-Aware In-Context Policy Improvement for LLM-Aided Analog Layout Refinement

Authors: Bingyang Liu , Ziming Wei , Xiaohan Gao , David Z. Pan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13767
Abstract:

Analog IC layout design remains a labor-intensive iterative process dominated by simulation-driven refinement. Although end-to-end layout generators accelerate initial placement and routing, they still require experts to manually tune layout optimization parameters with repeated post-layout simulations for stringent design specifications. While Bayesian Optimization (BO) is widely adopted for parameter tuning in analog IC design, at the layout level it typically requires hundreds to thousands of evaluations, each involving costly parasitic extraction and post-layout simulation, which makes it impractical. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in improving the sample efficiency of such simulation-driven tuning. However, their restricted access to geometric layout context and design-specific heuristics limits their ability to manipulate the layout optimization process. In this paper, we propose a simulation-aware LLM multi-agent framework that performs in-context policy improvement (ICPI) by iteratively updating layout optimization parameters exposed by an analog layout generator through an act-observe-reflect loop on compact structured layout representations. Experiments on real-world analog circuits show that, with only tens of post-layout simulations, our approach improves post-layout performance over the generator’s built-in heuristics and BO-based tuning method.

28. Second Thought: Reasoning in Parallel as LLM Agents Act and Observe

Authors: Zhensu Sun , Chengran Yang , Yunbo Lyu , Jieke Shi , David Lo
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13667
Abstract:

LLM agents in the ReAct paradigm alternate between reasoning, acting, and observing, but deliberate reasoning is confined to the Thought phase: while the agent serializes an action and waits for the environment, its reasoning is frozen. We identify this recurring interval for Action and Observation as a reasoning idle window and ask whether it can host additional reasoning in parallel that serves future turns. Therefore, we propose Second Thought, a training-free inference framework that forks four auxiliary branches the instant each Thought phase concludes, decodes them concurrently with the main loop, and merges the generated thoughts back when the environment observation arrives. In this way, Second Thought relocates the added reasoning off the main thread’s sequential decoding path. Across three agentic benchmarks and three reasoning LLMs, Second Thought lowers the average turn count in all nine (model,benchmark) pairs and reduces main thread decoding in six of them by up to 43% (roughly 20% on average among those settings), while leaving it essentially unchanged in a seventh; Pass@1 shows no significant change in seven of nine pairs and the two significant differences are +12.4 and +10.2 points. Against a compute-matched control that forces an equivalent budget onto the main thread’s own reasoning, it attains strictly higher Pass@1 with 1.3 to 3.2 less sequential decoding in all four settings where the control applies.

29. How Compliant is Sepsis Treatment? An Expert-Guided Neuro-symbolic Pipeline for Generating Clinical Compliance Insights

Authors: Himanshu Tripathi , Kaushik Roy , Subash Neupane , Shahram Rahimi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13617
Abstract:

Verifying whether clinical care follows evidence-based protocols is a natural neuro-symbolic problem, yet the safety-critical setting defeats either paradigm alone. We present an expert-guided pipeline that constrains a large language model strictly to semantic normalization, mapping messy drug and microbiology strings onto a fixed clinical vocabulary, while a Sugeno fuzzy inference system reasons over the normalized events. The fuzzy layer encodes eight Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle rules and replaces binary judgments with graded scores in [0,1]. Applied to 2,438 MIMIC-IV v3.1 sepsis episodes, it surfaces antibiotic timing as the most critical breakdown (mean 0.24, 13% within one hour), Hour-1 underperformance (mean 36.7%), a 51% elevated-lactate drop-off, and descriptive differences in ICU stay across compliance groups (3.8 versus 5.1 days).

30. SemPlan: Benchmarking Structured Semantic Planning for LLM-Based Queries over Enterprise Data

Authors: Bruno Santos Teixeira
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13612
Abstract:

Natural-language interfaces to enterprise data must translate underspecified requests into governed, executable behavior while controlling invalid queries, policy failures, cost, and nondeterminism. SemPlan Benchmark evaluates this architectural design space with a deterministic synthetic bilingual benchmark containing 1,800 cases in English and Brazilian Portuguese; 1,200 cases form the frozen scientific evaluation subset. Four architectures are compared under the same model configuration: direct SQL generation (A1), a bounded tool-agent baseline (A2), structured semantic-request generation followed by deterministic planning and execution (A3), and a clarification/stateful semantic-plan variant (A4). Across 4,800 primary records, answer correctness was low in absolute terms: 22.25% for A1, 22.58% for A2, 25.67% for A3, and 24.25% for A4. A3 had the highest observed correctness and significantly exceeded A1, A2, and A4 in the pre-specified paired correctness analysis, while A1 retained the highest policy-correct rate and the lowest unsafe-or-invalid rate. A4 had the lowest mean API cost and lowest false-refusal rate. On a preselected 150-case stability subset, answer-correct repeatability ranged from 92.00% to 98.67%. The results support a trade-off interpretation rather than a universal ranking: additional structural constraints changed failure modes and efficiency, but did not monotonically improve correctness or solve ambiguity and multi-turn state consistency.

31. Evaluating Agentic Learning Harness Capabilities Without Labels via the Scaling Hypothesis

Authors: Aryan Luthra , Kshitij Jain , Siddharth Arya , Bobby Filar , Anna Bertiger
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13608
Abstract:

Agentic “Continual Learning Harnesses”, systems that pair an LLM with retrieval or memory to improve from feedback without retraining, have shown growing value in cybersecurity. But their value is conventionally measured by gains against labeled benchmarks, an approach that often fails in operational security settings. Benchmark labels are scarce, stale, and unrepresentative, so a practitioner often cannot tell whether a given harness helps at all or which of two is better for their task. Traditional LLM-as-a-judge offers little signal because it is no stronger than the agent it evaluates, and distillation is unreliable on scarce, sporadic, and biased labels. We propose a framework for evaluating learning harnesses end-to-end without a labeled benchmark, grounded in the scaling hypothesis. A stronger teacher model provides sparsely sampled corrections to a smaller student with a continual learning harness. We score a harness by how much its student converges toward the teacher over time. Across security tasks, model families, and harness designs, we show that improvement relative to the teacher correlates with improvement relative to a held-out gold standard, validating teacher-relative lift as a proxy for true harness uplift when labels are absent. We further show that LLM-as-a-judge between similarly powered models yields no usable signal. These results suggest that a teacher-sized model can be improved through the same harness when humans provide the same kind of sparse, high-precision corrections.

32. No Universal Signal Predicts Sample-Level LLM Regression under Version Updates

Authors: Jia Sheng , Yiwei Lu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13607
Abstract:

Frontier LLMs are updated frequently and typically outperform their predecessors in aggregate. But aggregate gains say little about individual samples: an update can still cause sample-level regression, where a response correct under the old model becomes incorrect under the new one. This paper studies how to predict such regressions from signals available at inference time. We compare single-model signals (confidence, logit margin, attention entropy) against cross-version signals (output KL divergence, likelihood drift, token-level KL, representation drift) under a unified added-value test that isolates each signal’s gain over a confidence baseline. Across six benchmarks in three task families (multiple-choice question answering, or MCQ; math reasoning; code generation) and six model update pairs, we find that (1) signal effectiveness is task-dependent: confidence is strongest on MCQ and simpler math, while likelihood/KL signals give the most frequent gains on harder math and code; (2) no signal is universally best across model updates either; and (3) some cross-version signals stay informative even when confidence fails, including without labels, which supports a proof-of-concept selective fallback that routes high-risk samples back to the old model. Practitioners can use these task-level patterns to choose which regression signal to trust for a given update. Code is available at this https URL .

33. Active Perception for Embodied Disambiguation

Authors: Yiwei Liu , Luwei Yang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13605
Abstract:

Natural language provides robots with a flexible task interface, but target ambiguity in embodied environments arises not only from user intent; it can also result from missing taskrelevant physical evidence in the current observation. Existing interactive disambiguation methods primarily obtain additional information by asking the user, whereas occlusion, restricted viewpoints, unreadable text, and unobserved targets require the robot to actively change its observation. We propose an active-perception framework for embodied target disambiguation that uses active observation as the backbone for information acquisition and uses a vision-language model to decide, on the basis of accumulated visual evidence and interaction information, whether to continue observing, request clarification, or complete target selection. Active observation can both directly recover missing discriminative evidence and reveal object names, labels, and semantic attributes, thereby improving user clarification when it remains necessary. Real-robot experiments show that the framework combines physical information acquisition and userintent clarification within a unified embodied disambiguation process.

34. Measuring Cross-Task Behavioral Consistency in Language Model Agents

Authors: Amritesh Banerjee , Pranil Raichura
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13598
Abstract:

Agent evaluation relies almost entirely on outcome metrics such as success rate, which capture whether an agent succeeds but not how consistently it behaves. We argue that behavioral consistency across tasks is a distinct and measurable property, and we introduce the Behavioral Consistency Metric (BCM) to quantify it. BCM trains a model to predict task success from behavioral features of agent execution traces, derives a per-trajectory feature-attribution vector, and measures the mean pairwise similarity of these vectors within an agent system. Across roughly 9,000 trajectories from six language model agents on software engineering tasks, our central finding is that cross-task and within-task consistency are distinct axes that can diverge: some systems are locally reproducible, behaving similarly on repeated attempts at one task, yet globally fragmented, with no stable strategy across different tasks, while others are consistent at both scales. Prior work measures only same-task reproducibility and so cannot observe this separation. We further find that consistency is not reducible to success rate, since systems with comparable success can differ sharply in consistency, and that the frontier-versus-open-source consistency gap persists under a within-task control that holds task difficulty constant. We position BCM as a process-level reliability signal that complements outcome metrics, and we are explicit about the conditions under which it is meaningful.

35. Stable Miscalibration in Large Language Models: A Practical View of High-Confidence Errors

Authors: Akira Okutomi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13591
Abstract:

High-confidence errors in large language models are often treated as evidence of fragile internal inference. We study a different possibility: stable miscalibration, where a confident wrong answer remains locally stable under small perturbations. We combine two diagnostics: a label-aware output-level audit score that ranks domains by confidence variation and overconfident mistakes under a forced-answer baseline, and an internal sensitivity probe that measures hidden-state movement. On a multi-domain binary factual audit set, this audit score tracks where abstention-aware self-critique reduces decision loss, although direct labeled baselines rank the same gain more strongly. Internally, self-critical prompting consistently reduces hidden-state sensitivity across layers in three open-weight models. This supports prompt-induced local stabilization rather than a purely output-level abstention pattern, but it does not imply calibration: audit-defined overconfident errors are not clearly more locally sensitive than confidently correct answers, so some high-confidence errors may be stable and miscalibrated rather than simply fragile.

36. Agentao: A Governed Local-First Runtime for Tool-Using LLM Agents

Authors: Bo Jin , Qiang Jiao , Xin Tong
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13574
Abstract:

LLM agents increasingly operate as execution systems that invoke tools, modify local state, use persistent memory, and interact with external protocols. These capabilities make agents useful, but they also introduce risks related to over-privileged actions, weak auditability, prompt injection, tool poisoning, and uncontrolled side effects. This paper presents Agentao, a governed local-first runtime for tool-using LLM agents. Agentao separates model-generated action proposals from host-authorized execution through a layered architecture consisting of host-facing surfaces, a host contract, a runtime core, a permission-mediated tool system, and supporting subsystems for memory, replay, plugins, skills, sub-agents, and protocol integration. We describe the motivation, threat model, design goals, governance model, execution pipeline, and structured event interface of the system. Agentao does not provide formal safety guarantees; rather, it demonstrates how permissions, state, protocol boundaries, and execution traces can be made explicit runtime abstractions for building agents that are more governable, inspectable, and suitable for host-controlled local environments. The code is publicly available at this https URL .

37. A Year in LLM Serving: Workload Evolution, Caching and Load-Balancing

Authors: William Nixon , Jon Durbin , Florian Standhartinger , Haryadi S. Gunawi , Juncheng Yang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13573
Abstract:

Large Language Model (LLM) serving has become a critical cloud workload, and realistic traces are essential for motivating and benchmarking serving systems. However, existing LLM serving workload studies remain limited in scale and scope. They often observe short time periods and provide limited visibility into how users interact with models in production. As a result, they do not fully capture how LLM serving workloads evolve over time or how user-model interactions shape production traffic. In this work, we further the understanding of real-world LLM serving workloads through both a global characterization and a longitudinal study of a one-year production trace from Chutes. Unlike prior studies, our trace captures full production behavior across many models and users, including both popular and long-tail models. We analyze the workload from aggregate, temporal, model-level, and user-level perspectives, revealing workload evolution and user-model structure that are typically hidden behind aggregate views. To support future research, we will release the full one-year trace with the paper, enabling downstream studies of production behavior without relying on sampled or synthetically generated workloads.

38. Modular Cognitive Architecture Emerges in Large Language Models

Authors: Pengrui Han , Jacob Andreas , Evelina Fedorenko , Andrea Gregor de Varda
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13567
Abstract:

The human brain exhibits a striking degree of functional specialization, with distinct networks supporting language, formal reasoning, reasoning about other minds, and reasoning about the physical world. Is this modular organization a fundamental principle of how intelligent systems must be built, or an evolutionary accident specific to biological brains? Here, we test whether a similar organization emerges in Large Language Models–another class of intelligent systems created through a very different optimization process. Using circuit analyses across N=46 tasks spanning four cognitive domains (language, formal reasoning, social reasoning, physical reasoning), we find that LLMs develop a modular architecture that mirrors the human brain: tasks drawing on the same network in humans recruit overlapping neurons in LLMs, whereas tasks drawing on different networks recruit distinct neurons. The convergent emergence of modularity in brains and neural networks suggests that it may be a fundamental property of intelligent systems.

39. Depth-Aware Sensitivity Analysis of Mixture-of-Experts Models via Magnitude-Based Expert Masking

Authors: Pradeep Kumar Sharma , Shantanu Godbole , Hritvik Shrivastava
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13565
Abstract:

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures scale large language models (LLMs) while preserving computational efficiency through sparse activation. Despite their widespread adoption, the relative importance of individual MoE layers remains insufficiently characterized, particularly for model compression. This paper presents a systematic layer-wise sensitivity analysis of the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B model (40 MoE layers, 256 experts per layer, top-8 routing) using magnitude-based expert masking on the XLCoST cross-lingual code translation benchmark. We conduct a multi-phase study spanning 100, 300, and 500 prompt evaluation scales across three H100 GPU servers. Our central finding is that layer sensitivity is strongly depth-dependent: early layers (0-9) and middle layers (10-29) are highly fragile to expert masking, while late layers (30-39), and especially very-late layers (35-39), tolerate aggressive masking of low-magnitude experts. Flat all-layer masking at 30% retains only 150/300 Good+Similar outputs at 300-prompt scale, whereas late-focused policies retain 249-255/300 while masking 640-1,145 experts. On a later 500-prompt held-out validation slice, the narrow very-late policy (layers 35-39 @ 50%) achieves the strongest quality/masked-expert tradeoff among tested candidates, retaining 419/500 Good+Similar outputs while masking only 640 of 10,240 total experts. We additionally characterize top-k routing width reduction from 8 to 6 active experts per token, which shows a large observed wall-clock reduction on a 100-prompt probe with no Good+Similar loss, though it does not yet compose cleanly with aggressive expert masking. These findings provide an empirical foundation for depth-aware MoE expert masking and establish a practical path toward physical weight surgery, activation-based expert scoring, and training-based recovery.

40. Inducing Reward-Free Judging Rubrics that Reduce Over-Crediting in Agent Evaluation

Authors: Darragh Quinn , David Dylan , Roisin Healy , Fionn Carroll , Maeve Donnelly , Cormac Sheehan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13564

Abstract:

Evaluating language-model agents at scale increasingly relies on a second language model as an automatic judge, because the gold signal, an executable environment reward, is expensive, slow, or unavailable at deployment time. Such a judge is a reward-free proxy whose value depends on whether it can be trusted, yet existing judges either hand-write the scoring rubric, as in G-Eval, or fine-tune the judge’s weights, and both tend to credit fluent but unsuccessful trajectories as successes. We instead induce the text of an agent-judging rubric from a small set of ground-truth-labeled trajectories, grounding it in true outcomes. We present RubricForge, which evolves a judge rubric by reflective evolution against labeled trajectories to maximize agreement with the environment reward, freezes it, and applies it to held-out trajectories in one model call with no environment access. The optimized artifact is human-readable text, so every verdict is attributable to named criteria. Using one frozen 7B model as both agent and judge, on tau-bench (173 labeled trajectories drawn from 220 rollouts) and WebShop (160), the principal gain is faithfulness rather than raw agreement. The edge over a generic G-Eval judge is not statistically significant (McNemar p = 0.248), and absolute-score calibration marginally favors the generic judge ( err difference -0.048, p = 2x10^-4). Yet RubricForge over-credits failed trajectories roughly half as often (0.115 vs. 0.173 false-pass rate on tau-bench, with three over-credit catches and zero reversals) and ranks graded WebShop outcomes more faithfully (Spearman 0.410 vs. 0.370). For a reward-free evaluator the false-pass rate, not aggregate agreement, is the deployment-relevant quantity, since a false pass ships a broken agent whereas a false fail merely costs a retry.

Authors: Syeda Anshrah Gillani , Mirza Samad Ahmed Baig
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14399
Abstract:

Patients increasingly ask large language model (LLM) assistants which doctor to see, making these systems AI infomediaries: algorithms that intermediate one person’s choice among other people and thereby decide, silently and at scale, which physicians become visible. We report a prespecified randomized algorithm audit of what causally moves those recommendations. Seven models (six open-weight; gpt-4o-mini) each chose among five synthetic family-medicine physician cards whose attributes were independently randomized across 3,024 choice sets, three patient personas, nine prompt paraphrases and nine experimental arms, yielding 40,068 scored responses; gender and ethnicity were signaled through names following correspondence-audit methodology. Reputation signals dominate: raising a rating from 3.9 to 4.7 increases choice probability by 31.4 percentage points (pp), and raising the fee from $90 to $190 lowers it by 20.0 pp. Demographic parity is rejected, but not in the direction human audit studies predict: female-signaled names gain 2.5 pp, and Hispanic-, South-Asian- and Black-signaled names gain 1.3-2.9 pp over White-signaled names, tilts worth $7-$14 per visit in fee-equivalent terms, and a content-free first-listed position is worth $11. Yet models mentioned gender or ethnicity in at most 0.03% of their stated reasons and abstained in 0.39% of trials, so these effects are invisible in the models’ own explanations, and transparency obligations relying on model self-report would not detect them. One reasoning model failed the prespecified auditability gate outright. The frozen design makes the audit repeatable: any new model can be assessed against identical stimuli, making recurring behavioural audit, rather than self-reported explanation, the monitoring technology fit for purpose.

42. DeaMoE: Efficient MoE Structure for Fast Small-Batch Decoding

Authors: Zewen Jin , Shen Fu , Zeping Duan , Shannon Wang , Weihao Wu , Chengjie Tang , Congkun Ai , Ping Gong , Zijian Dai , Youhui Bai , Cheng Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14385
Abstract:

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have been widely adopted in real-time interactive applications such as coding assistants, real-time audio-video interaction systems. To meet the extremely low response latency requirements of these scenarios, practitioners commonly employ small-batch decoding, under which MoE inference becomes memory-bound and is severely bottlenecked by expert weight loading. However, this bottleneck has received limited attention, and existing solutions such as post-training weight compression or fine-grained expert design during pre-training either degrade model accuracy or introduce additional computation and communication overhead. To tackle this issue, we propose DeaMoE, a decoding-efficient MoE architecture, in which the experts are grouped into several departments, and the experts belonging to the same department share most parameters since they come from the same professional field, and additionally each expert contains a few private parameters to reflect its uniqueness. Moreover, we design customized two-stage routing strategy for DeaMoE to avoid redundant loading, under which DeaMoE greatly improves the efficiency during LLM decoding. Compared with vanilla MoE, DeaMoE reduces per-step loaded weights by up to 50.9% and achieves up to 1.33 end-to-end TPOT speedup for the pre-trained 7B model on A40, and up to 2.00x and 1.97x peak speedup for DeepSeek-V3 on A40 and H100 in microbenchmarks.

43. A Hybrid LLM-Based Framework for Automated Security Annotation Generation in Business Process Models

Authors: Md Kamrul Islam , Tiphaine Henry , Mattia Salnitri , Julius Köpke , Sami Souihi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14370
Abstract:

The modelling and analysis of secure business processes require the incorporation of security annotations into process models. Although BPMN extensions, including SecBPMN2, exist for this purpose, the derivation of accurate and complete security annotations from natural-language specifications remains a manual, expert-intensive, and error-prone task. This paper presents a hybrid framework that takes a BPMN process model and a security requirements document as input and automatically generates security annotations adhering to the SecBPMN2 specification. The approach combines Large Language Model (LLM)–based semantic extraction with schema-constrained mapping, rule-based normalization, and deterministic validation. The framework is evaluated comprehensively on a curated dataset of 27 process models from various domains. The results indicate that it consistently produces structurally valid SecBPMN2 annotations with high schema completeness. Compared to human security analysts, the system achieves substantially higher precision (0.58 vs. 0.29) while maintaining comparable recall (0.52 vs. 0.50) and reduces erroneous or misplaced annotations by nearly 50%. In addition, annotation generation is significantly faster than manual annotation. These findings demonstrate that hybrid LLM- and rule-based automation can reduce modeling effort while improving consistency and reliability, thereby providing a scalable foundation for security-by-design BPM.

44. A Four-Axis Trustworthiness Benchmark for LLM-as-Judge in Principle-Based Regulation

Authors: Dipankar Sarkar
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14329
Abstract:

Principle-based regulation, with evaluative standards such as “fair, clear, and not misleading” or “deliver good outcomes”, cannot be reduced to binary predicates, and LLM-as-judge is increasingly used as the substitute. Our position is that any such judge must be evaluated on four axes: accuracy, paraphrase robustness, adversarial robustness, and calibration. We release Principle-Bench, 168 cryptoasset financial-promotion scenarios mapped to two UK FCA principles, with paraphrase, adversarial keyword-stuffing, and boundary perturbations authored under a pre-registered rubric; the first benchmark covering all four axes for principle-based regulation. We also introduce Ceca (Calibrated Exemplar-Cluster Assessment): a calibrated, auditable assessor that emits exact per-exemplar counterfactual attributions. Across keyword counting, three sentence-transformer embedders, an open-weight LLM-judge, and a calibrated cascade, no method dominates all four axes. A 120B LLM-judge, strongest on benign inputs, loses 47 accuracy points (0.74 to 0.27) on keyword-stuffed Consumer Duty inputs: “compliance theatre.” A second judge from a different model family agrees only at Cohen’s kappa = 0.16 on that split, localising the failure to the model rather than the corpus. Any deployment-grade LLM-judge for principle-based regulation must report per-principle adversarial deception and post-hoc calibration alongside aggregate accuracy.

45. Seeing Red, Thinking Bad: Color Bias in Vision Language Models

Authors: Kohsuke Ide , Ryousuke Yamada , Yoshihiro Fukuhara , Hirokatsu Kataoka , Yutaka Satoh
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14286
Abstract:

Vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in industrial decision-making systems, such as recruitment support and recommendation. This motivates careful analysis of how VLMs process visual and textual information. In this work, we study how VLMs interpret text rendered as an image, and investigate the influence of visual styling biases. To this end, we introduce Stealth Visual Prompts, which subtly change visual styling of text, such as color and contrast, while preserving semantic content. Using these prompts, we systematically control the visual styling of words in text and measure their impact on the analysis performed by VLMs. We further analyze how such visual perturbations affect the latent representations of the vision encoder. From our experiments, we observed that coloring positive words in green consistently shifts sentiment predictions toward a positive direction. As a result, VLMs often fail to properly account for negative words present in the text. Our analysis suggests that this behavior is correlated with changes in the latent representations of the vision encoder induced by color variations. In addition, we show that reducing text–background contrast increases reliance on visually salient cues and leads to more incorrect Visual Question Answering (VQA) outputs. These results suggest that the visual styling of rendered text can guide VLMs’ interpretation in ways that diverge from human semantic understanding. Project page: this https URL

46. Act2Intention: A Benchmark For Developing Active Mobile Agents Through Inferring User Intention from GUI Actions

Authors: Xiaokai Yan , Jingtao Ding , Yong Li , Zhiwen Yu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14132
Abstract:

Mobile GUI Agents powered by multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promise in human-computer intelligence. However, current research primarily focuses on reactive task execution while lacking a comprehensive understanding-prediction-execution process for user intentions, which are the core requirements of active agents. In this paper, we propose the Act2Intention framework that builds an active mobile agent by integrating understanding, predicting user intentions, and executing decisions. First, we construct the Act2Intention Bench through data collection and validated generation, comprising 72,511 intentions and over 700,000 actions across 52 apps, thereby establishing the first benchmark for evaluating proactive agents via continuous intention-action trajectories. We further develop the Act2Intention Agent, achieving proactive services through Proactive-oriented Intention Understanding, Personalized Proactive Intention Prediction, and Experience-guided Intention Execution. Experimental results show that supervised fine-tuning on Act2Intention Bench yields absolute improvements of +32.0 Acc-S, +10.25 Acc-S, and +6.9 SSR points over non-fine-tuned counterparts under the same agent framework for intention understanding, prediction, and execution, respectively. This success underscores the necessity and value of the Act2Intention Bench, which establishes a standardized platform for developing and evaluating proactive agents and consequently paves the way for research on intention-driven human-computer interaction.

47. P2Skill: Privacy Preserving Skill Distillation for Cloud-Local LLM Inference Systems

Authors: Myunghoon Ryu , Geunpyo Park , Sungjoon Lee , XinYu Piao , Jong-Kook Kim
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14094
Abstract:

Cloud-local LLM inference systems have the potential to use the reasoning capability of large cloud models while protecting sensitive user data on personal devices. Cloud-bound requests must exclude personally identifiable information (PII) to prevent external data leakage. Existing privacy-preserving methods rely on prompt perturbation, entity masking, or model fine-tuning, but these approaches may distort contextual semantics or require additional training. This paper proposes P2Skill, a prompt-based skill distillation method in which a local small language model (SLM) autonomously performs decomposition, PII-aware routing, paraphrasing, and reconstruction by following the skill prompts. Skills are iteratively refined from execution failures by a cloud LLM, enabling the local SLM to generalize beyond memorized PII patterns, and therefore P2Skill requires no privacy-specific fine-tuning or learned auxiliary detectors. Evaluation on a four-domain benchmark shows that P2Skill achieves $1.69\times$ and $3.66\times$ higher privacy-preserved inference quality than previous baselines.

48. MACS: A Hybrid Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable Conversational E-Commerce Recommendation

Authors: Juli Huang , Hannah Clay , Sajjad Beygi , Thomas Sarda , Negin Golrezaei , Amin Saberi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14068
Abstract:

Conversational recommendation for e-commerce is increasingly mediated by large language models (LLMs), yet many real-world deployments operate under a stricter requirement: recommendations must be drawn only from a merchant’s fixed catalog, without web search or unsupported product claims. In this setting, the main challenge is reliability under hard constraints: the system must satisfy user requirements, remain grounded in available inventory, and preserve preferences across multiple conversational turns. We present MACS (Multi-Agent Commerce System), a hybrid multi-agent framework for reliable conversational recommendation in fixed-catalog settings. MACS uses LLMs for language-facing tasks such as interpreting user requests, eliciting preferences, and generating responses, while correctness-critical operations, including product retrieval, hard-constraint filtering, brand exclusion, and progressive relaxation, are executed deterministically by the merchant agent. A session-persistent preference layer tracks constraints across turns, enabling consistent handling of budget overwrites and exclusion reversals. On a 140-query single-turn benchmark, MACS achieves the highest pass rate (87.1%) and perfect brand compliance (1.000). On a 10-scenario multi-turn benchmark, MACS achieves the strongest macro Pass@5 (72% vs. 56% GPT+Catalog / 52% Gemini+Catalog) with zero constraint drift. The advantage is sharpest on exclusion reversal (100% vs. 20% / 0%) and constraint accumulation (100% vs. 60% / 40%). Mean judged response quality is similar across systems (0.751 vs. 0.736). These results suggest that hybrid architectures combining deterministic constraint enforcement with session-persistent preference tracking provide stronger reliability-oriented performance than catalog-bound prompt-only baselines in the fixed-catalog merchant setting.

49. Rethinking Automated Program Repair: The Impact of Bug Complexity, Fault Localization, and LLM Cost-efficiency

Authors: Junchi Liu , Ali Bigdeli , Roya Daneshi , Atu Ambala , Sudipto Ghosh , Fabio Santos
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14065
Abstract:

Background: Software bugs remain a critical challenge in development, necessitating effective Automated Program Repair (APR) techniques. While Large Language Model (LLM)-based APR systems have shown promise, prior studies primarily focus on overall repair effectiveness. The effects of bug complexity, fault localization, reasoning settings, and repair cost-effectiveness remain insufficiently explored. Aims: This study presents a comprehensive empirical analysis of LLM-based APR, focusing on how repair performance is shaped by bug complexity, fault localization, reasoning settings, and costs. Method: We evaluate two APR techniques (ChatRepair and CodeCorrector) using three LLMs (DeepSeek, GPT, and Llama), and examine their performance across diverse levels of bug complexity and localization strategies through a multi-dimensional empirical framework and statistical analysis. Results: Although structurally complex bugs and imprecise fault localization make repair more challenging, LLM-based APR techniques still achieve competitive repair effectiveness. Imprecise fault localization can substantially enlarge the performance gap between APR techniques. Furthermore, higher-cost LLMs and stronger reasoning settings do not consistently yield better cost-efficiency, revealing a nontrivial trade-off between repair effectiveness and computational cost. Conclusions: Over 50% of moderately complex bugs can be repaired by low-cost LLM-based APR techniques. The repair effectiveness gap between APR techniques becomes larger as fault localization becomes less precise. GPT-5 repairs 7 and 39 more complex bugs than DeepSeek-V4-pro and DeepSeek-V3.2, respectively; whereas the total repair cost of DeepSeek-V3.2 shows the best cost-efficiency performance.

50. Content Based Video Narration of Gameplay with Vision Language Models

Authors: Mathew Varghese
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14016
Abstract:

Live game commentary is scarce: it exists for professional esports broadcasts and almost nowhere else. We present a content-based video narration system that produces spoken, esports-style commentary for arbitrary gameplay recordings using a general-purpose vision-language model (VLM) and a text-to-speech back end, with no game-specific instrumentation, no engine telemetry, and no task-specific training. Three mechanisms carry the system. Temporal mosaic packing arranges nine uniformly sampled frames into a single 3x3 image, letting an image-native VLM reason about motion while consuming one image payload per segment instead of nine. Context-conditioned prompting replays the K most recent narrations as assistant-role history, suppressing the repetition that dominates per-segment captioning of static scenes. Duration-conditioned generation and elastic alignment constrain narration length in the prompt, then time-scale or symmetrically pad the synthesized audio so each utterance fills its segment slot exactly, giving frame-accurate muxing without a forced aligner. The implementation supports either cloud TTS or a 6-bit quantized 4B-parameter on-device TTS model on Apple silicon, making the speech stage fully local. We report a qualitative case study on real-time strategy footage, a cost model showing the mosaic reduces per-minute image payloads by 9x, and a candid account of observed failure modes - hallucinated game state, resolution loss from mosaicking, and prosody artifacts from time-scaling. We release the system as a reproducible baseline, with an evaluation protocol for the quantitative study a full version will report.

51. MedClaw: Heuristic Agent Harness for Long-Horizon Surgical Video Reasoning

Authors: Yingying Fan , Penghui Du , Leyan Zhu , Runze He , Zimeng Wu , Yuxuan Zhang , Liang Chen , Jiahao Xie , Jiangtang Wang , Shuai Shao , Anchao Yang , Yutong Bai , Yan Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14015
Abstract:

Understanding tens-of-minutes surgical videos requires long-horizon temporal reasoning, answering what happens before, after, or across stages of a procedure by grounding the question in visual evidence spread across time. Existing approaches handle this poorly: a one-shot vision-language model (VLM) compresses the whole procedure to fit its context window and loses the detail a “before” or “after” question depends on, while video agents that train the model where to look are data-hungry and transfer poorly to out-of-domain surgery. We build an agent harness that separates reasoning from perception and improves by evolving context rather than optimizing weights. A text-only orchestrator plans which evidence to gather and issues an auditable sequence of tool calls, while frozen vision-language sub-agents execute each call over the pixels, viewing, cropping, inspecting frames, and retrieving external knowledge. We further propose a gradient-free, reward-gated Heuristic Skill Distillation loop that mines the agent’s own low-scoring traces and keeps a candidate skill only when it raises a validation reward, yielding reusable retrieval skills, notably directed re-look. Growing an external skill library rather than tuning weights, the loop adapts from only about 100 labeled examples, far fewer than supervised or reinforcement fine-tuning requires. To evaluate this agent, we introduce MedClawBench, a de-leaked, doctor-grounded benchmark of 1,123 questions over self-built long neurosurgery recordings and a held-out public lecture-video test split. Across both datasets and all four evaluation dimensions, our agent consistently outperforms one-shot VLMs and general video-agent frameworks, with the largest gains on the long, out-of-domain neurosurgery videos. Project page: this https URL .

52. Musical Mirrors: The LLM as Sounding Board in Songwriting

Authors: Xiao Xiao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13944
Abstract:

This paper examines a use of AI in creative practice as an interpretive sounding board for human-generated material, rather than the more familiar pattern of AI generation followed by human curation. Through the lens of resonance as theorized by Hartmut Rosa, I present a first-person case study of songwriting from July 2025 to March 2026, drawing on 16 original pieces in English, French, and other languages along with piano solos. I describe a configuration in which resonance is not located between user and model, but in the author’s deepening contact with their own material, mediated through the model. This kind of resonance was supported rather than inhibited by AI when sounding-board behavior was cultivated through sustained calibration by the user. Two failure modes appeared when calibration was absent: sycophantic drift and magical overinterpretation. This account suggests both the potential and the risks of AI as an interpretive partner in creative practice.

53. CForce: Boosting Parallel Decoding for dLLMs via Consistency Forcing

Authors: Yuji Ren , Chenkai Xu , Zhuocheng Gong , Jianguo Li , Zhijie Deng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13925
Abstract:

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) accelerate language generation by predicting multiple masks in a single forward pass. However, existing dLLMs can suffer from unreliable predictions in early denoising stages under aggressive parallelism strategies, leading to errors that can propagate to later stages. To tackle this issue, we present Consistency Forcing (CForce) for dLLMs, a distillation method to force the mask predictions of early stages to align with those of later stages. CForce trains the model on pre-collected self-rollout trajectories, thereby improving training-inference alignment. We introduce Confidence Adaptive KL Divergence as a distillation objective to conjoin the merits of forward and reverse KL. We further provide a theoretical analysis for the consistency objective to explain why CForce can approximately minimize the prediction error of early stages. Critically, the same formulation applies to both mask-to-token decoding and edit-capable decoding; in the edit-capable case, later token-to-token refinements provide additional supervision for earlier masked-state predictions. Experiments on non-edit and edit-capable LLaDA models show improved speed-quality trade-offs, especially under high-parallelism decoding budgets. Code is available at: this https URL .

54. Agentic Transaction: Towards ACID-Compliant Agent Systems

Authors: Zhaoyan Sun , Xiaoxiao Wang , Guoliang Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13900
Abstract:

Large language model (LLM) agents are evolving from conversational assistants into autonomous systems that execute long-horizon tasks through reasoning, tool use, code generation, and workspace manipulation. As agents increasingly operate over persistent environments and multi-step workflows, they face challenges analogous to those addressed by transactional database systems: reliable execution, consistent outcomes, safe concurrency, and durable state management. We introduce the concept of an agentic transaction and propose an ACID-compliant agent system framework that reinterprets the classical ACID properties for agent execution through four semantic guarantees: Semantic Atomicity, Semantic Consistency, Semantic Isolation, and Semantic Durability. Together, these properties provide a principled foundation for building reliable agent systems despite model uncertainty and dynamic execution environments. To instantiate this framework, we develop an ACID-compliant data agent that realizes these guarantees through transactional exploration-execution-validation cycles, transactional skill hubs, confidence divergence-based validation, semantic dependency-aware isolation, and transaction-aware semantic state management. Experimental results on widely used benchmarks show that our system achieves a 10.6% improvement over state-of-the-art agents, including Claude Code. This work opens a broader research agenda on extending transactional principles and system architectures toward building trustworthy, scalable, and self-evolving AI agent systems.

55. Federated Prompt Learning: A Unified Framework, Empirical Analysis, and Future Directions

Authors: Qinglin Yang , Chen Qiu , Hongyuan Zhang , Pengdeng Li , Yuan Liu , Zhihong Tian
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13844
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) have become core components of cloud-based intelligent services in academia and industry, yet their training and deployment are hindered by high computational costs, data centralization, and privacy concerns. Federated learning (FL) offers a decentralized training paradigm that enables clients to collaboratively train a learning model without sharing raw data, making it a promising solution for privacy-preserving LLM training and reasoning. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of federated prompt learning (FPL) to review recent advances in integrating the federated learning paradigm and large language models, answering the following research questions: RQ1: The fundamental motivations, characteristics, and enabling technologies of FPL, and how it differs from conventional FL and full-model federated fine-tuning; RQ2: The trade-offs FPL approaches exhibit in performance, communication efficiency, computational overhead, scalability, personalization, and heterogeneity handling; RQ3: The remaining security, privacy, robustness, and system challenges, along with key future research directions. To this end, we systematically examine existing FPL methods across the full model lifecycle: pre-training, fine-tuning, and practical applications, while discussing security, privacy, and robustness issues and summarizing existing defense mechanisms. Finally, we highlight open challenges and future directions, aiming to help readers understand how the insights drive research in FPL.

56. Do AI chatbots find what experts would? Effects of model, user role, and sample size on study retrieval for medical questions

Authors: Qingfang Liu , Qiao Jin , Joe D. Menke , Thorsten Kahnt , Zhiyong Lu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13786
Abstract:

Large language model (LLM) chatbots are increasingly used to answer clinical questions with citations to relevant clinical studies. Prior research has largely focused on citation fabrication, leaving a gap in evaluating the quality of retrieved studies and the factors driving their selection. In this study, we evaluated three general-purpose LLM chatbots: Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and ChatGPT GPT-5.5. We prompted the models with clinical questions adapted from 20 review questions in Issues 6 and 7 of the 2026 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, simulating patient, clinician, and evidence-synthesis researcher roles. Each chatbot was queried under each user role with four independent repetitions, yielding 720 responses. Each chatbot was asked to support its answers with primary clinical citations, which we benchmarked against the included and excluded study sets of the Cochrane reviews. On average, a chatbot response retrieved 39.2% $\pm$ 29.8% of Cochrane included studies, while citing 5.0% $\pm$ 9.4% of excluded studies. Recall of Cochrane included studies varied significantly by model and user role. ChatGPT achieved higher recall than Claude or Gemini (63.1% $\pm$ 29.5% vs. 37.0% $\pm$ 23.8% vs. 17.3% $\pm$ 13.1%; $p=2.0\times10^{-5}$). The researcher role yielded higher recall than the clinician or patient roles (42.8% $\pm$ 30.8% vs. 38.6% $\pm$ 28.9% vs. 36.1% $\pm$ 29.3%; $p=2.0\times10^{-5}$). Controlling for publication year, citations per year, and open-access status, sample size was the only independently significant predictor of retrieval (odds ratio 1.80 per 1-unit increase in log sample size, 95% CI 1.37-2.36, $p=2.34\times10^{-5}$). These findings suggest that while LLM chatbots can retrieve some studies identified by expert reviewers, their performance varies by model and user role, and they exhibit a bias toward clinical trials with larger sample sizes.

57. Amplified Does Not Mean Predictive: Reasoning Behaviors in Thinking Models

Authors: Jean de Dieu Nyandwi , Leena Mathur , Yonatan Bisk , Robert Hawkins , Graham Neubig
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13760
Abstract:

Which reasoning behaviors are associated with correct answers in reasoning models, and does reasoning-oriented training amplify those behaviors? This distinction is important because reasoning-oriented training can make traces look more deliberative without amplifying the behaviors most tied to model correctness. We quantify this mismatch with Behavioral Lift, a metric that measures how much correctness changes when a behavior is present versus absent in a model’s reasoning trace. Across 15 models and 6 benchmarks spanning text-only and vision-language reasoning, we annotate 15,282 traces with a taxonomy whose core behaviors are defined for both LLM and VLM traces. We find evidence for an Amplification-Lift Gap, in which thinking models strongly amplify self-correction, hypothesis testing, and uncertainty acknowledgment, while the highest-lift behaviors are confidence calibration, knowledge alignment, and self-awareness. Confidence calibration is among the strongest positive signals of correctness in both modalities, yet is barely amplified; uncertainty acknowledgment is amplified by 3–7$\times$, yet is weakly or negatively associated with correctness. We find that reasoning-oriented training does not preferentially amplify the highest-Lift behaviors, motivating process-level objectives that reward calibrated and grounded reasoning rather than surface form alone.

58. Does ISO-Grounded NFR Specification Improve LLM Code Generation? A Comparison of Rich and Structured Interventions against a Natural-Language Baseline

Authors: Joào Pedro Monteiro Pereira , Vinicius Cardoso Garcia
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13742

Abstract:

In LLM-based code generation, Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) are often specified as terse one-line phrases. We ask whether grounding those specifications in ISO/IEC 25010 Quality Model, either as rich natural-language prose (NL-rich) or as structured JSON (Structured), improves code generated on HumanEval/HumanEval-ET compared to a RobuNFR-style one-line baseline (NL-simple). We evaluate four NFRs (performance, error handling, code smell, readability) with ten prompt variations per condition under a fixed model snapshot and paired non-parametric analysis. Primary finding: ISO-grounded enrichment improves static quality proxies (unreadability density falls across all four NFRs (e.g., Performance 0.88 -> 0.69 for NL-rich)) and reduces sensitivity to prompt wording, but does not reliably improve functional correctness; for error handling, extended-test pass rate decreases, suggesting tension between defensive coding patterns and exact-output benchmarks. Secondary finding: when ISO content is held constant, NL-rich and Structured differ negligibly in correctness ( delta <= 0.023), indicating that semantic content matters more than JSON-vs-prose format. Practitioners should invest in standard-grounded NFR content rather than serialization form. A fully traceable replication package is provided.

59. MedPlex: Deep Vision-Language Co-Adaptation for Clinically Grounded Medical Segmentation

Authors: Rafi Ibn Sultan , Hui Zhu , Chengyin Li , Dongxiao Zhu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13690
Abstract:

Medical image segmentation is still largely treated as a vision-only problem, although clinical interpretation often relies on textual knowledge of anatomy, location, appearance, and surrounding context. Existing text-guided segmentation methods within the Vision-Language Model (VLM) paradigm often use language only as a late conditioning signal, limiting its influence on visual representation learning. We introduce MedPlex (Medical Plexus of Vision and Language), an end-to-end VLM framework that makes text guidance a continuous, clinically grounded component of segmentation learning. Through Bi-Fusion (Bidirectional Fusion), visual and textual representations evolve jointly across the encoding hierarchy. MedPlex further introduces class-level and region-level concept alignment to organize the shared representation at complementary granularities. Class-level alignment anchors each anatomical target to an aggregated clinical concept profile, while region-level alignment preserves individual concepts, such as shape, location, appearance, and texture, through class-specific visual evidence. In this way, language provides structured supervision throughout the encoder rather than serving only as a late-stage cue. MedPlex achieves state-of-the-art performance across CT and MR benchmarks for multi-organ, cardiac substructure, and tumor segmentation, including settings with real free-text clinical supervision. Code: this https URL .

60. Fine-Tuning Qwen3-27B for C-to-Rust Code Translation: A Three-Stage Curriculum of Pretraining, Debugging-Aware SFT, and Task-Specific SFT

Authors: Pu Zhao , Changdi Yang , Yixiao Chen , Yi Gao , Yifan Cao , Haochen Zeng , Yanzhi Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13681
Abstract:

Translating C code into safe, idiomatic Rust is a longstanding software-engineering goal because it can eliminate entire classes of memory-safety vulnerabilities while preserving the functional behavior of legacy systems. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for this task but typically underperform when applied off-the-shelf, since general-purpose pretraining rarely emphasizes idiomatic Rust generation, cross-language semantic equivalence, or the ability to reason about and repair compiler/runtime feedback. In this report we describe a three-stage fine-tuning curriculum applied to Qwen3-27B that is designed to progressively specialize the model for the C-to-Rust (C2Rust) translation task: (1) continued pretraining on Rust-centric corpora to strengthen the model’s prior over idiomatic Rust syntax and standard-library usage; (2) supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on the microsoft/Verus_Training_Data dataset to instill debugging and self-repair behavior over Rust code; and (3) task-specific SFT on paired C/Rust solutions derived from LeetCode problems to teach direct semantic translation. We evaluate the resulting model using the agentic, static-analysis-guided verification framework of SACTOR, which performs structure-aware, two-phase (unidiomatic to idiomatic) translation with foreign-function-interface (FFI)-based end-to-end (E2E) testing. We report success rate, idiomaticity (Clippy lint counts, unsafe-code fraction), and failure-mode analyses, and compare our fine-tuned model against baseline Qwen3-27B and other LLMs evaluated under the same framework.

61. Measuring Fairness in Large Audio Language Models via Semantic-Aware Bias Estimation

Authors: Zhe Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13624
Abstract:

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have seen increasing use for audio understanding tasks such as speech recognition and audio question answering, raising concerns about fairness across demographic subgroups. Fairness evaluation in spoken-input settings is challenging due to confounding factors, including semantic variation in spoken content and speaker-specific characteristics. Ignoring these factors can result in misleading conclusions about model bias. We propose a semantic-aware mixed-effects regression framework for fairness evaluation in LALMs that explicitly accounts for these confounders. Our approach incorporates sentence-level semantic embeddings of reference text as covariates and models speaker identity as a random effect. Notably, semantic representations are extracted from the same LALM under evaluation, enabling semantic control over variation as perceived by the model itself. Experiments on simulated data and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed approach substantially reduces spurious fairness findings and yields more robust and interpretable estimates of subgroup performance differences.

62. Training-Free Knowledge Transfer Across Model Scales through Activation-Guided Pruning

Authors: Jiahe Fan , Si Chen , Yinghao Hou , Aiyuan Zhang , Hong Xie
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13596
Abstract:

Heterogeneous model fusion seeks to combine models that differ in tasks, initializations, architectures, or scales. We study an underexplored cross-scale setting: improving a small recipient language model with a stronger donor despite substantial architectural mismatch. We ask whether useful capabilities can be transferred without explicit neuron-wise semantic alignment. Building on the observation that truncating a large model to a smaller architecture and injecting it with a tiny mixing weight can already improve the recipient, we propose Activation-Prune-Merge (APM), an activation-guided framework for cross-scale fusion. APM constructs task-conditioned activation maps on the donor, selects salient layers, hidden dimensions, attention heads, and MLP neurons to prune it to the recipient architecture, and injects the resulting donor slice into the original recipient using a micro interpolation coefficient. This formulation treats the donor as a source of concentrated functional components rather than requiring precise structural transplantation. Across 16 benchmarks spanning reasoning, mathematics, code generation, instruction following, and classification, APM improves the overall average accuracy from 55.5% to 60.6% over the original 3B recipient. RTE accuracy increases from 64.3% to 82.3%, QNLI from 52.3% to 65.7%, and BoolQ from 70.8% to 79.2%. Analyses of injection ratios and sequential multi-stage fusion further suggest that activation-guided extraction improves the quality of the transferable donor slice while preserving the small-ratio fusion regime. These results provide evidence that cross-scale heterogeneous fusion can succeed without explicit semantic alignment when the donor contribution is sufficiently concentrated and carefully selected.

63. Context Aware AI Assistant and AR Interface for Lunar Extravehicular Activity (EVA) Procedural Guidance

Authors: Rodrigo Gallardo , Qilmeg Doudatcz , Ganit Goldstein , Ilkyaz Sarimehmetoglu , Sergio Mutis , Alexander Htet Kyaw , Anita Lin , Clara Emmerling , Berfin Ataman , Skylar Tibbits
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13589
Abstract:

As human space exploration returns to the Moon, astronauts need rapid access to procedural information during extravehicular activities (EVAs), where attention is divided across navigation, repair tasks, tool handling, and environmental risk. The challenge is not the absence of information, but surfacing the right information at the right moment. We present GAIN-AI (Guided Assistant for Intelligent Navigation), a context-aware AI assistant and minimal heads-up interface for procedural guidance in simulated lunar EVA. The system operates in two layers. The first grounds a large language model with structured context: EVA procedure documents, live telemetry data, and error-handling protocols encoded as JSON. The second restructures that output into three compact units for AR display: Goal, Task, and Verification. Evaluated on 111 synthetic EVA scenarios, the system scores 10.0/10 on nominal conditions and 8.15/10 on single-fault scenarios, with performance degrading on multi-fault and boundary-threshold cases.

64. From Prediction to Intervention: Personalized Meal-Level Glucose Regulation via an LLM Agent

Authors: Mingyu Huang , Weiqing Min , Ying Jin , Yilin Wang , Shuqiang Jiang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13581
Abstract:

Personalized glucose regulation remains a central yet unresolved challenge in precision nutrition, as postprandial glucose response varies substantially across individuals. Existing approaches based on glycemic indices fail to adequately account for such heterogeneity and lack the mechanism to dynamically adjust meals based on personal physiological feedback. In this context, recent advances in LLM-based agents offer a promising direction, as they enable context-aware reasoning and iterative refinement. Inspired by this, we propose a physio-feedback agentic loop, a unified system that integrates individualized absorption modeling with dietary intervention to regulate glucose response. Specifically, we develop a Physiology-Aware Glucose Predictor to model individualized absorption dynamics through a learnable Temporal Physiological Absorption Decay Module. We then construct a Prediction-Driven Two-Stage Meal Optimization Agent that iteratively refines real-world meals using predicted outcomes as explicit feedback. Through extensive experiments on multiple public datasets, we demonstrate that our method not only improves prediction accuracy but also effectively reduces glucose excursions. To the best of our knowledge, this paper marks the first step in integrating physiological learning with an LLM-based agent for personalized glucose regulation.

65. Jais 2: A Family of Arabic-Centric Open Large Language Models

Authors: Mohamed Anwar , Abed Alhakim Freihat , George Ibrahim , Mostafa Awad , Abdelrahman Sadallah , Gurpreet Gosal , Gokulakrishnan Ramakrishnan , Sarath Chandran , Biswajit Mishra , Rituraj Joshi , Ahmed Frikha , Etienne Goffinet , Abhishek Maiti , Ali El Filali , Sarah AlBarri , Samujjwal Ghosh , Rahul Pal , Parvez Mullah , Awantika Shukla , Sajid siddiki , Samta Kamboj , Onkar Pandit , Sunil Kumar Sahu , AbdelRahman Elbadawy , Amr Mohamed , Ahmad Chamma , Evan Dufraisse , Abdelaziz Bounhar , Dani Bouch , Hadi Abdine , Guokan Shang , Fajri Koto , Yuxia Wang , Zhuohan Xie , Ali Mekky , Rania Elbadry , Sarfraz Ahmad , Momina Ahsan , Omar El Herraoui , Daniil Orel , Hasan Iqbal , Kareem Elzeky , Mervat Abassy , Kareem Elozeiri , Saadeldine Eletter , Farah Atif , Nurdaulet Mukhituly , Haonan Li , Xudong Han , Aaryamonvikram Singh , Zainul Abedien Ahmed Quraishi , Neha Sengupta , Larry Murray , Avraham Sheinin , Joel Hestness , Natalia Vassilieva , Hector Xuguang Ren , Zhengzhong Liu , Michalis Vazirgiannis , Preslav Nakov
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13580
Abstract:

Jais 2 is a family of Arabic-centric large language models developed jointly by MBZUAI, Cerebras, and Inception, designed to advance Arabic-centric language modeling, with strong performance across the Arabic and culturally grounded benchmarks evaluated in this report. The family includes, to our knowledge, the largest open Arabic-centric LLM trained from scratch at 70B parameters, and a competitive 8B-parameter variant among the evaluated open models. A custom Arabic-centric vocabulary enables efficient training and inference. In addition, an optimized architecture and training recipe yield highly compute-efficient training. With a substantially smaller token budget than comparable models, Jais 2 achieves strong Arabic performance on the benchmarks considered in this report and competitive English results. The models obtain leading results among the evaluated open models on OALL2 and AraGen. They also perform strongly on several culturally grounded Arabic benchmarks, including poetry, religion, cuisine, and dream interpretation, as well as in general tasks such as translation and summarization. We release the models in HuggingFace under a commercially permissive license. Jais 2 70B is also released as a chat app on the Web, iOS, and Android; it runs on Cerebras hardware, delivering up to 2,000 tokens per second, and enabling high-throughput Arabic-centric chat serving in our deployment setting. By uniting scale, linguistic diversity, cultural fidelity, openness, and speed, Jais 2 provides an open-weight foundation intended to support further research and development in Arabic-centric LLMs.

66. Not All Tokens Are Equal: Inflation-Aware Routing for Agentic LLM Systems

Authors: Heming Fu , Shan Lin , Qianqian Xie , Guojun Xiong
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13571
Abstract:

When a language model fails to answer a query on the first attempt, an agentic system retries, consuming additional tokens each time. This retry overhead creates a gap between what a model’s per-token price implies and what a full workflow actually costs. We call this gap \emph{token inflation} and define it as the ratio of true workflow cost to single-call cost. Systems like FrugalGPT route based on the latter, which can underestimate real cost by more than $2\times$ on difficult tasks. We address this with InflationAgent, a four-stage router that (1) measures token inflation systematically across model tiers and task types, finding inflation as high as $4.25\times$ for a 7B model on multi-hop question answering; (2) introduces CoT Branching Entropy (CBE), a pre-execution difficulty signal computed entirely from local inference, which predicts high inflation with AUROC 0.887; and (3) selects models by maximizing a Semantic Exchange Rate (SER) that divides expected accuracy by predicted true cost, with a fresh-escalation policy that discards failed chains before routing to a stronger model. On GSM8K under a fixed budget, InflationAgent achieves 94.7\% accuracy versus 91.0\% for FrugalGPT while using 31\% fewer tokens, and we show that forwarding a failed reasoning chain to GPT-4o reduces its accuracy by up to 34.8 percentage points, validating the fresh-escalation design.

67. Think in Latent, Explain in Language: Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning

Authors: Dayuan Zhao , Shengcao Cao , Yu-Xiong Wang , Liang-Yan Gui
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13570
Abstract:

Latent reasoning has emerged as a powerful alternative to text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT), offering significant gains in computational efficiency by compressing verbose reasoning into compact embeddings. However, compressing reasoning into the latent space renders the thinking opaque, hindering its interpretability. Current methods present a stark trade-off: they either function as unexplainable ‘‘black boxes’’ (e.g., Coconut), where the latent reasoning is not human-readable, or rely on separate post-hoc decoders for explainability (e.g., Heima), introducing architectural overhead and decoupling the explanation from the actual reasoning process. In this work, we present a unified framework for Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning (SELR) that trains a single model to perform efficient and inherently explainable latent reasoning. Our core contribution is a novel multi-task training objective that optimizes for two goals simultaneously: (1) an Answer Loss that optimizes the latent reasoning trajectory to produce accurate final answers, and (2) a CoT Loss that explicitly trains the same model to decode its own latent representations back into human-understandable reasoning steps. This design ensures that generated latent representations are both task-effective and semantically interpretable, eliminating the need for external decoders. We validate the effectiveness of SELR on both Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs), demonstrating that SELR achieves superior token efficiency and accuracy compared to baselines, while uniquely providing self-contained explainability without auxiliary models. Project page is available at this https URL .

68. Proxy-Validated LLM UX Micro-Simulations: An Artifact-First Protocol for Early-Stage Decision Support

Authors: Alexandre Cristovão Maiorano
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13563
Abstract:

Early-stage teams often lack users, time, and budget to run repeated UX studies, yet still need decision-oriented signals to iterate safely. We study an LLM-driven UX micro-simulation pipeline that generates structured customer-experience feedback (walkthrough steps, friction points, micro-survey signals) from versioned prompts, personas, tasks, and UI snapshots. Because public usability datasets with task outcomes are scarce, we validate simulated friction themes using multiple public proxy corpora (app reviews, support tweets, and open-source software issues). We propose a lightweight proxy-validation protocol with two alignment metrics: top-k Jaccard and distributional weighted-Jaccard (W), and compare lexical, TF-IDF, and multilingual embedding baselines across six proxy datasets. Embedding-based alignment yields higher W than lexical baselines on primary app-review and support-tweet proxies (e.g., W=0.128 vs 0.000 on Gojek), while top-k Jaccard is shown to overstate alignment at large k. We ablate four agent strategies (single-pass, best-of-N, hybrid, and a proposed score-then-select judge) across Azure OpenAI deployments and report bootstrap confidence intervals over 8 method-dataset pairs; these intervals reveal that the embedding W point estimate is systematically unstable under resampling at our subsample size. We also provide a failure-mode analysis of grounding and fabrication proxies, with documented calibration caveats and worked examples of outputs flagged as fabricated by an adversarial judge. Our artifact-first pipeline produces reproducible tables and figures from versioned run artifacts, supporting iterative prompt and taxonomy refinement before final paid-model calibration.

LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-08-17

1. Handover of In-Context Learning State Across Session Boundaries

2. Split the Labor: Separating Evidence Interpretation from Decision Aggregation

3. SheetCompass: Hierarchical Relation Graphs for Agentic Spreadsheet Reasoning

4. Knowing When to Stop: Bayesian Optimal Stopping for LLM Evaluations

5. LLMs Don’t Pay for the Jump

6. Tripwire: Triggering Aligned Refusal via Statistically Certified Safety Neurons

7. AgentRewind: Recoverable Execution for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

8. ScienceFlow: A long-horizon agent for ML research, scientific discovery and beyond

9. Clearing the Fog: Towards Installing and Refining Proactive Exploration Capabilities in LLM Agents

10. AnchorBench: A Multi-Pathway Benchmark for the Anchoring Effect in LLMs

11. TimeSage-EV: A Live Benchmark for Agentic Time Series Analysis in Evolving Environments

12. Grounding Without Corrective Control: Truth-Tracking Profiles for Large Language Models

13. APTER: Adaptive Post-Training with Expert-Grounded Rubrics

14. Can Language Models Understand mmWave Data? Benchmarking Large Language Models for mmWave Radar-Based Human Understanding

15. BiasTrace: Linking Reasoning Behaviours to Biased Outputs in LLMs

16. Towards Efficient Multimodal and Multilingual Opinion Extraction for STI: A QLoRA-Based Fine-Tuning Approach

17. A Graph-Based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Structured Drift Diagnosis and Recovery in Autonomous LLM Agents

18. Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers

19. Scaling Domain Data Repetition in LLM Pretraining

20. Demystifying Agent Skills: Why They Work-Until They Don’t

21. Agent-Orchestration in Autonomous Chip Design

22. Buy the Rumor, Sell the News: When Is News Priced In?

23. AI Research Preference Models

24. Never the Number: Structural Abstention for AI Systems Whose Answers Are Consumed as Fact

25. When Personal Memory Has No Single Answer: Evaluating LLM Agents under Irreducible Conflict

26. From Passive Delegates to Strategic Negotiators: Reinforcing Social Reasoning in Small Language Models with SocialRL

27. Simulation-Aware In-Context Policy Improvement for LLM-Aided Analog Layout Refinement

28. Second Thought: Reasoning in Parallel as LLM Agents Act and Observe

29. How Compliant is Sepsis Treatment? An Expert-Guided Neuro-symbolic Pipeline for Generating Clinical Compliance Insights

30. SemPlan: Benchmarking Structured Semantic Planning for LLM-Based Queries over Enterprise Data

31. Evaluating Agentic Learning Harness Capabilities Without Labels via the Scaling Hypothesis

32. No Universal Signal Predicts Sample-Level LLM Regression under Version Updates

33. Active Perception for Embodied Disambiguation

34. Measuring Cross-Task Behavioral Consistency in Language Model Agents

35. Stable Miscalibration in Large Language Models: A Practical View of High-Confidence Errors

36. Agentao: A Governed Local-First Runtime for Tool-Using LLM Agents

37. A Year in LLM Serving: Workload Evolution, Caching and Load-Balancing

38. Modular Cognitive Architecture Emerges in Large Language Models

39. Depth-Aware Sensitivity Analysis of Mixture-of-Experts Models via Magnitude-Based Expert Masking

40. Inducing Reward-Free Judging Rubrics that Reduce Over-Crediting in Agent Evaluation

41. Whose doctor does the AI recommend? An algorithm audit of reputation and demographic signals in large language model-assisted physician choice

42. DeaMoE: Efficient MoE Structure for Fast Small-Batch Decoding

43. A Hybrid LLM-Based Framework for Automated Security Annotation Generation in Business Process Models

44. A Four-Axis Trustworthiness Benchmark for LLM-as-Judge in Principle-Based Regulation

45. Seeing Red, Thinking Bad: Color Bias in Vision Language Models

46. Act2Intention: A Benchmark For Developing Active Mobile Agents Through Inferring User Intention from GUI Actions

47. P2Skill: Privacy Preserving Skill Distillation for Cloud-Local LLM Inference Systems

48. MACS: A Hybrid Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable Conversational E-Commerce Recommendation

49. Rethinking Automated Program Repair: The Impact of Bug Complexity, Fault Localization, and LLM Cost-efficiency

50. Content Based Video Narration of Gameplay with Vision Language Models

51. MedClaw: Heuristic Agent Harness for Long-Horizon Surgical Video Reasoning

52. Musical Mirrors: The LLM as Sounding Board in Songwriting

53. CForce: Boosting Parallel Decoding for dLLMs via Consistency Forcing

54. Agentic Transaction: Towards ACID-Compliant Agent Systems

55. Federated Prompt Learning: A Unified Framework, Empirical Analysis, and Future Directions

56. Do AI chatbots find what experts would? Effects of model, user role, and sample size on study retrieval for medical questions

57. Amplified Does Not Mean Predictive: Reasoning Behaviors in Thinking Models

58. Does ISO-Grounded NFR Specification Improve LLM Code Generation? A Comparison of Rich and Structured Interventions against a Natural-Language Baseline

59. MedPlex: Deep Vision-Language Co-Adaptation for Clinically Grounded Medical Segmentation

60. Fine-Tuning Qwen3-27B for C-to-Rust Code Translation: A Three-Stage Curriculum of Pretraining, Debugging-Aware SFT, and Task-Specific SFT

61. Measuring Fairness in Large Audio Language Models via Semantic-Aware Bias Estimation

62. Training-Free Knowledge Transfer Across Model Scales through Activation-Guided Pruning

63. Context Aware AI Assistant and AR Interface for Lunar Extravehicular Activity (EVA) Procedural Guidance

64. From Prediction to Intervention: Personalized Meal-Level Glucose Regulation via an LLM Agent

65. Jais 2: A Family of Arabic-Centric Open Large Language Models

66. Not All Tokens Are Equal: Inflation-Aware Routing for Agentic LLM Systems

67. Think in Latent, Explain in Language: Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning

68. Proxy-Validated LLM UX Micro-Simulations: An Artifact-First Protocol for Early-Stage Decision Support