LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-03-27

1. Training the Knowledge Base through Evidence Distillation and Write-Back Enrichment

Authors: Yuxing Lu , Xukai Zhao , Wei Wu , Jinzhuo Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25737
Abstract:

The knowledge base in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system is typically assembled once and never revised, even though the facts a query requires are often fragmented across documents and buried in irrelevant content. We argue that the knowledge base should be treated as a trainable component and propose WriteBack-RAG, a framework that uses labeled examples to identify where retrieval succeeds, isolate the relevant documents, and distill them into compact knowledge units that are indexed alongside the original corpus. Because the method modifies only the corpus, it can be applied once as an offline preprocessing step and combined with any RAG pipeline. Across four RAG methods, six benchmarks, and two LLM backbones, WriteBack-RAG improves every evaluated setting, with gains averaging +2.14%. Cross-method transfer experiments further show that the distilled knowledge benefits RAG pipelines other than the one used to produce it, confirming that the improvement resides in the corpus itself.

2. Is Mathematical Problem-Solving Expertise in Large Language Models Associated with Assessment Performance?

Authors: Liang Zhang , Yu Fu , Xinyi Jin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25633
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in math education not only as problem solvers but also as assessors of learners’ reasoning. However, it remains unclear whether stronger math problem-solving ability is associated with stronger step-level assessment performance. This study examines that relationship using the GSM8K and MATH subsets of PROCESSBENCH, a human-annotated benchmark for identifying the earliest erroneous step in mathematical reasoning. We evaluate two LLM-based math tutor agent settings, instantiated with GPT-4 and GPT-5, in two independent tasks on the same math problems: solving the original problem and assessing a benchmark-provided solution by predicting the earliest erroneous step. Results show a consistent within-model pattern: assessment accuracy is substantially higher on math problem items the same model solved correctly than on items it solved incorrectly, with statistically significant associations across both models and datasets. At the same time, assessment remains more difficult than direct problem solving, especially on error-present solutions. These findings suggest that math problem-solving expertise supports stronger assessment performance, but reliable step-level diagnosis also requires additional capabilities such as step tracking, monitoring, and precise error localization. The results have implications for the design and evaluation of AI-supported Adaptive Instructional Systems (AISs) for formative assessment in math education.

3. EcoThink: A Green Adaptive Inference Framework for Sustainable and Accessible Agents

Authors: Linxiao Li , Zhixiang Lu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25498
Abstract:

As the Web transitions from static retrieval to generative interaction, the escalating environmental footprint of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a critical sustainability challenge. Current paradigms indiscriminately apply computation-intensive strategies like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to billions of daily queries, causing LLM overthinking, a redundancy that amplifies carbon emissions and operational barriers. This inefficiency directly undermines UN Sustainable Development Goals 13 (Climate Action) and 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by hindering equitable AI access in resource-constrained regions. To address this, we introduce EcoThink, an energy-aware adaptive inference framework designed to reconcile high-performance AI intelligence with environmental responsibility. EcoThink employs a lightweight, distillation-based router to dynamically assess query complexity, skipping unnecessary reasoning for factoid retrieval while reserving deep computation for complex logic. Extensive evaluations across 9 diverse benchmarks demonstrate that EcoThink reduces inference energy by 40.4% on average (up to 81.9% for web knowledge retrieval) without statistically significant performance loss. By mitigating algorithmic waste, EcoThink offers a scalable path toward a sustainable, inclusive, and energy-efficient generative AI Agent.

4. Cross-Model Disagreement as a Label-Free Correctness Signal

Authors: Matt Gorbett , Suman Jana
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25450
Abstract:

Detecting when a language model is wrong without ground truth labels is a fundamental challenge for safe deployment. Existing approaches rely on a model’s own uncertainty – such as token entropy or confidence scores – but these signals fail critically on the most dangerous failure mode: confident errors, where a model is wrong but certain. In this work we introduce cross-model disagreement as a correctness indicator – a simple, training-free signal that can be dropped into existing production systems, routing pipelines, and deployment monitoring infrastructure without modification. Given a model’s generated answer, cross-model disagreement computes how surprised or uncertain a second verifier model is when reading that answer via a single forward pass. No generation from the verifying model is required, and no correctness labels are needed. We instantiate this principle as Cross-Model Perplexity (CMP), which measures the verifying model’s surprise at the generating model’s answer tokens, and Cross-Model Entropy (CME), which measures the verifying model’s uncertainty at those positions. Both CMP and CME outperform within-model uncertainty baselines across benchmarks spanning reasoning, retrieval, and mathematical problem solving (MMLU, TriviaQA, and GSM8K). On MMLU, CMP achieves a mean AUROC of 0.75 against a within-model entropy baseline of 0.59. These results establish cross-model disagreement as a practical, training-free approach to label-free correctness estimation, with direct applications in deployment monitoring, model routing, selective prediction, data filtering, and scalable oversight of production language model systems.

5. Beyond Content Safety: Real-Time Monitoring for Reasoning Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models

Authors: Xunguang Wang , Yuguang Zhou , Qingyue Wang , Zongjie Li , Ruixuan Huang , Zhenlan Ji , Pingchuan Ma , Shuai Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25412
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet the safety of the reasoning process itself remains largely unaddressed. Existing work on LLM safety focuses on content safety–detecting harmful, biased, or factually incorrect outputs – and treats the reasoning chain as an opaque intermediate artifact. We identify reasoning safety as an orthogonal and equally critical security dimension: the requirement that a model’s reasoning trajectory be logically consistent, computationally efficient, and resistant to adversarial manipulation. We make three contributions. First, we formally define reasoning safety and introduce a nine-category taxonomy of unsafe reasoning behaviors, covering input parsing errors, reasoning execution errors, and process management errors. Second, we conduct a large-scale prevalence study annotating 4111 reasoning chains from both natural reasoning benchmarks and four adversarial attack methods (reasoning hijacking and denial-of-service), confirming that all nine error types occur in practice and that each attack induces a mechanistically interpretable signature. Third, we propose a Reasoning Safety Monitor: an external LLM-based component that runs in parallel with the target model, inspects each reasoning step in real time via a taxonomy-embedded prompt, and dispatches an interrupt signal upon detecting unsafe behavior. Evaluation on a 450-chain static benchmark shows that our monitor achieves up to 84.88\% step-level localization accuracy and 85.37\% error-type classification accuracy, outperforming hallucination detectors and process reward model baselines by substantial margins. These results demonstrate that reasoning-level monitoring is both necessary and practically achievable, and establish reasoning safety as a foundational concern for the secure deployment of large reasoning models.

6. Evaluating Language Models for Harmful Manipulation

Authors: Canfer Akbulut , Rasmi Elasmar , Abhishek Roy , Anthony Payne , Priyanka Suresh , Lujain Ibrahim , Seliem El-Sayed , Charvi Rastogi , Ashyana Kachra , Will Hawkins , Kristian Lum , Laura Weidinger
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25326
Abstract:

Interest in the concept of AI-driven harmful manipulation is growing, yet current approaches to evaluating it are limited. This paper introduces a framework for evaluating harmful AI manipulation via context-specific human-AI interaction studies. We illustrate the utility of this framework by assessing an AI model with 10,101 participants spanning interactions in three AI use domains (public policy, finance, and health) and three locales (US, UK, and India). Overall, we find that that the tested model can produce manipulative behaviours when prompted to do so and, in experimental settings, is able to induce belief and behaviour changes in study participants. We further find that context matters: AI manipulation differs between domains, suggesting that it needs to be evaluated in the high-stakes context(s) in which an AI system is likely to be used. We also identify significant differences across our tested geographies, suggesting that AI manipulation results from one geographic region may not generalise to others. Finally, we find that the frequency of manipulative behaviours (propensity) of an AI model is not consistently predictive of the likelihood of manipulative success (efficacy), underscoring the importance of studying these dimensions separately. To facilitate adoption of our evaluation framework, we detail our testing protocols and make relevant materials publicly available. We conclude by discussing open challenges in evaluating harmful manipulation by AI models.

7. DAGverse: Building Document-Grounded Semantic DAGs from Scientific Papers

Authors: Shu Wan , Saketh Vishnubhatla , Iskander Kushbay , Tom Heffernan , Aaron Belikoff , Raha Moraffah , Huan Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25293
Abstract:

Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) are widely used to represent structured knowledge in scientific and technical domains. However, datasets for real-world DAGs remain scarce because constructing them typically requires expert interpretation of domain documents. We study Doc2SemDAG construction: recovering a preferred semantic DAG from a document together with the cited evidence and context that explain it. This problem is challenging because a document may admit multiple plausible abstractions, the intended structure is often implicit, and the supporting evidence is scattered across prose, equations, captions, and figures. To address these challenges, we leverage scientific papers containing explicit DAG figures as a natural source of supervision. In this setting, the DAG figure provides the DAG structure, while the accompanying text provides context and explanation. We introduce DAGverse, a framework for constructing document-grounded semantic DAGs from online scientific papers. Its core component, DAGverse-Pipeline, is a semi-automatic system designed to produce high-precision semantic DAG examples through figure classification, graph reconstruction, semantic grounding, and validation. As a case study, we test the framework for causal DAGs and release DAGverse-1, a dataset of 108 expert-validated semantic DAGs with graph-level, node-level, and edge-level evidence. Experiments show that DAGverse-Pipeline outperforms existing Vision-Language Models on DAG classification and annotation. DAGverse provides a foundation for document-grounded DAG benchmarks and opens new directions for studying structured reasoning grounded in real-world evidence.

8. SliderQuant: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for LLMs

Authors: Shigeng Wang , Chao Li , Yangyuxuan Kang , Jiawei Fan , Zhonghong Ou , Anbang Yao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25284
Abstract:

In this paper, we address post-training quantization (PTQ) for large language models (LLMs) from an overlooked perspective: given a pre-trained high-precision LLM, the predominant sequential quantization framework treats different layers equally, but this may be not optimal in challenging bit-width settings. We empirically study the quantization impact of different layers on model accuracy, and observe that: (1) shallow/deep layers are usually more sensitive to quantization than intermediate layers; (2) among shallow/deep layers, the most sensitive one is the first/last layer, which exhibits significantly larger quantization error than others. These empirical observations imply that the quantization design for different layers of LLMs is required on multiple levels instead of a single level shared to all layers. Motivated by this, we propose a new PTQ framework termed Sliding-layer Quantization (SliderQuant) that relies on a simple adaptive sliding quantization concept facilitated by few learnable parameters. The base component of SliderQuant is called inter-layer sliding quantization, which incorporates three types of novel sliding window designs tailored for addressing the varying quantization sensitivity of shallow, intermediate and deep layers. The other component is called intra-layer sliding quantization that leverages an incremental strategy to quantize each window. As a result, SliderQuant has a strong ability to reduce quantization errors across layers. Extensive experiments on basic language generation, zero-shot commonsense reasoning and challenging math and code tasks with various LLMs, including Llama/Llama2/Llama3/Qwen2.5 model families, DeepSeek-R1 distilled models and large MoE models, show that our method outperforms existing PTQ methods (including the latest PTQ methods using rotation transformations) for both weight-only quantization and weight-activation quantization.

9. Trace2Skill: Distill Trajectory-Local Lessons into Transferable Agent Skills

Authors: Jingwei Ni , Yihao Liu , Xinpeng Liu , Yutao Sun , Mengyu Zhou , Pengyu Cheng , Dexin Wang , Xiaoxi Jiang , Guanjun Jiang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25158
Abstract:

Equipping Large Language Model (LLM) agents with domain-specific skills is critical for tackling complex tasks. Yet, manual authoring creates a severe scalability bottleneck. Conversely, automated skill generation often yields fragile or fragmented results because it either relies on shallow parametric knowledge or sequentially overfits to non-generalizable trajectory-local lessons. To overcome this, we introduce Trace2Skill, a framework that mirrors how human experts author skills: by holistically analyzing broad execution experience before distilling it into a single, comprehensive guide. Instead of reacting sequentially to individual trajectories, Trace2Skill dispatches a parallel fleet of sub-agents to analyze a diverse pool of executions. It extracts trajectory-specific lessons and hierarchically consolidates them into a unified, conflict-free skill directory via inductive reasoning. Trace2Skill supports both deepening existing human-written skills and creating new ones from scratch. Experiments in challenging domains, such as spreadsheet, VisionQA and math reasoning, show that Trace2Skill significantly improves upon strong baselines, including Anthropic’s official xlsx skills. Crucially, this trajectory-grounded evolution does not merely memorize task instances or model-specific quirks: evolved skills transfer across LLM scales and generalize to OOD settings. For example, skills evolved by Qwen3.5-35B on its own trajectories improved a Qwen3.5-122B agent by up to 57.65 absolute percentage points on WikiTableQuestions. Ultimately, our results demonstrate that complex agent experience can be packaged into highly transferable, declarative skills – requiring no parameter updates, no external retrieval modules, and utilizing open-source models as small as 35B parameters.

10. RubricEval: A Rubric-Level Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Judges in Instruction Following

Authors: Tianjun Pan , Xuan Lin , Wenyan Yang , Qianyu He , Shisong Chen , Licai Qi , Wanqing Xu , Hongwei Feng , Bo Xu , Yanghua Xiao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25133
Abstract:

Rubric-based evaluation has become a prevailing paradigm for evaluating instruction following in large language models (LLMs). Despite its widespread use, the reliability of these rubric-level evaluations remains unclear, calling for meta-evaluation. However, prior meta-evaluation efforts largely focus on the response level, failing to assess the fine-grained judgment accuracy that rubric-based evaluation relies on. To bridge this gap, we introduce RubricEval. Our benchmark features: (1) the first rubric-level meta-evaluation benchmark for instruction following, (2) diverse instructions and responses spanning multiple categories and model sources, and (3) a substantial set of 3,486 quality-controlled instances, along with Easy/Hard subsets that better differentiates judge performance. Our experiments reveal that rubric-level judging remains far from solved: even GPT-4o, a widely adopted judge in instruction-following benchmarks, achieves only 55.97% on Hard subset. Considering evaluation paradigm, rubric-level evaluation outperforms checklist-level, explicit reasoning improves accuracy, and both together reduce inter-judge variance. Through our established rubric taxonomy, we further identify common failure modes and offer actionable insights for reliable instruction-following evaluation.

11. ElephantBroker: A Knowledge-Grounded Cognitive Runtime for Trustworthy AI Agents

Authors: Cristian Lupascu , Alexandru Lupascu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25097
Abstract:

Large Language Model based agents increasingly operate in high stakes, multi turn settings where factual grounding is critical, yet their memory systems typically rely on flat key value stores or plain vector retrieval with no mechanism to track the provenance or trustworthiness of stored knowledge. We present ElephantBroker, an open source cognitive runtime that unifies a Neo4j knowledge graph with a Qdrant vector store through the Cognee SDK to provide durable, verifiable agent memory. The system implements a complete cognitive loop (store, retrieve, score, compose, protect, learn) comprising a hybrid five source retrieval pipeline, an eleven dimension competitive scoring engine for budget constrained context assembly, a four state evidence verification model, a five stage context lifecycle with goal aware assembly and continuous compaction, a six layer cheap first guard pipeline for safety enforcement, an AI firewall providing enforceable tool call interception and multi tier safety scanning, a nine stage consolidation engine that strengthens useful patterns while decaying noise, and a numeric authority model governing multi organization identity with hierarchical access control. Architectural validation through a comprehensive test suite of over 2,200 tests spanning unit, integration, and end to end levels confirms subsystem correctness. The modular design supports three deployment tiers, five profile presets with inheritance, multi gateway isolation, and a management dashboard for human oversight, enabling configurations from lightweight memory only agents to full cognitive runtimes with enterprise grade safety and auditability.

12. Sparse Visual Thought Circuits in Vision-Language Models

Authors: Yunpeng Zhou
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25075
Abstract:

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) improve interpretability in multimodal models, but it remains unclear whether SAE features form modular, composable units for reasoning-an assumption underlying many intervention-based steering methods. We test this modularity hypothesis and find it often fails: intervening on a task-selective feature set can modestly improve reasoning accuracy, while intervening on the union of two such sets reliably induces output drift (large unintended changes in predictions) and degrades accuracy, even under norm-matched perturbations. This non modular circuit interference is consistent with shared internal pathways where feature unions amplify activation shifts. We develop a reproducible causal pipeline to localize and test these sparse visual thought circuits in Qwen3-VL-8B. On a controlled synthetic benchmark with seven task types and three difficulty levels, linear probes identify a mid decoder locus for task type information. We train SAEs at this layer, construct task-selective sets via an explicit rule, and perform inference time scaling and ablation while quantifying accuracy and drift. Our findings-validated with bootstrapped subsamples and permutation controls, and replicated across multiple VLM families and five diverse datasets clarify the boundaries of SAE feature composability and provide a rigorous diagnostic framework for more reliable VLM control.

13. Mechanistically Interpreting Compression in Vision-Language Models

Authors: Veeraraju Elluru , Arth Singh , Roberto Aguero , Ajay Agarwal , Debojyoti Das , Hreetam Paul
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25035
Abstract:

Compressed vision-language models (VLMs) are widely used to reduce memory and compute costs, making them a suitable choice for real-world deployment. However, compressing these models raises concerns about whether internal computations and safety behaviors are preserved. In this work, we use causal circuit analysis and crosscoder-based feature comparisons to examine how pruning and quantization fundamentally change the internals across representative VLMs. We observe that pruning generally keeps circuit structure intact but rotates and attenuates internal features, while quantization modifies the circuits at a higher level yet leaves the surviving features better aligned. Leveraging this insight, we also introduce VLMSafe-420, a novel benchmark that pairs harmful inputs with matched benign counterfactuals across various safety categories. Our findings show that pruning causes a sharp drop in genuine refusal behavior, suggesting that the choice of compression has safety implications.

14. From Stateless to Situated: Building a Psychological World for LLM-Based Emotional Support

Authors: Boning Zhao , Clover Hu , Xinnuo Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25031
Abstract:

In psychological support and emotional companionship scenarios, the core limitation of large language models (LLMs) lies not merely in response quality, but in their reliance on local next-token prediction, which prevents them from maintaining the temporal continuity, stage awareness, and user consent boundaries required for multi-turn intervention. This stateless characteristic makes systems prone to premature advancement, stage misalignment, and boundary violations in continuous dialogue. To address this problem, we argue that the key challenge in process-oriented emotional support is not simply generating natural language, but constructing a sustainably updatable external situational structure for the model. We therefore propose LEKIA 2.0, a situated LLM architecture that separates the cognitive layer from the executive layer, thereby decoupling situational modeling from intervention execution. This design enables the system to maintain stable representations of the user’s situation and consent boundaries throughout ongoing interaction. To evaluate this process-control capability, we further introduce a Static-to-Dynamic online evaluation protocol for multi-turn interaction. LEKIA achieved an average absolute improvement of approximately 31% over prompt-only baselines in deep intervention loop completion. The results suggest that an external situational structure is a key enabling condition for building stable, controllable, and situated emotional support systems.

15. The Anatomy of Uncertainty in LLMs

Authors: Aditya Taparia , Ransalu Senanayake , Kowshik Thopalli , Vivek Narayanaswamy
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24967
Abstract:

Understanding why a large language model (LLM) is uncertain about the response is important for their reliable deployment. Current approaches, which either provide a single uncertainty score or rely on the classical aleatoric-epistemic dichotomy, fail to offer actionable insights for improving the generative model. Recent studies have also shown that such methods are not enough for understanding uncertainty in LLMs. In this work, we advocate for an uncertainty decomposition framework that dissects LLM uncertainty into three distinct semantic components: (i) input ambiguity, arising from ambiguous prompts; (ii) knowledge gaps, caused by insufficient parametric evidence; and (iii) decoding randomness, stemming from stochastic sampling. Through a series of experiments we demonstrate that the dominance of these components can shift across model size and task. Our framework provides a better understanding to audit LLM reliability and detect hallucinations, paving the way for targeted interventions and more trustworthy systems.

16. Can MLLMs Read Students’ Minds? Unpacking Multimodal Error Analysis in Handwritten Math

Authors: Dingjie Song , Tianlong Xu , Yi-Fan Zhang , Hang Li , Zhiling Yan , Xing Fan , Haoyang Li , Lichao Sun , Qingsong Wen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24961
Abstract:

Assessing student handwritten scratchwork is crucial for personalized educational feedback but presents unique challenges due to diverse handwriting, complex layouts, and varied problem-solving approaches. Existing educational NLP primarily focuses on textual responses and neglects the complexity and multimodality inherent in authentic handwritten scratchwork. Current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel at visual reasoning but typically adopt an “examinee perspective”, prioritizing generating correct answers rather than diagnosing student errors. To bridge these gaps, we introduce ScratchMath, a novel benchmark specifically designed for explaining and classifying errors in authentic handwritten mathematics scratchwork. Our dataset comprises 1,720 mathematics samples from Chinese primary and middle school students, supporting two key tasks: Error Cause Explanation (ECE) and Error Cause Classification (ECC), with seven defined error types. The dataset is meticulously annotated through rigorous human-machine collaborative approaches involving multiple stages of expert labeling, review, and verification. We systematically evaluate 16 leading MLLMs on ScratchMath, revealing significant performance gaps relative to human experts, especially in visual recognition and logical reasoning. Proprietary models notably outperform open-source models, with large reasoning models showing strong potential for error explanation. All evaluation data and frameworks are publicly available to facilitate further research.

17. Shopping with a Platform AI Assistant: Who Adopts, When in the Journey, and What For

Authors: Se Yan , Han Zhong , Zemin (Zachary) Zhong , Wenyu Zhou
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24947
Abstract:

This paper provides some of the first large-scale descriptive evidence on how consumers adopt and use platform-embedded shopping AI in e-commerce. Using data on 31 million users of Ctrip, China’s largest online travel platform, we study “Wendao,” an LLM-based AI assistant integrated into the platform. We document three empirical regularities. First, adoption is highest among older consumers, female users, and highly engaged existing users, reversing the younger, male-dominated profile commonly documented for general-purpose AI tools. Second, AI chat appears in the same broad phase of the purchase journey as traditional search and well before order placement; among journeys containing both chat and search, the most common pattern is interleaving, with users moving back and forth between the two modalities. Third, consumers disproportionately use the assistant for exploratory, hard-to-keyword tasks: attraction queries account for 42% of observed chat requests, and chat intent varies systematically with both the timing of chat relative to search and the category of products later purchased within the same journey. These findings suggest that embedded shopping AI functions less as a substitute for conventional search than as a complementary interface for exploratory product discovery in e-commerce.

18. FinMCP-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use under the Model Context Protocol

Authors: Jie Zhu , Yimin Tian , Boyang Li , Kehao Wu , Zhongzhi Liang , Junhui Li , Xianyin Zhang , Lifan Guo , Feng Chen , Yong Liu , Chi Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24943
Abstract:

This paper introduces \textbf{FinMCP-Bench}, a novel benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in solving real-world financial problems through tool invocation of financial model context protocols. FinMCP-Bench contains 613 samples spanning 10 main scenarios and 33 sub-scenarios, featuring both real and synthetic user queries to ensure diversity and authenticity. It incorporates 65 real financial MCPs and three types of samples, single tool, multi-tool, and multi-turn, allowing evaluation of models across different levels of task complexity. Using this benchmark, we systematically assess a range of mainstream LLMs and propose metrics that explicitly measure tool invocation accuracy and reasoning capabilities. FinMCP-Bench provides a standardized, practical, and challenging testbed for advancing research on financial LLM agents.

19. LogitScope: A Framework for Analyzing LLM Uncertainty Through Information Metrics

Authors: Farhan Ahmed , Yuya Jeremy Ong , Chad DeLuca
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24929
Abstract:

Understanding and quantifying uncertainty in large language model (LLM) outputs is critical for reliable deployment. However, traditional evaluation approaches provide limited insight into model confidence at individual token positions during generation. To address this issue, we introduce LogitScope, a lightweight framework for analyzing LLM uncertainty through token-level information metrics computed from probability distributions. By measuring metrics such as entropy and varentropy at each generation step, LogitScope reveals patterns in model confidence, identifies potential hallucinations, and exposes decision points where models exhibit high uncertainty, all without requiring labeled data or semantic interpretation. We demonstrate LogitScope’s utility across diverse applications including uncertainty quantification, model behavior analysis, and production monitoring. The framework is model-agnostic, computationally efficient through lazy evaluation, and compatible with any HuggingFace model, enabling both researchers and practitioners to inspect LLM behavior during inference.

20. How Far Are Vision-Language Models from Constructing the Real World? A Benchmark for Physical Generative Reasoning

Authors: Luyu Yang , Yutong Dai , An Yan , Viraj Prabhu , Ran Xu , Zeyuan Chen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24866
Abstract:

The physical world is not merely visual; it is governed by rigorous structural and procedural constraints. Yet, the evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) remains heavily skewed toward perceptual realism, prioritizing the generation of visually plausible 3D layouts, shapes, and appearances. Current benchmarks rarely test whether models grasp the step-by-step processes and physical dependencies required to actually build these artifacts, a capability essential for automating design-to-construction pipelines. To address this, we introduce DreamHouse, a novel benchmark for physical generative reasoning: the capacity to synthesize artifacts that concurrently satisfy geometric, structural, constructability, and code-compliance constraints. We ground this benchmark in residential timber-frame construction, a domain with fully codified engineering standards and objectively verifiable correctness. We curate over 26,000 structures spanning 13 architectural styles, ach verified to construction-document standards (LOD 350) and develop a deterministic 10-test structural validation framework. Unlike static benchmarks that assess only final outputs, DreamHouse supports iterative agentic interaction. Models observe intermediate build states, generate construction actions, and receive structured environmental feedback, enabling a fine-grained evaluation of planning, structural reasoning, and self-correction. Extensive experiments with state-of-the-art VLMs reveal substantial capability gaps that are largely invisible on existing leaderboards. These findings establish physical validity as a critical evaluation axis orthogonal to visual realism, highlighting physical generative reasoning as a distinct and underdeveloped frontier in multimodal intelligence. Available at this https URL

21. ReLope: KL-Regularized LoRA Probes for Multimodal LLM Routing

Authors: Yaopei Zeng , Congchao Wang , Blake JianHang Chen , Lu Lin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24787
Abstract:

Routing has emerged as a promising strategy for balancing performance and cost in large language model (LLM) systems that combine lightweight models with powerful but expensive large models. Recent studies show that \emph{probe routing}, which predicts the correctness of a small model using its hidden states, provides an effective solution in text-only LLMs. However, we observe that these probes degrade substantially when applied to multimodal LLMs (MLLMs). Through empirical analysis, we find that the presence of visual inputs weakens the separability of correctness signals in hidden states, making them harder to extract using standard probe designs. To address this challenge, we introduce two complementary approaches for improving probe routing in MLLMs. First, we propose the \emph{Attention Probe}, which aggregates hidden states from the preceding layer based on attention scores to recover distributed correctness signals. Second, we present the \emph{KL-Regularized LoRA Probe (ReLope)}, which inserts a lightweight LoRA adapter and applies a KL regularizer to learn routing-aware representations. Comprehensive experiments show that our methods consistently outperform baselines, suggesting that improving the quality of hidden states is key to effective routing in MLLMs. Our code is available at this https URL .

22. Supervising Ralph Wiggum: Exploring a Metacognitive Co-Regulation Agentic AI Loop for Engineering Design

Authors: Zeda Xu , Nikolas Martelaro , Christopher McComb
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24768
Abstract:

The engineering design research community has studied agentic AI systems that use Large Language Model (LLM) agents to automate the engineering design process. However, these systems are prone to some of the same pathologies that plague humans. Just as human designers, LLM design agents can fixate on existing paradigms and fail to explore alternatives when solving design challenges, potentially leading to suboptimal solutions. In this work, we propose (1) a novel Self-Regulation Loop (SRL), in which the Design Agent self-regulates and explicitly monitors its own metacognition, and (2) a novel Co-Regulation Design Agentic Loop (CRDAL), in which a Metacognitive Co-Regulation Agent assists the Design Agent in metacognition to mitigate design fixation, thereby improving system performance for engineering design tasks. In the battery pack design problem examined here, we found that the novel CRDAL system generates designs with better performance, without significantly increasing the computational cost, compared to a plain Ralph Wiggum Loop (RWL) and the metacognitively self-assessing Self-Regulation Loop (SRL). Also, we found that the CRDAL system navigated through the latent design space more effectively than both SRL and RWL. However, the SRL did not generate designs with significantly better performance than RWL, even though it explored a different region of the design space. The proposed system architectures and findings of this work provide practical implications for future development of agentic AI systems for engineering design.

23. Formal Semantics for Agentic Tool Protocols: A Process Calculus Approach

Authors: Andreas Schlapbach
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24747
Abstract:

The emergence of large language model agents capable of invoking external tools has created urgent need for formal verification of agent protocols. Two paradigms dominate this space: Schema-Guided Dialogue (SGD), a research framework for zero-shot API generalization, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an industry standard for agent-tool integration. While both enable dynamic service discovery through schema descriptions, their formal relationship remains unexplored. Building on prior work establishing the conceptual convergence of these paradigms, we present the first process calculus formalization of SGD and MCP, proving they are structurally bisimilar under a well-defined mapping Phi. However, we demonstrate that the reverse mapping Phi^{-1} is partial and lossy, revealing critical gaps in MCP’s expressivity. Through bidirectional analysis, we identify five principles – semantic completeness, explicit action boundaries, failure mode documentation, progressive disclosure compatibility, and inter-tool relationship declaration – as necessary and sufficient conditions for full behavioral equivalence. We formalize these principles as type-system extensions MCP+, proving MCP+ is isomorphic to SGD. Our work provides the first formal foundation for verified agent systems and establishes schema quality as a provable safety property.

Authors: Zaid Abulawi (1 and 2), Zavier Ndum Ndum (1 and 2), Eric Cervi (2), Rui Hu (2), Yang Liu (1) ((1) Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, (2) Nuclear Science and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory)
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24736
Abstract:

In the design and safety analysis of advanced reactor systems, constructing input files for system-level thermal-hydraulics codes such as the System Analysis Module (SAM) remains a labor-intensive task. Analysts must extract and reconcile design data from heterogeneous engineering documents and manually translate it into solver-specific syntax. In this paper, we present AutoSAM, an agentic framework that automates SAM input file generation. The framework combines a large language model agent with retrieval-augmented generation over the solver’s user guide and theory manual, together with specialized tools for analyzing PDFs, images, spreadsheets, and text files. AutoSAM ingests unstructured engineering documents, including system diagrams, design reports, and data tables, extracts simulation-relevant parameters into a human-auditable intermediate representation, and synthesizes validated, solver-compatible input decks. Its multimodal retrieval pipeline integrates scientific text extraction, vision-based figure interpretation, semantic embedding, and query answering. We evaluate AutoSAM on four case studies of increasing complexity: a single-pipe steady-state model, a solid-fuel channel with temperature reactivity feedback, the Advanced Burner Test Reactor core, and the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment primary loop. Across all cases, the agent produces runnable SAM models consistent with expected thermal-hydraulic behavior while explicitly identifying missing data and labeling assumed values. The framework achieves 100% utilization of structured inputs, about 88% extraction from PDF text, and 100% completeness in vision-based geometric extraction. These results demonstrate a practical path toward prompt-driven reactor modeling, in which analysts provide system descriptions and supporting documentation while the agent translates them into transparent, and executable, SAM simulations.

25. When Is Collective Intelligence a Lottery? Multi-Agent Scaling Laws for Memetic Drift in LLMs

Authors: Hidenori Tanaka
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24676
Abstract:

Multi-agent systems powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings that shape consequential decisions, both directly and indirectly. Yet it remains unclear whether their outcomes reflect collective reasoning, systematic bias, or mere chance. Recent work has sharpened this question with naming games, showing that even when no individual agent favors any label a priori, populations rapidly break symmetry and reach consensus. Here, we reveal the mechanism by introducing a minimal model, Quantized Simplex Gossip (QSG), and trace the microscopic origin of this agreement to mutual in-context learning. In QSG, agents maintain internal belief states but learn from one another’s sampled outputs, so one agent’s arbitrary choice becomes the next agent’s evidence and can compound toward agreement. By analogy with neutral evolution, we call this sampling-driven regime memetic drift. QSG predicts a crossover from a drift-dominated regime, where consensus is effectively a lottery, to a selection regime, where weak biases are amplified and shape the outcome. We derive scaling laws for drift-induced polarization as a function of population size, communication bandwidth, in-context adaptation rate, and agents’ internal uncertainty, and we validate them in both QSG simulations and naming-game experiments with LLM populations. Together, these results provide a framework for studying the collective mechanisms of social representation formation in multi-agent systems.

26. The Kitchen Loop: User-Spec-Driven Development for a Self-Evolving Codebase

Authors: Yannick Roy
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25697
Abstract:

Code production is now a commodity; the bottleneck is knowing what to build and proving it works. We present the Kitchen Loop, a framework for autonomous, self-evolving software built on a unified trust model: (1) a specification surface enumerating what the product claims to support; (2) ‘As a User x 1000’, where an LLM agent exercises that surface as a synthetic power user at 1,000x human cadence; (3) Unbeatable Tests, ground-truth verification the code author cannot fake; and (4) Drift Control, continuous quality measurement with automated pause gates. We validate across two production systems over 285+ iterations, producing 1,094+ merged pull requests with zero regressions detected by the regression oracle (methodology in Section 6.1). We observe emergent properties at scale: multi-iteration self-correction chains, autonomous infrastructure healing, and monotonically improving quality gates. The primitives are not new; our contribution is their composition into a production-tested system with the operational discipline that makes long-running autonomous evolution safe.

27. Measuring What Matters – or What’s Convenient?: Robustness of LLM-Based Scoring Systems to Construct-Irrelevant Factors

Authors: Cole Walsh , Rodica Ivan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25674
Abstract:

Automated systems have been widely adopted across the educational testing industry for open-response assessment and essay scoring. These systems commonly achieve performance levels comparable to or superior than trained human raters, but have frequently been demonstrated to be vulnerable to the influence of construct-irrelevant factors (i.e., features of responses that are unrelated to the construct assessed) and adversarial conditions. Given the rising usage of large language models in automated scoring systems, there is a renewed focus on ``hallucinations’’ and the robustness of these LLM-based automated scoring approaches to construct-irrelevant factors. This study investigates the effects of construct-irrelevant factors on a dual-architecture LLM-based scoring system designed to score short essay-like open-response items in a situational judgment test. It was found that the scoring system was generally robust to padding responses with meaningless text, spelling errors, and writing sophistication. Duplicating large passages of text resulted in lower scores predicted by the system, on average, contradicting results from previous studies of non-LLM-based scoring systems, while off-topic responses were heavily penalized by the scoring system. These results provide encouraging support for the robustness of future LLM-based scoring systems when designed with construct relevance in mind.

28. A Mentalistic Interface for Probing Folk-Psychological Attribution to Non-Humanoid Robots

Authors: Giulio Pisaneschi , Pierpaolo Serio , Estelle Gerbier , Andrea Dan Ryals , Lorenzo Pollini , Mario G. C. A. Cimino
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25646
Abstract:

This paper presents an experimental platform for studying intentional-state attribution toward a non-humanoid robot. The system combines a simulated robot, realistic task environments, and large language model-based explanatory layers that can express the same behavior in mentalistic, teleological, or mechanistic terms. By holding behavior constant while varying the explanatory frame, the platform provides a controlled way to investigate how language and framing shape the adoption of the intentional stance in robotics.

29. Beyond Via: Analysis and Estimation of the Impact of Large Language Models in Academic Papers

Authors: Mingmeng Geng , Yuhang Dong , Thierry Poibeau
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25638
Abstract:

Through an analysis of arXiv papers, we report several shifts in word usage that are likely driven by large language models (LLMs) but have not previously received sufficient attention, such as the increased frequency of “beyond” and “via” in titles and the decreased frequency of “the” and “of” in abstracts. Due to the similarities among different LLMs, experiments show that current classifiers struggle to accurately determine which specific model generated a given text in multi-class classification tasks. Meanwhile, variations across LLMs also result in evolving patterns of word usage in academic papers. By adopting a direct and highly interpretable linear approach and accounting for differences between models and prompts, we quantitatively assess these effects and show that real-world LLM usage is heterogeneous and dynamic.

30. Demographic Fairness in Multimodal LLMs: A Benchmark of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in Face Verification

Authors: Ünsal Öztürk , Hatef Otroshi Shahreza , Sébastien Marcel
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25613
Abstract:

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been explored as face verification systems that determine whether two face images are of the same person. Unlike dedicated face recognition systems, MLLMs approach this task through visual prompting and rely on general visual and reasoning abilities. However, the demographic fairness of these models remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we present a benchmarking study that evaluates nine open-source MLLMs from six model families, ranging from 2B to 8B parameters, on the IJB-C and RFW face verification protocols across four ethnicity groups and two gender groups. We measure verification accuracy with the Equal Error Rate and True Match Rate at multiple operating points per demographic group, and we quantify demographic disparity with four FMR-based fairness metrics. Our results show that FaceLLM-8B, the only face-specialised model in our study, substantially outperforms general-purpose MLLMs on both benchmarks. The bias patterns we observe differ from those commonly reported for traditional face recognition, with different groups being most affected depending on the benchmark and the model. We also note that the most accurate models are not necessarily the fairest and that models with poor overall accuracy can appear fair simply because they produce uniformly high error rates across all demographic groups.

31. Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes

Authors: Yuqian Fu , Haohuan Huang , Kaiwen Jiang , Yuanheng Zhu , Dongbin Zhao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25562
Abstract:

On-policy distillation (OPD) is appealing for large language model (LLM) post-training because it evaluates teacher feedback on student-generated rollouts rather than fixed teacher traces. In long-horizon settings, however, the common sampled-token variant is fragile: it reduces distribution matching to a one-token signal and becomes increasingly unreliable as rollouts drift away from prefixes the teacher commonly visits. We revisit OPD from the estimator and implementation sides. Theoretically, token-level OPD is biased relative to sequence-level reverse-KL, but it has a much tighter worst-case variance bound; our toy study shows the same tradeoff empirically, with stronger future-reward coupling producing higher gradient variance and less stable learning. Empirically, we identify three failure modes of sampled-token OPD: an imbalanced one-token signal, unreliable teacher guidance on student-generated prefixes, and distortions caused by tokenizer or special-token mismatch. We address these issues with teacher top-K local support matching, implemented as truncated reverse-KL with top-p rollout sampling and special-token masking. Across single-task math reasoning and multi-task agentic-plus-math training, this objective yields more stable optimization and better downstream performance than sampled-token OPD.

32. Shape and Substance: Dual-Layer Side-Channel Attacks on Local Vision-Language Models

Authors: Eyal Hadad , Mordechai Guri
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25403
Abstract:

On-device Vision-Language Models (VLMs) promise data privacy via local execution. However, we show that the architectural shift toward Dynamic High-Resolution preprocessing (e.g., AnyRes) introduces an inherent algorithmic side-channel. Unlike static models, dynamic preprocessing decomposes images into a variable number of patches based on their aspect ratio, creating workload-dependent inputs. We demonstrate a dual-layer attack framework against local VLMs. In Tier 1, an unprivileged attacker can exploit significant execution-time variations using standard unprivileged OS metrics to reliably fingerprint the input’s geometry. In Tier 2, by profiling Last-Level Cache (LLC) contention, the attacker can resolve semantic ambiguity within identical geometries, distinguishing between visually dense (e.g., medical X-rays) and sparse (e.g., text documents) content. By evaluating state-of-the-art models such as LLaVA-NeXT and Qwen2-VL, we show that combining these signals enables reliable inference of privacy-sensitive contexts. Finally, we analyze the security engineering trade-offs of mitigating this vulnerability, reveal substantial performance overhead with constant-work padding, and propose practical design recommendations for secure Edge AI deployments.

33. GlowQ: Group-Shared LOw-Rank Approximation for Quantized LLMs

Authors: Selim An , Il hong Suh , Yeseong Kim
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25385
Abstract:

Quantization techniques such as BitsAndBytes, AWQ, and GPTQ are widely used as a standard method in deploying large language models but often degrades accuracy when using low-bit representations, e.g., 4 bits. Low-rank correction methods (e.g., LQER, QERA, ASER) has been proposed to mitigate this issue, however, they restore all layers and insert error-correction modules into every decoder block, which increases latency and memory overhead. To address this limitation, we propose GlowQ, a group-shared low-rank approximation for quantized LLMs that caches a single shared right factor per input-sharing group and restores only the groups or layers that yield the highest accuracy benefit. GlowQ computes the high-precision projection once per input-sharing group and reuses it across its modules, reducing parameter and memory overhead, and retaining the expressivity of layer-specific corrections. We also propose a selective variant, GlowQ-S, that applies the cached shared module only where it provides the largest benefit. Compared with strong baselines, our approach reduces TTFB by (5.6%) and increases throughput by (9.6%) on average, while reducing perplexity on WikiText-2 by (0.17%) and increasing downstream accuracy by 0.42 percentage points. The selective model GlowQ-S further reduces latency, cutting TTFB by (23.4%) and increasing throughput by (37.4%), while maintaining accuracy within 0.2 percentage points on average.

34. Adaptive Chunking: Optimizing Chunking-Method Selection for RAG

Authors: Paulo Roberto de Moura Júnior , Jean Lelong , Annabelle Blangero
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25333
Abstract:

The effectiveness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is highly dependent on how documents are chunked, that is, segmented into smaller units for indexing and retrieval. Yet, commonly used “one-size-fits-all” approaches often fail to capture the nuanced structure and semantics of diverse texts. Despite its central role, chunking lacks a dedicated evaluation framework, making it difficult to assess and compare strategies independently of downstream performance. We challenge this paradigm by introducing Adaptive Chunking, a framework that selects the most suitable chunking strategy for each document based on a set of five novel intrinsic, document-based metrics: References Completeness (RC), Intrachunk Cohesion (ICC), Document Contextual Coherence (DCC), Block Integrity (BI), and Size Compliance (SC), which directly assess chunking quality across key dimensions. To support this framework, we also introduce two new chunkers, an LLM-regex splitter and a split-then-merge recursive splitter, alongside targeted post-processing techniques. On a diverse corpus spanning legal, technical, and social science domains, our metric-guided adaptive method significantly improves downstream RAG performance. Without changing models or prompts, our framework increases RAG outcomes, raising answers correctness to 72% (from 62-64%) and increasing the number of successfully answered questions by over 30% (65 vs. 49). These results demonstrate that adaptive, document-aware chunking, guided by a complementary suite of intrinsic metrics, offers a practical and effective path to more robust RAG systems. Code available at this https URL .

35. How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models

Authors: Hector Borobia , Elies Seguí-Mas , Guillermina Tormo-Carbó
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25325
Abstract:

Weight pruning is a standard technique for compressing large language models, yet its effect on learned internal representations remains poorly understood. We present the first systematic study of how unstructured pruning reshapes the feature geometry of language models, using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) as interpretability probes. Across three model families (Gemma 3 1B, Gemma 2 2B, Llama 3.2 1B), two pruning methods (magnitude and Wanda), and six sparsity levels (0–60%), we investigate five research questions spanning seed stability, feature survival, SAE transferability, feature fragility, and causal relevance. Our most striking finding is that rare SAE features–those with low firing rates–survive pruning far better than frequent ones, with within-condition Spearman correlations of rho = -1.0 in 11 of 17 experimental conditions. This counter-intuitive result suggests that pruning acts as implicit feature selection, preferentially destroying high-frequency generic features while preserving specialized rare ones. We further show that Wanda pruning preserves feature structure up to 3.7x better than magnitude pruning, that pre-trained SAEs remain viable on Wanda-pruned models up to 50% sparsity, and that geometric feature survival does not predict causal importance–a dissociation with implications for interpretability under compression.

36. AD-CARE: A Guideline-grounded, Modality-agnostic LLM Agent for Real-world Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis with Multi-cohort Assessment, Fairness Analysis, and Reader Study

Authors: Wenlong Hou , Sheng Bi , Guangqian Yang , Lihao Liu , Ye Du , Hanxiao Xue , Juncheng Wang , Yuxiang Feng , Yue Xun , Nanxi Yu , Ning Mao , Mo Yang , Yi Wah Eva Cheung , Ling Long , Kay Chen Tan , Lequan Yu , Xiaomeng Ma , Shaozhen Yan , Shujun Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25322
Abstract:

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden. However, real-world AD assessment is hampered by incomplete, heterogeneous multimodal data and variability across sites and patient demographics. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in biomedicine, their use in AD has largely been confined to answering narrow, disease-specific questions rather than generating comprehensive diagnostic reports that support clinical decision-making. Here we expand LLM capabilities for clinical decision support by introducing AD-CARE, a modality-agnostic agent that performs guideline-grounded diagnostic assessment from incomplete, heterogeneous inputs without imputing missing modalities. By dynamically orchestrating specialized diagnostic tools and embedding clinical guidelines into LLM-driven reasoning, AD-CARE generates transparent, report-style outputs aligned with real-world clinical workflows. Across six cohorts comprising 10,303 cases, AD-CARE achieved 84.9% diagnostic accuracy, delivering 4.2%-13.7% relative improvements over baseline methods. Despite cohort-level differences, dataset-specific accuracies remain robust (80.4%-98.8%), and the agent consistently outperforms all baselines. AD-CARE reduced performance disparities across racial and age subgroups, decreasing the average dispersion of four metrics by 21%-68% and 28%-51%, respectively. In a controlled reader study, the agent improved neurologist and radiologist accuracy by 6%-11% and more than halved decision time. The framework yielded 2.29%-10.66% absolute gains over eight backbone LLMs and converges their performance. These results show that AD-CARE is a scalable, practically deployable framework that can be integrated into routine clinical workflows for multimodal decision support in AD.

37. CRAFT: Grounded Multi-Agent Coordination Under Partial Information

Authors: Abhijnan Nath , Hannah VanderHoeven , Nikhil Krishnaswamy
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25268
Abstract:

We introduce CRAFT, a multi-agent benchmark for evaluating pragmatic communication in large language models under strict partial information. In this setting, multiple agents with complementary but incomplete views must coordinate through natural language to construct a shared 3D structure that no single agent can fully observe. We formalize this problem as a multi-sender pragmatic reasoning task and provide a diagnostic framework that decomposes failures into spatial grounding, belief modeling and pragmatic communication errors, including a taxonomy of behavioral failure profiles in both frontier and open-weight models. Across a diverse set of models, including 8 open-weight and 7 frontier including reasoning models, we find that stronger reasoning ability does not reliably translate to better coordination: smaller open-weight models often match or outperform frontier systems, and improved individual communication does not guarantee successful collaboration. These results suggest that multi-agent coordination remains a fundamentally unsolved challenge for current language models. Our code can be found at this https URL

38. MolQuest: A Benchmark for Agentic Evaluation of Abductive Reasoning in Chemical Structure Elucidation

Authors: Taolin Han , Shuang Wu , Jinghang Wang , Yuhao Zhou , Renquan Lv , Bing Zhao , Wei Hu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25253
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) hold considerable potential for advancing scientific discovery, yet systematic assessment of their dynamic reasoning in real-world research remains limited. Current scientific evaluation benchmarks predominantly rely on static, single-turn Question Answering (QA) formats, which are inadequate for measuring model performance in complex scientific tasks that require multi-step iteration and experimental interaction. To address this gap, we introduce MolQuest, a novel agent-based evaluation framework for molecular structure elucidation built upon authentic chemical experimental data. Unlike existing datasets, MolQuest formalizes molecular structure elucidation as a multi-turn interactive task, requiring models to proactively plan experimental steps, integrate heterogeneous spectral sources (e.g., NMR, MS), and iteratively refine structural hypotheses. This framework systematically evaluates LLMs’ abductive reasoning and strategic decision-making abilities within a vast and complex chemical space. Empirical results reveal that contemporary frontier models exhibit significant limitations in authentic scientific scenarios: notably, even state-of-the-art (SOTA) models achieve an accuracy of only approximately 50%, while the performance of most other models remains below the 30% threshold. This work provides a reproducible and extensible framework for science-oriented LLM evaluation, our findings highlight the critical gap in current LLMs’ strategic scientific reasoning, setting a clear direction for future research toward AI that can actively participate in the scientific process.

39. Activation Matters: Test-time Activated Negative Labels for OOD Detection with Vision-Language Models

Authors: Yabin Zhang , Maya Varma , Yunhe Gao , Jean-Benoit Delbrouck , Jiaming Liu , Chong Wang , Curtis Langlotz
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25250
Abstract:

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection aims to identify samples that deviate from in-distribution (ID). One popular pipeline addresses this by introducing negative labels distant from ID classes and detecting OOD based on their distance to these labels. However, such labels may present poor activation on OOD samples, failing to capture the OOD characteristics. To address this, we propose \underline{T}est-time \underline{A}ctivated \underline{N}egative \underline{L}abels (TANL) by dynamically evaluating activation levels across the corpus dataset and mining candidate labels with high activation responses during the testing process. Specifically, TANL identifies high-confidence test images online and accumulates their assignment probabilities over the corpus to construct a label activation metric. Such a metric leverages historical test samples to adaptively align with the test distribution, enabling the selection of distribution-adaptive activated negative labels. By further exploring the activation information within the current testing batch, we introduce a more fine-grained, batch-adaptive variant. To fully utilize label activation knowledge, we propose an activation-aware score function that emphasizes negative labels with stronger activations, boosting performance and enhancing its robustness to the label number. Our TANL is training-free, test-efficient, and grounded in theoretical justification. Experiments on diverse backbones and wide task settings validate its effectiveness. Notably, on the large-scale ImageNet benchmark, TANL significantly reduces the FPR95 from 17.5\% to 9.8\%. Codes are available at \href{ this https URL }{YBZh/OpenOOD-VLM}.

40. FluxEDA: A Unified Execution Infrastructure for Stateful Agentic EDA

Authors: Zhengrui Chen , Zixuan Song , Yu Li , Qi Sun , Cheng Zhuo
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25243
Abstract:

Large language models and autonomous agents are increasingly explored for EDA automation, but many existing integrations still rely on script-level or request-level interactions, which makes it difficult to preserve tool state and support iterative optimization in real production-oriented environments. In this work, we present FluxEDA, a unified and stateful infrastructure substrate for agentic EDA. FluxEDA introduces a managed gateway-based execution interface with structured request and response handling. It also maintains persistent backend instances. Together, these features allow upper-layer agents and programmable clients to interact with heterogeneous EDA tools through preserved runtime state, rather than through isolated shell invocations. We evaluate the framework using two representative commercial backend case studies: automated post-route timing ECO and standard-cell sub-library optimization. The results show that FluxEDA can support multi-step analysis and optimization over real tool contexts, including state reuse, rollback, and coordinated iterative execution. These findings suggest that a stateful and governed infrastructure layer is a practical foundation for agent-assisted EDA automation.

41. WebTestBench: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents towards End-to-End Automated Web Testing

Authors: Fanheng Kong , Jingyuan Zhang , Yang Yue , Chenxi Sun , Yang Tian , Shi Feng , Xiaocui Yang , Daling Wang , Yu Tian , Jun Du , Wenchong Zeng , Han Li , Kun Gai
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25226
Abstract:

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has catalyzed a paradigm shift in programming, giving rise to “vibe coding”, where users can build complete projects and even control computers using natural language instructions. This paradigm has driven automated webpage development, but it introduces a new requirement about how to automatically verify whether the web functionalities are reliably implemented. Existing works struggle to adapt, relying on static visual similarity or predefined checklists that constrain their utility in open-ended environments. Furthermore, they overlook a vital aspect of software quality, namely latent logical constraints. To address these gaps, we introduce WebTestBench, a benchmark for evaluating end-to-end automated web testing. WebTestBench encompasses comprehensive dimensions across diverse web application categories. We decompose the testing process into two cascaded sub-tasks, checklist generation and defect detection, and propose WebTester, a baseline framework for this task. Evaluating popular LLMs with WebTester reveals severe challenges, including insufficient test completeness, detection bottlenecks, and long-horizon interaction unreliability. These findings expose a substantial gap between current computer-use agent capabilities and industrial-grade deployment demands. We hope that WebTestBench provides valuable insights and guidance for advancing end-to-end automated web testing. Our dataset and code are available at this https URL .

42. A Decade-Scale Benchmark Evaluating LLMs’ Clinical Practice Guidelines Detection and Adherence in Multi-turn Conversations

Authors: Andong Tan , Shuyu Dai , Jinglu Wang , Fengtao Zhou , Yan Lu , Xi Wang , Yingcong Chen , Can Yang , Shujie Liu , Hao Chen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25196
Abstract:

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) play a pivotal role in ensuring evidence-based decision-making and improving patient outcomes. While Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in healthcare scenarios, it is unclear to which extend LLMs could identify and adhere to CPGs during conversations. To address this gap, we introduce CPGBench, an automated framework benchmarking the clinical guideline detection and adherence capabilities of LLMs in multi-turn conversations. We collect 3,418 CPG documents from 9 countries/regions and 2 international organizations published in the last decade spanning across 24 specialties. From these documents, we extract 32,155 clinical recommendations with corresponding publication institute, date, country, specialty, recommendation strength, evidence level, etc. One multi-turn conversation is generated for each recommendation accordingly to evaluate the detection and adherence capabilities of 8 leading LLMs. We find that the 71.1%-89.6% recommendations can be correctly detected, while only 3.6%-29.7% corresponding titles can be correctly referenced, revealing the gap between knowing the guideline contents and where they come from. The adherence rates range from 21.8% to 63.2% in different models, indicating a large gap between knowing the guidelines and being able to apply them. To confirm the validity of our automatic analysis, we further conduct a comprehensive human evaluation involving 56 clinicians from different specialties. To our knowledge, CPGBench is the first benchmark systematically revealing which clinical recommendations LLMs fail to detect or adhere to during conversations. Given that each clinical recommendation may affect a large population and that clinical applications are inherently safety critical, addressing these gaps is crucial for the safe and responsible deployment of LLMs in real world clinical practice.

43. Probing the Lack of Stable Internal Beliefs in LLMs

Authors: Yifan Luo , Kangping Xu , Yanzhen Lu , Yang Yuan , Andrew Chi-Chih Yao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25187
Abstract:

Persona-driven large language models (LLMs) require consistent behavioral tendencies across interactions to simulate human-like personality traits, such as persistence or reliability. However, current LLMs often lack stable internal representations that anchor their responses over extended dialogues. This work explores whether LLMs can maintain “implicit consistency”, defined as persistent adherence to an unstated goal in multi-turn interactions. We designed a 20-question-style riddle game paradigm where an LLM is tasked with secretly selecting a target and responding to users’ guesses with “yes/no” answers. Through evaluations, we find that LLMs struggle to preserve latent consistency: their implicit “goals” shift across turns unless explicitly provided their selected target in context. These findings highlight critical limitations in the building of persona-driven LLMs and underscore the need for mechanisms that anchor implicit goals over time, which is a key to realistic personality modeling in interactive applications such as dialogue systems.

44. Train at Moving Edge: Online-Verified Prompt Selection for Efficient RL Training of Large Reasoning Model

Authors: Jiahao Wu , Ning Lu , Shengcai Liu , Kun Wang , Yanting Yang , Li Qing , Ke Tang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25184
Abstract:

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become essential for post-training large language models (LLMs) in reasoning tasks. While scaling rollouts can stabilize training and enhance performance, the computational overhead is a critical issue. In algorithms like GRPO, multiple rollouts per prompt incur prohibitive costs, as a large portion of prompts provide negligible gradients and are thus of low utility. To address this problem, we investigate how to select high-utility prompts before the rollout phase. Our experimental analysis reveals that sample utility is non-uniform and evolving: the strongest learning signals concentrate at the ``learning edge”, the intersection of intermediate difficulty and high uncertainty, which shifts as training proceeds. Motivated by this, we propose HIVE (History-Informed and online-VErified prompt selection), a dual-stage framework for data-efficient RL. HIVE utilizes historical reward trajectories for coarse selection and employs prompt entropy as a real-time proxy to prune instances with stale utility. By evaluating HIVE across multiple math reasoning benchmarks and models, we show that HIVE yields significant rollout efficiency without compromising performance.

45. PIDP-Attack: Combining Prompt Injection with Database Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

Authors: Haozhen Wang , Haoyue Liu , Jionghao Zhu , Zhichao Wang , Yongxin Guo , Xiaoying Tang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25164
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of applications. However, their practical deployment is often hindered by issues such as outdated knowledge and the tendency to generate hallucinations. To address these limitations, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have been introduced, enhancing LLMs with external, up-to-date knowledge sources. Despite their advantages, RAG systems remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, with data poisoning emerging as a prominent threat. Existing poisoning-based attacks typically require prior knowledge of the user’s specific queries, limiting their flexibility and real-world applicability. In this work, we propose PIDP-Attack, a novel compound attack that integrates prompt injection with database poisoning in RAG. By appending malicious characters to queries at inference time and injecting a limited number of poisoned passages into the retrieval database, our method can effectively manipulate LLM response to arbitrary query without prior knowledge of the user’s actual query. Experimental evaluations across three benchmark datasets (Natural Questions, HotpotQA, MS-MARCO) and eight LLMs demonstrate that PIDP-Attack consistently outperforms the original PoisonedRAG. Specifically, our method improves attack success rates by 4% to 16% on open-domain QA tasks while maintaining high retrieval precision, proving that the compound attack strategy is both necessary and highly effective.

46. Photon: Speedup Volume Understanding with Efficient Multimodal Large Language Models

Authors: Chengyu Fang , Heng Guo , Zheng Jiang , Chunming He , Xiu Li , Minfeng Xu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25155
Abstract:

Multimodal large language models are promising for clinical visual question answering tasks, but scaling to 3D imaging is hindered by high computational costs. Prior methods often rely on 2D slices or fixed-length token compression, disrupting volumetric continuity and obscuring subtle findings. We present Photon, a framework that represents 3D medical volumes with token sequences of variable length. Photon introduces instruction-conditioned token scheduling and surrogate gradient propagation to adaptively reduce tokens during both training and inference, which lowers computational cost while mitigating the attention dilution caused by redundant tokens. It incorporates a custom backpropagation rule with gradient restoration to enable differentiable optimization despite discrete token drop. To stabilize token compression and ensure reliable use of visual evidence, Photon further applies regularization objectives that mitigate language-only bias and improve reliability. Experiments on diverse medical visual question answering tasks show that Photon achieves state-of-the-art accuracy while reducing resource usage and accelerating both training and inference.

47. Factors Influencing the Quality of AI-Generated Code: A Synthesis of Empirical Evidence

Authors: Vehid Geruslu , Zulfiyya Aliyeva , Eray Tüzün
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25146
Abstract:

Context: The rapid adoption of AI-assisted code generation tools, such as large language models (LLMs), is transforming software development practices. While these tools promise significant productivity gains, concerns regarding the quality, reliability, and security of AI-generated code are increasingly reported in both academia and industry. –Objective: This study aims to systematically synthesize existing empirical evidence on the factors influencing the quality of AI-generated source code and to analyze how these factors impact software quality outcomes across different evaluation contexts. –Method: We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) following established guidelines, supported by an AI-assisted workflow with human oversight. A total of 24 primary studies were selected through a structured search and screening process across major digital libraries. Data were extracted and analyzed using qualitative, pattern-based evidence synthesis. –Results: The findings reveal that code quality in AI-assisted development is influenced by a combination of human factors, AI system characteristics, and human AI interaction dynamics. Key influencing factors include prompt design, task specification, and developer expertise. The results also show variability in quality outcomes such as correctness, security, maintainability, and complexity across studies, with both improvements and risks reported. –Conclusion: AI-assisted code generation represents a socio-technical shift in software engineering, where achieving high-quality outcomes depends on both technological and human factors. While promising, AI-generated code requires careful validation and integration into development workflows.

48. Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory

Authors: Jon-Paul Cacioli
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25112
Abstract:

Standard evaluation of LLM confidence relies on calibration metrics (ECE, Brier score) that conflate two distinct capacities: how much a model knows (Type-1 sensitivity) and how well it knows what it knows (Type-2 metacognitive sensitivity). We introduce an evaluation framework based on Type-2 Signal Detection Theory that decomposes these capacities using meta-d’ and the metacognitive efficiency ratio M-ratio. Applied to four LLMs (Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Llama-3-8B-Base, Gemma-2-9B-Instruct) across 224,000 factual QA trials, we find: (1) metacognitive efficiency varies substantially across models even when Type-1 sensitivity is similar – Mistral achieves the highest d’ but the lowest M-ratio; (2) metacognitive efficiency is domain-specific, with different models showing different weakest domains, invisible to aggregate metrics; (3) temperature manipulation shifts Type-2 criterion while meta-d’ remains stable for two of four models, dissociating confidence policy from metacognitive capacity; (4) AUROC_2 and M-ratio produce fully inverted model rankings, demonstrating these metrics answer fundamentally different evaluation questions. The meta-d’ framework reveals which models “know what they don’t know” versus which merely appear well-calibrated due to criterion placement – a distinction with direct implications for model selection, deployment, and human-AI collaboration. Pre-registered analysis; code and data publicly available.

49. Large Language Models as Optimization Controllers: Adaptive Continuation for SIMP Topology Optimization

Authors: Shaoliang Yang , Jun Wang , Yunsheng Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25099
Abstract:

We present a framework in which a large language model (LLM) acts as an online adaptive controller for SIMP topology optimization, replacing conventional fixed-schedule continuation with real-time, state-conditioned parameter decisions. At every $k$-th iteration, the LLM receives a structured observation$-$current compliance, grayness index, stagnation counter, checkerboard measure, volume fraction, and budget consumption$-$and outputs numerical values for the penalization exponent $p$, projection sharpness $\beta$, filter radius $r_{\min}$, and move limit $\delta$ via a Direct Numeric Control interface. A hard grayness gate prevents premature binarization, and a meta-optimization loop uses a second LLM pass to tune the agent’s call frequency and gate threshold across runs. We benchmark the agent against four baselines$-$fixed (no-continuation), standard three-field continuation, an expert heuristic, and a schedule-only ablation$-$on three 2-D problems (cantilever, MBB beam, L-bracket) at $120!\times!60$ resolution and two 3-D problems (cantilever, MBB beam) at $40!\times!20!\times!10$ resolution, all run for 300 iterations. A standardized 40-iteration sharpening tail is applied from the best valid snapshot so that compliance differences reflect only the exploration phase. The LLM agent achieves the lowest final compliance on every benchmark: $-5.7\%$ to $-18.1\%$ relative to the fixed baseline, with all solutions fully binary. The schedule-only ablation underperforms the fixed baseline on two of three problems, confirming that the LLM’s real-time intervention$-$not the schedule geometry$-$drives the gain. Code and reproduction scripts will be released upon publication.

50. TopoPilot: Reliable Conversational Workflow Automation for Topological Data Analysis and Visualization

Authors: Nathaniel Gorski , Shusen Liu , Bei Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25063
Abstract:

Recent agentic systems demonstrate that large language models can generate scientific visualizations from natural language. However, reliability remains a major limitation: systems may execute invalid operations, introduce subtle but consequential errors, or fail to request missing information when inputs are underspecified. These issues are amplified in real-world workflows, which often exceed the complexity of standard benchmarks. Ensuring reliability in autonomous visualization pipelines therefore remains an open challenge. We present TopoPilot, a reliable and extensible agentic framework for automating complex scientific visualization workflows. TopoPilot incorporates systematic guardrails and verification mechanisms to ensure reliable operation. While we focus on topological data analysis and visualization as a primary use case, the framework is designed to generalize across visualization domains. TopoPilot adopts a reliability-centered two-agent architecture. An orchestrator agent translates user prompts into workflows composed of atomic backend actions, while a verifier agent evaluates these workflows prior to execution, enforcing structural validity and semantic consistency. This separation of interpretation and verification reduces code-generation errors and enforces correctness guarantees. A modular architecture further improves robustness by isolating components and enabling seamless integration of new descriptors and domain-specific workflows without modifying the core system. To systematically address reliability, we introduce a taxonomy of failure modes and implement targeted safeguards for each class. In evaluations simulating 1,000 multi-turn conversations across 100 prompts, including adversarial and infeasible requests, TopoPilot achieves a success rate exceeding 99%, compared to under 50% for baselines without comprehensive guardrails and checks.

51. The System Prompt Is the Attack Surface: How LLM Agent Configuration Shapes Security and Creates Exploitable Vulnerabilities

Authors: Ron Litvak
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25056
Abstract:

System prompt configuration can make the difference between near-total phishing blindness and near-perfect detection in LLM email agents. We present PhishNChips, a study of 11 models under 10 prompt strategies, showing that prompt-model interaction is a first-order security variable: a single model’s phishing bypass rate ranges from under 1% to 97% depending on how it is configured, while the false-positive cost of the same prompt varies sharply across models. We then show that optimizing prompts around highly predictive signals can improve benchmark performance, reaching up to 93.7% recall at 3.8% false positive rate, but also creates a brittle attack surface. In particular, domain-matching strategies perform well when legitimate emails mostly have matched sender and URL domains, yet degrade sharply when attackers invert that signal by registering matching infrastructure. Response-trace analysis shows that 98% of successful bypasses reason in ways consistent with the inverted signal: the models are following the instruction, but the instruction’s core assumption has become false. A counter-intuitive corollary follows: making prompts more specific can degrade already-capable models by replacing broader multi-signal reasoning with exploitable single-signal dependence. We characterize the resulting tension between detection, usability, and adversarial robustness as a navigable tradeoff, introduce Safetility, a deployability-aware metric that penalizes false positives, and argue that closing the adversarial gap likely requires tool augmentation with external ground truth.

52. Closing the Confidence-Faithfulness Gap in Large Language Models

Authors: Miranda Muqing Miao , Lyle Ungar
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25052
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) tend to verbalize confidence scores that are largely detached from their actual accuracy, yet the geometric relationship governing this behavior remain poorly understood. In this work, we present a mechanistic interpretability analysis of verbalized confidence, using linear probes and contrastive activation addition (CAA) steering to show that calibration and verbalized confidence signals are encoded linearly but are orthogonal to one another – a finding consistent across three open-weight models and four datasets. Interestingly, when models are prompted to simultaneously reason through a problem and verbalize a confidence score, the reasoning process disrupts the verbalized confidence direction, exacerbating miscalibration. We term this the “Reasoning Contamination Effect.” Leveraging this insight, we introduce a two-stage adaptive steering pipeline that reads the model’s internal accuracy estimate and steers verbalized output to match it, substantially improving calibration alignment across all evaluated models.

Authors: Tony Mason
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25015
Abstract:

System prompt instructions that cooperate in English compete in Spanish, with the same semantic content, but opposite interaction topology. We present instruction-level ablation experiments across four languages and four models showing that this topology inversion is mediated by social register: the imperative mood carries different obligatory force across speech communities, and models trained on multilingual data have learned these conventions. Declarative rewriting of a single instruction block reduces cross-linguistic variance by 81% (p = 0.029, permutation test). Rewriting three of eleven imperative blocks shifts Spanish instruction topology from competitive to cooperative, with spillover effects on unrewritten blocks. These findings suggest that models process instructions as social acts, not technical specifications: “NEVER do X” is an exercise of authority whose force is language-dependent, while “X: disabled” is a factual description that transfers across languages. If register mediates instruction-following at inference time, it plausibly does so during training. We state this as a testable prediction: constitutional AI principles authored in imperative mood may create language-dependent alignment. Corpus: 22 hand-authored probes against a production system prompt decomposed into 56 blocks.

54. Learning Rollout from Sampling:An R1-Style Tokenized Traffic Simulation Model

Authors: Ziyan Wang , Peng Chen , Ding Li , Chiwei Li , Qichao Zhang , Zhongpu Xia , Guizhen Yu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24989
Abstract:

Learning diverse and high-fidelity traffic simulations from human driving demonstrations is crucial for autonomous driving evaluation. The recent next-token prediction (NTP) paradigm, widely adopted in large language models (LLMs), has been applied to traffic simulation and achieves iterative improvements via supervised fine-tuning (SFT). However, such methods limit active exploration of potentially valuable motion tokens, particularly in suboptimal regions. Entropy patterns provide a promising perspective for enabling exploration driven by motion token uncertainty. Motivated by this insight, we propose a novel tokenized traffic simulation policy, R1Sim, which represents an initial attempt to explore reinforcement learning based on motion token entropy patterns, and systematically analyzes the impact of different motion tokens on simulation outcomes. Specifically, we introduce an entropy-guided adaptive sampling mechanism that focuses on previously overlooked motion tokens with high uncertainty yet high potential. We further optimize motion behaviors using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), guided by a safety-aware reward design. Overall, these components enable a balanced exploration-exploitation trade-off through diverse high-uncertainty sampling and group-wise comparative estimation, resulting in realistic, safe, and diverse multi-agent behaviors. Extensive experiments on the Waymo Sim Agent benchmark demonstrate that R1Sim achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.

55. Rethinking Health Agents: From Siloed AI to Collaborative Decision Mediators

Authors: Ray-Yuan Chung , Xuhai Xu , Ari Pollack
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24986
Abstract:

Large language model based health agents are increasingly used by health consumers and clinicians to interpret health information and guide health decisions. However, most AI systems in healthcare operate in siloed configurations, supporting individual users rather than the multi-stakeholder relationships central to healthcare. Such use can fragment understanding and exacerbate misalignment among patients, caregivers, and clinicians. We reframe AI not as a standalone assistant, but as a collaborator embedded within multi-party care interactions. Through a clinically validated fictional pediatric chronic kidney disease case study, we show that breakdowns in adherence stem from fragmented situational awareness and misaligned goals, and that siloed use of general-purpose AI tools does little to address these collaboration gaps. We propose a conceptual framework for designing AI collaborators that surface contextual information, reconcile mental models, and scaffold shared understanding while preserving human decision authority.

56. Self-Corrected Image Generation with Explainable Latent Rewards

Authors: Yinyi Luo , Hrishikesh Gokhale , Marios Savvides , Jindong Wang , Shengfeng He
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24965
Abstract:

Despite significant progress in text-to-image generation, aligning outputs with complex prompts remains challenging, particularly for fine-grained semantics and spatial relations. This difficulty stems from the feed-forward nature of generation, which requires anticipating alignment without fully understanding the output. In contrast, evaluating generated images is more tractable. Motivated by this asymmetry, we propose xLARD, a self-correcting framework that uses multimodal large language models to guide generation through Explainable LAtent RewarDs. xLARD introduces a lightweight corrector that refines latent representations based on structured feedback from model-generated references. A key component is a differentiable mapping from latent edits to interpretable reward signals, enabling continuous latent-level guidance from non-differentiable image-level evaluations. This mechanism allows the model to understand, assess, and correct itself during generation. Experiments across diverse generation and editing tasks show that xLARD improves semantic alignment and visual fidelity while maintaining generative priors. Code is available at this https URL .

57. Toward domain-specific machine translation and quality estimation systems

Authors: Javad Pourmostafa Roshan Sharami
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24955
Abstract:

Machine Translation (MT) and Quality Estimation (QE) perform well in general domains but degrade under domain mismatch. This dissertation studies how to adapt MT and QE systems to specialized domains through a set of data-focused contributions. Chapter 2 presents a similarity-based data selection method for MT. Small, targeted in-domain subsets outperform much larger generic datasets and reach strong translation quality at lower computational cost. Chapter 3 introduces a staged QE training pipeline that combines domain adaptation with lightweight data augmentation. The method improves performance across domains, languages, and resource settings, including zero-shot and cross-lingual cases. Chapter 4 studies the role of subword tokenization and vocabulary in fine-tuning. Aligned tokenization-vocabulary setups lead to stable training and better translation quality, while mismatched configurations reduce performance. Chapter 5 proposes a QE-guided in-context learning method for large language models. QE models select examples that improve translation quality without parameter updates and outperform standard retrieval methods. The approach also supports a reference-free setup, reducing reliance on a single reference set. These results show that domain adaptation depends on data selection, representation, and efficient adaptation strategies. The dissertation provides methods for building MT and QE systems that perform reliably in domain-specific settings.

58. Evaluating adaptive and generative AI-based feedback and recommendations in a knowledge-graph-integrated programming learning system

Authors: Lalita Na Nongkhai , Jingyun Wang , Adam Wynn , Takahiko Mendori
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24940
Abstract:

This paper introduces the design and development of a framework that integrates a large language model (LLM) with a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach leveraging both a knowledge graph and user interaction history. The framework is incorporated into a previously developed adaptive learning support system to assess learners’ code, generate formative feedback, and recommend exercises. Moerover, this study examines learner preferences across three instructional modes; adaptive, Generative AI (GenAI), and hybrid GenAI-adaptive. An experimental study was conducted to compare the learning performance and perception of the learners, and the effectiveness of these three modes using four key log features derived from 4956 code submissions across all experimental groups. The analysis results show that learners receiving feedback from GenAI modes had significantly more correct code and fewer code submissions missing essential programming logic than those receiving feedback from adaptive mode. In particular, the hybrid GenAI-adaptive mode achieved the highest number of correct submissions and the fewest incorrect or incomplete attempts, outperforming both the adaptive-only and GenAI-only modes. Questionnaire responses further indicated that GenAI-generated feedback was widely perceived as helpful, while all modes were rated positively for ease of use and usefulness. These results suggest that the hybrid GenAI-adaptive mode outperforms the other two modes across all measured log features.

59. NeuroVLM-Bench: Evaluation of Vision-Enabled Large Language Models for Clinical Reasoning in Neurological Disorders

Authors: Katarina Trojachanec Dineva , Stefan Andonov , Ilinka Ivanoska , Ivan Kitanovski , Sasho Gramatikov , Tamara Kostova , Monika Simjanoska Misheva , Kostadin Mishev
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24846
Abstract:

Recent advances in multimodal large language models enable new possibilities for image-based decision support. However, their reliability and operational trade-offs in neuroimaging remain insufficiently understood. We present a comprehensive benchmarking study of vision-enabled large language models for 2D neuroimaging using curated MRI and CT datasets covering multiple sclerosis, stroke, brain tumors, other abnormalities, and normal controls. Models are required to generate multiple outputs simultaneously, including diagnosis, diagnosis subtype, imaging modality, specialized sequence, and anatomical plane. Performance is evaluated across four directions: discriminative classification with abstention, calibration, structured-output validity, and computational efficiency. A multi-phase framework ensures fair comparison while controlling for selection bias. Across twenty frontier multimodal models, the results show that technical imaging attributes such as modality and plane are nearly solved, whereas diagnostic reasoning, especially subtype prediction, remains challenging. Tumor classification emerges as the most reliable task, stroke is moderately solvable, while multiple sclerosis and rare abnormalities remain difficult. Few-shot prompting improves performance for several models but increases token usage, latency, and cost. Gemini-2.5-Pro and GPT-5-Chat achieve the strongest overall diagnostic performance, while Gemini-2.5-Flash offers the best efficiency-performance trade-off. Among open-weight architectures, MedGemma-1.5-4B demonstrates the most promising results, as under few-shot prompting, it approaches the zero-shot performance of several proprietary models, while maintaining perfect structured output. These findings provide practical insights into performance, reliability, and efficiency trade-offs, supporting standardized evaluation of multimodal LLMs in neuroimaging.

60. Reaching Beyond the Mode: RL for Distributional Reasoning in Language Models

Authors: Isha Puri , Mehul Damani , Idan Shenfeld , Marzyeh Ghassemi , Jacob Andreas , Yoon Kim
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24844
Abstract:

Given a question, a language model (LM) implicitly encodes a distribution over possible answers. In practice, post-training procedures for LMs often collapse this distribution onto a single dominant mode. While this is generally not a problem for benchmark-style evaluations that assume one correct answer, many real-world tasks inherently involve multiple valid answers or irreducible uncertainty. Examples include medical diagnosis, ambiguous question answering, and settings with incomplete information. In these cases, we would like LMs to generate multiple plausible hypotheses, ideally with confidence estimates for each one, and without computationally intensive repeated sampling to generate non-modal answers. This paper describes a multi-answer reinforcement learning approach for training LMs to perform distributional reasoning over multiple answers during inference. We modify the RL objective to enable models to explicitly generate multiple candidate answers in a single forward pass, internalizing aspects of inference-time search into the model’s generative process. Across question-answering, medical diagnostic, and coding benchmarks, we observe improved diversity, coverage, and set-level calibration scores compared to single answer trained baselines. Models trained with our approach require fewer tokens to generate multiple answers than competing approaches. On coding tasks, they are also substantially more accurate. These results position multi-answer RL as a principled and compute-efficient alternative to inference-time scaling procedures such as best-of-k. Code and more information can be found at this https URL .

61. Learning From Developers: Towards Reliable Patch Validation at Scale for Linux

Authors: Chih-En Lin , Attreyee Mukherjee , Ajay Rawat , Ruqi Zhang , Pedro Fonseca
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24825
Abstract:

Patch reviewing is critical for software development, especially in distributed open-source development, which highly depends on voluntary work, such as Linux. This paper studies the past 10 years of patch reviews of the Linux memory management subsystem to characterize the challenges involved in patch reviewing at scale. Our study reveals that the review process is still primarily reliant on human effort despite a wide-range of automatic checking tools. Although kernel developers strive to review all patch proposals, they struggle to keep up with the increasing volume of submissions and depend significantly on a few developers for these reviews. To help scale the patch review process, we introduce FLINT, a patch validation system framework that synthesizes insights from past discussions among developers and automatically analyzes patch proposals for compliance. FLINT employs a rule-based analysis informed by past discussions among developers and an LLM that does not require training or fine-tuning on new data, and can continuously improve with minimum human effort. FLINT uses a multi-stage approach to efficiently distill the essential information from past discussions. Later, when a patch proposal needs review, FLINT retrieves the relevant validation rules for validation and generates a reference-backed report that developers can easily interpret and validate. FLINT targets bugs that traditional tools find hard to detect, ranging from maintainability issues, e.g., design choices and naming conventions, to complex concurrency issues, e.g., deadlocks and data races. FLINT detected 2 new issues in Linux v6.18 development cycle and 7 issues in previous versions. FLINT achieves 21% and 14% of higher ground-truth coverage on concurrency bugs than the baseline with LLM only. Moreover, FLINT achieves a 35% false positive rate, which is lower than the baseline.

62. GoldiCLIP: The Goldilocks Approach for Balancing Explicit Supervision for Language-Image Pretraining

Authors: Deen Dayal Mohan , Hossein Souri , Vitali Petsiuk , Juhong Min , Gopal Sharma , Luowei Zhou , Suren Kumar
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24804
Abstract:

Until recently, the success of large-scale vision-language models (VLMs) has primarily relied on billion-sample datasets, posing a significant barrier to progress. Latest works have begun to close this gap by improving supervision quality, but each addresses only a subset of the weaknesses in contrastive pretraining. We present GoldiCLIP, a framework built on a Goldilocks principle of finding the right balance of supervision signals. Our multifaceted training framework synergistically combines three key innovations: (1) a text-conditioned self-distillation method to align both text-agnostic and text-conditioned features; (2) an encoder integrated decoder with Visual Question Answering (VQA) objective that enables the encoder to generalize beyond the caption-like queries; and (3) an uncertainty-based weighting mechanism that automatically balances all heterogeneous losses. Trained on just 30 million images, 300x less data than leading methods, GoldiCLIP achieves state-of-the-art among data-efficient approaches, improving over the best comparable baseline by 2.2 points on MSCOCO retrieval, 2.0 on fine-grained retrieval, and 5.9 on question-based retrieval, while remaining competitive with billion-scale models. Project page: this https URL .

63. From Untestable to Testable: Metamorphic Testing in the Age of LLMs

Authors: Valerio Terragni
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24774
Abstract:

This article discusses the challenges of testing software systems with increasingly integrated AI and LLM functionalities. LLMs are powerful but unreliable, and labeled ground truth for testing rarely scales. Metamorphic Testing solves this by turning relations among multiple test executions into executable test oracles.

64. Evaluating Fine-Tuned LLM Model For Medical Transcription With Small Low-Resource Languages Validated Dataset

Authors: Mohammed Nowshad Ruhani Chowdhury , Mohammed Nowaz Rabbani Chowdhury , Sakari Lukkarinen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24772
Abstract:

Clinical documentation is a critical factor for patient safety, diagnosis, and continuity of care. The administrative burden of EHRs is a significant factor in physician burnout. This is a critical issue for low-resource languages, including Finnish. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a domain-aligned natural language processing (NLP); large language model for medical transcription in Finnish by fine-tuning LLaMA 3.1-8B on a small validated corpus of simulated clinical conversations by students at Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. The fine-tuning process for medical transcription used a controlled preprocessing and optimization approach. The fine-tuning effectiveness was evaluated by sevenfold cross-validation. The evaluation metrics for fine-tuned LLaMA 3.1-8B were BLEU = 0.1214, ROUGE-L = 0.4982, and BERTScore F1 = 0.8230. The results showed a low n-gram overlap but a strong semantic similarity with reference transcripts. This study indicate that fine-tuning can be an effective approach for translation of medical discourse in spoken Finnish and support the feasibility of fine-tuning a privacy-oriented domain-specific large language model for clinical documentation in Finnish. Beside that provide directions for future work.

65. Scalable Object Relation Encoding for Better 3D Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models

Authors: Shengli Zhou , Minghang Zheng , Feng Zheng , Yang Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24721
Abstract:

Spatial reasoning focuses on locating target objects based on spatial relations in 3D scenes, which plays a crucial role in developing intelligent embodied agents. Due to the limited availability of 3D scene-language paired data, it is challenging to train models with strong reasoning ability from scratch. Previous approaches have attempted to inject 3D scene representations into the input space of Large Language Models (LLMs) and leverage the pretrained comprehension and reasoning abilities for spatial reasoning. However, models encoding absolute positions struggle to extract spatial relations from prematurely fused features, while methods explicitly encoding all spatial relations (which is quadratic in the number of objects) as input tokens suffer from poor scalability. To address these limitations, we propose QuatRoPE, a novel positional embedding method with an input length that is linear to the number of objects, and explicitly calculates pairwise spatial relations through the dot product in attention layers. QuatRoPE’s holistic vector encoding of 3D coordinates guarantees a high degree of spatial consistency, maintaining fidelity to the scene’s geometric integrity. Additionally, we introduce the Isolated Gated RoPE Extension (IGRE), which effectively limits QuatRoPE’s influence to object-related tokens, thereby minimizing interference with the LLM’s existing positional embeddings and maintaining the LLM’s original capabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approaches. The code and data are available at this https URL .

66. Experiential Reflective Learning for Self-Improving LLM Agents

Authors: Marc-Antoine Allard , Arnaud Teinturier , Victor Xing , Gautier Viaud
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24639
Abstract:

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled the development of autonomous agents capable of complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving. However, these agents struggle to adapt to specialized environments and do not leverage past interactions, approaching each new task from scratch regardless of their accumulated experience. We introduce Experiential Reflective Learning (ERL), a simple self-improvement framework that enables rapid environment adaptation through experiential learning. ERL reflects on task trajectories and outcomes to generate heuristics, capturing actionable lessons that transfer across tasks. At test time, relevant heuristics are retrieved based on the current task and injected into the agent’s context to guide execution. On the Gaia2 benchmark, ERL improves success rate by 7.8% over a ReAct baseline, with large gains in task completion reliability, and outperforms prior experiential learning methods. Through systematic ablations, we find that selective retrieval is essential and that heuristics provide more transferable abstractions than few-shot trajectory prompting. These results demonstrate that reflecting on single-attempt experiences to extract transferable heuristics enables effective agent self-improvement.

67. Sketch2Simulation: Automating Flowsheet Generation via Multi Agent Large Language Models

Authors: Abdullah Bahamdan , Emma Pajak , John D. Hedengren , Antonio del Rio Chanona
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24629
Abstract:

Converting process sketches into executable simulation models remains a major bottleneck in process systems engineering, requiring substantial manual effort and simulator-specific expertise. Recent advances in generative AI have improved both engineering-diagram interpretation and LLM-assisted flowsheet generation, but these remain largely disconnected: diagram-understanding methods often stop at extracted graphs, while text-to-simulation workflows assume structured inputs rather than raw visual artifacts. To bridge this gap, we present an end-to-end multi-agent large language model system that converts process diagrams directly into executable Aspen HYSYS flowsheets. The framework decomposes the task into three coordinated layers: diagram parsing and interpretation, simulation model synthesis, and multi-level validation. Specialized agents handle visual interpretation, graph-based intermediate representation construction, code generation for the HYSYS COM interface, execution, and structural verification. We evaluate the framework on four chemical engineering case studies of increasing complexity, from a simple desalting process to an industrial aromatic production flowsheet with multiple recycle loops. The system produces executable HYSYS models in all cases, achieving complete structural fidelity on the two simpler cases and strong performance on the more complex ones, with connection consistency above 0.93 and stream consistency above 0.96. These results demonstrate a viable end-to-end sketch-to-simulation workflow while highlighting remaining challenges in dense recycle structures, implicit diagram semantics, and simulator-interface constraints.

Authors: Di Cao , Dongjie Fu , Hai Yu , Siqi Zheng , Xu Tan , Tao Jin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24596
Abstract:

While the shift from cascaded dialogue systems to end-to-end (E2E) speech Large Language Models (LLMs) improves latency and paralinguistic modeling, E2E models often exhibit a significant performance degradation compared to their text-based counterparts. The standard Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) training methods fail to close this gap. To address this, we propose X-OPD, a novel Cross-Modal On-Policy Distillation framework designed to systematically align the capabilities of Speech LLMs to their text-based counterparts. X-OPD enables the Speech LLM to explore its own distribution via on-policy rollouts, where a text-based teacher model evaluates these trajectories and provides token-level feedback, effectively distilling teacher’s capabilities into student’s multi-modal representations. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that X-OPD significantly narrows the gap in complex tasks while preserving the model’s inherent capabilities.

69. Model2Kernel: Model-Aware Symbolic Execution For Safe CUDA Kernels

Authors: Mengting He , Shihao Xia , Haomin Jia , Wenfei Wu , Linhai Song
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24595
Abstract:

The widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) has made GPU-accelerated inference a critical part of modern computing infrastructure. Production inference systems rely on CUDA kernels to implement core transformer operations, yet these kernels are highly susceptible to memory-safety bugs due to model-dependent tensor layouts, intricate memory indexing, and massive thread-level parallelism. Such bugs can corrupt model weights, crash inference services, or even enable adversarial attacks. Existing techniques either depend on unavailable hardware, incur high overhead, or fail to handle kernel inputs with variable lengths, and none can effectively detect CUDA memory bugs in LLM inference systems. This paper presents Model2Kernel, the first practical system for automatically verifying the memory safety of CUDA kernels used in LLM inference. Model2Kernel performs model-aware dynamic analysis to determine how each model invokes kernels and to classify kernel arguments as either fixed by the model architecture or controlled by model users. Using this information, Model2Kernel then applies CUDA-specialized symbolic execution, supported by new abstractions for dynamic tensor memory and thread identifiers, to accurately pinpoint memory bugs in kernels. In the evaluation on CUDA kernels and models from vLLM, Hugging Face, and recent LLM research papers, Model2Kernel discovers 353 previously unknown bugs while producing only nine false positives, demonstrating its effectiveness.

70. Malicious LLM-Based Conversational AI Makes Users Reveal Personal Information

Authors: Xiao Zhan , Juan Carlos Carrillo , William Seymour , Jose Such
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11680
Abstract:

LLM-based Conversational AIs (CAIs), also known as GenAI chatbots, like ChatGPT, are increasingly used across various domains, but they pose privacy risks, as users may disclose personal information during their conversations with CAIs. Recent research has demonstrated that LLM-based CAIs could be used for malicious purposes. However, a novel and particularly concerning type of malicious LLM application remains unexplored: an LLM-based CAI that is deliberately designed to extract personal information from users. In this paper, we report on the malicious LLM-based CAIs that we created based on system prompts that used different strategies to encourage disclosures of personal information from users. We systematically investigate CAIs’ ability to extract personal information from users during conversations by conducting a randomized-controlled trial with 502 participants. We assess the effectiveness of different malicious and benign CAIs to extract personal information from participants, and we analyze participants’ perceptions after their interactions with the CAIs. Our findings reveal that malicious CAIs extract significantly more personal information than benign CAIs, with strategies based on the social nature of privacy being the most effective while minimizing perceived risks. This study underscores the privacy threats posed by this novel type of malicious LLM-based CAIs and provides actionable recommendations to guide future research and practice.

LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-03-27

1. Training the Knowledge Base through Evidence Distillation and Write-Back Enrichment

2. Is Mathematical Problem-Solving Expertise in Large Language Models Associated with Assessment Performance?

3. EcoThink: A Green Adaptive Inference Framework for Sustainable and Accessible Agents

4. Cross-Model Disagreement as a Label-Free Correctness Signal

5. Beyond Content Safety: Real-Time Monitoring for Reasoning Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models

6. Evaluating Language Models for Harmful Manipulation

7. DAGverse: Building Document-Grounded Semantic DAGs from Scientific Papers

8. SliderQuant: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for LLMs

9. Trace2Skill: Distill Trajectory-Local Lessons into Transferable Agent Skills

10. RubricEval: A Rubric-Level Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Judges in Instruction Following

11. ElephantBroker: A Knowledge-Grounded Cognitive Runtime for Trustworthy AI Agents

12. Sparse Visual Thought Circuits in Vision-Language Models

13. Mechanistically Interpreting Compression in Vision-Language Models

14. From Stateless to Situated: Building a Psychological World for LLM-Based Emotional Support

15. The Anatomy of Uncertainty in LLMs

16. Can MLLMs Read Students’ Minds? Unpacking Multimodal Error Analysis in Handwritten Math

17. Shopping with a Platform AI Assistant: Who Adopts, When in the Journey, and What For

18. FinMCP-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use under the Model Context Protocol

19. LogitScope: A Framework for Analyzing LLM Uncertainty Through Information Metrics

20. How Far Are Vision-Language Models from Constructing the Real World? A Benchmark for Physical Generative Reasoning

21. ReLope: KL-Regularized LoRA Probes for Multimodal LLM Routing

22. Supervising Ralph Wiggum: Exploring a Metacognitive Co-Regulation Agentic AI Loop for Engineering Design

23. Formal Semantics for Agentic Tool Protocols: A Process Calculus Approach

24. AutoSAM: an Agentic Framework for Automating Input File Generation for the SAM Code with Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation

25. When Is Collective Intelligence a Lottery? Multi-Agent Scaling Laws for Memetic Drift in LLMs

26. The Kitchen Loop: User-Spec-Driven Development for a Self-Evolving Codebase

27. Measuring What Matters – or What’s Convenient?: Robustness of LLM-Based Scoring Systems to Construct-Irrelevant Factors

28. A Mentalistic Interface for Probing Folk-Psychological Attribution to Non-Humanoid Robots

29. Beyond Via: Analysis and Estimation of the Impact of Large Language Models in Academic Papers

30. Demographic Fairness in Multimodal LLMs: A Benchmark of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in Face Verification

31. Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes

32. Shape and Substance: Dual-Layer Side-Channel Attacks on Local Vision-Language Models

33. GlowQ: Group-Shared LOw-Rank Approximation for Quantized LLMs

34. Adaptive Chunking: Optimizing Chunking-Method Selection for RAG

35. How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models

36. AD-CARE: A Guideline-grounded, Modality-agnostic LLM Agent for Real-world Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis with Multi-cohort Assessment, Fairness Analysis, and Reader Study

37. CRAFT: Grounded Multi-Agent Coordination Under Partial Information

38. MolQuest: A Benchmark for Agentic Evaluation of Abductive Reasoning in Chemical Structure Elucidation

39. Activation Matters: Test-time Activated Negative Labels for OOD Detection with Vision-Language Models

40. FluxEDA: A Unified Execution Infrastructure for Stateful Agentic EDA

41. WebTestBench: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents towards End-to-End Automated Web Testing

42. A Decade-Scale Benchmark Evaluating LLMs’ Clinical Practice Guidelines Detection and Adherence in Multi-turn Conversations

43. Probing the Lack of Stable Internal Beliefs in LLMs

44. Train at Moving Edge: Online-Verified Prompt Selection for Efficient RL Training of Large Reasoning Model

45. PIDP-Attack: Combining Prompt Injection with Database Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

46. Photon: Speedup Volume Understanding with Efficient Multimodal Large Language Models

47. Factors Influencing the Quality of AI-Generated Code: A Synthesis of Empirical Evidence

48. Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory

49. Large Language Models as Optimization Controllers: Adaptive Continuation for SIMP Topology Optimization

50. TopoPilot: Reliable Conversational Workflow Automation for Topological Data Analysis and Visualization

51. The System Prompt Is the Attack Surface: How LLM Agent Configuration Shapes Security and Creates Exploitable Vulnerabilities

52. Closing the Confidence-Faithfulness Gap in Large Language Models

53. Imperative Interference: Social Register Shapes Instruction Topology in Large Language Models

54. Learning Rollout from Sampling:An R1-Style Tokenized Traffic Simulation Model

55. Rethinking Health Agents: From Siloed AI to Collaborative Decision Mediators

56. Self-Corrected Image Generation with Explainable Latent Rewards

57. Toward domain-specific machine translation and quality estimation systems

58. Evaluating adaptive and generative AI-based feedback and recommendations in a knowledge-graph-integrated programming learning system

59. NeuroVLM-Bench: Evaluation of Vision-Enabled Large Language Models for Clinical Reasoning in Neurological Disorders

60. Reaching Beyond the Mode: RL for Distributional Reasoning in Language Models

61. Learning From Developers: Towards Reliable Patch Validation at Scale for Linux

62. GoldiCLIP: The Goldilocks Approach for Balancing Explicit Supervision for Language-Image Pretraining

63. From Untestable to Testable: Metamorphic Testing in the Age of LLMs

64. Evaluating Fine-Tuned LLM Model For Medical Transcription With Small Low-Resource Languages Validated Dataset

65. Scalable Object Relation Encoding for Better 3D Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models

66. Experiential Reflective Learning for Self-Improving LLM Agents

67. Sketch2Simulation: Automating Flowsheet Generation via Multi Agent Large Language Models

68. X-OPD: Cross-Modal On-Policy Distillation for Capability Alignment in Speech LLMs

69. Model2Kernel: Model-Aware Symbolic Execution For Safe CUDA Kernels

70. Malicious LLM-Based Conversational AI Makes Users Reveal Personal Information