LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-03-31

1. Not Search, But Scan: Benchmarking MLLMs on Scan-Oriented Academic Paper Reasoning

Authors: Rongjin Li , Zichen Tang , Xianghe Wang , Xinyi Hu , Zhengyu Wang , Zhengyu Lu , Yiling Huang , Jiayuan Chen , Weisheng Tan , Jiacheng Liu , Zhongjun Yang , Haihong E
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28651
Abstract:

With the rapid progress of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), AI already performs well at literature retrieval and certain reasoning tasks, serving as a capable assistant to human researchers, yet it remains far from autonomous research. The fundamental reason is that current work on academic paper reasoning is largely confined to a search-oriented paradigm centered on pre-specified targets, with reasoning grounded in relevance retrieval, which struggles to support researcher-style full-document understanding, reasoning, and verification. To bridge this gap, we propose \textbf{ScholScan}, a new benchmark for academic paper reasoning. ScholScan introduces a scan-oriented task setting that asks models to read and cross-check entire papers like human researchers, scanning the document to identify consistency issues. The benchmark comprises 1,800 carefully annotated questions drawn from nine error categories across 13 natural-science domains and 715 papers, and provides detailed annotations for evidence localization and reasoning traces, together with a unified evaluation protocol. We assessed 15 models across 24 input configurations and conducted a fine-grained analysis of MLLM capabilities for all error categories. Across the board, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods yield no significant improvements, revealing systematic deficiencies of current MLLMs on scan-oriented tasks and underscoring the challenge posed by ScholScan. We expect ScholScan to be the leading and representative work of the scan-oriented task paradigm.

2. The Ultimate Tutorial for AI-driven Scale Development in Generative Psychometrics: Releasing AIGENIE from its Bottle

Authors: Lara Russell-Lasalandra , Hudson Golino , Luis Eduardo Garrido , Alexander P. Christensen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28643
Abstract:

Psychological scale development has traditionally required extensive expert involvement, iterative revision, and large-scale pilot testing before psychometric evaluation can begin. The AIGENIE R package implements the AI-GENIE framework (Automatic Item Generation with Network-Integrated Evaluation), which integrates large language model (LLM) text generation with network psychometric methods to automate the early stages of this process. The package generates candidate item pools using LLMs, transforms them into high-dimensional embeddings, and applies a multi-step reduction pipeline – Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA), Unique Variable Analysis (UVA), and bootstrap EGA – to produce structurally validated item pools entirely in silico. This tutorial introduces the package across six parts: installation and setup, understanding Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), text generation, item generation, the AIGENIE function, and the GENIE function. Two running examples illustrate the package’s use: the Big Five personality model (a well-established construct) and AI Anxiety (an emerging construct). The package supports multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, HuggingFace, and local models), offers a fully offline mode with no external API calls, and provides the GENIE() function for researchers who wish to apply the psychometric reduction pipeline to existing item pools regardless of their origin. The AIGENIE package is freely available on R-universe at this https URL .

3. Seeing with You: Perception-Reasoning Coevolution for Multimodal Reasoning

Authors: Ziqi Miao , Haonan Jia , Lijun Li , Chen Qian , Yuan Xiong , Wenting Yan , Jing Shao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28618
Abstract:

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has substantially enhanced the reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). However, existing RLVR approaches typically rely on outcome-driven optimization that updates both perception and reasoning using a shared reward based solely on the final answer. This shared reward blurs credit assignment, frequently improving reasoning patterns while failing to reliably enhance the accuracy of upstream visual evidence extraction. To address this perception bottleneck, we introduce PRCO (Perception-Reasoning Coevolution), a dual-role RLVR framework with a shared policy. PRCO consists of two cooperative roles: an Observer that generates an evidence caption tailored to the question and a Solver that predicts the final answer based on this caption. Crucially, PRCO employs role-specific reward signals: the Solver is optimized using verifiable outcome rewards on the final answer, while the Observer receives a utility reward derived from the Solver’s downstream success. Extensive experiments across eight challenging multimodal reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that PRCO yields consistent improvements across model scales by over 7 points on average accuracy compared to the base model, outperforming prior open-source RL-tuned baselines.

4. MonitorBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Monitorability in Large Language Models

Authors: Han Wang , Yifan Sun , Brian Ko , Mann Talati , Jiawen Gong , Zimeng Li , Naicheng Yu , Xucheng Yu , Wei Shen , Vedant Jolly , Huan Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28590
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) can generate chains of thought (CoTs) that are not always causally responsible for their final outputs. When such a mismatch occurs, the CoT no longer faithfully reflects the decision-critical factors driving the model’s behavior, leading to the reduced CoT monitorability problem. However, a comprehensive and fully open-source benchmark for studying CoT monitorability remains lacking. To address this gap, we propose MonitorBench, a systematic benchmark for evaluating CoT monitorability in LLMs. MonitorBench provides: (1) a diverse set of 1,514 test instances with carefully designed decision-critical factors across 19 tasks spanning 7 categories to characterize when CoTs can be used to monitor the factors driving LLM behavior; and (2) two stress-test settings to quantify the extent to which CoT monitorability can be degraded. Extensive experiments across multiple popular LLMs with varying capabilities show that CoT monitorability is higher when producing the final target response requires structural reasoning through the decision-critical factor. Closed-source LLMs generally show lower monitorability, and there exists a negative relationship between monitorability and model capability. Moreover, both open- and closed-source LLMs can intentionally reduce monitorability under stress-tests, with monitorability dropping by up to 30% in some tasks that do not require structural reasoning over the decision-critical factors. Beyond these empirical insights, MonitorBench provides a basis for further research on evaluating future LLMs, studying advanced stress-test monitorability techniques, and developing new monitoring approaches.

5. Towards a Medical AI Scientist

Authors: Hongtao Wu , Boyun Zheng , Dingjie Song , Yu Jiang , Jianfeng Gao , Lei Xing , Lichao Sun , Yixuan Yuan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28589
Abstract:

Autonomous systems that generate scientific hypotheses, conduct experiments, and draft manuscripts have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for accelerating discovery. However, existing AI Scientists remain largely domain-agnostic, limiting their applicability to clinical medicine, where research is required to be grounded in medical evidence with specialized data modalities. In this work, we introduce Medical AI Scientist, the first autonomous research framework tailored to clinical autonomous research. It enables clinically grounded ideation by transforming extensively surveyed literature into actionable evidence through clinician-engineer co-reasoning mechanism, which improves the traceability of generated research ideas. It further facilitates evidence-grounded manuscript drafting guided by structured medical compositional conventions and ethical policies. The framework operates under 3 research modes, namely paper-based reproduction, literature-inspired innovation, and task-driven exploration, each corresponding to a distinct level of automated scientific inquiry with progressively increasing autonomy. Comprehensive evaluations by both large language models and human experts demonstrate that the ideas generated by the Medical AI Scientist are of substantially higher quality than those produced by commercial LLMs across 171 cases, 19 clinical tasks, and 6 data modalities. Meanwhile, our system achieves strong alignment between the proposed method and its implementation, while also demonstrating significantly higher success rates in executable experiments. Double-blind evaluations by human experts and the Stanford Agentic Reviewer suggest that the generated manuscripts approach MICCAI-level quality, while consistently surpassing those from ISBI and BIBM. The proposed Medical AI Scientist highlights the potential of leveraging AI for autonomous scientific discovery in healthcare.

6. The Scaffold Effect: How Prompt Framing Drives Apparent Multimodal Gains in Clinical VLM Evaluation

Authors: Doan Nam Long Vu , Simone Balloccu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28387
Abstract:

Trustworthy clinical AI requires that performance gains reflect genuine evidence integration rather than surface-level artifacts. We evaluate 12 open-weight vision-language models (VLMs) on binary classification across two clinical neuroimaging cohorts, \textsc{FOR2107} (affective disorders) and \textsc{OASIS-3} (cognitive decline). Both datasets come with structural MRI data that carries no reliable individual-level diagnostic signal. Under these conditions, smaller VLMs exhibit gains of up to 58\% F1 upon introduction of neuroimaging context, with distilled models becoming competitive with counterparts an order of magnitude larger. A contrastive confidence analysis reveals that merely \emph{mentioning} MRI availability in the task prompt accounts for 70-80\% of this shift, independent of whether imaging data is present, a domain-specific instance of modality collapse we term the \emph{scaffold effect}. Expert evaluation reveals fabrication of neuroimaging-grounded justifications across all conditions, and preference alignment, while eliminating MRI-referencing behavior, collapses both conditions toward random baseline. Our findings demonstrate that surface evaluations are inadequate indicators of multimodal reasoning, with direct implications for the deployment of VLMs in clinical settings.

7. COvolve: Adversarial Co-Evolution of Large-Language-Model-Generated Policies and Environments via Two-Player Zero-Sum Game

Authors: Alkis Sygkounas , Rishi Hazra , Andreas Persson , Pedro Zuidberg Dos Martires , Amy Loutfi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28386
Abstract:

A central challenge in building continually improving agents is that training environments are typically static or manually constructed. This restricts continual learning and generalization beyond the training distribution. We address this with COvolve, a co-evolutionary framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate both environments and agent policies, expressed as executable Python code. We model the interaction between environment and policy designers as a two-player zero-sum game, ensuring adversarial co-evolution in which environments expose policy weaknesses and policies adapt in response. This process induces an automated curriculum in which environments and policies co-evolve toward increasing complexity. To guarantee robustness and prevent forgetting as the curriculum progresses, we compute the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium (MSNE) of the zero-sum game, thereby yielding a meta-policy. This MSNE meta-policy ensures that the agent does not forget to solve previously seen environments while learning to solve previously unseen ones. Experiments in urban driving, symbolic maze-solving, and geometric navigation showcase that COvolve produces progressively more complex environments. Our results demonstrate the potential of LLM-driven co-evolution to achieve open-ended learning without predefined task distributions or manual intervention.

8. Deep Research of Deep Research: From Transformer to Agent, From AI to AI for Science

Authors: Yipeng Yu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28361
Abstract:

With the advancement of large language models (LLMs) in their knowledge base and reasoning capabilities, their interactive modalities have evolved from pure text to multimodality and further to agentic tool use. Consequently, their applications have broadened from question answering to AI assistants and now to general-purpose agents. Deep research (DR) represents a prototypical vertical application for general-purpose agents, which represents an ideal approach for intelligent information processing and assisting humans in discovering and solving problems, with the goal of reaching or even surpassing the level of top human scientists. This paper provides a deep research of deep research. We articulate a clear and precise definition of deep research and unify perspectives from industry’s deep research and academia’s AI for Science (AI4S) within a developmental framework. We position LLMs and Stable Diffusion as the twin pillars of generative AI, and lay out a roadmap evolving from the Transformer to agents. We examine the progress of AI4S across various disciplines. We identify the predominant paradigms of human-AI interaction and prevailing system architectures, and discuss the major challenges and fundamental research issues that remain. AI supports scientific innovation, and science also can contribute to AI growth (Science for AI, S4AI). We hope this paper can help bridge the gap between the AI and AI4S communities.

9. CoE: Collaborative Entropy for Uncertainty Quantification in Agentic Multi-LLM Systems

Authors: Kangkang Sun , Jun Wu , Jianhua Li , Minyi Guo , Xiuzhen Che , Jianwei Huang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28360
Abstract:

Uncertainty estimation in multi-LLM systems remains largely single-model-centric: existing methods quantify uncertainty within each model but do not adequately capture semantic disagreement across models. To address this gap, we propose Collaborative Entropy (CoE), a unified information-theoretic metric for semantic uncertainty in multi-LLM collaboration. CoE is defined on a shared semantic cluster space and combines two components: intra-model semantic entropy and inter-model divergence to the ensemble mean. CoE is not a weighted ensemble predictor; it is a system-level uncertainty measure that characterizes collaborative confidence and disagreement. We analyze several core properties of CoE, including non-negativity, zero-value certainty under perfect semantic consensus, and the behavior of CoE when individual models collapse to delta distributions. These results clarify when reducing per-model uncertainty is sufficient and when residual inter-model disagreement remains. We also present a simple CoE-guided, training-free post-hoc coordination heuristic as a practical application of the metric. Experiments on \textit{TriviaQA} and \textit{SQuAD} with LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct, and Mistral-7B-Instruct show that CoE provides stronger uncertainty estimation than standard entropy- and divergence-based baselines, with gains becoming larger as additional heterogeneous models are introduced. Overall, CoE offers a useful uncertainty-aware perspective on multi-LLM collaboration.

10. A Multi-Agent Rhizomatic Pipeline for Non-Linear Literature Analysis

Authors: Julio C. Serrano. Joonas Kevari , Rumy Narayan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28336
Abstract:

Systematic literature reviews in the social sciences overwhelmingly follow arborescent logics – hierarchical keyword filtering, linear screening, and taxonomic classification – that suppress the lateral connections, ruptures, and emergent patterns characteristic of complex research landscapes. This research note presents the Rhizomatic Research Agent (V3), a multi-agent computational pipeline grounded in Deleuzian process-relational ontology, designed to conduct non-linear literature analysis through 12 specialized agents operating across a seven-phase architecture. The system was developed in response to the methodological groundwork established by (Narayan2023), who employed rhizomatic inquiry in her doctoral research on sustainable energy transitions but relied on manual, researcher-driven exploration. The Rhizomatic Research Agent operationalizes the six principles of the rhizome – connection, heterogeneity, multiplicity, asignifying rupture, cartography, and decalcomania – into an automated pipeline integrating large language model (LLM) orchestration, dual-source corpus ingestion from OpenAlex and arXiv, SciBERT semantic topography, and dynamic rupture detection protocols. Preliminary deployment demonstrates the system’s capacity to surface cross-disciplinary convergences and structural research gaps that conventional review methods systematically overlook. The pipeline is open-source and extensible to any phenomenon zone where non-linear knowledge mapping is required.

11. Evaluating LLMs for Answering Student Questions in Introductory Programming Courses

Authors: Thomas Van Mullem , Bart Mesuere , Peter Dawyndt
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28295
Abstract:

The rapid emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents both opportunities and challenges for programming education. While students increasingly use generative AI tools, direct access often hinders the learning process by providing complete solutions rather than pedagogical hints. Concurrently, educators face significant workload and scalability challenges when providing timely, personalized feedback. This study investigates the capabilities of LLMs to safely and effectively assist educators in answering student questions within a CS1 programming course. To achieve this, we established a rigorous, reproducible evaluation process by curating a benchmark dataset of 170 authentic student questions from a learning management system, paired with ground-truth responses authored by subject matter experts. Because traditional text-matching metrics are insufficient for evaluating open-ended educational responses, we developed and validated a custom LLM-as-a-Judge metric optimized for assessing pedagogical accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that models, such as Gemini 3 flash, can surpass the quality baseline of typical educator responses, achieving high alignment with expert pedagogical standards. To mitigate persistent risks like hallucination and ensure alignment with course-specific context, we advocate for a “teacher-in-the-loop” implementation. Finally, we abstract our methodology into a task-agnostic evaluation framework, advocating for a shift in the development of educational LLM tools from ad-hoc, post-deployment testing to a quantifiable, pre-deployment validation process.

12. EpiPersona: Persona Projection and Episode Coupling for Pluralistic Preference Modeling

Authors: Yujie Zhang , Weikang Yuan , Zhuoren Jiang , Pengwei Yan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28197
Abstract:

Pluralistic alignment is essential for adapting large language models (LLMs) to the diverse preferences of individuals and minority groups. However, existing approaches often mix stable personal traits with episode-specific factors, limiting their ability to generalize across episodes. To address this challenge, we introduce EpiPersona, a framework for explicit persona-episode coupling. EpiPersona first projects noisy preference feedback into a low-dimensional persona space, where similar personas are aggregated into shared discrete codes. This process separates enduring personal characteristics from situational signals without relying on predefined preference dimensions. The inferred persona representation is then coupled with the current episode, enabling episode-aware preference prediction. Extensive experiments show that EpiPersona consistently outperforms the baselines. It achieves notable performance gains in hard episodic-shift scenarios, while remaining effective with sparse preference data.

13. PReD: An LLM-based Foundation Multimodal Model for Electromagnetic Perception, Recognition, and Decision

Authors: Zehua Han , Jing Xiao , Yiqi Duan , Mengyu Xiang , Yuheng Ji , Xiaolong Zheng , Chenghanyu Zhang , Zhendong She , Junyu Shen , Dingwei Tan , Shichu Sun , Zhou Cong , Mingxuan Liu , Fengxiang Wang , Jinping Sun , Yangang Sun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28183
Abstract:

Multimodal Large Language Models have demonstrated powerful cross-modal understanding and reasoning capabilities in general domains. However, in the electromagnetic (EM) domain, they still face challenges such as data scarcity and insufficient integration of domain knowledge. This paper proposes PReD, the first foundation model for the EM domain that covers the intelligent closed-loop of “perception, recognition, decision-making.” We constructed a high-quality multitask EM dataset, PReD-1.3M, and an evaluation benchmark, PReD-Bench. The dataset encompasses multi-perspective representations such as raw time-domain waveform, frequency-domain spectrograms, and constellation diagrams, covering typical features of communication and radar signals. It supports a range of core tasks, including signal detection, modulation recognition, parameter estimation, protocol recognition, radio frequency fingerprint recognition, and anti-jamming decision-making. PReD adopts a multi-stage training strategy that unifies multiple tasks for EM signals. It achieves closed-loop optimization from end-to-end signal understanding to language-driven reasoning and decision-making, significantly enhancing EM domain expertise while maintaining general multimodal capabilities. Experimental results show that PReD achieves state-of-the-art performance on PReD-Bench constructed from both open-source and self-collected signal datasets. These results collectively validate the feasibility and potential of vision-aligned foundation models in advancing the understanding and reasoning of EM signals.

14. SLOW: Strategic Logical-inference Open Workspace for Cognitive Adaptation in AI Tutoring

Authors: Yuang Wei , Ruijia Li , Bo Jiang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28062
Abstract:

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable fluency in educational dialogues, most generative tutors primarily operate through intuitive, single-pass generation. This reliance on fast thinking precludes a dedicated reasoning workspace, forcing multiple diagnostic and strategic signals to be processed in a conflated manner. As a result, learner cognitive diagnosis, affective perception, and pedagogical decision-making become tightly entangled, which limits the tutoring system’s capacity for deliberate instructional adaptation. We propose SLOW, a theory-informed tutoring framework that supports deliberate learner-state reasoning within a transparent decision workspace. Inspired by dual-process accounts of human tutoring, SLOW explicitly separates learner-state inference from instructional action selection. The framework integrates causal evidence parsing from learner language, fuzzy cognitive diagnosis with counterfactual stability analysis, and prospective affective reasoning to anticipate how instructional choices may influence learners’ emotional trajectories. These signals are jointly considered to guide pedagogically and affectively aligned tutoring strategies. Evaluation using hybrid human-AI judgments demonstrates significant improvements in personalization, emotional sensitivity, and clarity. Ablation studies further confirm the necessity of each module, showcasing how SLOW enables interpretable and reliable intelligent tutoring through a visualized decision-making process. This work advances the interpretability and educational validity of LLM-based adaptive instruction.

15. Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses

Authors: Yoonho Lee , Roshen Nair , Qizheng Zhang , Kangwook Lee , Omar Khattab , Chelsea Finn
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28052
Abstract:

The performance of large language model (LLM) systems depends not only on model weights, but also on their harness: the code that determines what information to store, retrieve, and present to the model. Yet harnesses are still designed largely by hand, and existing text optimizers are poorly matched to this setting because they compress feedback too aggressively. We introduce Meta-Harness, an outer-loop system that searches over harness code for LLM applications. It uses an agentic proposer that accesses the source code, scores, and execution traces of all prior candidates through a filesystem. On online text classification, Meta-Harness improves over a state-of-the-art context management system by 7.7 points while using 4x fewer context tokens. On retrieval-augmented math reasoning, a single discovered harness improves accuracy on 200 IMO-level problems by 4.7 points on average across five held-out models. On agentic coding, discovered harnesses surpass the best hand-engineered baselines on TerminalBench-2. Together, these results show that richer access to prior experience can enable automated harness engineering.

16. Beyond the Answer: Decoding the Behavior of LLMs as Scientific Reasoners

Authors: Rohan Pandey , Eric Ye , Michael Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28038
Abstract:

As Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve increasingly sophisticated performance on complex reasoning tasks, current architectures serve as critical proxies for the internal heuristics of frontier models. Characterizing emergent reasoning is vital for long-term interpretability and safety. Furthermore, understanding how prompting modulates these processes is essential, as natural language will likely be the primary interface for interacting with AGI systems. In this work, we use a custom variant of Genetic Pareto (GEPA) to systematically optimize prompts for scientific reasoning tasks, and analyze how prompting can affect reasoning behavior. We investigate the structural patterns and logical heuristics inherent in GEPA-optimized prompts, and evaluate their transferability and brittleness. Our findings reveal that gains in scientific reasoning often correspond to model-specific heuristics that fail to generalize across systems, which we call “local” logic. By framing prompt optimization as a tool for model interpretability, we argue that mapping these preferred reasoning structures for LLMs is an important prerequisite for effectively collaborating with superhuman intelligence.

17. CARV: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Compositional Analogical Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs

Authors: Yongkang Du , Xiaohan Zou , Minhao Cheng , Lu Lin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27958
Abstract:

Analogical reasoning tests a fundamental aspect of human cognition: mapping the relation from one pair of objects to another. Existing evaluations of this ability in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) overlook the ability to compose rules from multiple sources, a critical component of higher-order intelligence. To close this gap, we introduce CARV (Compositional Analogical Reasoning in Vision), a novel task together with a 5,500-sample dataset as the first diagnostic benchmark. We extend the analogy from a single pair to multiple pairs, which requires MLLMs to extract symbolic rules from each pair and compose new transformations. Evaluation on the state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals a striking performance gap: even Gemini-2.5 Pro achieving only 40.4% accuracy, far below human-level performance of 100%. Diagnostic analysis shows two consistent failure modes: (1) decomposing visual changes into symbolic rules, and (2) maintaining robustness under diverse or complex settings, highlighting the limitations of current MLLMs on this task.

18. GEAKG: Generative Executable Algorithm Knowledge Graphs

Authors: Camilo Chacón Sartori , José H. García , Andrei Voicu Tomut , Christian Blum
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27922
Abstract:

In the context of algorithms for problem solving, procedural knowledge – the know-how of algorithm design and operator composition – remains implicit in code, lost between runs, and must be re-engineered for each new domain. Knowledge graphs (KGs) have proven effective for organizing declarative knowledge, yet current KG paradigms provide limited support for representing procedural knowledge as executable, learnable graph structures. We introduce \textit{Generative Executable Algorithm Knowledge Graphs} (GEAKG), a class of KGs whose nodes store executable operators, whose edges encode learned composition patterns, and whose traversal generates solutions. A GEAKG is \emph{generative} (topology and operators are synthesized by a Large Language Model), \emph{executable} (every node is runnable code), and \emph{transferable} (learned patterns generalize zero-shot across domains). The framework is domain-agnostic at the engine level: the same three-layer architecture and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO)-based learning engine can be instantiated across domains, parameterized by a pluggable ontology (\texttt{RoleSchema}). Two case studies – sharing no domain-specific framework code – provide concrete evidence for this framework hypothesis: (1)~Neural Architecture Search across 70 cross-dataset transfer pairs on two tabular benchmarks, and (2)~Combinatorial Optimization, where knowledge learned on the Traveling Salesman Problem transfers zero-shot to scheduling and assignment domains. Taken together, the results support that algorithmic expertise can be explicitly represented, learned, and transferred as executable knowledge graphs.

19. GAAMA: Graph Augmented Associative Memory for Agents

Authors: Swarna Kamal Paul , Shubhendu Sharma , Nitin Sareen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27910
Abstract:

AI agents that interact with users across multiple sessions require persistent long-term memory to maintain coherent, personalized behavior. Current approaches either rely on flat retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which loses structural relationships between memories, or use memory compression and vector retrieval that cannot capture the associative structure of multi-session conversations. There are few graph based techniques proposed in the literature, however they still suffer from hub dominated retrieval and poor hierarchical reasoning over evolving memory. We propose GAAMA, a graph-augmented associative memory system that constructs a concept-mediated hierarchical knowledge graph through a three-step pipeline: (1)~verbatim episode preservation from raw conversations, (2)~LLM-based extraction of atomic facts and topic-level concept nodes, and (3)~synthesis of higher-order reflections. The resulting graph uses four node types (episode, fact, reflection, concept) connected by five structural edge types, with concept nodes providing cross-cutting traversal paths that complement semantic similarity. Retrieval combines cosine-similarity-based $k$-nearest neighbor search with edge-type-aware Personalized PageRank (PPR) through an additive scoring function. On the LoCoMo-10 benchmark (1,540 questions across 10 multi-session conversations), GAAMA achieves 78.9\% mean reward, outperforming a tuned RAG baseline (75.0\%), HippoRAG (69.9\%), A-Mem (47.2\%), and Nemori (52.1\%). Ablation analysis shows that augmenting graph-traversal-based ranking (Personalized PageRank) with semantic search consistently improves over pure semantic search on graph nodes (+1.0 percentage point overall).

20. Let the Agent Steer: Closed-Loop Ranking Optimization via Influence Exchange

Authors: Yin Cheng , Liao Zhou , Xiyu Liang , Dihao Luo , Tewei Lee , Kailun Zheng , Weiwei Zhang , Mingchen Cai , Jian Dong , Andy Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27765
Abstract:

Recommendation ranking is fundamentally an influence allocation problem: a sorting formula distributes ranking influence among competing factors, and the business outcome depends on finding the optimal “exchange rates” among them. However, offline proxy metrics systematically misjudge how influence reallocation translates to online impact, with asymmetric bias across metrics that a single calibration factor cannot correct. We present Sortify, the first fully autonomous LLM-driven ranking optimization agent deployed in a large-scale production recommendation system. The agent reframes ranking optimization as continuous influence exchange, closing the full loop from diagnosis to parameter deployment without human intervention. It addresses structural problems through three mechanisms: (1) a dual-channel framework grounded in Savage’s Subjective Expected Utility (SEU) that decouples offline-online transfer correction (Belief channel) from constraint penalty adjustment (Preference channel); (2) an LLM meta-controller operating on framework-level parameters rather than low-level search variables; (3) a persistent Memory DB with 7 relational tables for cross-round learning. Its core metric, Influence Share, provides a decomposable measure where all factor contributions sum to exactly 100%. Sortify has been deployed across two Southeast Asian markets. In Country A, the agent pushed GMV from -3.6% to +9.2% within 7 rounds with peak orders reaching +12.5%. In Country B, a cold-start deployment achieved +4.15% GMV/UU and +3.58% Ads Revenue in a 7-day A/B test, leading to full production rollout.

21. TianJi:An autonomous AI meteorologist for discovering physical mechanisms in atmospheric science

Authors: Kaikai Zhang , Xiang Wang , Haoluo Zhao , Nan Chen , Mengyang Yu Jing-Jia Luo , Tao Song , Fan Meng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27738
Abstract:

Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved breakthroughs comparable to traditional numerical models in data-driven weather forecasting, yet it remains essentially statistical fitting and struggles to uncover the physical causal mechanisms of the atmosphere. Physics-oriented mechanism research still heavily relies on domain knowledge and cumbersome engineering operations of human scientists, becoming a bottleneck restricting the efficiency of Earth system science exploration. Here, we propose TianJi - the first “AI meteorologist” system capable of autonomously driving complex numerical models to verify physical mechanisms. Powered by a large language model-driven multi-agent architecture, TianJi can autonomously conduct literature research and generate scientific hypotheses. We further decouple scientific research into cognitive planning and engineering execution: the meta-planner interprets hypotheses and devises experimental roadmaps, while a cohort of specialized worker agents collaboratively complete data preparation, model configuration, and multi-dimensional result analysis. In two classic atmospheric dynamic scenarios (squall-line cold pools and typhoon track deflections), TianJi accomplishes expert-level end-to-end experimental operations with zero human intervention, compressing the research cycle to a few hours. It also delivers detailed result analyses and autonomously judges and explains the validity of the hypotheses from outputs. TianJi reveals that the role of AI in Earth system science is transitioning from a “black-box predictor” to an “interpretable scientific collaborator”, offering a new paradigm for high-throughput exploration of scientific mechanisms.

22. DSevolve: Enabling Real-Time Adaptive Scheduling on Dynamic Shop Floor with LLM-Evolved Heuristic Portfolios

Authors: Jin Huang , Jie Yang , XinLei Zhou , Qihao Liu , Liang Gao , Xinyu Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27628
Abstract:

In dynamic manufacturing environments, disruptions such as machine breakdowns and new order arrivals continuously shift the optimal dispatching strategy, making adaptive rule selection essential. Existing LLM-powered Automatic Heuristic Design (AHD) frameworks evolve toward a single elite rule that cannot meet this adaptability demand. To address this, we present DSevolve, an industrial scheduling framework that evolves a quality-diverse portfolio of dispatching rules offline and adaptively deploys them online with second-level response time. Multi-persona seeding and topology-aware evolutionary operators produce a behaviorally diverse rule archive indexed by a MAP-Elites feature space. Upon each disruption event, a probe-based fingerprinting mechanism characterizes the current shop floor state, retrieves high-quality candidate rules from an offline knowledge base, and selects the best one via rapid look-ahead simulation. Evaluated on 500 dynamic flexible job shop instances derived from real industrial data, DSevolve outperforms state-of-the-art AHD frameworks, classical dispatching rules, genetic programming, and deep reinforcement learning, offering a practical and deployable solution for intelligent shop floor scheduling.

23. Dual-Stage LLM Framework for Scenario-Centric Semantic Interpretation in Driving Assistance

Authors: Jean Douglas Carvalho , Hugo Taciro Kenji , Ahmad Mohammad Saber , Glaucia Melo , Max Mauro Dias Santos , Deepa Kundur
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27536
Abstract:

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) increasingly rely on learning-based perception, yet safety-relevant failures often arise without component malfunction, driven instead by partial observability and semantic ambiguity in how risk is interpreted and communicated. This paper presents a scenario-centric framework for reproducible auditing of LLM-based risk reasoning in urban driving contexts. Deterministic, temporally bounded scenario windows are constructed from multimodal driving data and evaluated under fixed prompt constraints and a closed numeric risk schema, ensuring structured and comparable outputs across models. Experiments on a curated near-people scenario set compare two text-only models and one multimodal model under identical inputs and prompts. Results reveal systematic inter-model divergence in severity assignment, high-risk escalation, evidence use, and causal attribution. Disagreement extends to the interpretation of vulnerable road user presence, indicating that variability often reflects intrinsic semantic indeterminacy rather than isolated model failure. These findings highlight the importance of scenario-centric auditing and explicit ambiguity management when integrating LLM-based reasoning into safety-aligned driver assistance systems.

24. PeopleSearchBench: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Evaluating AI-Powered People Search Platforms

Authors: Wei Wang , Tianyu Shi , Shuai Zhang , Boyang Xia , Zequn Xie , Chenyu Zeng , Qi Zhang , Lynn Ai , Yaqi Yu , Kaiming Zhang , Feiyue Tang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27476
Abstract:

AI-powered people search platforms are increasingly used in recruiting, sales prospecting, and professional networking, yet no widely accepted benchmark exists for evaluating their performance. We introduce PeopleSearchBench, an open-source benchmark that compares four people search platforms on 119 real-world queries across four use cases: corporate recruiting, B2B sales prospecting, expert search with deterministic answers, and influencer/KOL discovery. A key contribution is Criteria-Grounded Verification, a factual relevance pipeline that extracts explicit, verifiable criteria from each query and uses live web search to determine whether returned people satisfy them. This produces binary relevance judgments grounded in factual verification rather than subjective holistic LLM-as-judge scores. We evaluate systems on three dimensions: Relevance Precision (padded nDCG@10), Effective Coverage (task completion and qualified result yield), and Information Utility (profile completeness and usefulness), averaged equally into an overall score. Lessie, a specialized AI people search agent, performs best overall, scoring 65.2, 18.5% higher than the second-ranked system, and is the only system to achieve 100% task completion across all 119 queries. We also report confidence intervals, human validation of the verification pipeline (Cohen’s kappa = 0.84), ablations, and full documentation of queries, prompts, and normalization procedures. Code, query definitions, and aggregated results are available on GitHub.

25. AstraAI: LLMs, Retrieval, and AST-Guided Assistance for HPC Codebases

Authors: Mahesh Natarajan , Xiaoye Li , Weiqun Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27423
Abstract:

We present AstraAI, a command-line interface (CLI) coding framework for high-performance computing (HPC) software development. AstraAI operates directly within a Linux terminal and integrates large language models (LLMs) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Abstract Syntax Tree (AST)-based structural analysis to enable context-aware code generation for complex scientific codebases. The central idea is to construct a high-fidelity prompt that is passed to the LLM for inference. This prompt augments the user request with relevant code snippets retrieved from the underlying framework codebase via RAG and structural context extracted from AST analysis, providing the model with precise information about relevant functions, data structures, and overall code organization. The framework is designed to perform scoped modifications to source code while preserving structural consistency with the surrounding code. AstraAI supports both locally hosted models from Hugging Face and API-based frontier models accessible via the American Science Cloud, enabling flexible deployment across HPC environments. The system generates code that aligns with existing project structures and programming patterns. We demonstrate AstraAI on representative HPC code generation tasks within AMReX, a DOE-supported HPC software infrastructure for exascale applications.

26. Greedy Is a Strong Default: Agents as Iterative Optimizers

Authors: Yitao Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27415
Abstract:

Classical optimization algorithms–hill climbing, simulated annealing, population-based methods–generate candidate solutions via random perturbations. We replace the random proposal generator with an LLM agent that reasons about evaluation diagnostics to propose informed candidates, and ask: does the classical optimization machinery still help when the proposer is no longer random? We evaluate on four tasks spanning discrete, mixed, and continuous search spaces (all replicated across 3 independent runs): rule-based classification on Breast Cancer (test accuracy 86.0% to 96.5%), mixed hyperparameter optimization for MobileNetV3-Small on STL-10 (84.5% to 85.8%, zero catastrophic failures vs. 60% for random search), LoRA fine-tuning of Qwen2.5-0.5B on SST-2 (89.5% to 92.7%, matching Optuna TPE with 2x efficiency), and XGBoost on Adult Census (AUC 0.9297 to 0.9317, tying CMA-ES with 3x fewer evaluations). Empirically, on these tasks: a cross-task ablation shows that simulated annealing, parallel investigators, and even a second LLM model (OpenAI Codex) provide no benefit over greedy hill climbing while requiring 2-3x more evaluations. In our setting, the LLM’s learned prior appears strong enough that acceptance-rule sophistication has limited impact–round 1 alone delivers the majority of improvement, and variants converge to similar configurations across strategies. The practical implication is surprising simplicity: greedy hill climbing with early stopping is a strong default. Beyond accuracy, the framework produces human-interpretable artifacts–the discovered cancer classification rules independently recapitulate established cytopathology principles.

27. Heterogeneous Debate Engine: Identity-Grounded Cognitive Architecture for Resilient LLM-Based Ethical Tutoring

Authors: Jakub Masłowski , Jarosław A. Chudziak
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27404
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly used as autonomous agents in complex reasoning tasks, opening the niche for dialectical interactions. However, Multi-Agent systems implemented with systematically unconstrained systems systematically undergo semantic drift and logical deterioration and thus can hardly be used in providing ethical tutoring where a precise answer is required. Current simulation often tends to degenerate into dialectical stagnation, the agents degenerate into recursive concurrence or circular arguments. A critical challenge remains: how to enforce doctrinal fidelity without suppressing the generative flexibility required for dialectical reasoning? To address this niche, we contribute the Heterogeneous Debate Engine (HDE), a cognitive architecture that combines Identity-Grounded Retrieval-Augmented Generation (ID-RAG) for doctrinal fidelity and Heuristic Theory of Mind for strategic opponent modeling. Our evaluation shows that architectural heterogeneity is a crucial variable to stability: contrary doctrinal initializations (e.g., Deontology vs. Utilitarianism) have increased the Argument Complexity Scores of students by an order of magnitude, over baselines. These findings validate the effectiveness of ID-RAG and Heuristic ToM as architectural requirements in maintaining high-fidelity (adversarial) pedagogy.

28. Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance

Authors: Jyotsana Khatri , Manasi Patwardhan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27360
Abstract:

Rebuttal generation is a critical component of the peer review process for scientific papers, enabling authors to clarify misunderstandings, correct factual inaccuracies, and guide reviewers toward a more accurate evaluation. We observe that Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to perform targeted refutation and maintain accurate factual grounding when used directly for rebuttal generation, highlighting the need for structured reasoning and author intervention. To address this, in the paper, we introduce DEFEND an LLM based tool designed to explicitly execute the underlying reasoning process of automated rebuttal generation, while keeping the author-in-the-loop. As opposed to writing the rebuttals from scratch, the author needs to only drive the reasoning process with minimal intervention, leading an efficient approach with minimal effort and less cognitive load. We compare DEFEND against three other paradigms: (i) Direct rebuttal generation using LLM (DRG), (ii) Segment-wise rebuttal generation using LLM (SWRG), and (iii) Sequential approach (SA) of segment-wise rebuttal generation without author intervention. To enable finegrained evaluation, we extend the ReviewCritique dataset, creating review segmentation, deficiency, error type annotations, rebuttal-action labels, and mapping to gold rebuttal segments. Experimental results and a user study demonstrate that directly using LLMs perform poorly in factual correctness and targeted refutation. Segment-wise generation and the automated sequential approach with author-in-the-loop, substantially improve factual correctness and strength of refutation.

29. LLM Readiness Harness: Evaluation, Observability, and CI Gates for LLM/RAG Applications

Authors: Alexandre Cristovão Maiorano
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27355
Abstract:

We present a readiness harness for LLM and RAG applications that turns evaluation into a deployment decision workflow. The system combines automated benchmarks, OpenTelemetry observability, and CI quality gates under a minimal API contract, then aggregates workflow success, policy compliance, groundedness, retrieval hit rate, cost, and p95 latency into scenario-weighted readiness scores with Pareto frontiers. We evaluate the harness on ticket-routing workflows and BEIR grounding tasks (SciFact and FiQA) with full Azure matrix coverage (162/162 valid cells across datasets, scenarios, retrieval depths, seeds, and models). Results show that readiness is not a single metric: on FiQA under sla-first at k=5, gpt-4.1-mini leads in readiness and faithfulness, while gpt-5.2 pays a substantial latency cost; on SciFact, models are closer in quality but still separable operationally. Ticket-routing regression gates consistently reject unsafe prompt variants, demonstrating that the harness can block risky releases instead of merely reporting offline scores. The result is a reproducible, operationally grounded framework for deciding whether an LLM or RAG system is ready to ship.

30. Beyond Completion: Probing Cumulative State Tracking to Predict LLM Agent Performance

Authors: Dengzhe Hou , Lingyu Jiang , Deng Li , Zirui Li , Fangzhou Lin , Kazunori D Yamada
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27343
Abstract:

Task-completion rate is the standard proxy for LLM agent capability, but models with identical completion scores can differ substantially in their ability to track intermediate state. We introduce Working Memory Fidelity-Active Manipulation (WMF-AM), a calibrated no-scratchpad probe of cumulative arithmetic state tracking, and evaluate it on 20 open-weight models (0.5B-35B, 13 families) against a released deterministic 10-task agent battery. In a pre-specified, Bonferroni-corrected analysis, WMF-AM predicts agent performance with Kendall’s tau = 0.612 (p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.360, 0.814]); exploratory partial-tau analyses suggest this signal persists after controlling for completion score and model scale. Three construct-isolation ablations (K = 1 control, non-arithmetic ceiling, yoked cancellation) support the interpretation that cumulative state tracking under load, rather than single-step arithmetic or entity tracking alone, is the primary difficulty source. K-calibration keeps the probe in a discriminative range where prior fixed-depth benchmarks become non-discriminative; generalization beyond this open-weight sample remains open.

31. A Comparative Study in Surgical AI: Datasets, Foundation Models, and Barriers to Med-AGI

Authors: Kirill Skobelev , Eric Fithian , Yegor Baranovski , Jack Cook , Sandeep Angara , Shauna Otto , Zhuang-Fang Yi , John Zhu , Daniel A. Donoho , X.Y. Han , Neeraj Mainkar , Margaux Masson-Forsythe
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27341
Abstract:

Recent Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have matched or exceeded human experts in several benchmarks of biomedical task performance, but have lagged behind on surgical image-analysis benchmarks. Since surgery requires integrating disparate tasks – including multimodal data integration, human interaction, and physical effects – generally-capable AI models could be particularly attractive as a collaborative tool if performance could be improved. On the one hand, the canonical approach of scaling architecture size and training data is attractive, especially since there are millions of hours of surgical video data generated per year. On the other hand, preparing surgical data for AI training requires significantly higher levels of professional expertise, and training on that data requires expensive computational resources. These trade-offs paint an uncertain picture of whether and to-what-extent modern AI could aid surgical practice. In this paper, we explore this question through a case study of surgical tool detection using state-of-the-art AI methods available in 2026. We demonstrate that even with multi-billion parameter models and extensive training, current Vision Language Models fall short in the seemingly simple task of tool detection in neurosurgery. Additionally, we show scaling experiments indicating that increasing model size and training time only leads to diminishing improvements in relevant performance metrics. Thus, our experiments suggest that current models could still face significant obstacles in surgical use cases. Moreover, some obstacles cannot be simply ``scaled away’’ with additional compute and persist across diverse model architectures, raising the question of whether data and label availability are the only limiting factors. We discuss the main contributors to these constraints and advance potential solutions.

32. CounterMoral: Editing Morals in Language Models

Authors: Michael Ripa , Jim Davies
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27338
Abstract:

Recent advancements in language model technology have significantly enhanced the ability to edit factual information. Yet, the modification of moral judgments, a crucial aspect of aligning models with human values, has garnered less attention. In this work, we introduce CounterMoral, a benchmark dataset crafted to assess how well current model editing techniques modify moral judgments across diverse ethical frameworks. We apply various editing techniques to multiple language models and evaluate their performance. Our findings contribute to the evaluation of language models designed to be ethical.

33. AutoMS: Multi-Agent Evolutionary Search for Cross-Physics Inverse Microstructure Design

Authors: Zhenyuan Zhao , Yu Xing , Tianyang Xue , Lingxin Cao , Xin Yan , Lin Lu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27195
Abstract:

Designing microstructures that satisfy coupled cross-physics objectives is a fundamental challenge in material science. This inverse design problem involves a vast, discontinuous search space where traditional topology optimization is computationally prohibitive, and deep generative models often suffer from “physical hallucinations,” lacking the capability to ensure rigorous validity. To address this limitation, we introduce AutoMS, a multi-agent neuro-symbolic framework that reformulates inverse design as an LLM-driven evolutionary search. Unlike methods that treat LLMs merely as interfaces, AutoMS integrates them as “semantic navigators” to initialize search spaces and break local optima, while our novel Simulation-Aware Evolutionary Search (SAES) addresses the “blindness” of traditional evolutionary strategies. Specifically, SAES utilizes simulation feedback to perform local gradient approximation and directed parameter updates, effectively guiding the search toward physically valid Pareto frontiers. Orchestrating specialized agents (Manager, Parser, Generator, and Simulator), AutoMS achieves a state-of-the-art 83.8\% success rate on 17 diverse cross-physics tasks, nearly doubling the performance of traditional NSGA-II (43.7\%) and significantly outperforming ReAct-based LLM baselines (53.3\%). Furthermore, our hierarchical architecture reduces total execution time by 23.3\%. AutoMS demonstrates that autonomous agent systems can effectively navigate complex physical landscapes, bridging the gap between semantic design intent and rigorous physical validity.

34. Aligning LLMs with Graph Neural Solvers for Combinatorial Optimization

Authors: Shaodi Feng , Zhuoyi Lin , Yaoxin Wu , Haiyan Yin , Yan Jin , Senthilnath Jayavelu , Xun Xu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27169
Abstract:

Recent research has demonstrated the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs) by representing tasks and instances in natural language. However, purely language-based approaches struggle to accurately capture complex relational structures inherent in many COPs, rendering them less effective at addressing medium-sized or larger instances. To address these limitations, we propose AlignOPT, a novel approach that aligns LLMs with graph neural solvers to learn a more generalizable neural COP heuristic. Specifically, AlignOPT leverages the semantic understanding capabilities of LLMs to encode textual descriptions of COPs and their instances, while concurrently exploiting graph neural solvers to explicitly model the underlying graph structures of COP instances. Our approach facilitates a robust integration and alignment between linguistic semantics and structural representations, enabling more accurate and scalable COP solutions. Experimental results demonstrate that AlignOPT achieves state-of-the-art results across diverse COPs, underscoring its effectiveness in aligning semantic and structural representations. In particular, AlignOPT demonstrates strong generalization, effectively extending to previously unseen COP instances.

35. daVinci-LLM:Towards the Science of Pretraining

Authors: Yiwei Qin , Yixiu Liu , Tiantian Mi , Muhang Xie , Zhen Huang , Weiye Si , Pengrui Lu , Siyuan Feng , Xia Wu , Liming Liu , Ye Luo , Jinlong Hou , Qipeng Guo , Yu Qiao , Pengfei Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27164
Abstract:

The foundational pretraining phase determines a model’s capability ceiling, as post-training struggles to overcome capability foundations established during pretraining, yet it remains critically under-explored. This stems from a structural paradox: organizations with computational resources operate under commercial pressures that inhibit transparent disclosure, while academic institutions possess research freedom but lack pretraining-scale computational resources. daVinci-LLM occupies this unexplored intersection, combining industrial-scale resources with full research freedom to advance the science of pretraining. We adopt a fully-open paradigm that treats openness as scientific methodology, releasing complete data processing pipelines, full training processes, and systematic exploration results. Recognizing that the field lacks systematic methodology for data processing, we employ the Data Darwinism framework, a principled L0-L9 taxonomy from filtering to synthesis. We train a 3B-parameter model from random initialization across 8T tokens using a two-stage adaptive curriculum that progressively shifts from foundational capabilities to reasoning-intensive enhancement. Through 200+ controlled ablations, we establish that: processing depth systematically enhances capabilities, establishing it as a critical dimension alongside volume scaling; different domains exhibit distinct saturation dynamics, necessitating adaptive strategies from proportion adjustments to format shifts; compositional balance enables targeted intensification while preventing performance collapse; how evaluation protocol choices shape our understanding of pretraining progress. By releasing the complete exploration process, we enable the community to build upon our findings and systematic methodologies to form accumulative scientific knowledge in pretraining.

36. MediHive: A Decentralized Agent Collective for Medical Reasoning

Authors: Xiaoyang Wang , Christopher C. Yang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27150
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized medical reasoning tasks, yet single-agent systems often falter on complex, interdisciplinary problems requiring robust handling of uncertainty and conflicting evidence. Multi-agent systems (MAS) leveraging LLMs enable collaborative intelligence, but prevailing centralized architectures suffer from scalability bottlenecks, single points of failure, and role confusion in resource-constrained environments. Decentralized MAS (D-MAS) promise enhanced autonomy and resilience via peer-to-peer interactions, but their application to high-stakes healthcare domains remains underexplored. We introduce MediHive, a novel decentralized multi-agent framework for medical question answering that integrates a shared memory pool with iterative fusion mechanisms. MediHive deploys LLM-based agents that autonomously self-assign specialized roles, conduct initial analyses, detect divergences through conditional evidence-based debates, and locally fuse peer insights over multiple rounds to achieve consensus. Empirically, MediHive outperforms single-LLM and centralized baselines on MedQA and PubMedQA datasets, attaining accuracies of 84.3% and 78.4%, respectively. Our work advances scalable, fault-tolerant D-MAS for medical AI, addressing key limitations of centralized designs while demonstrating superior performance in reasoning-intensive tasks.

37. When Verification Hurts: Asymmetric Effects of Multi-Agent Feedback in Logic Proof Tutoring

Authors: Tahreem Yasir , Sutapa Dey Tithi , Benyamin Tabarsi , Dmitri Droujkov , Sam Gilson Yasitha Rajapaksha , Xiaoyi Tian , Arun Ramesh , DongKuan (DK)Xu, Tiffany Barnes
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27076
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for automated tutoring, but their reliability in structured symbolic domains remains unclear. We study step-level feedback for propositional logic proofs, which require precise symbolic reasoning aligned with a learner’s current proof state. We introduce a knowledge-graph-grounded benchmark of 516 unique proof states with step-level annotations and difficulty metrics. Unlike prior tutoring evaluations that rely on model self-assessment or binary correctness, our framework enables fine-grained analysis of feedback quality against verified solution paths. We evaluate three role-specialized pipelines with varying solution access: Tutor (partial solution access), Teacher (full derivation access), and Judge (verification of Tutor feedback). Our results reveal a striking asymmetry: verification improves outcomes when upstream feedback is error-prone (<70% accuracy), but degrades performance by 4-6 percentage points through over-specification when feedback is already reliable (>85%). Critically, we identify a shared complexity ceiling; no model or pipeline reliably succeeds on proof states exceeding complexity 4-5. These findings challenge the assumption that adding verifiers or richer context universally improves tutoring, motivating adaptive, difficulty-aware architectures that route problems by estimated complexity and upstream reliability.

38. Transparency as Architecture: Structural Compliance Gaps in EU AI Act Article 50 II

Authors: Vera Schmitt , Niklas Kruse , Premtim Sahitaj , Julius Schöning
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26983
Abstract:

Art. 50 II of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act mandates dual transparency for AI-generated content: outputs must be labeled in both human-understandable and machine-readable form for automated verification. This requirement, entering into force in August 2026, collides with fundamental constraints of current generative AI systems. Using synthetic data generation and automated fact-checking as diagnostic use cases, we show that compliance cannot be reduced to post-hoc labeling. In fact-checking pipelines, provenance tracking is not feasible under iterative editorial workflows and non-deterministic LLM outputs; moreover, the assistive-function exemption does not apply, as such systems actively assign truth values rather than supporting editorial presentation. In synthetic data generation, persistent dual-mode marking is paradoxical: watermarks surviving human inspection risk being learned as spurious features during training, while marks suited for machine verification are fragile under standard data processing. Across both domains, three structural gaps obstruct compliance: (a) absent cross-platform marking formats for interleaved human-AI outputs; (b) misalignment between the regulation’s ‘reliability’ criterion and probabilistic model behavior; and (c) missing guidance for adapting disclosures to heterogeneous user expertise. Closing these gaps requires transparency to be treated as an architectural design requirement, demanding interdisciplinary research across legal semantics, AI engineering, and human-centered desi

39. SAGAI-MID: A Generative AI-Driven Middleware for Dynamic Runtime Interoperability

Authors: Oliver Aleksander Larsen , Mahyar T. Moghaddam
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28731
Abstract:

Modern distributed systems integrate heterogeneous services, REST APIs with different schema versions, GraphQL endpoints, and IoT devices with proprietary payloads that suffer from persistent schema mismatches. Traditional static adapters require manual coding for every schema pair and cannot handle novel combinations at runtime. We present SAGAI-MID, a FastAPI-based middleware that uses large language models (LLMs) to dynamically detect and resolve schema mismatches at runtime. The system employs a five-layer pipeline: hybrid detection (structural diff plus LLM semantic analysis), dual resolution strategies (per-request LLM transformation and LLM-generated reusable adapter code), and a three-tier safeguard stack (validation, ensemble voting, rule-based fallback). We frame the architecture through Bass et al.’s interoperability tactics, transforming them from design-time artifacts into runtime capabilities. We evaluate SAGAI-MID on 10 interoperability scenarios spanning REST version migration, IoT-to-analytics bridging, and GraphQL protocol conversion across six LLMs from two providers. The best-performing configuration achieves 0.90 pass@1 accuracy. The CODEGEN strategy consistently outperforms DIRECT (0.83 vs 0.77 mean pass@1), while cost varies by over 30x across models with no proportional accuracy gain; the most accurate model is also the cheapest. We discuss implications for software architects adopting LLMs as runtime architectural components.

40. AdaptToken: Entropy-based Adaptive Token Selection for MLLM Long Video Understanding

Authors: Haozhe Qi , Kevin Qu , Mahdi Rad , Rui Wang , Alexander Mathis , Marc Pollefeys
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28696
Abstract:

Long video understanding remains challenging for Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) due to high memory costs and context-length limits. Prior approaches mitigate this by scoring and selecting frames/tokens within short clips, but they lack a principled mechanism to (i) compare relevance across distant video clips and (ii) stop processing once sufficient evidence has been gathered. We propose AdaptToken, a training-free framework that turns an MLLM’s self-uncertainty into a global control signal for long-video token selection. AdaptToken splits a video into groups, extracts cross-modal attention to rank tokens within each group, and uses the model’s response entropy to estimate each group’s prompt relevance. This entropy signal enables a global token budget allocation across groups and further supports early stopping (AdaptToken-Lite), skipping the remaining groups when the model becomes sufficiently certain. Across four long-video benchmarks (VideoMME, LongVideoBench, LVBench, and MLVU) and multiple base MLLMs (7B-72B), AdaptToken consistently improves accuracy (e.g., +6.7 on average over Qwen2.5-VL 7B) and continues to benefit from extremely long inputs (up to 10K frames), while AdaptToken-Lite reduces inference time by about half with comparable performance. Project page: this https URL

41. AMIGO: Agentic Multi-Image Grounding Oracle Benchmark

Authors: Min Wang , Ata Mahjoubfar
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28662
Abstract:

Agentic vision-language models increasingly act through extended interactions, but most evaluations still focus on single-image, single-turn correctness. We introduce AMIGO (Agentic Multi-Image Grounding Oracle Benchmark), a long-horizon benchmark for hidden-target identification over galleries of visually similar images. In AMIGO, the oracle privately selects a target image, and the model must recover it by asking a sequence of attribute-focused Yes/No/Unsure questions under a strict protocol that penalizes invalid actions with Skip. This setting stresses (i) question selection under uncertainty, (ii) consistent constraint tracking across turns, and (iii) fine-grained discrimination as evidence accumulates. AMIGO also supports controlled oracle imperfections to probe robustness and verification behavior under inconsistent feedback. We instantiate AMIGO with Guess My Preferred Dress task and report metrics covering both outcomes and interaction quality, including identification success, evidence verification, efficiency, protocol compliance, noise tolerance, and trajectory-level diagnostics.

42. Information-Theoretic Limits of Safety Verification for Self-Improving Systems

Authors: Arsenios Scrivens
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28650
Abstract:

Can a safety gate permit unbounded beneficial self-modification while maintaining bounded cumulative risk? We formalize this question through dual conditions – requiring sum delta_n < infinity (bounded risk) and sum TPR_n = infinity (unbounded utility) – and establish a theory of their (in)compatibility. Classification impossibility (Theorem 1): For power-law risk schedules delta_n = O(n^{-p}) with p > 1, any classifier-based gate under overlapping safe/unsafe distributions satisfies TPR_n <= C_alpha * delta_n^beta via Holder’s inequality, forcing sum TPR_n < infinity. This impossibility is exponent-optimal (Theorem 3). A second independent proof via the NP counting method (Theorem 4) yields a 13% tighter bound without Holder’s inequality. Universal finite-horizon ceiling (Theorem 5): For any summable risk schedule, the exact maximum achievable classifier utility is U(N, B) = N * TPR_NP(B/N), growing as exp(O(sqrt(log N))) – subpolynomial. At N = 10^6 with budget B = 1.0, a classifier extracts at most U ~ 87 versus a verifier’s ~500,000. Verification escape (Theorem 2): A Lipschitz ball verifier achieves delta = 0 with TPR > 0, escaping the impossibility. Formal Lipschitz bounds for pre-LayerNorm transformers under LoRA enable LLM-scale verification. The separation is strict. We validate on GPT-2 (d_LoRA = 147,456): conditional delta = 0 with TPR = 0.352. Comprehensive empirical validation is in the companion paper [D2].

43. ResAdapt: Adaptive Resolution for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning

Authors: Huanxuan Liao , Zhongtao Jiang , Yupu Hao , Yuqiao Tan , Shizhu He , Jun Zhao , Kun Xu , Kang Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28610
Abstract:

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve stronger visual understanding by scaling input fidelity, yet the resulting visual token growth makes jointly sustaining high spatial resolution and long temporal context prohibitive. We argue that the bottleneck lies not in how post-encoding representations are compressed but in the volume of pixels the encoder receives, and address it with ResAdapt, an Input-side adaptation framework that learns how much visual budget each frame should receive before encoding. ResAdapt couples a lightweight Allocator with an unchanged MLLM backbone, so the backbone retains its native visual-token interface while receiving an operator-transformed input. We formulate allocation as a contextual bandit and train the Allocator with Cost-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO), which converts sparse rollout feedback into a stable accuracy-cost learning signal. Across budget-controlled video QA, temporal grounding, and image reasoning tasks, ResAdapt improves low-budget operating points and often lies on or near the efficiency-accuracy frontier, with the clearest gains on reasoning-intensive benchmarks under aggressive compression. Notably, ResAdapt supports up to 16x more frames at the same visual budget while delivering over 15% performance gain. Code is available at this https URL .

44. Moving Beyond Review: Applying Language Models to Planning and Translation in Reflection

Authors: Seyed Parsa Neshaei , Richard Lee Davis , Tanja Käser
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28596
Abstract:

Reflective writing is known to support the development of students’ metacognitive skills, yet learners often struggle to engage in deep reflection, limiting learning gains. Although large language models (LLMs) have been shown to improve writing skills, their use as conversational agents for reflective writing has produced mixed results and has largely focused on providing feedback on reflective texts, rather than support during planning and organizing. In this paper, inspired by the Cognitive Process Theory of writing (CPT), we propose the first application of LLMs to the planning and translation steps of reflective writing. We introduce Pensée, a tool to explore the effects of explicit AI support during these stages by scaffolding structured reflection planning using a conversational agent, and supporting translation by automatically extracting key concepts. We evaluate Pensée in a controlled between-subjects experiment (N=93), manipulating AI support across writing phases. Results show significantly greater reflection depth and structural quality when learners receive support during planning and translation stages of CPT, though these effects reduce in a delayed post-test. Analyses of learner behavior and perceptions further illustrate how CPT-aligned conversational support shapes reflection processes and learner experience, contributing empirical evidence for theory-driven uses of LLMs in AI-supported reflective writing.

45. Navigating the Mirage: A Dual-Path Agentic Framework for Robust Misleading Chart Question Answering

Authors: Yanjie Zhang , Yafei Li , Rui Sheng , Zixin Chen , Yanna Lin , Huamin Qu , Lei Chen , Yushi Sun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28583
Abstract:

Despite the success of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), misleading charts remain a significant challenge due to their deceptive visual structures and distorted data representations. We present ChartCynics, an agentic dual-path framework designed to unmask visual deception via a “skeptical” reasoning paradigm. Unlike holistic models, ChartCynics decouples perception from verification: a Diagnostic Vision Path captures structural anomalies (e.g., inverted axes) through strategic ROI cropping, while an OCR-Driven Data Path ensures numerical grounding. To resolve cross-modal conflicts, we introduce an Agentic Summarizer optimized via a two-stage protocol: Oracle-Informed SFT for reasoning distillation and Deception-Aware GRPO for adversarial alignment. This pipeline effectively penalizes visual traps and enforces logical consistency. Evaluations on two benchmarks show that ChartCynics achieves 74.43% and 64.55% accuracy, providing an absolute performance boost of ~29% over the Qwen3-VL-8B backbone, outperforming state-of-the-art proprietary models. Our results demonstrate that specialized agentic workflows can grant smaller open-source models superior robustness, establishing a new foundation for trustworthy chart interpretation.

46. CirrusBench: Evaluating LLM-based Agents Beyond Correctness in Real-World Cloud Service Environments

Authors: Yi Yu , Guangquan Hu , Chenghuang Shen , Xingyan Liu , Jing Gu , Hangyi Sun , Junzhuo Ma , Weiting Liu , Jianfeng Liu , Mingyue Pu , Yu Wang , Zhengdong Xiao , Rui Xie , Longjiu Luo , Qianrong Wang , Gurong Cui , Honglin Qiao , Wenlian Lu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28569
Abstract:

The increasing agentic capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled their deployment in real-world applications, such as cloud services, where customer-assistant interactions exhibit high technical complexity and long-horizon dependencies, making robustness and resolution efficiency critical for customer satisfaction. However, existing benchmarks for LLM-based agents largely rely on synthetic environments that fail to capture the diversity and unpredictability of authentic customer inputs, often ignoring the resolution efficiency essential for real-world deployment. To bridge this gap, we introduce CirrusBench, a novel evaluation framework distinguished by its foundation in real-world data from authentic cloud service tickets. CirrusBench preserves the intricate multi-turn logical chains and realistic tool dependencies inherent to technical service environments. Moving beyond execution correctness, we introduce novel Customer-Centric metrics to define agent success, quantifying service quality through metrics such as the Normalized Efficiency Index and Multi-Turn Latency to explicitly measure resolution efficiency. Experiments utilizing our framework reveal that while state-of-the-art models demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities, they frequently struggle in complex, realistic multi-turn tasks and fail to meet the high-efficiency standards required for customer service, highlighting critical directions for the future development of LLM-based agents in practical technical service applications. CirrusBench evaluation framework is released at: this https URL

47. Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Cooperative Tactical Deconfliction of Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

Authors: Iman Sharifi , Alex Zongo , Peng Wei
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28561
Abstract:

The growing deployment of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUASs) in low-altitude airspaces has increased the need for reliable tactical deconfliction under safety-critical constraints. Tactical deconfliction involves short-horizon decision-making in dense, partially observable, and heterogeneous multi-agent environments, where both cooperative separation assurance and operational efficiency must be maintained. While Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, their direct application to air traffic control remains limited by insufficient domain grounding and unpredictable output inconsistency. This paper investigates LLMs as decision-makers in cooperative multi-agent tactical deconfliction using fine-tuning strategies that align model outputs to human operator heuristics. We propose a simulation-to-language data generation pipeline based on the BlueSky air traffic simulator that produces rule-consistent deconfliction datasets reflecting established safety practices. A pretrained Qwen-Math-7B model is fine-tuned using two parameter-efficient strategies: supervised fine-tuning with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and preference-based fine-tuning combining LoRA with Group-Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Experimental results on validation datasets and closed-loop simulations demonstrate that supervised LoRA fine-tuning substantially improves decision accuracy, consistency, and separation performance compared to the pretrained LLM, with significant reductions in near mid-air collisions. GRPO provides additional coordination benefits but exhibits reduced robustness when interacting with heterogeneous agent policies.

48. Domain-Invariant Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models

Authors: Arsham Gholamzadeh Khoee , Yinan Yu , Robert Feldt
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28555
Abstract:

Large pre-trained vision-language models like CLIP have transformed computer vision by aligning images and text in a shared feature space, enabling robust zero-shot transfer via prompting. Soft-prompting, such as Context Optimization (CoOp), effectively adapts these models for downstream recognition tasks by learning a set of context vectors. However, CoOp lacks explicit mechanisms for handling domain shifts across unseen distributions. To address this, we propose Domain-invariant Context Optimization (DiCoOp), an extension of CoOp optimized for domain generalization. By employing an adversarial training approach, DiCoOp forces the model to learn domain-invariant prompts while preserving discriminative power for classification. Experimental results show that DiCoOp consistently surpasses CoOp in domain generalization tasks across diverse visual domains.

49. Hydra: Unifying Document Retrieval and Generation in a Single Vision-Language Model

Authors: Athos Georgiou
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28554
Abstract:

Visual document understanding typically requires separate retrieval and generation models, doubling memory and system complexity. We present Hydra, a dual-head approach that provides both ColBERT-style late-interaction retrieval and autoregressive generation from a single vision-language model (VLM). A single LoRA adapter, trained only for retrieval, is toggled at inference: enabling it produces multi-vector embeddings; disabling it recovers the base model’s generation quality – byte-identical outputs in 100% of 10,500 greedy and stochastic samples, with max delta-ANLS = 0.0044 across 15,301 samples on four VQA benchmarks (three informative; ChartQA is near-zero for both models under greedy decoding) when compared against an independent base-model pipeline. We identify three engineering requirements (attention-mode restoration, lm_head preservation, KV-cache-aware decoding) whose omission silently breaks generation despite correct weight recovery. On ViDoRe V1, Hydra (4B) is within 1 percentage point of a controlled single-head baseline in a single training run, with higher aggregate scores on V2 and V3 that are concentrated on a subset of tasks; multi-seed experiments are needed to confirm these trends. The single-model design reduces peak GPU memory by 41%, though adapter switching introduces throughput overhead under concurrent serving loads. An ablation shows that GritLM-style joint training provides no benefit within the LoRA-based (r=16) training regime. A proof-of-concept extension to Qwen2.5-Omni-3B demonstrates that the mechanism generalizes to audio retrieval and video embedding, with speech generation.

50. RAD-LAD: Rule and Language Grounded Autonomous Driving in Real-Time

Authors: Anurag Ghosh , Srinivasa Narasimhan , Manmohan Chandraker , Francesco Pittaluga
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28522
Abstract:

We present LAD, a real-time language–action planner with an interruptible architecture that produces a motion plan in a single forward pass (~20 Hz) or generates textual reasoning alongside a motion plan (~10 Hz). LAD is fast enough for real-time closed-loop deployment, achieving ~3x lower latency than prior driving language models while setting a new learning-based state of the art on nuPlan Test14-Hard and InterPlan. We also introduce RAD, a rule-based planner designed to address structural limitations of PDM-Closed. RAD achieves state-of-the-art performance among rule-based planners on nuPlan Test14-Hard and InterPlan. Finally, we show that combining RAD and LAD enables hybrid planning that captures the strengths of both approaches. This hybrid system demonstrates that rules and learning provide complementary capabilities: rules support reliable maneuvering, while language enables adaptive and explainable decision-making.

51. Courtroom-Style Multi-Agent Debate with Progressive RAG and Role-Switching for Controversial Claim Verification

Authors: Masnun Nuha Chowdhury , Nusrat Jahan Beg , Umme Hunny Khan , Syed Rifat Raiyan , Md Kamrul Hasan , Hasan Mahmud
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28488
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) remain unreliable for high-stakes claim verification due to hallucinations and shallow reasoning. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and multi-agent debate (MAD) address this, they are limited by one-pass retrieval and unstructured debate dynamics. We propose a courtroom-style multi-agent framework, PROClaim, that reformulates verification as a structured, adversarial deliberation. Our approach integrates specialized roles (e.g., Plaintiff, Defense, Judge) with Progressive RAG (P-RAG) to dynamically expand and refine the evidence pool during the debate. Furthermore, we employ evidence negotiation, self-reflection, and heterogeneous multi-judge aggregation to enforce calibration, robustness, and diversity. In zero-shot evaluations on the Check-COVID benchmark, PROClaim achieves 81.7% accuracy, outperforming standard multi-agent debate by 10.0 percentage points, with P-RAG driving the primary performance gains (+7.5 pp). We ultimately demonstrate that structural deliberation and model heterogeneity effectively mitigate systematic biases, providing a robust foundation for reliable claim verification. Our code and data are publicly available at this https URL .

52. Evolutionary Discovery of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms via Large Language Models

Authors: Alkis Sygkounas , Amy Loutfi , Andreas Persson
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28416
Abstract:

Reinforcement learning algorithms are defined by their learning update rules, which are typically hand-designed and fixed. We present an evolutionary framework for discovering reinforcement learning algorithms by searching directly over executable update rules that implement complete training procedures. The approach builds on REvolve, an evolutionary system that uses large language models as generative variation operators, and extends it from reward-function discovery to algorithm discovery. To promote the emergence of nonstandard learning rules, the search excludes canonical mechanisms such as actor–critic structures, temporal-difference losses, and value bootstrapping. Because reinforcement learning algorithms are highly sensitive to internal scalar parameters, we introduce a post-evolution refinement stage in which a large language model proposes feasible hyperparameter ranges for each evolved update rule. Evaluated end-to-end by full training runs on multiple Gymnasium benchmarks, the discovered algorithms achieve competitive performance relative to established baselines, including SAC, PPO, DQN, and A2C.

53. Membership Inference Attacks against Large Audio Language Models

Authors: Jia-Kai Dong , Yu-Xiang Lin , Hung-Yi Lee
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28378
Abstract:

We present the first systematic Membership Inference Attack (MIA) evaluation of Large Audio Language Models (LALMs). As audio encodes non-semantic information, it induces severe train and test distribution shifts and can lead to spurious MIA performance. Using a multi-modal blind baseline based on textual, spectral, and prosodic features, we demonstrate that common speech datasets exhibit near-perfect train/test separability (AUC approximately 1.0) even without model inference, and the standard MIA scores strongly correlate with these blind acoustic artifacts (correlation greater than 0.7). Using this blind baseline, we identify that distribution-matched datasets enable reliable MIA evaluation without distribution shift confounds. We benchmark multiple MIA methods and conduct modality disentanglement experiments on these datasets. The results reveal that LALM memorization is cross-modal, arising only from binding a speaker’s vocal identity with its text. These findings establish a principled standard for auditing LALMs beyond spurious correlations.

54. Coherent Without Grounding, Grounded Without Success: Observability and Epistemic Failure

Authors: Camilo Chacón Sartori
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28371
Abstract:

When an agent can articulate why something works, we typically take this as evidence of genuine understanding. This presupposes that effective action and correct explanation covary, and that coherent explanation reliably signals both. I argue that this assumption fails for contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs). I introduce what I call the Bidirectional Coherence Paradox: competence and grounding not only dissociate but invert across epistemic conditions. In low-observability domains, LLMs often act successfully while misidentifying the mechanisms that produce their success. In high-observability domains, they frequently generate explanations that accurately track observable causal structure yet fail to translate those diagnoses into effective intervention. In both cases, explanatory coherence remains intact, obscuring the underlying dissociation. Drawing on experiments in compiler optimization and hyperparameter tuning, I develop the Epistemic Triangle, a model of how priors, signals, and domain knowledge interact under varying observability. The results suggest that neither behavioral success nor explanatory accuracy alone suffices for attributing understanding. I argue that evaluating artificial epistemic agents requires a tripartite framework – coherence, grounding, and a proper basing relation linking explanation to action. The systematic separation of knowing-that and knowing-how in LLMs thus challenges assumptions inherited from both epistemology and current AI evaluation practice.

55. Crossing the NL/PL Divide: Information Flow Analysis Across the NL/PL Boundary in LLM-Integrated Code

Authors: Zihao Xu , Xiao Cheng , Ruijie Meng , Yuekang Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28345
Abstract:

LLM API calls are becoming a ubiquitous program construct, yet they create a boundary that no existing program analysis can cross: runtime values enter a natural-language prompt, undergo opaque processing inside the LLM, and re-emerge as code, SQL, JSON, or text that the program consumes. Every analysis that tracks data across function boundaries, including taint analysis, program slicing, dependency analysis, and change-impact analysis, relies on dataflow summaries of callee behavior. LLM calls have no such summaries, breaking all of these analyses at what we call the NL/PL boundary. We present the first information flow method to bridge this boundary. Grounded in quantitative information flow theory, our taxonomy defines 24 labels along two orthogonal dimensions: information preservation level (from lexically preserved to fully blocked) and output modality (natural language, structured format, executable artifact). We label 9,083 placeholder-output pairs from 4,154 real-world Python files and validate reliability with Cohen’s $\kappa = 0.82$ and near-complete coverage (0.01\% unclassifiable). We demonstrate the taxonomy’s utility on two downstream applications: (1)~a two-stage taint propagation pipeline combining taxonomy-based filtering with LLM verification achieves $F_1 = 0.923$ on 353 expert-annotated pairs, with cross-language validation on six real-world OpenClaw prompt injection cases further confirming effectiveness; (2)~taxonomy-informed backward slicing reduces slice size by a mean of 15\% in files containing non-propagating placeholders. Per-label analysis reveals that four blocked labels account for nearly all non-propagating cases, providing actionable filtering criteria for tool builders.

56. Integrating Multimodal Large Language Model Knowledge into Amodal Completion

Authors: Heecheol Yun , Eunho Yang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28333
Abstract:

With the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles and robotics, amodal completion, which reconstructs the occluded parts of people and objects in an image, has become increasingly crucial. Just as humans infer hidden regions based on prior experience and common sense, this task inherently requires physical knowledge about real-world entities. However, existing approaches either depend solely on the image generation ability of visual generative models, which lack such knowledge, or leverage it only during the segmentation stage, preventing it from explicitly guiding the completion process. To address this, we propose AmodalCG, a novel framework that harnesses the real-world knowledge of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to guide amodal completion. Our framework first assesses the extent of occlusion to selectively invoke MLLM guidance only when the target object is heavily occluded. If guidance is required, the framework further incorporates MLLMs to reason about both the (1) extent and (2) content of the missing regions. Finally, a visual generative model integrates these guidance and iteratively refines imperfect completions that may arise from inaccurate MLLM guidance. Experimental results on various real-world images show impressive improvements compared to all existing works, suggesting MLLMs as a promising direction for addressing challenging amodal completion.

57. Building evidence-based knowledge graphs from full-text literature for disease-specific biomedical reasoning

Authors: Chang Zong , Sicheng Lv , Si-tu Xue , Huilin Zheng , Jian Wan , Lei Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28325
Abstract:

Biomedical knowledge resources often either preserve evidence as unstructured text or compress it into flat triples that omit study design, provenance, and quantitative support. Here we present EvidenceNet, a framework and dataset for building disease-specific knowledge graphs from full-text biomedical literature. EvidenceNet uses a large language model (LLM)-assisted pipeline to extract experimentally grounded findings as structured evidence nodes, normalize biomedical entities, score evidence quality, and connect evidence records through typed semantic relations. We release two resources: EvidenceNet-HCC with 7,872 evidence records, 10,328 graph nodes, and 49,756 edges, and EvidenceNet-CRC with 6,622 records, 8,795 nodes, and 39,361 edges. Technical validation shows high component fidelity, including 98.3% field-level extraction accuracy, 100.0% high-confidence entity-link accuracy, 87.5% fusion integrity, and 90.0% semantic relation-type accuracy. In downstream evaluation, EvidenceNet improves internal and external retrieval-augmented question answering and retains structural signal for future link prediction and target prioritization. These results establish EvidenceNet as a disease-specific resource for evidence-aware biomedical reasoning and hypothesis generation.

58. Merge and Conquer: Instructing Multilingual Models by Adding Target Language Weights

Authors: Eneko Valero , Maria Ribalta i Albado , Oscar Sainz , Naiara Perez , German Rigau
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28263
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) remain heavily centered on English, with limited performance in low-resource languages. Existing adaptation approaches, such as continual pre-training, demand significant computational resources. In the case of instructed models, high-quality instruction data is also required, both of which are often inaccessible for low-resource language communities. Under these constraints, model merging offers a lightweight alternative, but its potential in low-resource contexts has not been systematically explored. In this work, we explore whether it is possible to transfer language knowledge to an instruction-tuned LLM by merging it with a language-specific base model, thereby eliminating the need of language-specific instructions and repeated fine-tuning processes whenever stronger instructed variants become available. Through experiments covering four Iberian languages (Basque, Catalan, Galician, and Spanish) and two model families, we show that merging enables effective instruction following behavior in new languages and even supports multilingual capability through the combination of multiple language-specific models. Our results indicate that model merging is a viable and efficient alternative to traditional adaptation methods for low-resource languages, achieving competitive performance while greatly reducing computational cost.

59. Categorical Perception in Large Language Model Hidden States: Structural Warping at Digit-Count Boundaries

Authors: Jon-Paul Cacioli
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28258
Abstract:

Categorical perception (CP) – enhanced discriminability at category boundaries – is among the most studied phenomena in perceptual psychology. This paper reports that analogous geometric warping occurs in the hidden-state representations of large language models (LLMs) processing Arabic numerals. Using representational similarity analysis across six models from five architecture families, the study finds that a CP-additive model (log-distance plus a boundary boost) fits the representational geometry better than a purely continuous model at 100% of primary layers in every model tested. The effect is specific to structurally defined boundaries (digit-count transitions at 10 and 100), absent at non-boundary control positions, and absent in the temperature domain where linguistic categories (hot/cold) lack a tokenisation discontinuity. Two qualitatively distinct signatures emerge: “classic CP” (Gemma, Qwen), where models both categorise explicitly and show geometric warping, and “structural CP” (Llama, Mistral, Phi), where geometry warps at the boundary but models cannot report the category distinction. This dissociation is stable across boundaries and is a property of the architecture, not the stimulus. Structural input-format discontinuities are sufficient to produce categorical perception geometry in LLMs, independently of explicit semantic category knowledge.

60. DiffAttn: Diffusion-Based Drivers’ Visual Attention Prediction with LLM-Enhanced Semantic Reasoning

Authors: Weimin Liu , Qingkun Li , Jiyuan Qiu , Wenjun Wang , Joshua H. Meng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28251
Abstract:

Drivers’ visual attention provides critical cues for anticipating latent hazards and directly shapes decision-making and control maneuvers, where its absence can compromise traffic safety. To emulate drivers’ perception patterns and advance visual attention prediction for intelligent vehicles, we propose DiffAttn, a diffusion-based framework that formulates this task as a conditional diffusion-denoising process, enabling more accurate modeling of drivers’ attention. To capture both local and global scene features, we adopt Swin Transformer as encoder and design a decoder that combines a Feature Fusion Pyramid for cross-layer interaction with dense, multi-scale conditional diffusion to jointly enhance denoising learning and model fine-grained local and global scene contexts. Additionally, a large language model (LLM) layer is incorporated to enhance top-down semantic reasoning and improve sensitivity to safety-critical cues. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that DiffAttn achieves state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance, surpassing most video-based, top-down-feature-driven, and LLM-enhanced baselines. Our framework further supports interpretable driver-centric scene understanding and has the potential to improve in-cabin human-machine interaction, risk perception, and drivers’ state measurement in intelligent vehicles.

61. ERPO: Token-Level Entropy-Regulated Policy Optimization for Large Reasoning Models

Authors: Song Yu , Li Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28204
Abstract:

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, standard Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) typically assigns a uniform, sequence-level advantage to all tokens, thereby overlooking the intrinsic information heterogeneity along reasoning chains. We show that this coarse-grained credit assignment leads to premature entropy collapse and encourages the model to generate redundant, low-quality reasoning paths. Through systematic empirical analysis, we identify Critical Decision Pivots (CDPs): transient high-entropy states where the policy’s trajectory is most sensitive to perturbations. These pivots represent the “forks in the road” where effective multi-path exploration is most crucial yet often suppressed by uniform advantage signals. Building on these insights, we propose Entropy-Regulated Policy Optimization (ERPO), which transitions the optimization focus from coarse sequences to fine-grained token dynamics. ERPO introduces three synergistic components: (i) Entropy-aware Gating, which adaptively amplifies exploration at CDPs to facilitate diverse path discovery; (ii) Bucket-based Implicit Normalization, which mitigates difficulty bias by aligning token progress windows; and (iii) Result-anchored Advantage Synthesis, which re-weights token-level signals via outcome-driven anchors. Extensive experiments on competitive mathematical benchmarks (e.g., MATH, AIME) demonstrate that ERPO significantly outperforms GRPO. Notably, ERPO not only boosts reasoning accuracy but also yields significantly more concise and robust derivation paths, establishing a new efficiency-accuracy frontier for large reasoning models.

62. Evaluating Privilege Usage of Agents on Real-World Tools

Authors: Quan Zhang , Lianhang Fu , Lvsi Lian , Gwihwan Go , Yujue Wang , Chijin Zhou , Yu Jiang , Geguang Pu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28166
Abstract:

Equipping LLM agents with real-world tools can substantially improve productivity. However, granting agents autonomy over tool use also transfers the associated privileges to both the agent and the underlying LLM. Improper privilege usage may lead to serious consequences, including information leakage and infrastructure damage. While several benchmarks have been built to study agents’ security, they often rely on pre-coded tools and restricted interaction patterns. Such crafted environments differ substantially from the real-world, making it hard to assess agents’ security capabilities in critical privilege control and usage. Therefore, we propose GrantBox, a security evaluation sandbox for analyzing agent privilege usage. GrantBox automatically integrates real-world tools and allows LLM agents to invoke genuine privileges, enabling the evaluation of privilege usage under prompt injection attacks. Our results indicate that while LLMs exhibit basic security awareness and can block some direct attacks, they remain vulnerable to more sophisticated attacks, resulting in an average attack success rate of 84.80% in carefully crafted scenarios.

63. Does Claude’s Constitution Have a Culture?

Authors: Parham Pourdavood
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28123
Abstract:

Constitutional AI (CAI) aligns language models with explicitly stated normative principles, offering a transparent alternative to implicit alignment through human feedback alone. However, because constitutions are authored by specific groups of people, the resulting models may reflect particular cultural perspectives. We investigate this question by evaluating Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet on 55 World Values Survey items, selected for high cross-cultural variance across six value domains and administered as both direct survey questions and naturalistic advice-seeking scenarios. Comparing Claude’s responses to country-level data from 90 nations, we find that Claude’s value profile most closely resembles those of Northern European and Anglophone countries, but on a majority of items extends beyond the range of all surveyed populations. When users provide cultural context, Claude adjusts its rhetorical framing but not its substantive value positions, with effect sizes indistinguishable from zero across all twelve tested countries. An ablation removing the system prompt increases refusals but does not alter the values expressed when responses are given, and replication on a smaller model (Claude Haiku) confirms the same cultural profile across model sizes. These findings suggest that when a constitution is authored within the same cultural tradition that dominates the training data, constitutional alignment may codify existing cultural biases rather than correct them–producing a value floor that surface-level interventions cannot meaningfully shift. We discuss the compounding nature of this risk and the need for globally representative constitution-authoring processes.

64. Transcription and Recognition of Italian Parliamentary Speeches Using Vision-Language Models

Authors: Luigi Curini , Alfio Ferrara , Giovanni Pagano , Sergio Picascia
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28103
Abstract:

Parliamentary proceedings represent a rich yet challenging resource for computational analysis, particularly when preserved only as scanned historical documents. Existing efforts to transcribe Italian parliamentary speeches have relied on traditional Optical Character Recognition pipelines, resulting in transcription errors and limited semantic annotation. In this paper, we propose a pipeline based on Vision-Language Models for the automatic transcription, semantic segmentation, and entity linking of Italian parliamentary speeches. The pipeline employs a specialised OCR model to extract text while preserving reading order, followed by a large-scale Vision-Language Model that performs transcription refinement, element classification, and speaker identification by jointly reasoning over visual layout and textual content. Extracted speakers are then linked to the Chamber of Deputies knowledge base through SPARQL queries and a multi-strategy fuzzy matching procedure. Evaluation against an established benchmark demonstrates substantial improvements both in transcription quality and speaker tagging.

65. MolmoPoint: Better Pointing for VLMs with Grounding Tokens

Authors: Christopher Clark , Yue Yang , Jae Sung Park , Zixian Ma , Jieyu Zhang , Rohun Tripathi , Mohammadreza Salehi , Sangho Lee , Taira Anderson , Winson Han , Ranjay Krishna
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28069
Abstract:

Grounding has become a fundamental capability of vision-language models (VLMs). Most existing VLMs point by generating coordinates as part of their text output, which requires learning a complicated coordinate system and results in a high token count. Instead, we propose a more intuitive pointing mechanism that directly selects the visual tokens that contain the target concept. Our model generates a special pointing token that cross-attends to the input image or video tokens and selects the appropriate one. To make this model more fine-grained, we follow these pointing tokens with an additional special token that selects a fine-grained subpatch within the initially selected region, and then a third token that specifies a location within that subpatch. We further show that performance improves by generating points sequentially in a consistent order, encoding the relative position of the previously selected point, and including a special no-more-points class when selecting visual tokens. Using this method, we set a new state-of-the-art on image pointing (70.7% on PointBench), set a new state-of-the-art among fully open models on GUI pointing (61.1% on ScreenSpotPro), and improve video pointing (59.1% human preference win rate vs. a text coordinate baseline) and tracking (+6.3% gain on Molmo2Track). We additionally show that our method achieves much higher sample efficiency and discuss the qualitative differences that emerge from this design change.

66. Kill-Chain Canaries: Stage-Level Tracking of Prompt Injection Across Attack Surfaces and Model Safety Tiers

Authors: Haochuan Kevin Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28013
Abstract:

We present a stage-decomposed analysis of prompt injection attacks against five frontier LLM agents. Prior work measures task-level attack success rate (ASR); we localize the pipeline stage at which each model’s defense activates. We instrument every run with a cryptographic canary token (SECRET-[A-F0-9]{8}) tracked through four kill-chain stages – Exposed, Persisted, Relayed, Executed – across four attack surfaces and five defense conditions (764 total runs, 428 no-defense attacked). Our central finding is that model safety is determined not by whether adversarial content is seen, but by whether it is propagated across pipeline stages. Concretely: (1) in our evaluation, exposure is 100% for all five models – the safety gap is entirely downstream; (2) Claude strips injections at write_memory summarization (0/164 ASR), while GPT-4o-mini propagates canaries without loss (53% ASR, 95% CI: 41–65%); (3) DeepSeek exhibits 0% ASR on memory surfaces and 100% ASR on tool-stream surfaces from the same model – a complete reversal across injection channels; (4) all four active defense conditions (write_filter, pi_detector, spotlighting, and their combination) produce 100% ASR due to threat-model surface mismatch; (5) a Claude relay node decontaminates downstream agents – 0/40 canaries survived into shared memory.

67. ViviDoc: Generating Interactive Documents through Human-Agent Collaboration

Authors: Yinghao Tang , Yupeng Xie , Yingchaojie Feng , Tingfeng Lan , Jiale Lao , Yue Cheng , Wei Chen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27991
Abstract:

Interactive documents help readers engage with complex ideas through dynamic visualization, interactive animations, and exploratory interfaces. However, creating such documents remains costly, as it requires both domain expertise and web development skills. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents can automate content creation, but directly applying them to interactive document generation often produces outputs that are difficult to control. To address this, we present ViviDoc, to the best of our knowledge the first work to systematically address interactive document generation. ViviDoc introduces a multi-agent pipeline (Planner, Styler, Executor, Evaluator). To make the generation process controllable, we provide three levels of human control: (1) the Document Specification (DocSpec) with SRTC Interaction Specifications (State, Render, Transition, Constraint) for structured planning, (2) a content-aware Style Palette for customizing writing and interaction styles, and (3) chat-based editing for iterative refinement. We also construct ViviBench, a benchmark of 101 topics derived from real-world interactive documents across 11 domains, along with a taxonomy of 8 interaction types and a 4-dimensional automated evaluation framework validated against human ratings (Pearson r > 0.84). Experiments show that ViviDoc achieves the highest content richness and interaction quality in both automated and human evaluation. A 12-person user study confirms that the system is easy to use, provides effective control over the generation process, and produces documents that satisfy users.

68. CDH-Bench: A Commonsense-Driven Hallucination Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Fidelity in Vision-Language Models

Authors: Kesheng Chen , Yamin Hu , Qi Zhou , Zhenqian Zhu , Wenjian Luo
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27982
Abstract:

Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on many benchmarks, yet a basic reliability question remains underexplored: when visual evidence conflicts with commonsense, do models follow what is shown or what commonsense suggests? A characteristic failure in this setting is that the model overrides visual evidence and outputs the commonsense alternative. We term this phenomenon \textbf{commonsense-driven hallucination} (CDH). To evaluate it, we introduce \textbf{CDH-Bench}, a benchmark designed to create explicit \textbf{visual evidence–commonsense conflicts}. CDH-Bench covers three dimensions: \textit{counting anomalies}, \textit{relational anomalies}, and \textit{attribute anomalies}. We evaluate frontier VLMs under \textit{binary Question Answering (QA)} and \textit{multiple-choice QA}, and report metrics including \textit{Counterfactual Accuracy} (CF-Acc), \textit{Commonsense Accuracy} (CS-Acc), \textit{Counterfactual Accuracy Drop} (CFAD), \textit{Commonsense Collapse Rate} (CCR), and \textit{Relative Prior Dependency} (RPD). Results show that even strong models remain vulnerable to prior-driven normalization under visual evidence–commonsense conflict. CDH-Bench provides a controlled diagnostic of visual fidelity under visual evidence–commonsense conflict.

69. JaWildText: A Benchmark for Vision-Language Models on Japanese Scene Text Understanding

Authors: Koki Maeda (1 and 2), Naoaki Okazaki (1 and 2) ((1) Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, (2) Research and Development Center for Large Language Models, National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan)
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27942
Abstract:

Japanese scene text poses challenges that multilingual benchmarks often fail to capture, including mixed scripts, frequent vertical writing, and a character inventory far larger than the Latin alphabet. Although Japanese is included in several multilingual benchmarks, these resources do not adequately capture the language-specific complexities. Meanwhile, existing Japanese visual text datasets have primarily focused on scanned documents, leaving in-the-wild scene text underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce JaWildText, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) on Japanese scene text understanding. JaWildText contains 3,241 instances from 2,961 images newly captured in Japan, with 1.12 million annotated characters spanning 3,643 unique character types. It comprises three complementary tasks that vary in visual organization, output format, and writing style: (i) Dense Scene Text Visual Question Answering (STVQA), which requires reasoning over multiple pieces of visual text evidence; (ii) Receipt Key Information Extraction (KIE), which tests layout-aware structured extraction from mobile-captured receipts; and (iii) Handwriting OCR, which evaluates page-level transcription across various media and writing directions. We evaluate 14 open-weight VLMs and find that the best model achieves an average score of 0.64 across the three tasks. Error analyses show recognition remains the dominant bottleneck, especially for kanji. JaWildText enables fine-grained, script-aware diagnosis of Japanese scene text capabilities, and will be released with evaluation code.

70. Adversarial Attacks on Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Authors: Bhavuk Jain , Sercan Ö. Arık , Hardeo K. Thakur
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27918
Abstract:

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) integrate information from multiple modalities such as text, images, audio, and video, enabling complex capabilities such as visual question answering and audio translation. While powerful, this increased expressiveness introduces new and amplified vulnerabilities to adversarial manipulation. This survey provides a comprehensive and systematic analysis of adversarial threats to MLLMs, moving beyond enumerating attack techniques to explain the underlying causes of model susceptibility. We introduce a taxonomy that organizes adversarial attacks according to attacker objectives, unifying diverse attack surfaces across modalities and deployment settings. Additionally, we also present a vulnerability-centric analysis that links integrity attacks, safety and jailbreak failures, control and instruction hijacking, and training-time poisoning to shared architectural and representational weaknesses in multimodal systems. Together, this framework provides an explanatory foundation for understanding adversarial behavior in MLLMs and informs the development of more robust and secure multimodal language systems.

71. ITQ3_S: High-Fidelity 3-bit LLM Inference via Interleaved Ternary Quantization with Rotation-Domain Smoothing

Authors: Edward J. Yoon
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27914
Abstract:

We present \textbf{ITQ3_S} (Interleaved Ternary Quantization – Specialized), a novel 3-bit weight quantization format for large language models (LLMs) that integrates \textbf{TurboQuant (TQ)}, a rotation-domain adaptive quantization strategy based on the Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform (FWHT). Conventional 3-bit quantization methods suffer from catastrophic precision loss caused by heavy-tailed weight distributions and inter-channel outliers. ITQ3_S addresses this fundamental limitation by pre-rotating the weight space via FWHT prior to quantization, effectively spreading outlier energy across the entire vector and inducing a near-Gaussian distribution amenable to uniform ternary coding. Critically, we derive a mathematically rigorous dequantization procedure that inverts the FWHT exactly using a 256-point Inverse Walsh-Hadamard Transform fused into the CUDA shared-memory loading stage, ensuring zero-error round-trip fidelity between offline quantization and online inference. We prove that for any weight vector $\mathbf{w} \in \mathbb{R}^{256}$ processed by our pipeline, the reconstruction satisfies $|\hat{\mathbf{w}} - \mathbf{w}|_2 \leq \epsilon_q$, where $\epsilon_q$ is determined solely by the ternary quantization grid and is strictly smaller than any uniform 3-bit baseline under equal bit-budget constraints. Empirically, on the NVIDIA RTX 5090 (Blackwell architecture), ITQ3_S achieves perplexity competitive with FP16 baselines while delivering throughput exceeding 1.5$\times$ that of 4-bit alternatives, owing to optimized DP4A and Tensor Core scheduling in the interleaved memory layout. Our results establish ITQ3_S as a practical, mathematically grounded solution for high-fidelity LLM deployment on consumer-grade hardware.

72. KVSculpt: KV Cache Compression as Distillation

Authors: Bo Jiang , Sian Jin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27819
Abstract:

KV cache compression is critical for efficient long-context LLM inference. Approaches that reduce the per-pair footprint – quantization and low-rank decomposition – are orthogonal to those that reduce the sequence length of the cache. Along the sequence-length dimension, existing methods range from pure eviction – selecting which KV pairs to keep – to merging, which combines similar pairs into fewer ones. Both remain anchored to the original cache entries. We propose KVSculpt, which moves to the other end of this spectrum: instead of selecting or combining original pairs, we optimize a smaller set of unconstrained KV pairs in continuous embedding space to preserve each layer’s attention behavior. Keys are optimized via L-BFGS and values are solved in closed form via least squares, alternating every few steps. On top of this, we introduce adaptive budget allocation, which uses a cheap pilot compression run to redistribute the compression budget across layers and KV heads based on per-component difficulty. On Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct with 2048-token contexts, KVSculpt reduces KL divergence by 3.5-4.1x compared to Select+Fit – attention-score eviction with least-squares value fitting – across compression ratios r in {0.3, 0.5, 0.7}. Adaptive allocation provides an additional 1.3x KL reduction at no extra inference cost. Analysis reveals that compression difficulty is highly non-uniform: per-layer pilot MSE varies by up to 100x across layers, and the two KV heads within a single layer can differ by up to 467x – demonstrating that fine-grained budget allocation is essential.

73. Towards Context-Aware Image Anonymization with Multi-Agent Reasoning

Authors: Robert Aufschläger , Jakob Folz , Gautam Savaliya , Manjitha D Vidanalage , Michael Heigl , Martin Schramm
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27817
Abstract:

Street-level imagery contains personally identifiable information (PII), some of which is context-dependent. Existing anonymization methods either over-process images or miss subtle identifiers, while API-based solutions compromise data sovereignty. We present an agentic framework CAIAMAR (\underline{C}ontext-\underline{A}ware \underline{I}mage \underline{A}nonymization with \underline{M}ulti-\underline{A}gent \underline{R}easoning) for context-aware PII segmentation with diffusion-based anonymization, combining pre-defined processing for high-confidence cases with multi-agent reasoning for indirect identifiers. Three specialized agents coordinate via round-robin speaker selection in a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, enabling large vision-language models to classify PII based on spatial context (private vs. public property) rather than rigid category rules. The agents implement spatially-filtered coarse-to-fine detection where a scout-and-zoom strategy identifies candidates, open-vocabulary segmentation processes localized crops, and $IoU$-based deduplication ($30\%$ threshold) prevents redundant processing. Modal-specific diffusion guidance with appearance decorrelation substantially reduces re-identification (Re-ID) risks. On CUHK03-NP, our method reduces person Re-ID risk by $73\%$ ($R1$: $16.9\%$ vs. $62.4\%$ baseline). For image quality preservation on CityScapes, we achieve KID: $0.001$, and FID: $9.1$, significantly outperforming existing anonymization. The agentic workflow detects non-direct PII instances across object categories, and downstream semantic segmentation is preserved. Operating entirely on-premise with open-source models, the framework generates human-interpretable audit trails supporting EU’s GDPR transparency requirements while flagging failed cases for human review.

74. EvA: An Evidence-First Audio Understanding Paradigm for LALMs

Authors: Xinyuan Xie , Shunian Chen , Zhiheng Liu , Yuhao Zhang , Zhiqiang Lv , Liyin Liang , Benyou Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27667
Abstract:

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) still struggle in complex acoustic scenes because they often fail to preserve task-relevant acoustic evidence before reasoning begins. We call this failure the evidence bottleneck: state-of-the-art systems show larger deficits in evidence extraction than in downstream reasoning, suggesting that the main limitation lies in upstream perception rather than reasoning policy. To address this problem, we propose EvA (Evidence-First Audio), a dual-path architecture that combines Whisper and CED-Base through non-compressive, time-aligned fusion. EvA first aggregates intermediate CED layers to preserve multi-scale acoustic cues, then aligns the aggregated CED features to the Whisper timeline and adds the two streams without changing sequence length. We also build EvA-Perception, a large-scale open-source training set with about 54K event-ordered captions (150 h) and about 500K QA pairs. Under a unified zero-shot protocol, EvA achieves the best open-source Perception scores on MMAU, MMAR, and MMSU, and improves over Kimi-Audio-7B on all reported metrics, with the largest gains on perception-heavy splits. These results support the evidence-first hypothesis: stronger audio understanding depends on preserving acoustic evidence before reasoning.

75. Umwelt Engineering: Designing the Cognitive Worlds of Linguistic Agents

Authors: Rodney Jehu-Appiah
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27626
Abstract:

I propose Umwelt engineering – the deliberate design of the linguistic cognitive environment – as a third layer in the agent design stack, upstream of both prompt and context engineering. Two experiments test the thesis that altering the medium of reasoning alters cognition itself. In Experiment 1, three language models reason under two vocabulary constraints – No-Have (eliminating possessive “to have”) and E-Prime (eliminating “to be”) – across seven tasks (N=4,470 trials). No-Have improves ethical reasoning by 19.1 pp (p < 0.001), classification by 6.5 pp (p < 0.001), and epistemic calibration by 7.4 pp, while achieving 92.8% constraint compliance. E-Prime shows dramatic but model-dependent effects: cross-model correlations reach r = -0.75. In Experiment 2, 16 linguistically constrained agents tackle 17 debugging problems. No constrained agent outperforms the control individually, yet a 3-agent ensemble achieves 100% ground-truth coverage versus 88.2% for the control. A permutation test confirms only 8% of random 3-agent subsets achieve full coverage, and every successful subset contains the counterfactual agent. Two mechanisms emerge: cognitive restructuring and cognitive diversification. The primary limitation is the absence of an active control matching constraint prompt elaborateness.

76. STRIDE: When to Speak Meets Sequence Denoising for Streaming Video Understanding

Authors: Junho Kim , Hosu Lee , James M. Rehg , Minsu Kim , Yong Man Ro
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27593
Abstract:

Recent progress in video large language models (Video-LLMs) has enabled strong offline reasoning over long and complex videos. However, real-world deployments increasingly require streaming perception and proactive interaction, where video frames arrive online and the system must decide not only what to respond, but also when to respond. In this work, we revisit proactive activation in streaming video as a structured sequence modeling problem, motivated by the observation that temporal transitions in streaming video naturally form span-structured activation patterns. To capture this span-level structure, we model activation signals jointly over a sliding temporal window and update them iteratively as new frames arrive. We propose STRIDE (Structured Temporal Refinement with Iterative DEnoising), which employs a lightweight masked diffusion module at the activation interface to jointly predict and progressively refine activation signals across the window. Extensive experiments on diverse streaming benchmarks and downstream models demonstrate that STRIDE shows more reliable and temporally coherent proactive responses, significantly improving when-to-speak decision quality in online streaming scenarios.

77. InnerPond: Fostering Inter-Self Dialogue with a Multi-Agent Approach for Introspection

Authors: Hayeon Jeon , Dakyeom Ahn , Sunyu Pang , Yunseo Choi , Suhwoo Yoon , Joonhwan Lee , Eun-mee Kim , Hajin Lim
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27563
Abstract:

Introspection is central to identity construction and future planning, yet most digital tools approach the self as a unified entity. In contrast, Dialogical Self Theory (DST) views the self as composed of multiple internal perspectives, such as values, concerns, and aspirations, that can come into tension or dialogue with one another. Building on this view, we designed InnerPond, a research probe in the form of a multi-agent system that represents these internal perspectives as distinct LLM-based agents for introspection. Its design was shaped through iterative explorations of spatial metaphors, interaction scaffolding, and conversational orchestration, culminating in a shared spatial environment for organizing and relating multiple inner perspectives. In a user study with 17 young adults navigating career choices, participants engaged with the probe by co-creating inner voices with AI, composing relational inner landscapes, and orchestrating dialogue as observers and mediators, offering insight into how such systems could support introspection. Overall, this work offers design implications for AI-supported introspection tools that enable exploration of the self’s multiplicity.

78. Toward Reliable Evaluation of LLM-Based Financial Multi-Agent Systems: Taxonomy, Coordination Primacy, and Cost Awareness

Authors: Phat Nguyen , Thang Pham
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27539
Abstract:

Multi-agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) for financial trading have grown rapidly since 2023, yet the field lacks a shared framework for understanding what drives performance or for evaluating claims credibly. This survey makes three contributions. First, we introduce a four-dimensional taxonomy, covering architecture pattern, coordination mechanism, memory architecture, and tool integration; applied to 12 multi-agent systems and two single-agent baselines. Second, we formulate the Coordination Primacy Hypothesis (CPH): inter-agent coordination protocol design is a primary driver of trading decision quality, often exerting greater influence than model scaling. CPH is presented as a falsifiable research hypothesis supported by tiered structural evidence rather than as an empirically validated conclusion; its definitive validation requires evaluation infrastructure that does not yet exist in the field. Third, we document five pervasive evaluation failures (look-ahead bias, survivorship bias, backtesting overfitting, transaction cost neglect, and regime-shift blindness) and show that these can reverse the sign of reported returns. Building on the CPH and the evaluation critique, we introduce the Coordination Breakeven Spread (CBS), a metric for determining whether multi-agent coordination adds genuine value net of transaction costs, and propose minimum evaluation standards as prerequisites for validating the CPH.

79. A Systematic Taxonomy of Security Vulnerabilities in the OpenClaw AI Agent Framework

Authors: Surada Suwansathit , Yuxuan Zhang , Guofei Gu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27517
Abstract:

AI agent frameworks connecting large language model (LLM) reasoning to host execution surfaces–shell, filesystem, containers, and messaging–introduce security challenges structurally distinct from conventional software. We present a systematic taxonomy of 190 advisories filed against OpenClaw, an open-source AI agent runtime, organized by architectural layer and trust-violation type. Vulnerabilities cluster along two orthogonal axes: (1) the system axis, reflecting the architectural layer (exec policy, gateway, channel, sandbox, browser, plugin, agent/prompt); and (2) the attack axis, reflecting adversarial techniques (identity spoofing, policy bypass, cross-layer composition, prompt injection, supply-chain escalation). Patch-differential evidence yields three principal findings. First, three Moderate- or High-severity advisories in the Gateway and Node-Host subsystems compose into a complete unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) path–spanning delivery, exploitation, and command-and-control–from an LLM tool call to the host process. Second, the exec allowlist, the primary command-filtering mechanism, relies on a closed-world assumption that command identity is recoverable via lexical parsing. This is invalidated by shell line continuation, busybox multiplexing, and GNU option abbreviation. Third, a malicious skill distributed via the plugin channel executed a two-stage dropper within the LLM context, bypassing the exec pipeline and demonstrating that the skill distribution surface lacks runtime policy enforcement. The dominant structural weakness is per-layer trust enforcement rather than unified policy boundaries, making cross-layer attacks resilient to local remediation.

80. Learning to Focus and Precise Cropping: A Reinforcement Learning Framework with Information Gaps and Grounding Loss for MLLMs

Authors: Xuanpu Zhao , Zhentao Tan , Dianmo Sheng , Tianxiang Chen , Yao Liu , Yue Wu , Tao Gong , Qi Chu , Nenghai Yu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27494
Abstract:

To enhance the perception and reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models in complex visual scenes, recent research has introduced agent-based workflows. In these works, MLLMs autonomously utilize image cropping tool to analyze regions of interest for question answering. While existing training strategies, such as those employing supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, have made significant progress, our empirical analysis reveals a key limitation. We demonstrate the model’s strong reliance on global input and its weak dependence on the details within the cropped region. To address this issue, we propose a novel two-stage reinforcement learning framework that does not require trajectory supervision. In the first stage, we introduce the ``Information Gap” mechanism by adjusting the granularity of the global image. This mechanism trains the model to answer questions by focusing on cropped key regions, driven by the information gain these regions provide. The second stage further enhances cropping precision by incorporating a grounding loss, using a small number of bounding box annotations. Experiments show that our method significantly enhances the model’s attention to cropped regions, enabling it to achieve state-of-the-art performance on high-resolution visual question-answering benchmarks. Our method provides a more efficient approach for perceiving and reasoning fine-grained details in MLLMs. Code is available at: this https URL .

81. AgentSwing: Adaptive Parallel Context Management Routing for Long-Horizon Web Agents

Authors: Zhaopeng Feng , Liangcai Su , Zhen Zhang , Xinyu Wang , Xiaotian Zhang , Xiaobin Wang , Runnan Fang , Qi Zhang , Baixuan Li , Shihao Cai , Rui Ye , Hui Chen , Jiang Yong , Joey Tianyi Zhou , Chenxiong Qian , Pengjun Xie , Bryan Hooi , Zuozhu Liu , Jingren Zhou
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27490
Abstract:

As large language models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents for long-horizon information-seeking, managing finite context capacity has become a critical bottleneck. Existing context management methods typically commit to a single fixed strategy throughout the entire trajectory. Such static designs may work well in some states, but they cannot adapt as the usefulness and reliability of the accumulated context evolve during long-horizon search. To formalize this challenge, we introduce a probabilistic framework that characterizes long-horizon success through two complementary dimensions: search efficiency and terminal precision. Building on this perspective, we propose AgentSwing, a state-aware adaptive parallel context management routing framework. At each trigger point, AgentSwing expands multiple context-managed branches in parallel and uses lookahead routing to select the most promising continuation. Experiments across diverse benchmarks and agent backbones show that AgentSwing consistently outperforms strong static context management methods, often matching or exceeding their performance with up to $3\times$ fewer interaction turns while also improving the ultimate performance ceiling of long-horizon web agents. Beyond the empirical gains, the proposed probabilistic framework provides a principled lens for analyzing and designing future context management strategies for long-horizon agents.

82. Difference Feedback: Generating Multimodal Process-Level Supervision for VLM Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Feiding , Yongkang Zhang , Yuhao Liao , Zijian Zeng , Chunzheng Zhu , Yaozong Zheng , Yafei Liu , Yeling Peng , Youwei Wang , Sibo Wang , Huiming Yang , Linglin Liao , Shunzhi Yang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27482
Abstract:

Vision–language models (VLMs) are increasingly aligned via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)-style training. However, relying solely on terminal outcome rewards yields sparse credit assignment in multi-step reasoning, weakening the linkage between visual evidence and intermediate steps and often causing unstable optimization and visual hallucinations. We propose Differential Feedback, which automatically constructs token/step-level supervision masks by repairing erroneous reasoning trajectories, explicitly marking the key positions that require correction. Without costly large-scale step-by-step human annotations, our method enables process-level visual alignment and can be seamlessly integrated into existing GRPO-like frameworks. Experiments on multimodal reasoning benchmarks including MMMStar and MathVista show an average 3% improvement under matched compute budgets. Our approach offers an effective, low-cost solution for accurate vision–reasoning process alignment.

83. On Token’s Dilemma: Dynamic MoE with Drift-Aware Token Assignment for Continual Learning of Large Vision Language Models

Authors: Chongyang Zhao , Mingsong Li , Haodong Lu , Dong Gong
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27481
Abstract:

Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning aims to continually enhance Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) by learning from new data without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. Mixture of Experts (MoE) architectures naturally facilitate this by incrementally adding new experts and expanding routers while keeping the existing ones frozen. However, despite expert isolation, MoE-based continual learners still suffer from forgetting due to routing-drift: old-task tokens become mistakenly attracted to newly added experts, degrading performance on prior tasks. We analyze the failure mode at the token level and reveal the token’s dilemma: ambiguous and old tokens in new-task data offer minimal learning benefit yet induce forgetting when routed to new experts, due to their ambiguous routing assignment during training. Motivated by this, we propose LLaVA-DyMoE, a dynamic MoE framework that incrementally expands the MoE with drift-aware token assignment. We characterize token types via their routing score distributions and apply targeted regularization. Specifically, a token-level assignment guidance steers ambiguous and old tokens away from new experts to preserve established routing patterns and alleviate routing-drift, while complementary routing score regularizations enforce expert-group separation and promote new-expert specialization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our LLaVA-DyMoE effectively mitigates routing-drift-induced forgetting, achieving over a 7% gain in mean final accuracy and a 12% reduction in forgetting compared to baselines. The project page is this https URL .

Authors: Jakub Bąba , Jarosław A. Chudziak
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27451
Abstract:

Argument Mining (AM) is a foundational technology for automated writing evaluation, yet traditional supervised approaches rely heavily on expensive, domain-specific fine-tuning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a training-free alternative, they often struggle with structural ambiguity, failing to distinguish between similar components like Claims and Premises. Furthermore, single-agent self-correction mechanisms often suffer from sycophancy, where the model reinforces its own initial errors rather than critically evaluating them. We introduce MAD-ACC (Multi-Agent Debate for Argument Component Classification), a framework that leverages dialectical refinement to resolve classification uncertainty. MAD-ACC utilizes a Proponent-Opponent-Judge model where agents defend conflicting interpretations of ambiguous text, exposing logical nuances that single-agent models miss. Evaluation on the UKP Student Essays corpus demonstrates that MAD-ACC achieves a Macro F1 score of 85.7%, significantly outperforming single-agent reasoning baselines, without requiring domain-specific training. Additionally, unlike “black-box” classifiers, MAD-ACC’s dialectical approach offers a transparent and explainable alternative by generating human-readable debate transcripts that explain the reasoning behind decisions.

85. Improving Attributed Long-form Question Answering with Intent Awareness

Authors: Xinran Zhao , Aakanksha Naik , Jay DeYoung , Joseph Chee Chang , Jena D. Hwang , Tongshuang Wu , Varsha Kishore
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27435
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to generate comprehensive, knowledge-intensive reports. However, while these models are trained on diverse academic papers and reports, they are not exposed to the reasoning processes and intents that guide authors in crafting these documents. We hypothesize that enhancing a model’s intent awareness can significantly improve the quality of generated long-form reports. We develop and employ structured, tag-based schemes to better elicit underlying implicit intents to write or cite. We demonstrate that these extracted intents enhance both zero-shot generation capabilities in LLMs and enable the creation of high-quality synthetic data for fine-tuning smaller models. Our experiments reveal improved performance across various challenging scientific report generation tasks, with an average improvement of +2.9 and +12.3 absolute points for large and small models over baselines, respectively. Furthermore, our analysis illuminates how intent awareness enhances model citation usage and substantially improves report readability.

86. Multiple-Prediction-Powered Inference

Authors: Charlie Cowen-Breen , Alekh Agarwal , Stephen Bates , William W. Cohen , Jacob Eisenstein , Amir Globerson , Adam Fisch
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27414
Abstract:

Statistical estimation often involves tradeoffs between expensive, high-quality measurements and a variety of lower-quality proxies. We introduce Multiple-Prediction-Powered Inference (MultiPPI): a general framework for constructing statistically efficient estimates by optimally allocating resources across these diverse data sources. This work provides theoretical guarantees about the minimax optimality, finite-sample performance, and asymptotic normality of the MultiPPI estimator. Through experiments across three diverse large language model (LLM) evaluation scenarios, we show that MultiPPI consistently achieves lower estimation error than existing baselines. This advantage stems from its budget-adaptive allocation strategy, which strategically combines subsets of models by learning their complex cost and correlation structures.

87. The Geometry of Harmful Intent: Training-Free Anomaly Detection via Angular Deviation in LLM Residual Streams

Authors: Isaac Llorente-Saguer
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27412
Abstract:

We present LatentBiopsy, a training-free method for detecting harmful prompts by analysing the geometry of residual-stream activations in large language models. Given 200 safe normative prompts, LatentBiopsy computes the leading principal component of their activations at a target layer and characterises new prompts by their radial deviation angle $\theta$ from this reference direction. The anomaly score is the negative log-likelihood of $\theta$ under a Gaussian fit to the normative distribution, flagging deviations symmetrically regardless of orientation. No harmful examples are required for training. We evaluate two complete model triplets from the Qwen3.5-0.8B and Qwen2.5-0.5B families: base, instruction-tuned, and \emph{abliterated} (refusal direction surgically removed via orthogonalisation). Across all six variants, LatentBiopsy achieves AUROC $\geq$0.937 for harmful-vs-normative detection and AUROC = 1.000 for discriminating harmful from benign-aggressive prompts (XSTest), with sub-millisecond per-query overhead. Three empirical findings emerge. First, geometry survives refusal ablation: both abliterated variants achieve AUROC at most 0.015 below their instruction-tuned counterparts, establishing a geometric dissociation between harmful-intent representation and the downstream generative refusal mechanism. Second, harmful prompts exhibit a near-degenerate angular distribution ($\sigma_\theta \approx 0.03$ rad), an order of magnitude tighter than the normative distribution ($\sigma_\theta \approx 0.27$ rad), preserved across all alignment stages including abliteration. Third, the two families exhibit opposite ring orientations at the same depth: harmful prompts occupy the outer ring in Qwen3.5-0.8B but the inner ring in Qwen2.5-0.5B, directly motivating the direction-agnostic scoring rule.

Authors: Lance Ying , Aydan Y. Huang , Aviv Netanyahu , Andrei Barbu , Boris Katz , Joshua B. Tenenbaum , Tianmin Shu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27410
Abstract:

People infer rich social information from others’ actions. These inferences are often constrained by the physical world: what agents can do, what obstacles permit, and how the physical actions of agents causally change an environment and other agents’ mental states and behavior. We propose that such rich social perception is more than visual pattern matching, but rather a reasoning process grounded in an integration of intuitive psychology with intuitive physics. To test this hypothesis, we introduced PHASE (PHysically grounded Abstract Social Events), a large dataset of procedurally generated animations, depicting physically simulated two-agent interactions on a 2D surface. Each animation follows the style of the Heider and Simmel movie, with systematic variation in environment geometry, object dynamics, agent capacities, goals, and relationships (friendly/adversarial/neutral). We then present a computational model, SIMPLE, a physics-grounded Bayesian inverse planning model that integrates planning, probabilistic planning, and physics simulation to infer agents’ goals and relations from their trajectories. Our experimental results showed that SIMPLE achieved high accuracy and agreement with human judgments across diverse scenarios, while feedforward baseline models – including strong vision-language models – and physics-agnostic inverse planning failed to achieve human-level performance and did not align with human judgments. These results suggest that our model provides a computational account for how people understand physically grounded social scenes by inverting a generative model of physics and agents.

89. Conditional Factuality Controlled LLMs with Generalization Certificates via Conformal Sampling

Authors: Kai Ye , Qingtao Pan , Shuo Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27403
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) need reliable test-time control of hallucinations. Existing conformal methods for LLMs typically provide only \emph{marginal} guarantees and rely on a single global threshold, which can under-cover hard prompts, over-cover easy ones, and produce oversized prediction sets. We propose \emph{Conditional Factuality Control} (CFC), a post-hoc conformal framework that returns \emph{set-valued} outputs with \emph{conditional} coverage guarantees. CFC defines a continuous, feature-conditional acceptance threshold through augmented quantile regression on a latent ``success’’ score, and deploys it through a fixed-point threshold rule at inference time. Theoretically, we show that CFC satisfies a conditional coverage guarantee under exchangeability and analyze its \emph{efficiency}, proving that, under mild assumptions on the score distributions, the conditional rule is strictly more sample-efficient than marginal conformal prediction at the same target coverage. We further derive a PAC-style variant, CFC-PAC, which shrinks the nominal risk level based on a stability bound, yielding a finite-sample certificate that the conditional miscoverage deviates from the target by at most $O(\sqrt{\log(1/\delta)/N})$. Empirically, on synthetic data, real-world reasoning and QA benchmarks, and a Flickr8k VLM setting, CFC and CFC-PAC consistently attain near-target coverage across difficulty groups while using smaller prediction sets than CP and non-CP baselines.

90. Culturally Adaptive Explainable LLM Assessment for Multilingual Information Disorder: A Human-in-the-Loop Approach

Authors: Maziar Kianimoghadam Jouneghani
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27356
Abstract:

Recognizing information disorder is difficult because judgments about manipulation depend on cultural and linguistic context. Yet current Large Language Models (LLMs) often behave as monocultural, English-centric “black boxes,” producing fluent rationales that overlook localized framing. Preliminary evidence from the multilingual Information Disorder (InDor) corpus suggests that existing models struggle to explain manipulated news consistently across communities. To address this gap, this ongoing study proposes a Hybrid Intelligence Loop, a human-in-the-loop (HITL) framework that grounds model assessment in human-written rationales from native-speaking annotators. The approach moves beyond static target-language few-shot prompting by pairing English task instructions with dynamically retrieved target-language exemplars drawn from filtered InDor annotations through In-Context Learning (ICL). In the initial pilot, the Exemplar Bank is seeded from these filtered annotations and used to compare static and adaptive prompting on Farsi and Italian news. The study evaluates span and severity prediction, the quality and cultural appropriateness of generated rationales, and model alignment across evaluator groups, providing a testbed for culturally grounded explainable AI.

91. GUIDE: Guided Updates for In-context Decision Evolution in LLM-Driven Spacecraft Operations

Authors: Alejandro Carrasco , Mariko Storey-Matsutani , Victor Rodriguez-Fernandez , Richard Linares
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27306
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as supervisory agents for spacecraft operations, but existing approaches rely on static prompting and do not improve across repeated executions. We introduce \textsc{GUIDE}, a non-parametric policy improvement framework that enables cross-episode adaptation without weight updates by evolving a structured, state-conditioned playbook of natural-language decision rules. A lightweight acting model performs real-time control, while offline reflection updates the playbook from prior trajectories. Evaluated on an adversarial orbital interception task in the Kerbal Space Program Differential Games environment, GUIDE’s evolution consistently outperforms static baselines. Results indicate that context evolution in LLM agents functions as policy search over structured decision rules in real-time closed-loop spacecraft interaction.

92. Codebase-Memory: Tree-Sitter-Based Knowledge Graphs for LLM Code Exploration via MCP

Authors: Martin Vogel , Falk Meyer-Eschenbach , Severin Kohler , Elias Grünewald , Felix Balzer
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27277
Abstract:

Large Language Model (LLM) coding agents typically explore codebases through repeated file-reading and grep-searching, consuming thousands of tokens per query without structural understanding. We present Codebase-Memory, an open-source system that constructs a persistent, Tree-Sitter-based knowledge graph via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), parsing 66 languages through a multi-phase pipeline with parallel worker pools, call-graph traversal, impact analysis, and community discovery. Evaluated across 31 real-world repositories, Codebase-Memory achieves 83% answer quality versus 92% for a file-exploration agent, at ten times fewer tokens and 2.1 times fewer tool calls. For graph-native queries such as hub detection and caller ranking, it matches or exceeds the explorer on 19 of 31 languages.

93. Amalgam: Hybrid LLM-PGM Synthesis Algorithm for Accuracy and Realism

Authors: Antheas Kapenekakis , Bent Thomsen , Katja Hose , Michele Albano
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27254
Abstract:

To generate synthetic datasets, e.g., in domains such as healthcare, the literature proposes approaches of two main types: Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs) and Deep Learning models, such as LLMs. While PGMs produce synthetic data that can be used for advanced analytics, they do not support complex schemas and datasets. LLMs on the other hand, support complex schemas but produce skewed dataset distributions, which are less useful for advanced analytics. In this paper, we therefore present Amalgam, a hybrid LLM-PGM data synthesis algorithm supporting both advanced analytics, realism, and tangible privacy properties. We show that Amalgam synthesizes data with an average 91 % $\chi^2 P$ value and scores 3.8/5 for realism using our proposed metric, where state-of-the-art is 3.3 and real data is 4.7.

94. Zero-shot Vision-Language Reranking for Cross-View Geolocalization

Authors: Yunus Talha Erzurumlu , John E. Anderson , William J. Shuart , Charles Toth , Alper Yilmaz
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27251
Abstract:

Cross-view geolocalization (CVGL) systems, while effective at retrieving a list of relevant candidates (high Recall@k), often fail to identify the single best match (low Top-1 accuracy). This work investigates the use of zero-shot Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as rerankers to address this gap. We propose a two-stage framework: state-of-the-art (SOTA) retrieval followed by VLM reranking. We systematically compare two strategies: (1) Pointwise (scoring candidates individually) and (2) Pairwise (comparing candidates relatively). Experiments on the VIGOR dataset show a clear divergence: all pointwise methods cause a catastrophic drop in performance or no change at all. In contrast, a pairwise comparison strategy using LLaVA improves Top-1 accuracy over the strong retrieval baseline. Our analysis concludes that, these VLMs are poorly calibrated for absolute relevance scoring but are effective at fine-grained relative visual judgment, making pairwise reranking a promising direction for enhancing CVGL precision.

Authors: Jinhu Fu , Yihang Lou , Qingyi Si , Shudong Zhang , Yan Bai , Sen Su
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27240
Abstract:

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved impressive performance across multimodal understanding and reasoning tasks, yet their internal safety mechanisms remain opaque and poorly controlled. In this work, we present a comprehensive framework for diagnosing and repairing unsafe channels within LVLMs (CARE). We first perform causal mediation analysis to identify neurons and layers that are causally responsible for unsafe behaviors. Based on these findings, we introduce a dual-modal safety subspace projection method that learns generalized safety subspaces for both visual and textual modalities through generalized eigen-decomposition between benign and malicious activations. During inference, activations are dynamically projected toward these safety subspaces via a hybrid fusion mechanism that adaptively balances visual and textual corrections, effectively suppressing unsafe features while preserving semantic fidelity. Extensive experiments on multiple safety benchmarks demonstrate that our causal-subspace repair framework significantly enhances safety robustness without degrading general multimodal capabilities, outperforming prior activation steering and alignment-based baselines. Additionally, our method exhibits good transferability, defending against unseen attacks.

96. EuraGovExam: A Multilingual Multimodal Benchmark from Real-World Civil Service Exams

Authors: JaeSeong Kim , Chaehwan Lim , Sang Hyun Gil , Suan Lee
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27223
Abstract:

We present EuraGovExam, a multilingual and multimodal benchmark sourced from real-world civil service examinations across five representative Eurasian regions: South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, India, and the European Union. Designed to reflect the authentic complexity of public-sector assessments, the dataset contains over 8,000 high-resolution scanned multiple-choice questions covering 17 diverse academic and administrative domains. Unlike existing benchmarks, EuraGovExam embeds all question content–including problem statements, answer choices, and visual elements–within a single image, providing only a minimal standardized instruction for answer formatting. This design demands that models perform layout-aware, cross-lingual reasoning directly from visual input. All items are drawn from real exam documents, preserving rich visual structures such as tables, multilingual typography, and form-like layouts. Evaluation results show that even state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) achieve only 86% accuracy, underscoring the benchmark’s difficulty and its power to diagnose the limitations of current models. By emphasizing cultural realism, visual complexity, and linguistic diversity, EuraGovExam establishes a new standard for evaluating VLMs in high-stakes, multilingual, image-grounded settings. It also supports practical applications in e-governance, public-sector document analysis, and equitable exam preparation.

97. SafetyDrift: Predicting When AI Agents Cross the Line Before They Actually Do

Authors: Aditya Dhodapkar , Farhaan Pishori
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27148
Abstract:

When an LLM agent reads a confidential file, then writes a summary, then emails it externally, no single step is unsafe, but the sequence is a data leak. We call this safety drift: individually safe actions compounding into violations. Prior work has measured this problem; we predict it. SafetyDrift models agent safety trajectories as absorbing Markov chains, computing the probability that a trajectory will reach a violation within a given number of steps via closed form absorption analysis. A consequence of the monotonic state design is that every agent will eventually violate safety if left unsupervised (absorption probability 1.0 from all states), making the practical question not if but when, and motivating our focus on finite horizon prediction. Across 357 traces spanning 40 realistic tasks in four categories, we discover that “points of no return” are sharply task dependent: in communication tasks, agents that reach even a mild risk state have an 85% chance of violating safety within five steps, while in technical tasks the probability stays below 5% from any state. A lightweight monitor built on these models detects 94.7% of violations with 3.7 steps of advance warning at negligible computational cost, outperforming both keyword matching (44.7% detection, 55.9% false positive rate) and per step LLM judges (52.6% detection, 38.2% false positive rate) while running over 60,000x faster.

98. Sovereign Context Protocol: An Open Attribution Layer for Human-Generated Content in the Age of Large Language Models

Authors: Praneel Panchigar , Torlach Rush , Matthew Canabarro
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27094
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) consume vast quantities of human-generated content for both training and real-time inference, yet the creators of that content remain largely invisible in the value chain. Existing approaches to data attribution operate either at the model-internals level, tracing influence through gradient signals, or at the legal-policy level through transparency mandates and copyright litigation. Neither provides a runtime mechanism for content creators to know when, by whom, and how their work is being consumed. We introduce the Sovereign Context Protocol (SCP), an open-source protocol specification and reference architecture that functions as an attribution-aware data access layer between LLMs and human-generated content. Inspired by Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP), which standardizes how LLMs connect to tools, SCP standardizes how LLMs connect to creator-owned data, with every access event logged, licensed, and attributable. SCP defines six core methods (creator profiles, semantic search, content retrieval, trust/value scoring, authenticity verification, and access auditing) exposed over both REST and MCP-compatible interfaces. We formalize the protocol’s message envelope, present a threat model with five adversary classes, propose a log-proportional revenue attribution model, and report preliminary latency benchmarks from a reference implementation built on FastAPI, ChromaDB, and NetworkX. We situate SCP within the emerging regulatory landscape, including the EU AI Act’s Article 53 training data transparency requirements and ongoing U.S. copyright litigation, and argue that the attribution gap requires a protocol-level intervention that makes attribution a default property of data access.

99. ChartNet: A Million-Scale, High-Quality Multimodal Dataset for Robust Chart Understanding

Authors: Jovana Kondic , Pengyuan Li , Dhiraj Joshi , Isaac Sanchez , Ben Wiesel , Shafiq Abedin , Amit Alfassy , Eli Schwartz , Daniel Caraballo , Yagmur Gizem Cinar , Florian Scheidegger , Steven I. Ross , Daniel Karl I. Weidele , Hang Hua , Ekaterina Arutyunova , Roei Herzig , Zexue He , Zihan Wang , Xinyue Yu , Yunfei Zhao , Sicong Jiang , Minghao Liu , Qunshu Lin , Peter Staar , Luis Lastras , Aude Oliva , Rogerio Feris
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27064
Abstract:

Understanding charts requires models to jointly reason over geometric visual patterns, structured numerical data, and natural language – a capability where current vision-language models (VLMs) remain limited. We introduce ChartNet, a high-quality, million-scale multimodal dataset designed to advance chart interpretation and reasoning. ChartNet leverages a novel code-guided synthesis pipeline to generate 1.5 million diverse chart samples spanning 24 chart types and 6 plotting libraries. Each sample consists of five aligned components: plotting code, rendered chart image, data table, natural language summary, and question-answering with reasoning, providing fine-grained cross-modal alignment. To capture the full spectrum of chart comprehension, ChartNet additionally includes specialized subsets encompassing human annotated data, real-world data, safety, and grounding. Moreover, a rigorous quality-filtering pipeline ensures visual fidelity, semantic accuracy, and diversity across chart representations. Fine-tuning on ChartNet consistently improves results across benchmarks, demonstrating its utility as large-scale supervision for multimodal models. As the largest open-source dataset of its kind, ChartNet aims to support the development of foundation models with robust and generalizable capabilities for data visualization understanding. The dataset is publicly available at this https URL

Authors: Hossein Salemi , Jitin Krishnan , Hemant Purohit
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27057
Abstract:

Attribution theory explains how individuals interpret and attribute others’ behavior in a social context by employing personal (dispositional) and impersonal (situational) causality. Large Language Models (LLMs), trained on human-generated corpora, may implicitly mimic this social attribution process in social contexts. However, the extent to which LLMs utilize these causal attributions in their reasoning remains underexplored. Although using reasoning paradigms, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), has shown promising results in various tasks, ignoring social attribution in reasoning could lead to biased responses by LLMs in social contexts. In this study, we investigate the impact of incorporating a user’s goal as knowledge to infer dispositional causality and message context to infer situational causality on LLM performance. To this end, we introduce a scalable method to mitigate such biases by enriching the instruction prompts for LLMs with two prompt aids using social-attribution knowledge, based on the context and goal of a social media message. This method improves the model performance while reducing the social-attribution bias of the LLM in the reasoning on zero-shot classification tasks for behavior analytics applications. We empirically show the benefits of our method across two tasks-intent detection and theme detection on social media in the disaster domain-when considering the variability of disaster types and multiple languages of social media. Our experiments highlight the biases of three open-source LLMs: Llama3, Mistral, and Gemma, toward social attribution, and show the effectiveness of our mitigation strategies.

101. Persona-Based Simulation of Human Opinion at Population Scale

Authors: Mao Li , Frederick G.Conrad
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27056
Abstract:

What does it mean to model a person, not merely to predict isolated responses, preferences, or behaviors, but to simulate how an individual interprets events, forms opinions, makes judgments, and acts consistently across contexts? This question matters because social science requires not only observing and predicting human outcomes, but also simulating interventions and their consequences. Although large language models (LLMs) can generate human-like answers, most existing approaches remain predictive, relying on demographic correlations rather than representations of individuals themselves. We introduce SPIRIT (Semi-structured Persona Inference and Reasoning for Individualized Trajectories), a framework designed explicitly for simulation rather than prediction. SPIRIT infers psychologically grounded, semi-structured personas from public social media posts, integrating structured attributes (e.g., personality traits and world beliefs) with unstructured narrative text reflecting values and lived experience. These personas prompt LLM-based agents to act as specific individuals when answering survey questions or responding to events. Using the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. adults, we show that SPIRIT-conditioned simulations recover self-reported responses more faithfully than demographic persona and reproduce human-like heterogeneity in response patterns. We further demonstrate that persona banks can function as virtual respondent panels for studying both stable attitudes and time-sensitive public opinion.

102. AutoSiMP: Autonomous Topology Optimization from Natural Language via LLM-Driven Problem Configuration and Adaptive Solver Control

Authors: Shaoliang Yang , Jun Wang , Yunsheng Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27000
Abstract:

We present AutoSiMP, an autonomous pipeline that transforms a natural-language structural problem description into a validated, binary topology without manual configuration. The pipeline comprises five modules: (1) an LLM-based configurator that parses a plain-English prompt into a validated specification of geometry, supports, loads, passive regions, and mesh parameters; (2) a boundary-condition generator producing solver-ready DOF arrays, force vectors, and passive-element masks; (3) a three-field SIMP solver with Heaviside projection and pluggable continuation control; (4) an eight-check structural evaluator (connectivity, compliance, grayness, volume fraction, convergence, plus three informational quality metrics); and (5) a closed-loop retry mechanism. We evaluate on three axes. Configuration accuracy: across 10 diverse problems the configurator produces valid specifications on all cases with a median compliance penalty of $+0.3\%$ versus expert ground truth. Controller comparison: on 17 benchmarks with six controllers sharing an identical sharpening tail, the LLM controller achieves the lowest median compliance but $76.5\%$ pass rate, while the deterministic schedule achieves $100\%$ pass rate at only $+1.5\%$ higher compliance. End-to-end reliability: with the schedule controller, all LLM-configured problems pass every quality check on the first attempt $-$ no retries needed. Among the systems surveyed in this work (Table 1), AutoSiMP is the first to close the full loop from natural-language problem description to validated structural topology. The complete codebase, all specifications, and an interactive web demo will be released upon journal acceptance.

103. ASTER – Agentic Science Toolkit for Exoplanet Research

Authors: Emilie Panek , Alexander Roman , Gaurav Shukla , Leonardo Pagliaro , Katia Matcheva , Konstantin Matchev
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26953
Abstract:

The expansion of exoplanet observations has created a need for flexible, accessible, and user-friendly workflows. Transmission spectroscopy has become a key technique for probing atmospheric composition of transiting exoplanets. The analyses of these data require the combination of archival queries, literature search, the use of radiative transfer models, and Bayesian retrieval frameworks, each demanding specialized expertise. Modern large language models enable the coordinated execution of complex, multi-step tasks by AI agents with tool integration, structured prompts, and iterative reasoning. In this study we present ASTER, an Agentic Science Toolkit for Exoplanet Research. ASTER is an orchestration framework that brings LLM capability to the exoplanetary community by enabling LLM-driven interaction with integrated domain-specific tools, workflow planning and management, and support for common data analysis tasks. Currently ASTER incorporates tools for downloading planetary parameters and observational datasets from the NASA Exoplanet Archive, as well as the generation of transit spectra from the TauREx radiative transfer model, and the completion of Bayesian retrieval of planetary parameters with TauREx. Beyond tool integration, the agent assists users by proposing alternative modeling approaches, reporting potential issues and suggesting solutions, and interpretations. We demonstrate ASTER’s workflow through a complete case study of WASP-39b, performing multiple retrievals using observational data available on the archive. The agent efficiently transitions between datasets, generates appropriate forward model spectra and performs retrievals. ASTER provides a unified platform for the characterization of exoplanet atmospheres. Ongoing development and community contributions will continue expanding ASTER’s capabilities toward broader applications in exoplanet research.

104. Are LLMs Good For Quantum Software, Architecture, and System Design?

Authors: Sourish Wawdhane , Poulami Das
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26904
Abstract:

Quantum computers promise massive computational speedup for problems in many critical domains, such as physics, chemistry, cryptanalysis, healthcare, etc. However, despite decades of research, they remain far from entering an era of utility. The lack of mature software, architecture, and systems solutions capable of translating quantum-mechanical properties of algorithms into physical state transformations on qubit devices remains a key factor underlying the slow pace of technological progress. The problem worsens due to significant reliance on domain-specific expertise, especially for software developers, computer architects, and systems engineers. To address these limitations and accelerate large-scale high-performance quantum system design, we ask: Can large language models (LLMs) help with solving quantum software, architecture, and systems problems? In this work, we present a case study assessing the performance of LLMs on quantum system reasoning tasks. We evaluate nine frontier LLMs and compare their performance to graduate UT Austin students on a set of quantum computing problems. Finally, we recommend several directions along which research and engineering development efforts must be pursued.

105. Magic Words or Methodical Work? Challenging Conventional Wisdom in LLM-Based Political Text Annotation

Authors: Lorca McLaren , James Cross , Zuzanna Krakowska , Robin Rauner , Martijn Schoonvelde
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26898
Abstract:

Political scientists are rapidly adopting large language models (LLMs) for text annotation, yet the sensitivity of annotation results to implementation choices remains poorly understood. Most evaluations test a single model or configuration; how model choice, model size, learning approach, and prompt style interact, and whether popular “best practices” survive controlled comparison, are largely unexplored. We present a controlled evaluation of these pipeline choices, testing six open-weight models across four political science annotation tasks under identical quantisation, hardware, and prompt-template conditions. Our central finding is methodological: interaction effects dominate main effects, so seemingly reasonable pipeline choices can become consequential researcher degrees of freedom. No single model, prompt style, or learning approach is uniformly superior, and the best-performing model varies across tasks. Two corollaries follow. First, model size is an unreliable guide both to cost and to performance: cross-family efficiency differences are so large that some larger models are less resource-intensive than much smaller alternatives, while within model families mid-range variants often match or exceed larger counterparts. Second, widely recommended prompt engineering techniques yield inconsistent and sometimes negative effects on annotation performance. We use these benchmark results to develop a validation-first framework - with a principled ordering of pipeline decisions, guidance on prompt freezing and held-out evaluation, reporting standards, and open-source tools - to help researchers navigate this decision space transparently.

106. Stable Reasoning, Unstable Responses: Mitigating LLM Deception via Stability Asymmetry

Authors: Guoxi Zhang , Jiawei Chen , Tianzhuo Yang , Lang Qin , Juntao Dai , Yaodong Yang , Jingwei Yi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26846
Abstract:

As Large Language Models (LLMs) expand in capability and application scope, their trustworthiness becomes critical. A vital risk is intrinsic deception, wherein models strategically mislead users to achieve their own objectives. Existing alignment approaches based on chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring supervise explicit reasoning traces. However, under optimization pressure, models are incentivized to conceal deceptive reasoning, rendering semantic supervision fundamentally unreliable. Grounded in cognitive psychology, we hypothesize that a deceptive LLM maintains a stable internal belief in its CoT while its external response remains fragile under perturbation. We term this phenomenon stability asymmetry and quantify it by measuring the contrast between internal CoT stability and external response stability under perturbation. Building on this structural signature, we propose the Stability Asymmetry Regularization (SAR), a novel alignment objective that penalizes this distributional asymmetry during reinforcement learning. Unlike CoT monitoring, SAR targets the statistical structure of model outputs, rendering it robust to semantic concealment. Extensive experiments confirm that stability asymmetry reliably identifies deceptive behavior, and that SAR effectively suppresses intrinsic deception without degrading general model capability.

107. GISclaw: An Open-Source LLM-Powered Agent System for Full-Stack Geospatial Analysis

Authors: Jinzhen Han , JinByeong Lee , Yuri Shim , Jisung Kim , Jae-Joon Lee
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26845
Abstract:

The convergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Geographic Information Science has opened new avenues for automating complex geospatial analysis. However, existing LLM-powered GIS agents are constrained by limited data-type coverage (vector-only), reliance on proprietary GIS platforms, and single-model architectures that preclude systematic comparisons. We present GISclaw, an open-source agent system that integrates an LLM reasoning core with a persistent Python sandbox, a comprehensive suite of open-source GIS libraries (GeoPandas, rasterio, scipy, scikit-learn), and a web-based interactive interface for full-stack geospatial analysis spanning vector, raster, and tabular data. GISclaw implements two pluggable agent architectures – a Single Agent ReAct loop and a Dual Agent Plan-Execute-Replan pipeline – and supports six heterogeneous LLM backends ranging from cloud-hosted flagship models (GPT-5.4) to locally deployed 14B models on consumer GPUs. Through three key engineering innovations – Schema Analysis bridging the task-data information gap, Domain Knowledge injection for domain-specific workflows, and an Error Memory mechanism for intelligent self-correction – GISclaw achieves up to 96% task success on the 50-task GeoAnalystBench benchmark. Systematic evaluation across 600 model–architecture–task combinations reveals that the Dual Agent architecture consistently degrades strong models while providing marginal gains for weaker ones. We further propose a three-layer evaluation protocol incorporating code structure analysis, reasoning process assessment, and type-specific output verification for comprehensive GIS agent assessment. The system and all evaluation code are publicly available.

108. VAN-AD: Visual Masked Autoencoder with Normalizing Flow For Time Series Anomaly Detection

Authors: PengYu Chen , Shang Wan , Xiaohou Shi , Yuan Chang , Yan Sun , Sajal K. Das
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26842
Abstract:

Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) is essential for maintaining the reliability and security of IoT-enabled service systems. Existing methods require training one specific model for each dataset, which exhibits limited generalization capability across different target datasets, hindering anomaly detection performance in various scenarios with scarce training data. To address this limitation, foundation models have emerged as a promising direction. However, existing approaches either repurpose large language models (LLMs) or construct largescale time series datasets to develop general anomaly detection foundation models, and still face challenges caused by severe cross-modal gaps or in-domain heterogeneity. In this paper, we investigate the applicability of large-scale vision models to TSAD. Specifically, we adapt a visual Masked Autoencoder (MAE) pretrained on ImageNet to the TSAD task. However, directly transferring MAE to TSAD introduces two key challenges: overgeneralization and limited local perception. To address these challenges, we propose VAN-AD, a novel MAE-based framework for TSAD. To alleviate the over-generalization issue, we design an Adaptive Distribution Mapping Module (ADMM), which maps the reconstruction results before and after MAE into a unified statistical space to amplify discrepancies caused by abnormal patterns. To overcome the limitation of local perception, we further develop a Normalizing Flow Module (NFM), which combines MAE with normalizing flow to estimate the probability density of the current window under the global distribution. Extensive experiments on nine real-world datasets demonstrate that VAN-AD consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods across multiple evaluation this http URL make our code and datasets available at this https URL .

Authors: Jiwen Zhang , Xiangyu Shi , Siyuan Wang , Zerui Li , Zhongyu Wei , Qi Wu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26837
Abstract:

Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) has recently benefited from Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), enabling zero-shot navigation. While recent exploration-based zero-shot methods have shown promising results by leveraging global scene priors, they rely on high-quality human-crafted scene reconstructions, which are impractical for real-world robot deployment. When encountering an unseen environment, a robot should build its own priors through pre-exploration. However, these self-built reconstructions are inevitably incomplete and noisy, which severely degrade methods that depend on high-quality scene reconstructions. To address these issues, we propose SpatialAnt, a zero-shot navigation framework designed to bridge the gap between imperfect self-reconstructions and robust execution. SpatialAnt introduces a physical grounding strategy to recover the absolute metric scale for monocular-based reconstructions. Furthermore, rather than treating the noisy self-reconstructed scenes as absolute spatial references, we propose a novel visual anticipation mechanism. This mechanism leverages the noisy point clouds to render future observations, enabling the agent to perform counterfactual reasoning and prune paths that contradict human instructions. Extensive experiments in both simulated and real-world environments demonstrate that SpatialAnt significantly outperforms existing zero-shot methods. We achieve a 66% Success Rate (SR) on R2R-CE and 50.8% SR on RxR-CE benchmarks. Physical deployment on a Hello Robot further confirms the efficiency and efficacy of our framework, achieving a 52% SR in challenging real-world settings.

110. A Regression Framework for Understanding Prompt Component Impact on LLM Performance

Authors: Andrew Lauziere , Jonathan Daugherty , Taisa Kushner
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26830
Abstract:

As large language models (LLMs) continue to improve and see further integration into software systems, so does the need to understand the conditions in which they will perform. We contribute a statistical framework for understanding the impact of specific prompt features on LLM performance. The approach extends previous explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods specifically to inspect LLMs by fitting regression models relating portions of the prompt to LLM evaluation. We apply our method to compare how two open-source models, Mistral-7B and GPT-OSS-20B, leverage the prompt to perform a simple arithmetic problem. Regression models of individual prompt portions explain 72% and 77% of variation in model performances, respectively. We find misinformation in the form of incorrect example query-answer pairs impedes both models from solving the arithmetic query, though positive examples do not find significant variability in the impact of positive and negative instructions - these prompts have contradictory effects on model performance. The framework serves as a tool for decision makers in critical scenarios to gain granular insight into how the prompt influences an LLM to solve a task.

111. Squish and Release: Exposing Hidden Hallucinations by Making Them Surface as Safety Signals

Authors: Nathaniel Oh , Paul Attie
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26829
Abstract:

Language models detect false premises when asked directly but absorb them under conversational pressure, producing authoritative professional output built on errors they already identified. This failure - order-gap hallucination - is invisible to output inspection because the error migrates into the activation space of the safety circuit, suppressed but not erased. We introduce Squish and Release (S&R), an activation-patching architecture with two components: a fixed detector body (layers 24-31, the localized safety evaluation circuit) and a swappable detector core (an activation vector controlling perception direction). A safety core shifts the model from compliance toward detection; an absorb core reverses it. We evaluate on OLMo-2 7B using the Order-Gap Benchmark - 500 chains across 500 domains, all manually graded. Key findings: cascade collapse is near-total (99.8% compliance at O5); the detector body is binary and localized (layers 24-31 shift 93.6%, layers 0-23 contribute zero, p<10^-189); a synthetically engineered core releases 76.6% of collapsed chains; detection is the more stable attractor (83% restore vs 58% suppress); and epistemic specificity is confirmed (false-premise core releases 45.4%, true-premise core releases 0.0%). The contribution is the framework - body/core architecture, benchmark, and core engineering methodology - which is model-agnostic by design.

112. Throughput Optimization as a Strategic Lever in Large-Scale AI Systems: Evidence from Dataloader and Memory Profiling Innovations

Authors: Mayank Jha
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26823
Abstract:

The development of large-scale foundation models, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), is constrained by significant computational and memory bottlenecks. These challenges elevate throughput optimization from a mere engineering task to a critical strategic lever, directly influencing training time, operational cost, and the feasible scale of next-generation models. This paper synthesizes evidence from recent academic and industry innovations to analyze key advancements in training efficiency. We examine architectural solutions to dataloader bottlenecks, such as the OVERLORD framework, which has demonstrated a 4.5% improvement in end-to-end training throughput. We investigate memory optimization techniques designed to overcome the GPU memory wall, including CPU offloading strategies like DeepSpeed’s ZeRO-Offload, which enable the training of models far exceeding single-accelerator capacity. Furthermore, we explore the growing importance of compiler-centric optimizations, exemplified by Triton-distributed, which enables the joint optimization of computation, memory, and communication for substantial performance gains. The analysis is contextualized by advanced profiling tools and hardware characterization studies that identify and mitigate previously overlooked overheads like Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS). Findings indicate that a holistic, system-level approach, integrating innovations across data pipelines, memory management, network fabrics, and compiler technologies, is essential for accelerating AI development, managing costs, and pushing the boundaries of model scale.

113. Resolving the Robustness-Precision Trade-off in Financial RAG through Hybrid Document-Routed Retrieval

Authors: Zhiyuan Cheng , Longying Lai , Yue Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26815
Abstract:

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for financial document question answering typically follow a chunk-based paradigm: documents are split into fragments, embedded into vector space, and retrieved via similarity search. While effective in general settings, this approach suffers from cross-document chunk confusion in structurally homogeneous corpora such as regulatory filings. Semantic File Routing (SFR), which uses LLM structured output to route queries to whole documents, reduces catastrophic failures but sacrifices the precision of targeted chunk retrieval. We identify this robustness-precision trade-off through controlled evaluation on the FinDER benchmark (1,500 queries across five groups): SFR achieves higher average scores (6.45 vs. 6.02) and fewer failures (10.3% vs. 22.5%), while chunk-based retrieval (CBR) yields more perfect answers (13.8% vs. 8.5%). To resolve this trade-off, we propose Hybrid Document-Routed Retrieval (HDRR), a two-stage architecture that uses SFR as a document filter followed by chunk-based retrieval scoped to the identified document(s). HDRR eliminates cross-document confusion while preserving targeted chunk precision. Experimental results demonstrate that HDRR achieves the best performance on every metric: an average score of 7.54 (25.2% above CBR, 16.9% above SFR), a failure rate of only 6.4%, a correctness rate of 67.7% (+18.7 pp over CBR), and a perfect-answer rate of 20.1% (+6.3 pp over CBR, +11.6 pp over SFR). HDRR resolves the trade-off by simultaneously achieving the lowest failure rate and the highest precision across all five experimental groups.

114. GroupRAG: Cognitively Inspired Group-Aware Retrieval and Reasoning via Knowledge-Driven Problem Structuring

Authors: Xinyi Duan , Yuanrong Tang , Jiangtao Gong
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26807
Abstract:

The performance of language models is commonly limited by insufficient knowledge and constrained reasoning. Prior approaches such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) address these issues by incorporating external knowledge or enforcing linear reasoning chains, but often degrade in real-world settings. Inspired by cognitive science, which characterizes human problem solving as search over structured problem spaces rather than single inference chains, we argue that inadequate awareness of problem structure is a key overlooked limitation. We propose GroupRAG, a cognitively inspired, group-aware retrieval and reasoning framework based on knowledge-driven keypoint grouping. GroupRAG identifies latent structural groups within a problem and performs retrieval and reasoning from multiple conceptual starting points, enabling fine-grained interaction between the two processes. Experiments on MedQA show that GroupRAG outperforms representative RAG- and CoT-based baselines. These results suggest that explicitly modeling problem structure, as inspired by human cognition, is a promising direction for robust retrieval-augmented reasoning.

115. Explaining, Verifying, and Aligning Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Model Embeddings

Authors: Gesina Schwalbe , Mert Keser , Moritz Bayerkuhnlein , Edgar Heinert , Annika Mütze , Marvin Keller , Sparsh Tiwari , Georgii Mikriukov , Diedrich Wolter , Jae Hee Lee , Matthias Rottmann
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26798
Abstract:

Vision-language model (VLM) encoders such as CLIP enable strong retrieval and zero-shot classification in a shared image-text embedding space, yet the semantic organization of this space is rarely inspected. We present a post-hoc framework to explain, verify, and align the semantic hierarchies induced by a VLM over a given set of child classes. First, we extract a binary hierarchy by agglomerative clustering of class centroids and name internal nodes by dictionary-based matching to a concept bank. Second, we quantify plausibility by comparing the extracted tree against human ontologies using efficient tree- and edge-level consistency measures, and we evaluate utility via explainable hierarchical tree-traversal inference with uncertainty-aware early stopping (UAES). Third, we propose an ontology-guided post-hoc alignment method that learns a lightweight embedding-space transformation, using UMAP to generate target neighborhoods from a desired hierarchy. Across 13 pretrained VLMs and 4 image datasets, our method finds systematic modality differences: image encoders are more discriminative, while text encoders induce hierarchies that better match human taxonomies. Overall, the results reveal a persistent trade-off between zero-shot accuracy and ontological plausibility and suggest practical routes to improve semantic alignment in shared embedding spaces.

116. Robust Batch-Level Query Routing for Large Language Models under Cost and Capacity Constraints

Authors: Jelena Markovic-Voronov , Kayhan Behdin , Yuanda Xu , Zhengze Zhou , Zhipeng Wang , Rahul Mazumder
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26796
Abstract:

We study the problem of routing queries to large language models (LLMs) under cost, GPU resources, and concurrency constraints. Prior per-query routing methods often fail to control batch-level cost, especially under non-uniform or adversarial batching. To address this, we propose a batch-level, resource-aware routing framework that jointly optimizes model assignment for each batch while respecting cost and model capacity limits. We further introduce a robust variant that accounts for uncertainty in predicted LLM performance, along with an offline instance allocation procedure that balances quality and throughput across multiple models. Experiments on two multi-task LLM benchmarks show that robustness improves accuracy by 1-14% over non-robust counterparts (depending on the performance estimator), batch-level routing outperforms per-query methods by up to 24% under adversarial batching, and optimized instance allocation yields additional gains of up to 3% compared to a non-optimized allocation, all while strictly controlling cost and GPU resource constraints.

117. CRISP: Characterizing Relative Impact of Scholarly Publications

Authors: Hannah Collison , Benjamin Van Durme , Daniel Khashabi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26791
Abstract:

Assessing a cited paper’s impact is typically done by analyzing its citation context in isolation within the citing paper. While this focuses on the most directly relevant text, it prevents relative comparisons across all the works a paper cites. We propose CRISP, which instead jointly ranks all cited papers within a citing paper using large language models (LLMs). To mitigate LLMs’ positional bias, we rank each list three times in a randomized order and aggregate the impact labels through majority voting. This joint approach leverages the full citation context, rather than evaluating citations independently, to more reliably distinguish impactful references. CRISP outperforms a prior state-of-the-art impact classifier by +9.5% accuracy and +8.3% F1 on a dataset of human-annotated citations. CRISP further gains efficiency through fewer LLM calls and performs competitively with an open-source model, enabling scalable, cost-effective citation impact analysis. We release our rankings, impact labels, and codebase to support future research.

118. A Step Toward Federated Pretraining of Multimodal Large Language Models

Authors: Baochen Xiong , Yifan Xu , Xiaoshan Yang , Yaguang Song , Yaowei Wang , Changsheng Xu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26786
Abstract:

The rapid evolution of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) is bottlenecked by the saturation of high-quality public data, while vast amounts of diverse multimodal data remain inaccessible in privacy-sensitive silos. Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising solution to unlock these distributed resources, but existing research focuses predominantly on fine-tuning, leaving the foundational pre-training phase largely unexplored. In this paper, we formally introduce the Federated MLLM Alignment (Fed-MA) task, a lightweight pre-training paradigm that freezes the vision encoder and LLM while collaboratively training the cross-modal projector. We identify two critical challenges in this setting: (i) parameter interference in aggregating local projectors; and (ii) gradient oscillations in one-pass collaborative SGD. To address these challenges, we propose Fed-CMP, a pioneering framework for federated MLLM pre-training. Fed-CMP employs Canonical Reliability-Aware Aggregation, which constructs a canonical space to decompose client projectors into a shared alignment basis and client-specific coefficients, then performs reliability-weighted fusion to suppress parameter interference. Furthermore, Fed-CMP introduces Orthogonality-Preserved Momentum, which applies momentum to the shared alignment basis via orthogonal projection, accumulating historical optimization directions while preserving geometric structure. We construct four federated pre-training scenarios based on public datasets, and extensive experiments validate that Fed-CMP significantly outperforms existing baselines.

119. Limits of Imagery Reasoning in Frontier LLM Models

Authors: Sergio Y. Hayashi , Nina S. T. Hirata
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26779
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, yet they struggle with spatial tasks that require mental simulation, such as mental rotation. This paper investigates whether equipping an LLM with an external Imagery Module'' -- a tool capable of rendering and rotating 3D models -- can bridge this gap, functioning as acognitive prosthetic.’’ We conducted experiments using a dual-module architecture in which a reasoning module (an MLLM) interacts with an imagery module on 3D model rotation tasks. Performance was lower than expected, with accuracy reaching at most 62.5%. Further investigation suggests that even when the burden of maintaining and manipulating a holistic 3D state is outsourced, the system still fails. This reveals that current frontier models lack the foundational visual-spatial primitives required to interface with imagery. Specifically, they lack: (1) the low-level sensitivity to extract spatial signals such as (a) depth, (b) motion, and (c) short-horizon dynamic prediction; and (2) the capacity to reason contemplatively over images, dynamically shifting visual focus and balancing imagery with symbolic and associative information.

120. Learning to Select Visual In-Context Demonstrations

Authors: Eugene Lee , Yu-Chi Lin , Jiajie Diao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26775
Abstract:

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) adapt to visual tasks via in-context learning (ICL), which relies heavily on demonstration quality. The dominant demonstration selection strategy is unsupervised k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) search. While simple, this similarity-first approach is sub-optimal for complex factual regression tasks; it selects redundant examples that fail to capture the task’s full output range. We reframe selection as a sequential decision-making problem and introduce Learning to Select Demonstrations (LSD), training a Reinforcement Learning agent to construct optimal demonstration sets. Using a Dueling DQN with a query-centric Transformer Decoder, our agent learns a policy that maximizes MLLM downstream performance. Evaluating across five visual regression benchmarks, we uncover a crucial dichotomy: while kNN remains optimal for subjective preference tasks, LSD significantly outperforms baselines on objective, factual regression tasks. By balancing visual relevance with diversity, LSD better defines regression boundaries, illuminating when learned selection is strictly necessary for visual ICL.

121. From Content to Audience: A Multimodal Annotation Framework for Broadcast Television Analytics

Authors: Paolo Cupini , Francesco Pierri
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26772
Abstract:

Automated semantic annotation of broadcast television content presents distinctive challenges, combining structured audiovisual composition, domain-specific editorial patterns, and strict operational constraints. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong general-purpose video understanding capabilities, their comparative effectiveness across pipeline architectures and input configurations in broadcast-specific settings remains empirically undercharacterized. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of multimodal annotation pipelines applied to broadcast television news in the Italian setting. We construct a domain-specific benchmark of clips labeled across four semantic dimensions: visual environment classification, topic classification, sensitive content detection, and named entity recognition. Two different pipeline architectures are evaluated across nine frontier models, including Gemini 3.0 Pro, LLaMA 4 Maverick, Qwen-VL variants, and Gemma 3, under progressively enriched input strategies combining visual signals, automatic speech recognition, speaker diarization, and metadata. Experimental results demonstrate that gains from video input are strongly model-dependent: larger models effectively leverage temporal continuity, while smaller models show performance degradation under extended multimodal context, likely due to token overload. Beyond benchmarking, the selected pipeline is deployed on 14 full broadcast episodes, with minute-level annotations integrated with normalized audience measurement data provided by an Italian media company. This integration enables correlational analysis of topic-level audience sensitivity and generational engagement divergence, demonstrating the operational viability of the proposed framework for content-based audience analytics.

122. Edge Reliability Gap in Vision-Language Models: Quantifying Failure Modes of Compressed VLMs Under Visual Corruption

Authors: Mehmet Kaan Erol
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26769
Abstract:

The rapid compression of large vision-language models (VLMs) for edge deployment raises an underexplored question: do compact models fail differently, not merely more often? This study compares a 7-billion-parameter quantised VLM (Qwen2.5-VL-7B, 4-bit NF4) against a 500-million-parameter FP16 model (SmolVLM2-500M) across 4,000 samples from VQAv2 and COCO Captions. A three-category error taxonomy (Object Blindness, Semantic Drift, Prior Bias) is applied as a diagnostic framework. A text-only GPT-4o judge reveals Semantic Drift (B) as the dominant failure mode on VQAv2 and on COCO for Qwen, with a mixed Object Blindness / Semantic Drift profile for SmolVLM2 on COCO; Prior Bias (C) is present on VQAv2 but absent on COCO for both models. Confidence calibration is measured via Expected Calibration Error (ECE) using geometric mean token probability, compositional reasoning is probed with structured negation probes across four templates, and a blur robustness experiment completes the evaluation. For this model pair, the compact model exhibits a qualitatively distinct failure signature: a 12.5pp larger negation collapse (-33.2pp vs. -20.8pp, Wald 95% CI [8.2, 16.8]pp, p < 10^-8), driven almost entirely by COCO while the VQAv2 gap is not statistically significant (4.5pp, p=0.19). The most discriminating template is false_yn: SMOLVLM2-500M responds “Yes” (incorrectly claiming a depicted object is absent) on 100% of COCO trials vs. 14% for Q WEN 2.5-VL-7B. Asymmetric dataset-dependent miscalibration and a blur experiment with two controlled ablations complete the analysis. The fully reproducible pipeline is released for systematic safety auditing of compressed VLMs prior to edge deployment.

123. Aesthetic Assessment of Chinese Handwritings Based on Vision Language Models

Authors: Chen Zheng , Yuxuan Lai , Haoyang Lu , Wentao Ma , Jitao Yang , Jian Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26768
Abstract:

The handwriting of Chinese characters is a fundamental aspect of learning the Chinese language. Previous automated assessment methods often framed scoring as a regression problem. However, this score-only feedback lacks actionable guidance, which limits its effectiveness in helping learners improve their handwriting skills. In this paper, we leverage vision-language models (VLMs) to analyze the quality of handwritten Chinese characters and generate multi-level feedback. Specifically, we investigate two feedback generation tasks: simple grade feedback (Task 1) and enriched, descriptive feedback (Task 2). We explore both low-rank adaptation (LoRA)-based fine-tuning strategies and in-context learning methods to integrate aesthetic assessment knowledge into VLMs. Experimental results show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performances across multiple evaluation tracks in the CCL 2025 workshop on evaluation of handwritten Chinese character quality.

124. SleepVLM: Explainable and Rule-Grounded Sleep Staging via a Vision-Language Model

Authors: Guifeng Deng , Pan Wang , Jiquan Wang , Shuying Rao , Junyi Xie , Wanjun Guo , Tao Li , Haiteng Jiang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26738
Abstract:

While automated sleep staging has achieved expert-level accuracy, its clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of auditable reasoning. We introduce SleepVLM, a rule-grounded vision-language model (VLM) designed to stage sleep from multi-channel polysomnography (PSG) waveform images while generating clinician-readable rationales based on American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) scoring criteria. Utilizing waveform-perceptual pre-training and rule-grounded supervised fine-tuning, SleepVLM achieved Cohen’s kappa scores of 0.767 on an held out test set (MASS-SS1) and 0.743 on an external cohort (ZUAMHCS), matching state-of-the-art performance. Expert evaluations further validated the quality of the model’s reasoning, with mean scores exceeding 4.0/5.0 for factual accuracy, evidence comprehensiveness, and logical coherence. By coupling competitive performance with transparent, rule-based explanations, SleepVLM may improve the trustworthiness and auditability of automated sleep staging in clinical workflows. To facilitate further research in interpretable sleep medicine, we release MASS-EX, a novel expert-annotated dataset.

125. Distilled Large Language Model-Driven Dynamic Sparse Expert Activation Mechanism

Authors: Qinghui Chen , Zekai Zhang , Zaigui Zhang , Kai Zhang , Dagang Li , Wenmin Wang , Jinglin Zhang , Cong Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26735
Abstract:

High inter-class similarity, extreme scale variation, and limited computational budgets hinder reliable visual recognition across diverse real-world data. Existing vision-centric and cross-modal approaches often rely on rigid fusion mechanisms and heavy annotation pipelines, leading to sub-optimal generalization. We propose the Distilled Large Language Model (LLM)-Driven Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (DS-MoE) framework, which integrates text-guided dynamic routing and lightweight multi-scale comprehension. The DS-MoE framework dynamically aligns textual semantics with defect-specific visual patterns through a sparse MoE architecture, where task-relevant experts are adaptively activated based on semantic relevance, resolving inter-class ambiguity. A lightweight MobileSAM encoder enables real-time inference while preserving multi-scale defect details. Extensive experiments on PCB, aluminum foil, and mold defect datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves superior performance compared to existing pure vision models. \textbf{DS-MoE} surpasses YOLOv8/YOLOX with gains of +13.9, +1.4, and +2.0 pp mAP@ 0.5:0.95 on BBMP, aluminum, and PCB, respectively, while also improving precision and recall.

126. Contextual inference from single objects in Vision-Language models

Authors: Martina G. Vilas , Timothy Schaumlöffel , Gemma Roig
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26731
Abstract:

How much scene context a single object carries is a well-studied question in human scene perception, yet how this capacity is organized in vision-language models (VLMs) remains poorly understood, with direct implications for the robustness of these models. We investigate this question through a systematic behavioral and mechanistic analysis of contextual inference from single objects. Presenting VLMs with single objects on masked backgrounds, we probe their ability to infer both fine-grained scene category and coarse superordinate context (indoor vs. outdoor). We found that single objects support above-chance inference at both levels, with performance modulated by the same object properties that predict human scene categorization. Object identity, scene, and superordinate predictions are partially dissociable: accurate inference at one level neither requires nor guarantees accurate inference at the others, and the degree of coupling differs markedly across models. Mechanistically, object representations that remain stable when background context is removed are more predictive of successful contextual inference. Scene and superordinate schemas are grounded in fundamentally different ways: scene identity is encoded in image tokens throughout the network, while superordinate information emerges only late or not at all. Together, these results reveal that the organization of contextual inference in VLMs is more complex than accuracy alone suggests, with behavioral and mechanistic signatures

127. SEAR: Schema-Based Evaluation and Routing for LLM Gateways

Authors: Zecheng Zhang , Han Zheng , Yue Xu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26728
Abstract:

Evaluating production LLM responses and routing requests across providers in LLM gateways requires fine-grained quality signals and operationally grounded decisions. To address this gap, we present SEAR, a schema-based evaluation and routing system for multi-model, multi-provider LLM gateways. SEAR defines an extensible relational schema covering both LLM evaluation signals (context, intent, response characteristics, issue attribution, and quality scores) and gateway operational metrics (latency, cost, throughput), with cross-table consistency links across around one hundred typed, SQL-queryable columns. To populate the evaluation signals reliably, SEAR proposes self-contained signal instructions, in-schema reasoning, and multi-stage generation that produces database-ready structured outputs. Because signals are derived through LLM reasoning rather than shallow classifiers, SEAR captures complex request semantics, enables human-interpretable routing explanations, and unifies evaluation and routing in a single query layer. Across thousands of production sessions, SEAR achieves strong signal accuracy on human-labeled data and supports practical routing decisions, including large cost reductions with comparable quality.

128. Agentic AI for Human Resources: LLM-Driven Candidate Assessment

Authors: Kamer Ali Yuksel , Abdul Basit Anees , Ashraf Elneima , Sanjika Hewavitharana , Mohamed Al-Badrashiny , Hassan Sawaf
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26710
Abstract:

In this work, we present a modular and interpretable framework that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate candidate assessment in recruitment. The system integrates diverse sources, including job descriptions, CVs, interview transcripts, and HR feedback; to generate structured evaluation reports that mirror expert judgment. Unlike traditional ATS tools that rely on keyword matching or shallow scoring, our approach employs role-specific, LLM-generated rubrics and a multi-agent architecture to perform fine-grained, criteria-driven evaluations. The framework outputs detailed assessment reports, candidate comparisons, and ranked recommendations that are transparent, auditable, and suitable for real-world hiring workflows. Beyond rubric-based analysis, we introduce an LLM-Driven Active Listwise Tournament mechanism for candidate ranking. Instead of noisy pairwise comparisons or inconsistent independent scoring, the LLM ranks small candidate subsets (mini-tournaments), and these listwise permutations are aggregated using a Plackett-Luce model. An active-learning loop selects the most informative subsets, producing globally coherent and sample-efficient rankings. This adaptation of listwise LLM preference modeling (previously explored in financial asset ranking) provides a principled and highly interpretable methodology for large-scale candidate ranking in talent acquisition.

129. The Cognitive Divergence: AI Context Windows, Human Attention Decline, and the Delegation Feedback Loop

Authors: Netanel Eliav (Machine Human Intelligence Lab)
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26707
Abstract:

This paper documents and theorises a self-reinforcing dynamic between two measurable trends: the exponential expansion of large language model (LLM) context windows and the secular contraction of human sustained-attention capacity. We term the resulting asymmetry the Cognitive Divergence. AI context windows have grown from 512 tokens in 2017 to 2,000,000 tokens by 2026 (factor ~3,906; fitted lambda = 0.59/yr; doubling time ~14 months). Over the same period, human Effective Context Span (ECS) – a token-equivalent measure derived from validated reading-rate meta-analysis (Brysbaert, 2019) and an empirically motivated Comprehension Scaling Factor – has declined from approximately 16,000 tokens (2004 baseline) to an estimated 1,800 tokens (2026, extrapolated from longitudinal behavioural data ending 2020 (Mark, 2023); see Section 9 for uncertainty discussion). The AI-to-human ratio grew from near parity at the ChatGPT launch (November 2022) to 556–1,111x raw and 56–111x quality-adjusted, after accounting for retrieval degradation (Liu et al., 2024; Chroma, 2025). Beyond documenting this divergence, the paper introduces the Delegation Feedback Loop hypothesis: as AI capability grows, the cognitive threshold at which humans delegate to AI falls, extending to tasks of negligible demand; the resulting reduction in cognitive practice may further attenuate the capacities already documented as declining (Gerlich, 2025; Kim et al., 2026; Kosmyna et al., 2025). Neither trend reverses spontaneously. The paper characterises the divergence statistically, reviews neurobiological mechanisms across eight peer-reviewed neuroimaging studies, presents empirical evidence bearing on the delegation threshold, and proposes a research agenda centred on a validated ECS psychometric instrument and longitudinal study of AI-mediated cognitive change.

130. SpatialPoint: Spatial-aware Point Prediction for Embodied Localization

Authors: Qiming Zhu , Zhirui Fang , Tianming Zhang , Chuanxiu Liu , Xiaoke Jiang , Lei Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26690
Abstract:

Embodied intelligence fundamentally requires a capability to determine where to act in 3D space. We formalize this requirement as embodied localization – the problem of predicting executable 3D points conditioned on visual observations and language instructions. We instantiate embodied localization with two complementary target types: touchable points, surface-grounded 3D points enabling direct physical interaction, and air points, free-space 3D points specifying placement and navigation goals, directional constraints, or geometric relations. Embodied localization is inherently a problem of embodied 3D spatial reasoning – yet most existing vision-language systems rely predominantly on RGB inputs, necessitating implicit geometric reconstruction that limits cross-scene generalization, despite the widespread adoption of RGB-D sensors in robotics. To address this gap, we propose SpatialPoint, a spatial-aware vision-language framework with careful design that integrates structured depth into a vision-language model (VLM) and generates camera-frame 3D coordinates. We construct a 2.6M-sample RGB-D dataset covering both touchable and air points QA pairs for training and evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that incorporating depth into VLMs significantly improves embodied localization performance. We further validate SpatialPoint through real-robot deployment across three representative tasks: language-guided robotic arm grasping at specified locations, object placement to target destinations, and mobile robot navigation to goal positions.

131. LITTA: Late-Interaction and Test-Time Alignment for Visually-Grounded Multimodal Retrieval

Authors: Seonok Kim
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26683
Abstract:

Retrieving relevant evidence from visually rich documents such as textbooks, technical reports, and manuals is challenging due to long context, complex layouts, and weak lexical overlap between user questions and supporting pages. We propose LITTA, a query-expansion-centric retrieval framework for evidence page retrieval that improves multimodal document retrieval without retriever retraining. Given a user query, LITTA generates complementary query variants using a large language model and retrieves candidate pages for each variant using a frozen vision retriever with late-interaction scoring. Candidates from expanded queries are then aggregated through reciprocal rank fusion to improve evidence coverage and reduce sensitivity to any single phrasing. This simple test-time strategy significantly improves retrieval robustness while remaining compatible with existing multimodal embedding indices. We evaluate LITTA on visually grounded document retrieval tasks across three domains: computer science, pharmaceuticals, and industrial manuals. Multi-query retrieval consistently improves top-k accuracy, recall, and MRR compared to single-query retrieval, with particularly large gains in domains with high visual and semantic variability. Moreover, the accuracy-efficiency trade-off is directly controllable by the number of query variants, making LITTA practical for deployment under latency constraints. These results demonstrate that query expansion provides a simple yet effective mechanism for improving visually grounded multimodal retrieval.

132. AlpsBench: An LLM Personalization Benchmark for Real-Dialogue Memorization and Preference Alignment

Authors: Jianfei Xiao , Xiang Yu , Chengbing Wang , Wuqiang Zheng , Xinyu Lin , Kaining Liu , Hongxun Ding , Yang Zhang , Wenjie Wang , Fuli Feng , Xiangnan He
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26680
Abstract:

As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into lifelong AI assistants, LLM personalization has become a critical frontier. However, progress is currently bottlenecked by the absence of a gold-standard evaluation benchmark. Existing benchmarks either overlook personalized information management that is critical for personalization or rely heavily on synthetic dialogues, which exhibit an inherent distribution gap from real-world dialogue. To bridge this gap, we introduce AlpsBench, An LLM PerSonalization benchmark derived from real-world human-LLM dialogues. AlpsBench comprises 2,500 long-term interaction sequences curated from WildChat, paired with human-verified structured memories that encapsulate both explicit and implicit personalization signals. We define four pivotal tasks - personalized information extraction, updating, retrieval, and utilization - and establish protocols to evaluate the entire lifecycle of memory management. Our benchmarking of frontier LLMs and memory-centric systems reveals that: (i) models struggle to reliably extract latent user traits; (ii) memory updating faces a performance ceiling even in the strongest models; (iii) retrieval accuracy declines sharply in the presence of large distractor pools; and (iv) while explicit memory mechanisms improve recall, they do not inherently guarantee more preference-aligned or emotionally resonant responses. AlpsBench aims to provide a comprehensive framework.

133. AI Meets Mathematics Education: A Case Study on Supporting an Instructor in a Large Mathematics Class with Context-Aware AI

Authors: Jérémy Barghorn , Anna Sotnikova , Sacha Friedli , Antoine Bosselut
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26679
Abstract:

Large-enrollment university courses face persistent challenges in providing timely and scalable instructional support. While generative AI holds promise, its effective use depends on reliability and pedagogical alignment. We present a human-centered case study of AI-assisted support in a Calculus I course, implemented in close collaboration with the course instructor. We developed a system to answer students’ questions on a discussion forum, fine-tuning a lightweight language model on 2,588 historical student-instructor interactions. The model achieved 75.3% accuracy on a benchmark of 150 representative questions annotated by five instructors, and in 36% of cases, its responses were rated equal to or better than instructor answers. Post-deployment student survey (N = 105) indicated that students valued the alignment of the responses with the course materials and their immediate availability, while still relying on the instructor verification for trust. We highlight the importance of hybrid human-AI workflows for safe and effective course support.

134. Can AI be a Teaching Partner? Evaluating ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek across Three Teaching Strategies

Authors: Talita de Paula Cypriano de Souza , Shruti Mehta , Matheus Arataque Uema , Luciano Bernardes de Paula , Seiji Isotani
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26673
Abstract:

There are growing promises that Large Language Models (LLMs) can support students’ learning by providing explanations, feedback, and guidance. However, despite their rapid adoption and widespread attention, there is still limited empirical evidence regarding the pedagogical skills of LLMs. This article presents a comparative study of popular LLMs, namely, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini, acting as teaching agents. An evaluation protocol was developed, focusing on three pedagogical strategies: Examples, Explanations and Analogies, and the Socratic Method. Six human judges conducted the evaluations in the context of teaching the C programming language to beginners. The results indicate that LLM models exhibited similar interaction patterns in the pedagogical strategies of Examples and Explanations and Analogies. In contrast, for the Socratic Method, the models showed greater sensitivity to the pedagogical strategy and the initial prompt. Overall, ChatGPT and Gemini received higher scores, whereas DeepSeek obtained lower scores across the criteria, indicating differences in pedagogical performance across models.

135. ReCQR: Incorporating conversational query rewriting to improve Multimodal Image Retrieval

Authors: Yuan Hu , ZhiYu Cao , PeiFeng Li , QiaoMing Zhu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26669
Abstract:

With the rise of multimodal learning, image retrieval plays a crucial role in connecting visual information with natural language queries. Existing image retrievers struggle with processing long texts and handling unclear user expressions. To address these issues, we introduce the conversational query rewriting (CQR) task into the image retrieval domain and construct a dedicated multi-turn dialogue query rewriting dataset. Built on full dialogue histories, CQR rewrites users’ final queries into concise, semantically complete ones that are better suited for retrieval. Specifically, We first leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate rewritten candidates at scale and employ an LLM-as-Judge mechanism combined with manual review to curate approximately 7,000 high-quality multimodal dialogues, forming the ReCQR dataset. Then We benchmark several SOTA multimodal models on the ReCQR dataset to assess their performance on image retrieval. Experimental results demonstrate that CQR not only significantly enhances the accuracy of traditional image retrieval models, but also provides new directions and insights for modeling user queries in multimodal systems.

136. Bridge-RAG: An Abstract Bridge Tree Based Retrieval Augmented Generation Algorithm With Cuckoo Filter

Authors: Zihang Li , Wenjun Liu , Yikun Zong , Jiawen Tao , Siying Dai , Songcheng Ren , Zirui Liu , Yanbing Jiang , Tong Yang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26668
Abstract:

As an important paradigm for enhancing the generation quality of Large Language Models (LLMs), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) faces the two challenges regarding retrieval accuracy and computational efficiency. This paper presents a novel RAG framework called Bridge-RAG. To overcome the accuracy challenge, we introduce the concept of abstract to bridge query entities and document chunks, providing robust semantic understanding. We organize the abstracts into a tree structure and design a multi-level retrieval strategy to ensure the inclusion of sufficient contextual information. To overcome the efficiency challenge, we introduce the improved Cuckoo Filter, an efficient data structure supporting rapid membership queries and updates, to accelerate entity location during the retrieval process. We design a block linked list structure and an entity temperature-based sorting mechanism to improve efficiency from the aspects of spatial and temporal locality. Extensive experiments show that Bridge-RAG achieves around 15.65% accuracy improvement and reduces 10x to 500x retrieval time compared to other RAG frameworks.

137. M-RAG: Making RAG Faster, Stronger, and More Efficient

Authors: Sun Xu , Tongkai Xu , Baiheng Xie , Li Huang , Qiang Gao , Kunpeng Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26667
Abstract:

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enhancing the reliability of large language models (LLMs). However, RAG systems are sensitive to retrieval strategies that rely on text chunking to construct retrieval units, which often introduce information fragmentation, retrieval noise, and reduced efficiency. Recent work has even questioned the necessity of RAG, arguing that long-context LLMs may eliminate multi-stage retrieval pipelines by directly processing full documents. Nevertheless, expanded context capacity alone does not resolve the challenges of relevance filtering, evidence prioritization, and isolating answer-bearing information. To this end, we proposed M-RAG, a novel Chunk-free retrieval strategy. Instead of retrieving coarse-grained textual chunks, M-RAG extracts structured, k-v decomposition meta-markers, with a lightweight, intent-aligned retrieval key for retrieval and a context-rich information value for generation. Under this setting, M-RAG enables efficient and stable query-key similarity matching without sacrificing expressive ability. Experimental results on the LongBench subtasks demonstrate that M-RAG outperforms chunk-based RAG baselines across varying token budgets, particularly under low-resource settings. Extensive analysis further reveals that M-RAG retrieves more answer-friendly evidence with high efficiency, validating the effectiveness of decoupling retrieval representation from generation and highlighting the proposed strategy as a scalable and robust alternative to existing chunk-based methods.

138. SimulCost: A Cost-Aware Benchmark and Toolkit for Automating Physics Simulations with LLMs

Authors: Yadi Cao , Sicheng Lai , Jiahe Huang , Yang Zhang , Zach Lawrence , Rohan Bhakta , Izzy F. Thomas , Mingyun Cao , Chung-Hao Tsai , Zihao Zhou , Yidong Zhao , Hao Liu , Alessandro Marinoni , Alexey Arefiev , Rose Yu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20253
Abstract:

Evaluating LLM agents for scientific tasks has focused on token costs while ignoring tool-use costs like simulation time and experimental resources. As a result, metrics like pass@k become impractical under realistic budget constraints. To address this gap, we introduce SimulCost, the first benchmark targeting cost-sensitive parameter tuning in physics simulations. SimulCost compares LLM tuning cost-sensitive parameters against traditional scanning approach in both accuracy and computational cost, spanning 2,916 single-round (initial guess) and 1,900 multi-round (adjustment by trial-and-error) tasks across 12 simulators from fluid dynamics, solid mechanics, and plasma physics. Each simulator’s cost is analytically defined and platform-independent. Frontier LLMs achieve 46–64% success rates in single-round mode, dropping to 35–54% under high accuracy requirements, rendering their initial guesses unreliable especially for high accuracy tasks. Multi-round mode improves rates to 71–80%, but LLMs are 1.5–2.5x slower than traditional scanning, making them uneconomical choices. We also investigate parameter group correlations for knowledge transfer potential, and the impact of in-context examples and reasoning effort, providing practical implications for deployment and fine-tuning. We open-source SimulCost as a static benchmark and extensible toolkit to facilitate research on improving cost-aware agentic designs for physics simulations, and for expanding new simulation environments. Code and data are available at this https URL .

139. Exploring Cultural Variations in Moral Judgments with Large Language Models

Authors: Hadi Mohammadi , Ayoub Bagheri
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12433
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across many tasks, but their ability to capture culturally diverse moral values remains unclear. In this paper, we examine whether LLMs mirror variations in moral attitudes reported by the World Values Survey (WVS) and the Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Survey (PEW). We compare smaller monolingual and multilingual models (GPT-2, OPT, BLOOMZ, and Qwen) with recent instruction-tuned models (GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemma-2-9b-it, and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct). Using log-probability-based \emph{moral justifiability} scores, we correlate each model’s outputs with survey data covering a broad set of ethical topics. Our results show that many earlier or smaller models often produce near-zero or negative correlations with human judgments. In contrast, advanced instruction-tuned models achieve substantially higher positive correlations, suggesting they better reflect real-world moral attitudes. We provide a detailed regional analysis revealing that models align better with Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (W.E.I.R.D.) nations than with other regions. While scaling model size and using instruction tuning improves alignment with cross-cultural moral norms, challenges remain for certain topics and regions. We discuss these findings in relation to bias analysis, training data diversity, information retrieval implications, and strategies for improving the cultural sensitivity of LLMs.