LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-03-24

1. MARCUS: An agentic, multimodal vision-language model for cardiac diagnosis and management

Authors: Jack W O’Sullivan , Mohammad Asadi , Lennart Elbe , Akshay Chaudhari , Tahoura Nedaee , Francois Haddad , Michael Salerno , Li Fe-Fei , Ehsan Adeli , Rima Arnaout , Euan A Ashley
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22179
Abstract:

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of global mortality, with progress hindered by human interpretation of complex cardiac tests. Current AI vision-language models are limited to single-modality inputs and are non-interactive. We present MARCUS (Multimodal Autonomous Reasoning and Chat for Ultrasound and Signals), an agentic vision-language system for end-to-end interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs), echocardiograms, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) independently and as multimodal input. MARCUS employs a hierarchical agentic architecture comprising modality-specific vision-language expert models, each integrating domain-trained visual encoders with multi-stage language model optimization, coordinated by a multimodal orchestrator. Trained on 13.5 million images (0.25M ECGs, 1.3M echocardiogram images, 12M CMR images) and our novel expert-curated dataset spanning 1.6 million questions, MARCUS achieves state-of-the-art performance surpassing frontier models (GPT-5 Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro Deep Think). Across internal (Stanford) and external (UCSF) test cohorts, MARCUS achieves accuracies of 87-91% for ECG, 67-86% for echocardiography, and 85-88% for CMR, outperforming frontier models by 34-45% (P<0.001). On multimodal cases, MARCUS achieved 70% accuracy, nearly triple that of frontier models (22-28%), with 1.7-3.0x higher free-text quality scores. Our agentic architecture also confers resistance to mirage reasoning, whereby vision-language models derive reasoning from unintended textual signals or hallucinated visual content. MARCUS demonstrates that domain-specific visual encoders with an agentic orchestrator enable multimodal cardiac interpretation. We release our models, code, and benchmark open-source.

2. GSEM: Graph-based Self-Evolving Memory for Experience Augmented Clinical Reasoning

Authors: Xiao Han , Yuzheng Fan , Sendong Zhao , Haochun Wang , Bing Qin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22096
Abstract:

Clinical decision-making agents can benefit from reusing prior decision experience. However, many memory-augmented methods store experiences as independent records without explicit relational structure, which may introduce noisy retrieval, unreliable reuse, and in some cases even hurt performance compared to direct LLM inference. We propose GSEM (Graph-based Self-Evolving Memory), a clinical memory framework that organizes clinical experiences into a dual-layer memory graph, capturing both the decision structure within each experience and the relational dependencies across experiences, and supporting applicability-aware retrieval and online feedback-driven calibration of node quality and edge weights. Across MedR-Bench and MedAgentsBench with two LLM backbones, GSEM achieves the highest average accuracy among all baselines, reaching 70.90\% and 69.24\% with DeepSeek-V3.2 and Qwen3.5-35B, respectively. Code is available at this https URL .

3. A Context Engineering Framework for Improving Enterprise AI Agents based on Digital-Twin MDP

Authors: Xi Yang , Aurelie Lozano , Naoki Abe , Bhavya , Saurabh Jha , Noah Zheutlin , Rohan R. Arora , Yu Deng , Daby M. Sow
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22083
Abstract:

Despite rapid progress in AI agents for enterprise automation and decision-making, their real-world deployment and further performance gains remain constrained by limited data quality and quantity, complex real-world reasoning demands, difficulties with self-play, and the lack of reliable feedback signals. To address these challenges, we propose a lightweight, model-agnostic framework for improving LLM-based enterprise agents via offline reinforcement learning (RL). The proposed Context Engineering via DT-MDP (DT-MDP-CE) framework comprises three key components: (1) A Digital-Twin Markov Decision Process (DT-MDP), which abstracts the agent’s reasoning behavior as a finite MDP; (2) A robust contrastive inverse RL, which, armed with the DT-MDP, to efficiently estimate a well-founded reward function and induces policies from mixed-quality offline trajectories; and (3) RL-guided context engineering, which uses the policy obtained from the integrated process of (1) and (2), to improve the agent’s decision-making behavior. As a case study, we apply the framework to a representative task in the enterprise-oriented domain of IT automation. Extensive experimental results demonstrate consistent and significant improvements over baseline agents across a wide range of evaluation settings, suggesting that the framework can generalize to other agents sharing similar characteristics in enterprise environments.

4. Reasoning or Rhetoric? An Empirical Analysis of Moral Reasoning Explanations in Large Language Models

Authors: Aryan Kasat , Smriti Singh , Aman Chadha , Vinija Jain
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21854
Abstract:

Do large language models reason morally, or do they merely sound like they do? We investigate whether LLM responses to moral dilemmas exhibit genuine developmental progression through Kohlberg’s stages of moral development, or whether alignment training instead produces reasoning-like outputs that superficially resemble mature moral judgment without the underlying developmental trajectory. Using an LLM-as-judge scoring pipeline validated across three judge models, we classify more than 600 responses from 13 LLMs spanning a range of architectures, parameter scales, and training regimes across six classical moral dilemmas, and conduct ten complementary analyses to characterize the nature and internal coherence of the resulting patterns. Our results reveal a striking inversion: responses overwhelmingly correspond to post-conventional reasoning (Stages 5-6) regardless of model size, architecture, or prompting strategy, the effective inverse of human developmental norms, where Stage 4 dominates. Most strikingly, a subset of models exhibit moral decoupling: systematic inconsistency between stated moral justification and action choice, a form of logical incoherence that persists across scale and prompting strategy and represents a direct reasoning consistency failure independent of rhetorical sophistication. Model scale carries a statistically significant but practically small effect; training type has no significant independent main effect; and models exhibit near-robotic cross-dilemma consistency producing logically indistinguishable responses across semantically distinct moral problems. We posit that these patterns constitute evidence for moral ventriloquism: the acquisition, through alignment training, of the rhetorical conventions of mature moral reasoning without the underlying developmental trajectory those conventions are meant to represent.

5. The Presupposition Problem in Representation Genesis

Authors: Yiling Wu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21745
Abstract:

Large language models are the first systems to achieve high cognitive performance without clearly undergoing representation genesis: the transition from a non-representing physical system to one whose states guide behavior in a content-sensitive way. Prior cognitive systems had already made this transition before we could examine it, and philosophy of mind treated genesis as a background condition rather than an explanatory target. LLMs provide a case that does not clearly involve this transition, making the genesis question newly urgent: if genesis did not occur, which cognitive capacities are affected, and why? We currently lack the conceptual resources to answer this. The reason, this paper argues, is structural. Major frameworks in philosophy of mind, including the Language of Thought hypothesis, teleosemantics, predictive processing, enactivism, and genetic phenomenology, share a common feature when applied to the genesis question: at some explanatory step, each deploys concepts whose explanatory purchase depends on the system already being organized as a representer. This pattern, which we call the Representation Presupposition structure, generates systematic explanatory deferral. Attempts to explain the first acquisition of content-manipulable representation within the existing categorical vocabulary import resources from the representational side of the transition itself. We call this the Representation Regress. The paper offers a conceptual diagnosis rather than a new theory, establishing the structure of the problem and deriving two minimum adequacy conditions for any account that avoids this pattern. LLMs make the absence of such a theory consequential rather than merely theoretical.

6. EvoIdeator: Evolving Scientific Ideas through Checklist-Grounded Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Andreas Sauter , Yuyue Zhao , Jacopo Urbani , Wenxiang Hu , Zaiqiao Meng , Lun Zhou , Xiaohui Yan , Yougang Lyu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21728
Abstract:

Scientific idea generation is a cornerstone of autonomous knowledge discovery, yet the iterative evolution required to transform initial concepts into high-quality research proposals remains a formidable challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigms often rely on rubric-based scalar rewards that provide global quality scores but lack actionable granularity. Conversely, language-based refinement methods are typically confined to inference-time prompting, targeting models that are not explicitly optimized to internalize such critiques. To bridge this gap, we propose \textbf{EvoIdeator}, a framework that facilitates the evolution of scientific ideas by aligning the RL training objective with \textbf{checklist-grounded feedback}. EvoIdeator leverages a structured judge model to generate two synergistic signals: (1) \emph{lexicographic rewards} for multi-dimensional optimization, and (2) \emph{fine-grained language feedback} that offers span-level critiques regarding grounding, feasibility, and methodological rigor. By integrating these signals into the RL loop, we condition the policy to systematically utilize precise feedback during both optimization and inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EvoIdeator, built on Qwen3-4B, significantly outperforms much larger frontier models across key scientific metrics. Crucially, the learned policy exhibits strong generalization to diverse external feedback sources without further fine-tuning, offering a scalable and rigorous path toward self-refining autonomous ideation.

7. CurvZO: Adaptive Curvature-Guided Sparse Zeroth-Order Optimization for Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning

Authors: Shuo Wang , Ziyu Chen , Ming Tang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21725
Abstract:

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with backpropagation achieves high performance but incurs substantial memory overhead, limiting scalability on resource-constrained hardware. Zeroth-order (ZO) optimization provides a memory-efficient alternative by relying solely on forward passes, yet it typically suffers from slow or unstable convergence due to high-variance gradient estimates. Sparse ZO updates partially address this issue by perturbing only a subset of parameters, but their effectiveness hinges on selecting informative parameters, which is challenging in ZO optimization because each query yields only scalar feedback. We propose \textbf{Adaptive Curvature-Guided Sparse Zeroth-Order Optimization (CurvZO)}, which tracks curvature signals online from scalar ZO feedback and leverages these signals to construct a parameter-wise sampling distribution for selecting coordinates at each update, reducing the variance of the sparse ZO gradient estimator. Moreover, CurvZO dynamically adapts the perturbation budget to the evolving curvature signal distribution, yielding sparse ZO updates that remain both focused and sufficiently exploratory. Extensive experiments on OPT and Llama across diverse NLP tasks show that CurvZO consistently improves fine-tuning performance and reduces training time over ZO baselines. It improves accuracy by up to 4.4 points and achieves up to a $2\times$ speedup, while preserving memory efficiency.

8. Compensating Visual Insufficiency with Stratified Language Guidance for Long-Tail Class Incremental Learning

Authors: Xi Wang , Xu Yang , Donghao Sun , Cheng Deng
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21708
Abstract:

Long-tail class incremental learning (LT CIL) remains highly challenging because the scarcity of samples in tail classes not only hampers their learning but also exacerbates catastrophic forgetting under continuously evolving and imbalanced data distributions. To tackle these issues, we exploit the informativeness and scalability of language knowledge. Specifically, we analyze the LT CIL data distribution to guide large language models (LLMs) in generating a stratified language tree that hierarchically organizes semantic information from coarse to fine grained granularity. Building upon this structure, we introduce stratified adaptive language guidance, which leverages learnable weights to merge multi-scale semantic representations, thereby enabling dynamic supervisory adjustment for tail classes and alleviating the impact of data imbalance. Furthermore, we introduce stratified alignment language guidance, which exploits the structural stability of the language tree to constrain optimization and reinforce semantic visual alignment, thereby alleviating catastrophic forgetting. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves state of the art performance.

9. MIND: Multi-agent inference for negotiation dialogue in travel planning

Authors: Hunmin Do , Taejun Yoon , Kiyong Jung
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21696
Abstract:

While Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) research has advanced, its efficacy in coordinating complex stakeholder interests such as travel planning remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose MIND (Multi-agent Inference for Negotiation Dialogue), a framework designed to simulate realistic consensus-building among travelers with heterogeneous preferences. Grounded in the Theory of Mind (ToM), MIND introduces a Strategic Appraisal phase that infers opponent willingness (w) from linguistic nuances with 90.2% accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that MIND outperforms traditional MAD frameworks, achieving a 20.5% improvement in High-w Hit and a 30.7% increase in Debate Hit-Rate, effectively prioritizing high-stakes constraints. Furthermore, qualitative evaluations via LLM-as-a-Judge confirm that MIND surpasses baselines in Rationality (68.8%) and Fluency (72.4%), securing an overall win rate of 68.3%. These findings validate that MIND effectively models human negotiation dynamics to derive persuasive consensus.

10. Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain

Authors: Mohammad Asadi , Tahoura Nedaee , Jack W. O’Sullivan , Euan Ashley , Ehsan Adeli
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21693
Abstract:

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for medical Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they remain prone to hallucinations, defined as generating responses that contradict the input image, posing serious risks in clinical settings. Current hallucination detection methods, such as Semantic Entropy (SE) and Vision-Amplified Semantic Entropy (VASE), require 10 to 20 stochastic generations per sample together with an external natural language inference model for semantic clustering, making them computationally expensive and difficult to deploy in practice. We observe that hallucinated responses exhibit a distinctive signature directly in the model’s own log-probabilities: inconsistent token-level confidence and weak sensitivity to visual evidence. Based on this observation, we propose Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain (CEBaG), a deterministic hallucination detection method that requires no stochastic sampling, no external models, and no task-specific hyperparameters. CEBaG combines two complementary signals: token-level predictive variance, which captures inconsistent confidence across response tokens, and evidence magnitude, which measures how much the image shifts per-token predictions relative to text-only inference. Evaluated across four medical MLLMs and three VQA benchmarks (16 experimental settings), CEBaG achieves the highest AUC in 13 of 16 settings and improves over VASE by 8 AUC points on average, while being fully deterministic and self-contained. The code will be made available upon acceptance.

11. AI Token Futures Market: Commoditization of Compute and Derivatives Contract Design

Authors: Yicai Xing
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21690
Abstract:

As large language models (LLMs) and vision-language-action models (VLAs) become widely deployed, the tokens consumed by AI inference are evolving into a new type of commodity. This paper systematically analyzes the commodity attributes of tokens, arguing for their transition from intelligent service outputs to compute infrastructure raw materials, and draws comparisons with established commodities such as electricity, carbon emission allowances, and bandwidth. Building on the historical experience of electricity futures markets and the theory of commodity financialization, we propose a complete design for standardized token futures contracts, including the definition of a Standard Inference Token (SIT), contract specifications, settlement mechanisms, margin systems, and market-maker regimes. By constructing a mean-reverting jump-diffusion stochastic process model and conducting Monte Carlo simulations, we evaluate the hedging efficiency of the proposed futures contracts for application-layer enterprises. Simulation results show that, under an application-layer demand explosion scenario, token futures can reduce enterprise compute cost volatility by 62%-78%. We also explore the feasibility of GPU compute futures and discuss the regulatory framework for token futures markets, providing a theoretical foundation and practical roadmap for the financialization of compute resources.

12. Mirage The Illusion of Visual Understanding

Authors: Mohammad Asadi , Jack W. O’Sullivan , Fang Cao , Tahoura Nedaee , Kamyar Fardi , Fei-Fei Li , Ehsan Adeli , Euan Ashley
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21687
Abstract:

Multimodal AI systems have achieved remarkable performance across a broad range of real-world tasks, yet the mechanisms underlying visual-language reasoning remain surprisingly poorly understood. We report three findings that challenge prevailing assumptions about how these systems process and integrate visual information. First, Frontier models readily generate detailed image descriptions and elaborate reasoning traces, including pathology-biased clinical findings, for images never provided; we term this phenomenon mirage reasoning. Second, without any image input, models also attain strikingly high scores across general and medical multimodal benchmarks, bringing into question their utility and design. In the most extreme case, our model achieved the top rank on a standard chest X-ray question-answering benchmark without access to any images. Third, when models were explicitly instructed to guess answers without image access, rather than being implicitly prompted to assume images were present, performance declined markedly. Explicit guessing appears to engage a more conservative response regime, in contrast to the mirage regime in which models behave as though images have been provided. These findings expose fundamental vulnerabilities in how visual-language models reason and are evaluated, pointing to an urgent need for private benchmarks that eliminate textual cues enabling non-visual inference, particularly in medical contexts where miscalibrated AI carries the greatest consequence. We introduce B-Clean as a principled solution for fair, vision-grounded evaluation of multimodal AI systems.

13. Silicon Bureaucracy and AI Test-Oriented Education: Contamination Sensitivity and Score Confidence in LLM Benchmarks

Authors: Yiliang Song , Hongjun An , Jiangan Chen , Xuanchen Yan , Huan Song , Jiawei Shao , Xuelong Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21636
Abstract:

Public benchmarks increasingly govern how large language models (LLMs) are ranked, selected, and deployed. We frame this benchmark-centered regime as Silicon Bureaucracy and AI Test-Oriented Education, and argue that it rests on a fragile assumption: that benchmark scores directly reflect genuine generalization. In practice, however, such scores may conflate exam-oriented competence with principled capability, especially when contamination and semantic leakage are difficult to exclude from modern training pipelines. We therefore propose an audit framework for analyzing contamination sensitivity and score confidence in LLM benchmarks. Using a router-worker setup, we compare a clean-control condition with noisy conditions in which benchmark problems are systematically deleted, rewritten, and perturbed before being passed downstream. For a genuinely clean benchmark, noisy conditions should not consistently outperform the clean-control baseline. Yet across multiple models, we find widespread but heterogeneous above-baseline gains under noisy conditions, indicating that benchmark-related cues may be reassembled and can reactivate contamination-related memory. These results suggest that similar benchmark scores may carry substantially different levels of confidence. Rather than rejecting benchmarks altogether, we argue that benchmark-based evaluation should be supplemented with explicit audits of contamination sensitivity and score confidence.

14. EnterpriseLab: A Full-Stack Platform for developing and deploying agents in Enterprises

Authors: Ankush Agarwal , Harsh Vishwakarma , Suraj Nagaje , Chaitanya Devaguptapu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21630
Abstract:

Deploying AI agents in enterprise environments requires balancing capability with data sovereignty and cost constraints. While small language models offer privacy-preserving alternatives to frontier models, their specialization is hindered by fragmented development pipelines that separate tool integration, data generation, and training. We introduce EnterpriseLab, a full-stack platform that unifies these stages into a closed-loop framework. EnterpriseLab provides (1) a modular environment exposing enterprise applications via Model Context Protocol, enabling seamless integration of proprietary and open-source tools; (2) automated trajectory synthesis that programmatically generates training data from environment schemas; and (3) integrated training pipelines with continuous evaluation. We validate the platform through EnterpriseArena, an instantiation with 15 applications and 140+ tools across IT, HR, sales, and engineering domains. Our results demonstrate that 8B-parameter models trained within EnterpriseLab match GPT-4o’s performance on complex enterprise workflows while reducing inference costs by 8-10x, and remain robust across diverse enterprise benchmarks, including EnterpriseBench (+10%) and CRMArena (+10%). EnterpriseLab provides enterprises a practical path to deploying capable, privacy-preserving agents without compromising operational capability.

15. A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment

Authors: Sheng Liu , Long Chen , Zeyun Zhao , Qinglin Gou , Qingyue Wei , Arjun Masurkar , Kevin M. Spiegler , Philip Kuball , Stefania C. Bray , Megan Bernath , Deanna R. Willis , Jiang Bian , Lei Xing , Eric Topol , Kyunghyun Cho , Yu Huang , Ruogu Fang , Narges Razavian , James Zou
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21597
Abstract:

Modern clinical practice increasingly depends on reasoning over heterogeneous, evolving, and incomplete patient data. Although recent advances in multimodal foundation models have improved performance on various clinical tasks, most existing models remain static, opaque, and poorly aligned with real-world clinical workflows. We present Cerebra, an interactive multi-agent AI team that coordinates specialized agents for EHR, clinical notes, and medical imaging analysis. These outputs are synthesized into a clinician-facing dashboard that combines visual analytics with a conversational interface, enabling clinicians to interrogate predictions and contextualize risk at the point of care. Cerebra supports privacy-preserving deployment by operating on structured representations and remains robust when modalities are incomplete. We evaluated Cerebra using a massive multi-institutional dataset spanning 3 million patients from four independent healthcare systems. Cerebra consistently outperformed both state-of-the-art single-modality models and large multimodal language model baselines. In dementia risk prediction, it achieved AUROCs up to 0.80, compared with 0.74 for the strongest single-modality model and 0.68 for language model baselines. For dementia diagnosis, it achieved an AUROC of 0.86, and for survival prediction, a C-index of 0.81. In a reader study with experienced physicians, Cerebra significantly improved expert performance, increasing accuracy by 17.5 percentage points in prospective dementia risk estimation. These results demonstrate Cerebra’s potential for interpretable, robust decision support in clinical care.

16. Mind over Space: Can Multimodal Large Language Models Mentally Navigate?

Authors: Qihui Zhu , Shouwei Ruan , Xiao Yang , Hao Jiang , Yao Huang , Shiji Zhao , Hanwei Fan , Hang Su , Xingxing Wei
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21577
Abstract:

Despite the widespread adoption of MLLMs in embodied agents, their capabilities remain largely confined to reactive planning from immediate observations, consistently failing in spatial reasoning across extensive spatiotemporal scales. Cognitive science reveals that Biological Intelligence (BI) thrives on “mental navigation”: the strategic construction of spatial representations from experience and the subsequent mental simulation of paths prior to action. To bridge the gap between AI and BI, we introduce Video2Mental, a pioneering benchmark for evaluating the mental navigation capabilities of MLLMs. The task requires constructing hierarchical cognitive maps from long egocentric videos and generating landmark-based path plans step by step, with planning accuracy verified through simulator-based physical interaction. Our benchmarking results reveal that mental navigation capability does not naturally emerge from standard pre-training. Frontier MLLMs struggle profoundly with zero-shot structured spatial representation, and their planning accuracy decays precipitously over extended horizons. To overcome this, we propose \textbf{NavMind}, a reasoning model that internalizes mental navigation using explicit, fine-grained cognitive maps as learnable intermediate representations. Through a difficulty-stratified progressive supervised fine-tuning paradigm, NavMind effectively bridges the gap between raw perception and structured planning. Experiments demonstrate that NavMind achieves superior mental navigation capabilities, significantly outperforming frontier commercial and spatial MLLMs.

17. Adaptive Robust Estimator for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Zhongyi Li , Wan Tian , Jingyu Chen , Kangyao Huang , Huiming Zhang , Hui Yang , Tao Ren , Jinyang Jiang , Yijie Peng , Yikun Ban , Fuzhen Zhuang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21574
Abstract:

Multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, yet it suffers from interaction-level ambiguity that blurs generation, critique, and revision, making credit assignment across agents difficult. Moreover, policy optimization in this setting is vulnerable to heavy-tailed and noisy rewards, which can bias advantage estimation and trigger unstable or even divergent training. To address both issues, we propose a robust multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for collaborative reasoning, consisting of two components: Dual-Agent Answer-Critique-Rewrite (DACR) and an Adaptive Robust Estimator (ARE). DACR decomposes reasoning into a structured three-stage pipeline: answer, critique, and rewrite, while enabling explicit attribution of each agent’s marginal contribution to its partner’s performance. ARE provides robust estimation of batch experience means during multi-agent policy optimization. Across mathematical reasoning and embodied intelligence benchmarks, even under noisy rewards, our method consistently outperforms the baseline in both homogeneous and heterogeneous settings. These results indicate stronger robustness to reward noise and more stable training dynamics, effectively preventing optimization failures caused by noisy reward signals.

18. Counterfactual Credit Policy Optimization for Multi-Agent Collaboration

Authors: Zhongyi Li , Wan Tian , Yikun Ban , Jinju Chen , Huiming Zhang , Yang Liu , Fuzhen Zhuang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21563
Abstract:

Collaborative multi-agent large language models (LLMs) can solve complex reasoning tasks by decomposing roles and aggregating diverse hypotheses. Yet, reinforcement learning (RL) for such systems is often undermined by credit assignment: a shared global reward obscures individual contributions, inflating update variance and encouraging free-riding. We introduce Counterfactual Credit Policy Optimization (CCPO), a framework that assigns agent-specific learning signals by estimating each agent’s marginal contribution through counterfactual trajectories. CCPO builds dynamic counterfactual baselines that simulate outcomes with an agent’s contribution removed, yielding role-sensitive advantages for policy optimization. To further improve stability under heterogeneous tasks and data distributions, we propose a global-history-aware normalization scheme that calibrates advantages using global rollout statistics. We evaluate CCPO on two collaboration topologies: a sequential Think–Reason dyad and multi-agent voting. Across mathematical and logical reasoning benchmarks, CCPO mitigates free-riding and outperforms strong multi-agent RL baselines, yielding finer-grained and more effective credit assignment for collaborative LLM training. Our code is available at this https URL .

19. DomAgent: Leveraging Knowledge Graphs and Case-Based Reasoning for Domain-Specific Code Generation

Authors: Shuai Wang , Dhasarathy Parthasarathy , Robert Feldt , Yinan Yu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21430
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in code generation. However, because most LLMs are trained on public domain corpora, directly applying them to real-world software development often yields low success rates, as these scenarios frequently require domain-specific knowledge. In particular, domain-specific tasks usually demand highly specialized solutions, which are often underrepresented or entirely absent in the training data of generic LLMs. To address this challenge, we propose DomAgent, an autonomous coding agent that bridges this gap by enabling LLMs to generate domain-adapted code through structured reasoning and targeted retrieval. A core component of DomAgent is DomRetriever, a novel retrieval module that emulates how humans learn domain-specific knowledge, by combining conceptual understanding with experiential examples. It dynamically integrates top-down knowledge-graph reasoning with bottom-up case-based reasoning, enabling iterative retrieval and synthesis of structured knowledge and representative cases to ensure contextual relevance and broad task coverage. DomRetriever can operate as part of DomAgent or independently with any LLM for flexible domain adaptation. We evaluate DomAgent on an open benchmark dataset in the data science domain (DS-1000) and further apply it to real-world truck software development tasks. Experimental results show that DomAgent significantly enhances domain-specific code generation, enabling small open-source models to close much of the performance gap with large proprietary LLMs in complex, real-world applications. The code is available at: this https URL .

20. Silent Commitment Failure in Instruction-Tuned Language Models: Evidence of Governability Divergence Across Architectures

Authors: Gregory M. Ruddell
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21415
Abstract:

As large language models are deployed as autonomous agents with tool execution privileges, a critical assumption underpins their security architecture: that model errors are detectable at runtime. We present empirical evidence that this assumption fails for two of three instruction-following models evaluable for conflict detection. We introduce governability – the degree to which a model’s errors are detectable before output commitment and correctable once detected – and demonstrate it varies dramatically across models. In six models across twelve reasoning domains, two of three instruction-following models exhibited silent commitment failure: confident, fluent, incorrect output with zero warning signal. The remaining model produced a detectable conflict signal 57 tokens before commitment under greedy decoding. We show benchmark accuracy does not predict governability, correction capacity varies independently of detection, and identical governance scaffolds produce opposite effects across models. A 2x2 experiment shows a 52x difference in spike ratio between architectures but only +/-0.32x variation from fine-tuning, suggesting governability is fixed at pretraining. We propose a Detection and Correction Matrix classifying model-task combinations into four regimes: Governable, Monitor Only, Steer Blind, and Ungovernable.

21. Persona Vectors in Games: Measuring and Steering Strategies via Activation Vectors

Authors: Johnathan Sun , Andrew Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21398
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous decision-makers in strategic settings, yet we have limited tools for understanding their high-level behavioral traits. We use activation steering methods in game-theoretic settings, constructing persona vectors for altruism, forgiveness, and expectations of others by contrastive activation addition. Evaluating on canonical games, we find that activation steering systematically shifts both quantitative strategic choices and natural-language justifications. However, we also observe that rhetoric and strategy can diverge under steering. In addition, vectors for self-behavior and expectations of others are partially distinct. Our results suggest that persona vectors offer a promising mechanistic handle on high-level traits in strategic environments.

22. AdaRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubrics for LLM Agent Evaluation

Authors: Liang Ding
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21362
Abstract:

LLM-as-Judge evaluation fails agent tasks because a fixed rubric cannot capture what matters for this task: code debugging demands Correctness and Error Handling; web navigation demands Goal Alignment and Action Efficiency. We present ADARUBRIC, which closes this gap by generating task-specific evaluation rubrics on the fly from task descriptions, scoring trajectories step-by-step with confidence-weighted per-dimension feedback, and filtering preference pairs with the novel DimensionAwareFilter - a provably necessary condition for preventing high-scoring dimensions from masking dimension-level failures. On WebArena and ToolBench, ADARUBRIC achieves Pearson r=0.79 human correlation (+0.16 over the best static baseline) with deployment-grade reliability (Krippendorff’s $\alpha$=0.83). DPO agents trained on ADARUBRIC preference pairs gain +6.8 to +8.5 pp task success over Prometheus across three benchmarks; gains transfer to SWE-bench code repair (+4.9 pp) and accelerate PPO convergence by +6.6 pp at 5K steps - both without any rubric engineering. Code: this https URL .

23. AgentHER: Hindsight Experience Replay for LLM Agent Trajectory Relabeling

Authors: Liang Ding
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21357
Abstract:

LLM agents fail on the majority of real-world tasks – GPT-4o succeeds on fewer than 15% of WebArena navigation tasks and below 55% pass@1 on ToolBench (Zhou et al., 2024; Qin et al., 2024) – yet every failed trajectory is routinely discarded, wasting the dominant source of collected experience. We introduce AgentHER, a framework that recovers this lost training signal by adapting the Hindsight Experience Replay (HER; Andrychowicz et al., 2017) principle to natural-language agent trajectories for offline data augmentation. The key insight is simple: a trajectory that fails goal A is often a correct demonstration for some achievable alternative goal B. AgentHER realises this idea through a four-stage pipeline – failure classification, outcome extraction, LLM-guided prompt relabeling with confidence gating, and data packaging – that converts discarded failures into high-quality SFT, DPO, and ShareGPT training data, with both zero-cost rule-based and LLM-judge implementations. On WebArena (Zhou et al., 2024) and ToolBench (Qin et al., 2024), AgentHER improves over success-only SFT by +7.1-11.7 pp across four model families (GPT-4o, Qwen2.5-72B/7B, LLaMA-3.1-8B), while achieving 2x data efficiency – matching baseline performance with only 50% of successful demonstrations. Gains are consistent from 1.5B to 72B parameters (+5.8-9.2 pp) and compound under iterative redeployment (+2.1 pp over additional rounds). Human evaluation confirms 97.7% relabeling precision under multi-judge verification.

24. RoboAlign: Learning Test-Time Reasoning for Language-Action Alignment in Vision-Language-Action Models

Authors: Dongyoung Kim , Sumin Park , Woomin Song , Seungku Kim , Taeyoung Kim , Huiwon Jang , Jinwoo Shin , Jaehyung Kim , Younggyo Seo
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21341
Abstract:

Improving embodied reasoning in multimodal-large-language models (MLLMs) is essential for building vision-language-action models (VLAs) on top of them to readily translate multimodal understanding into low-level actions. Accordingly, recent work has explored enhancing embodied reasoning in MLLMs through supervision of vision-question-answering type. However, these approaches have been reported to result in unstable VLA performance, often yielding only marginal or even negative gains. In this paper, we propose a more systematic MLLM training framework RoboAlign that reliably improves VLA performance. Our key idea is to sample action tokens via zero-shot natural language reasoning and refines this reasoning using reinforcement learning (RL) to improve action accuracy. As a result, RoboAlign bridges the modality gap between language and low-level actions in MLLMs, and facilitate knowledge transfer from MLLM to VLA. To validate the effectiveness of RoboAlign, we train VLAs by adding a diffusion-based action head on top of an MLLM backbone and evaluate them on major robotics benchmarks. Remarkably, by performing RL-based alignment after SFT using less than 1\% of the data, RoboAlign achieves performance improvements of 17.5\%, 18.9\%, and 106.6\% over SFT baselines on LIBERO, CALVIN, and real-world environments, respectively.

25. Improving Coherence and Persistence in Agentic AI for System Optimization

Authors: Pantea Karimi , Kimia Noorbakhsh , Mohammad Alizadeh , Hari Balakrishnan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21321
Abstract:

Designing high-performance system heuristics is a creative, iterative process requiring experts to form hypotheses and execute multi-step conceptual shifts. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in automating this loop, they struggle with complex system problems due to two critical failure modes: evolutionary neighborhood bias and the coherence ceiling. Evolutionary methods often remain trapped in local optima by relying on scalar benchmark scores, failing when coordinated multi-step changes are required. Conversely, existing agentic frameworks suffer from context degradation over long horizons or fail to accumulate knowledge across independent runs. We present Engram, an agentic researcher architecture that addresses these limitations by decoupling long-horizon exploration from the constraints of a single context window. Engram organizes exploration into a sequence of agents that iteratively design, test, and analyze mechanisms. At the conclusion of each run, an agent stores code snapshots, logs, and results in a persistent Archive and distills high-level modeling insights into a compact, persistent Research Digest. Subsequent agents then begin with a fresh context window, reading the Research Digest to build on prior discoveries. We find that Engram exhibits superior performance across diverse domains including multi-cloud multicast, LLM inference request routing, and optimizing KV cache reuse in databases with natural language queries.

26. The Library Theorem: How External Organization Governs Agentic Reasoning Capacity

Authors: Zachary F. Mainen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21272
Abstract:

Externalized reasoning is already exploited by transformer-based agents through chain-of-thought, but structured retrieval – indexing over one’s own reasoning state – remains underexplored. We formalize the transformer context window as an I/O page and prove that tool-augmented agents with indexed external memory achieve exponentially lower retrieval cost than agents restricted to sequential scanning: $O(\log_b N)$ versus $\Omega(N)$ page reads per query, and $O(T \log_b T)$ versus $\Theta(T^2)$ cumulative cost over $T$ reasoning steps – a gap that widens as deliberation deepens. We test these predictions on a controlled lookup benchmark across three content types – random hashes, ordered integers, and encyclopedia entries – varying store size from 50 to 5,000 items, and replicate key conditions across two model generations (GPT-4o-mini and GPT-5.4). On abstract content, the indexed agent achieves median 1 page read regardless of store size, confirming the $O(1)$ prediction. Sorted pages without an index fail to close the gap: the weaker model cannot sustain binary search at scale, and the stronger model achieves near-optimal $\log_2 N$ search but still loses to the index by $5\times$. On familiar content (encyclopedia entries), a competing failure mode emerges: the model recognizes the domain, bypasses the retrieval protocol, and generates answers from parametric memory, producing catastrophic token expenditure even when the index is sound. This parametric memory competition dissociates the two cognitive operations that indexing combines: understanding content (where language models excel) and following navigational protocols (where they fail when understanding tempts them to shortcut). The result argues for a separation of concerns: use language models for index construction, where semantic understanding helps, and deterministic algorithms for index traversal, where it hurts.

27. Graph of States: Solving Abductive Tasks with Large Language Models

Authors: Yu Luo , Rongchen Gao , Lu Teng , Xidao Wen , Jiamin Jiang , Qingliang Zhang , Yongqian Sun , Shenglin Zhang , Jiasong Feng , Tong Liu , Wenjie Zhang , Dan Pei
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21250
Abstract:

Logical reasoning encompasses deduction, induction, and abduction. However, while Large Language Models (LLMs) have effectively mastered the former two, abductive reasoning remains significantly underexplored. Existing frameworks, predominantly designed for static deductive tasks, fail to generalize to abductive reasoning due to unstructured state representation and lack of explicit state control. Consequently, they are inevitably prone to Evidence Fabrication, Context Drift, Failed Backtracking, and Early Stopping. To bridge this gap, we introduce Graph of States (GoS), a general-purpose neuro-symbolic framework tailored for abductive tasks. GoS grounds multi-agent collaboration in a structured belief states, utilizing a causal graph to explicitly encode logical dependencies and a state machine to govern the valid transitions of the reasoning process. By dynamically aligning the reasoning focus with these symbolic constraints, our approach transforms aimless, unconstrained exploration into a convergent, directed search. Extensive evaluations on two real-world datasets demonstrate that GoS significantly outperforms all baselines, providing a robust solution for complex abductive tasks. Code repo and all prompts: this https URL .

28. ConsRoute:Consistency-Aware Adaptive Query Routing for Cloud-Edge-Device Large Language Models

Authors: Haoyu Qiao , Hao Zhang , Shanwen Mao , Siyao Cheng , Jie Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21237
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) deliver impressive capabilities but incur substantial inference latency and cost, which hinders their deployment in latency-sensitive and resource-constrained scenarios. Cloud-edge-device collaborative inference has emerged as a promising paradigm by dynamically routing queries to models of different capacities across tiers. In this paper, we propose ConsRoute, a lightweight, semantic-aware, and adaptive routing framework that significantly improves inference efficiency while minimizing impact on response quality. Unlike prior routing methods that rely on predicting coarse-grained output quality gaps, ConsRoute leverages a reranker to directly assess the semantic consistency between responses generated by models at different tiers, yielding fine-grained soft supervision signals for routing. To minimize device-side overhead, ConsRoute reuses hidden states from the LLM prefilling stage as compact query representations, avoiding additional encoders or inference passes. Furthermore, these representations are clustered, and Bayesian optimization is employed to learn cluster-specific routing thresholds that dynamically balance quality, latency, and cost under heterogeneous query distributions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ConsRoute achieves near-cloud performance (>=95%) while reducing end-to-end latency and inference cost by nearly 40%, consistently outperforming existing routing baselines in both response quality and system efficiency.

29. Revisiting Tree Search for LLMs: Gumbel and Sequential Halving for Budget-Scalable Reasoning

Authors: Leonid Ugadiarov , Yuri Kuratov , Aleksandr Panov , Alexey Skrynnik
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21162
Abstract:

Neural tree search is a powerful decision-making algorithm widely used in complex domains such as game playing and model-based reinforcement learning. Recent work has applied AlphaZero-style tree search to enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) during inference, but we find that this approach suffers from a scaling failure: on GSM8K and Game24, accuracy drops as the search budget increases. In this paper, we present ReSCALE, an adaptation of Gumbel AlphaZero MCTS that replaces Dirichlet noise and PUCT selection with Gumbel sampling and Sequential Halving, restoring monotonic scaling without changes to the model or its training. ReSCALE reaches 58.4\% on GSM8K and 85.3\% on Game24 at budgets where the baseline degrades. Ablations confirm that Sequential Halving is the primary driver of the improvement.

30. Can LLMs Fool Graph Learning? Exploring Universal Adversarial Attacks on Text-Attributed Graphs

Authors: Zihui Chen , Yuling Wang , Pengfei Jiao , Kai Wu , Xiao Wang , Xiang Ao , Dalin Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21155
Abstract:

Text-attributed graphs (TAGs) enhance graph learning by integrating rich textual semantics and topological context for each node. While boosting expressiveness, they also expose new vulnerabilities in graph learning through text-based adversarial surfaces. Recent advances leverage diverse backbones, such as graph neural networks (GNNs) and pre-trained language models (PLMs), to capture both structural and textual information in TAGs. This diversity raises a key question: How can we design universal adversarial attacks that generalize across architectures to assess the security of TAG models? The challenge arises from the stark contrast in how different backbones-GNNs and PLMs-perceive and encode graph patterns, coupled with the fact that many PLMs are only accessible via APIs, limiting attacks to black-box settings. To address this, we propose BadGraph, a novel attack framework that deeply elicits large language models (LLMs) understanding of general graph knowledge to jointly perturb both node topology and textual semantics. Specifically, we design a target influencer retrieval module that leverages graph priors to construct cross-modally aligned attack shortcuts, thereby enabling efficient LLM-based perturbation reasoning. Experiments show that BadGraph achieves universal and effective attacks across GNN- and LLM-based reasoners, with up to a 76.3% performance drop, while theoretical and empirical analyses confirm its stealthy yet interpretable nature.

31. ORACLE: Optimizing Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models via Constraint-Led Synthetic Data Elicitation

Authors: Zhuojie Yang , Wentao Wan , Keze Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21140
Abstract:

Training large language models (LLMs) with synthetic reasoning data has become a popular approach to enhancing their reasoning capabilities, while a key factor influencing the effectiveness of this paradigm is the quality of the generated multi-step reasoning data. To generate high-quality reasoning data, many recent methods generate synthetic reasoning paths and filter them based on final answer correctness, often overlooking flaws in intermediate reasoning steps. To enhance the verification of intermediate reasoning steps, prior work primarily resorts to code execution or symbolic reasoning engines. However, code-based validation is restricted to code or mathematical tasks, and reasoning engines require a well-structured and complete context. As a result, existing methods fail to function effectively in natural language reasoning tasks that involve ambiguous or incomplete contexts. In these tasks, synthetic data still lack reliable checks for verifying each reasoning step. To address this challenge, we introduce ORACLE, a structured data generation framework inspired by syllogistic reasoning. ORACLE integrates the generative strengths of LLMs with symbolic supervision: the LLM produces step-wise reasoning contexts, while a symbolic reasoning engine verifies the validity of each intermediate step. By employing a unified prompting template to elicit modular reasoning chains, ORACLE enables fine-grained, step-level validation, facilitating the construction of high-quality multi-step reasoning data. Across six logical, factual, and commonsense reasoning benchmarks, our ORACLE consistently outperforms strong baselines on multiple models.

32. KLDrive: Fine-Grained 3D Scene Reasoning for Autonomous Driving based on Knowledge Graph

Authors: Ye Tian , Jingyi Zhang , Zihao Wang , Xiaoyuan Ren , Xiaofan Yu , Onat Gungor , Tajana Rosing
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21029
Abstract:

Autonomous driving requires reliable reasoning over fine-grained 3D scene facts. Fine-grained question answering over multi-modal driving observations provides a natural way to evaluate this capability, yet existing perception pipelines and driving-oriented large language model (LLM) methods still suffer from unreliable scene facts, hallucinations, opaque reasoning, and heavy reliance on task-specific training. We present KLDrive, the first knowledge-graph-augmented LLM reasoning framework for fine-grained question answering in autonomous driving. KLDrive addresses this problem through designing two tightly coupled components: an energy-based scene fact construction module that consolidates multi-source evidence into a reliable scene knowledge graph, and an LLM agent that performs fact-grounded reasoning over a constrained action space under explicit structural constraints. By combining structured prompting with few-shot in-context exemplars, the framework adapts to diverse reasoning tasks without heavy task-specific fine-tuning. Experiments on two large-scale autonomous-driving QA benchmarks show that KLDrive outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods, achieving the best overall accuracy of 65.04% on NuScenes-QA and the best SPICE score of 42.45 on GVQA. On counting, the most challenging factual reasoning task, it improves over the strongest baseline by 46.01 percentage points, demonstrating substantially reduced hallucinations and the benefit of coupling reliable scene fact construction with explicit reasoning.

33. Knowledge Boundary Discovery for Large Language Models

Authors: Ziquan Wang , Zhongqi Lu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21022
Abstract:

We propose Knowledge Boundary Discovery (KBD), a reinforcement learning based framework to explore the knowledge boundaries of the Large Language Models (LLMs). We define the knowledge boundary by automatically generating two types of questions: (i) those the LLM can confidently answer (within-knowledge boundary) and (ii) those it cannot (beyond-knowledge boundary). Iteratively exploring and exploiting the LLM’s responses to find its knowledge boundaries is challenging because of the hallucination phenomenon. To find the knowledge boundaries of an LLM, the agent interacts with the LLM under the modeling of exploring a partially observable environment. The agent generates a progressive question as the action, adopts an entropy reduction as the reward, receives the LLM’s response as the observation and updates its belief states. We demonstrate that the KBD detects knowledge boundaries of LLMs by automatically finding a set of non-trivial answerable and unanswerable questions. We validate the KBD by comparing its generated knowledge boundaries with manually crafted LLM benchmark datasets. Experiments show that our KBD-generated question set is comparable to the human-generated datasets. Our approach paves a new way to evaluate LLMs.

34. A Framework for Low-Latency, LLM-driven Multimodal Interaction on the Pepper Robot

Authors: Erich Studerus , Vivienne Jia Zhong , Stephan Vonschallen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21013
Abstract:

Despite recent advances in integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into social robotics, two weaknesses persist. First, existing implementations on platforms like Pepper often rely on cascaded Speech-to-Text (STT)->LLM->Text-to-Speech (TTS) pipelines, resulting in high latency and the loss of paralinguistic information. Second, most implementations fail to fully leverage the LLM’s capabilities for multimodal perception and agentic control. We present an open-source Android framework for the Pepper robot that addresses these limitations through two key innovations. First, we integrate end-to-end Speech-to-Speech (S2S) models to achieve low-latency interaction while preserving paralinguistic cues and enabling adaptive intonation. Second, we implement extensive Function Calling capabilities that elevate the LLM to an agentic planner, orchestrating robot actions (navigation, gaze control, tablet interaction) and integrating diverse multimodal feedback (vision, touch, system state). The framework runs on the robot’s tablet but can also be built to run on regular Android smartphones or tablets, decoupling development from robot hardware. This work provides the HRI community with a practical, extensible platform for exploring advanced LLM-driven embodied interaction.

35. Can we automatize scientific discovery in the cognitive sciences?

Authors: Akshay K. Jagadish , Milena Rmus , Kristin Witte , Marvin Mathony , Marcel Binz , Eric Schulz
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20988
Abstract:

The cognitive sciences aim to understand intelligence by formalizing underlying operations as computational models. Traditionally, this follows a cycle of discovery where researchers develop paradigms, collect data, and test predefined model classes. However, this manual pipeline is fundamentally constrained by the slow pace of human intervention and a search space limited by researchers’ background and intuition. Here, we propose a paradigm shift toward a fully automated, in silico science of the mind that implements every stage of the discovery cycle using Large Language Models (LLMs). In this framework, experimental paradigms exploring conceptually meaningful task structures are directly sampled from an LLM. High-fidelity behavioral data are then simulated using foundation models of cognition. The tedious step of handcrafting cognitive models is replaced by LLM-based program synthesis, which performs a high-throughput search over a vast landscape of algorithmic hypotheses. Finally, the discovery loop is closed by optimizing for ‘‘interestingness’’, a metric of conceptual yield evaluated by an LLM-critic. By enabling a fast and scalable approach to theory development, this automated loop functions as a high-throughput in-silico discovery engine, surfacing informative experiments and mechanisms for subsequent validation in real human populations.

36. Profit is the Red Team: Stress-Testing Agents in Strategic Economic Interactions

Authors: Shouqiao Wang , Marcello Politi , Samuele Marro , Davide Crapis
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20925
Abstract:

As agentic systems move into real-world deployments, their decisions increasingly depend on external inputs such as retrieved content, tool outputs, and information provided by other actors. When these inputs can be strategically shaped by adversaries, the relevant security risk extends beyond a fixed library of prompt attacks to adaptive strategies that steer agents toward unfavorable outcomes. We propose profit-driven red teaming, a stress-testing protocol that replaces handcrafted attacks with a learned opponent trained to maximize its profit using only scalar outcome feedback. The protocol requires no LLM-as-judge scoring, attack labels, or attack taxonomy, and is designed for structured settings with auditable outcomes. We instantiate it in a lean arena of four canonical economic interactions, which provide a controlled testbed for adaptive exploitability. In controlled experiments, agents that appear strong against static baselines become consistently exploitable under profit-optimized pressure, and the learned opponent discovers probing, anchoring, and deceptive commitments without explicit instruction. We then distill exploit episodes into concise prompt rules for the agent, which make most previously observed failures ineffective and substantially improve target performance. These results suggest that profit-driven red-team data can provide a practical route to improving robustness in structured agent settings with auditable outcomes.

37. Do LLM-Driven Agents Exhibit Engagement Mechanisms? Controlled Tests of Information Load, Descriptive Norms, and Popularity Cues

Authors: Tai-Quan Peng , Yuan Tian , Songsong Liang , Dazhen Deng , Yingcai Wu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20911
Abstract:

Large language models make agent-based simulation more behaviorally expressive, but they also sharpen a basic methodological tension: fluent, human-like output is not, by itself, evidence for theory. We evaluate what an LLM-driven simulation can credibly support using information engagement on social media as a test case. In a Weibo-like environment, we manipulate information load and descriptive norms, while allowing popularity cues (cumulative likes and Sina Weibo-style cumulative reshares) to evolve endogenously. We then ask whether simulated behavior changes in theoretically interpretable ways under these controlled variations, rather than merely producing plausible-looking traces. Engagement responds systematically to information load and descriptive norms, and sensitivity to popularity cues varies across contexts, indicating conditionality rather than rigid prompt compliance. We discuss methodological implications for simulation-based communication research, including multi-condition stress tests, explicit no-norm baselines because default prompts are not blank controls, and design choices that preserve endogenous feedback loops when studying bandwagon dynamics.

Authors: Jinming Yang , Xinyu Jiang , Xinshan Jiao , Xinping Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20750
Abstract:

We present an LLM-driven multi-agent probabilistic modeling framework that demonstrates how differences in students’ subjective social perceptions arise and evolve in real-world classroom settings, under constraints from an observed social network and limited questionnaire data. When social information is incomplete and the accuracy of perception differs between students, they can form different views of the same group structure from local cues they can access. Repeated peer communication and belief updates can gradually change these views and, over time, lead to stable group-level differences. To avoid assuming a global “god’s-eye view,” we assign each student an individualized subjective graph that shows which social ties they can perceive and how far information is reachable from their perspective. All judgments and interactions are restricted to this subjective graph: agents use retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to access only local information and then form evaluations of peers’ competence and social standing. We also add structural perturbations related to social-anxiety to represent consistent individual differences in the accuracy of social perception. During peer exchanges, agents share narrative assessments of classmates’ academic performance and social position with uncertainty tags, and update beliefs probabilistically using LLM-based trust scores. Using the time series of six real exam scores as an exogenous reference, we run multi-step simulations to examine how epistemic uncertainty spreads through local interactions. Experiments show that, without relying on global information, the framework reproduces several collective dynamics consistent with real-world educational settings. The code is released at this https URL .

Authors: Yicai Xing
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20678
Abstract:

Contemporary societies face a severe crisis of demographic reproduction. Global fertility rates continue to decline precipitously, with East Asian nations exhibiting the most dramatic trends – China’s total fertility rate (TFR) fell to approximately 1.0 in 2023, while South Korea’s dropped below 0.72. Simultaneously, the institution of marriage is undergoing structural disintegration: educated women rationally reject unions lacking both emotional fulfillment and economic security, while a growing proportion of men at the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum experience chronic sexual deprivation, anxiety, and learned helplessness. This paper proposes a computational framework for modeling and evaluating a Stratified Polyamory System (SPS) using techniques from agent-based modeling (ABM), multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), and large language model (LLM)-empowered social simulation. The SPS permits individuals to maintain a limited number of legally recognized secondary partners in addition to one primary spouse, combined with socialized child-rearing and inheritance reform. We formalize the A/B/C stratification as heterogeneous agent types in a multi-agent system and model the matching process as a MARL problem amenable to Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). The mating network is analyzed using graph neural network (GNN) representations. Drawing on evolutionary psychology, behavioral ecology, social stratification theory, computational social science, algorithmic fairness, and institutional economics, we argue that SPS can improve aggregate social welfare in the Pareto sense. Preliminary computational results demonstrate the framework’s viability in addressing the dual crisis of female motherhood penalties and male sexlessness, while offering a non-violent mechanism for wealth dispersion analogous to the historical Chinese Grace Decree (Tui’en Ling).

40. Towards Intelligent Geospatial Data Discovery: a knowledge graph-driven multi-agent framework powered by large language models

Authors: Ruixiang Liu , Zhenlong Li , Ali Khosravi Kazazi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20670
Abstract:

The rapid growth in the volume, variety, and velocity of geospatial data has created data ecosystems that are highly distributed, heterogeneous, and semantically inconsistent. Existing data catalogs, portals, and infrastructures still rely largely on keyword-based search with limited semantic support, which often fails to capture user intent and leads to weak retrieval performance. To address these challenges, this study proposes a knowledge graph-driven multi-agent framework for intelligent geospatial data discovery, powered by large language models. The framework introduces a unified geospatial metadata ontology as a semantic mediation layer to align heterogeneous metadata standards across platforms and constructs a geospatial metadata knowledge graph to explicitly model datasets and their multidimensional relationships. Building on the structured representation, the framework adopts a multi-agent collaborative architecture to perform intent parsing, knowledge graph retrieval, and answer synthesis, forming an interpretable and closed-loop discovery process from user queries to results. Results from representative use cases and performance evaluation show that the framework substantially improves intent matching accuracy, ranking quality, recall, and discovery transparency compared with traditional systems. This study advances geospatial data discovery toward a more semantic, intent-aware, and intelligent paradigm, providing a practical foundation for next-generation intelligent and autonomous spatial data infrastructures and contributing to the broader vision of Autonomous GIS.

41. Attention in Space: Functional Roles of VLM Heads for Spatial Reasoning

Authors: Xueqi Ma , Shuo Yang , Yanbei Jiang , Shu Liu , Zhenzhen Liu , Jiayang Ao , Xingjun Ma , Sarah Monazam Erfani , James Bailey
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20662
Abstract:

Despite remarkable advances in large Vision-Language Models (VLMs), spatial reasoning remains a persistent challenge. In this work, we investigate how attention heads within VLMs contribute to spatial reasoning by analyzing their functional roles through a mechanistic interpretability lens. We introduce CogVSR, a dataset that decomposes complex spatial reasoning questions into step-by-step subquestions designed to simulate human-like reasoning via a chain-of-thought paradigm, with each subquestion linked to specific cognitive functions such as spatial perception or relational reasoning. Building on CogVSR, we develop a probing framework to identify and characterize attention heads specialized for these functions. Our analysis across diverse VLM families reveals that these functional heads are universally sparse, vary in number and distribution across functions. Notably, spatially specialized heads are fewer than those for other cognitive functions, highlighting their scarcity. We propose methods to activate latent spatial heads, improving spatial understanding. Intervention experiments further demonstrate their critical role in spatial reasoning: removing functional heads leads to performance degradation, while emphasizing them enhances accuracy. This study provides new interpretability driven insights into how VLMs attend to space and paves the way for enhancing complex spatial reasoning in multimodal models.

42. From 50% to Mastery in 3 Days: A Low-Resource SOP for Localizing Graduate-Level AI Tutors via Shadow-RAG

Authors: Zonglin Yang , J.-H. Xie , Lining Zhang , Jiyou Jia , Zhi-X. Chen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20650
Abstract:

Deploying high-fidelity AI tutors in schools is often blocked by the Resource Curse – the need for expensive cloud GPUs and massive data engineering. In this practitioner report, we present a replicable Standard Operating Procedure that breaks this barrier. Using a Vision-Language Model data cleaning strategy and a novel Shadow-RAG architecture, we localized a graduate-level Applied Mathematics tutor using only 3 person-days of non-expert labor and open-weights 32B models deployable on a single consumer-grade GPU. Our pilot study on a full graduate-level final exam reveals a striking emergence phenomenon: while both zero-shot baselines and standard retrieval stagnate around 50-60% accuracy across model generations, the Shadow Agent, which provides structured reasoning guidance, triggers a massive capability surge in newer 32B models, boosting performance from 74% (Naive RAG) to mastery level (90%). In contrast, older models see only modest gains (~10%). This suggests that such guidance is the key to unlocking the latent power of modern small language models. This work offers a cost-effective, scientifically grounded blueprint for ubiquitous AI education.

43. Seed1.8 Model Card: Towards Generalized Real-World Agency

Authors: Bytedance Seed
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20633
Abstract:

We present Seed1.8, a foundation model aimed at generalized real-world agency: going beyond single-turn prediction to multi-turn interaction, tool use, and multi-step execution. Seed1.8 keeps strong LLM and vision-language performance while supporting a unified agentic interface-search, code generation and execution, and GUI interaction. For deployment, it offers latency- and cost-aware inference, including configurable thinking modes and optimized visual encoding for images and video. We report evaluations on standard benchmarks and application-aligned workflows spanning foundational skills, multimodal understanding, and agentic behavior. Seed1.8 is released to support further research and development on interactive, real-world use cases.

44. Context Cartography: Toward Structured Governance of Contextual Space in Large Language Model Systems

Authors: Zihua Wu , Georg Gartner
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20578
Abstract:

The prevailing approach to improving large language model (LLM) reasoning has centered on expanding context windows, implicitly assuming that more tokens yield better performance. However, empirical evidence - including the “lost in the middle” effect and long-distance relational degradation - demonstrates that contextual space exhibits structural gradients, salience asymmetries, and entropy accumulation under transformer architectures. We introduce Context Cartography, a formal framework for the deliberate governance of contextual space. We define a tripartite zonal model partitioning the informational universe into black fog (unobserved), gray fog (stored memory), and the visible field (active reasoning surface), and formalize seven cartographic operators - reconnaissance, selection, simplification, aggregation, projection, displacement, and layering - as transformations governing information transitions between and within zones. The operators are derived from a systematic coverage analysis of all non-trivial zone transformations and are organized by transformation type (what the operator does) and zone scope (where it applies). We ground the framework in the salience geometry of transformer attention, characterizing cartographic operators as necessary compensations for linear prefix memory, append-only state, and entropy accumulation under expanding context. An analysis of four contemporary systems (Claude Code, Letta, MemOS, and OpenViking) provides interpretive evidence that these operators are converging independently across the industry. We derive testable predictions from the framework - including operator-specific ablation hypotheses - and propose a diagnostic benchmark for empirical validation.

45. LLM-Driven Heuristic Synthesis for Industrial Process Control: Lessons from Hot Steel Rolling

Authors: Nima H. Siboni , Seyedreza Kiamousavi , Emad Scharifi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20537
Abstract:

Industrial process control demands policies that are interpretable and auditable, requirements that black-box neural policies struggle to meet. We study an LLM-driven heuristic synthesis framework for hot steel rolling, in which a language model iteratively proposes and refines human-readable Python controllers using rich behavioral feedback from a physics-based simulator. The framework combines structured strategic ideation, executable code generation, and per-component feedback across diverse operating conditions to search over control logic for height reduction, interpass time, and rolling velocity. Our first contribution is an auditable controller-synthesis pipeline for industrial process control. The generated controllers are explicit programs accessible to expert review, and we pair them with an automated audit pipeline that formally verifies key safety and monotonicity properties for the best synthesized heuristic. Our second contribution is a principled budget allocation strategy for LLM-driven heuristic search: we show that Luby-style universal restarts – originally developed for randomized algorithms – transfer directly to this setting, eliminating the need for problem-specific budget tuning. A single 160-iteration Luby campaign approaches the hindsight-optimal budget allocation derived from 52 ad-hoc runs totalling 730 iterations.

46. Grounded Chess Reasoning in Language Models via Master Distillation

Authors: Zhenwei Tang , Qianfeng Wen , Seth Grief-Albert , Yahya Elgabra , Blair Yang , Honghua Dong , Ashton Anderson
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20510
Abstract:

Language models often lack grounded reasoning capabilities in specialized domains where training data is scarce but bespoke systems excel. We introduce a general framework for distilling expert system reasoning into natural language chain-of-thought explanations, enabling compact models to acquire domain expertise and the ability to generate faithful, grounded explanations. Rather than distilling only final outputs, we capture the full reasoning process, transforming opaque expert computations into transparent, step-by-step explanations. We demonstrate this approach in chess, a canonical reasoning domain where language models continue to underperform. Our 4B parameter model, C1, advances from a near-zero baseline to 48.1% accuracy, outperforming all open-source models and most frontier proprietary systems. Notably, C1 surpasses its distillation teacher and generates solutions in two orders of magnitude fewer tokens than baselines. Unlike prior neural chess approaches that predict only best moves, C1 generates explainable solutions revealing strategic reasoning. Our pipeline combines supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with theme-balanced data sampling for comprehensive tactical coverage. Master Distillation demonstrates how to inject expert-level knowledge into compact models for under-optimized domains, offering a recipe for unlocking RLVR where LLMs lack sufficient base capabilities.

47. Deep reflective reasoning in interdependence constrained structured data extraction from clinical notes for digital health

Authors: Jingwei Huang , Kuroush Nezafati , Zhikai Chi , Ruichen Rong , Colin Treager , Tingyi Wanyan , Yueshuang Xu , Xiaowei Zhan , Patrick Leavey , Guanghua Xiao , Wenqi Shi , Yang Xie
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20435
Abstract:

Extracting structured information from clinical notes requires navigating a dense web of interdependent variables where the value of one attribute logically constrains others. Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based extraction pipelines often struggle to capture these dependencies, leading to clinically inconsistent outputs. We propose deep reflective reasoning, a large language model agent framework that iteratively self-critiques and revises structured outputs by checking consistency among variables, the input text, and retrieved domain knowledge, stopping when outputs converge. We extensively evaluate the proposed method in three diverse oncology applications: (1) On colorectal cancer synoptic reporting from gross descriptions (n=217), reflective reasoning improved average F1 across eight categorical synoptic variables from 0.828 to 0.911 and increased mean correct rate across four numeric variables from 0.806 to 0.895; (2) On Ewing sarcoma CD99 immunostaining pattern identification (n=200), the accuracy improved from 0.870 to 0.927; (3) On lung cancer tumor staging (n=100), tumor stage accuracy improved from 0.680 to 0.833 (pT: 0.842 -> 0.884; pN: 0.885 -> 0.948). The results demonstrate that deep reflective reasoning can systematically improve the reliability of LLM-based structured data extraction under interdependence constraints, enabling more consistent machine-operable clinical datasets and facilitating knowledge discovery with machine learning and data science towards digital health.

48. LLM-Enhanced Energy Contrastive Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Text-Attributed Graphs

Authors: Xiaoxu Ma , Dong Li , Minglai Shao , Xintao Wu , Chen Zhao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20293
Abstract:

Text-attributed graphs, where nodes are enriched with textual attributes, have become a powerful tool for modeling real-world networks such as citation, social, and transaction networks. However, existing methods for learning from these graphs often assume that the distributions of training and testing data are consistent. This assumption leads to significant performance degradation when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this paper, we address the challenge of node-level OOD detection in text-attributed graphs, with the goal of maintaining accurate node classification while simultaneously identifying OOD nodes. We propose a novel approach, LLM-Enhanced Energy Contrastive Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Text-Attributed Graphs (LECT), which integrates large language models (LLMs) and energy-based contrastive learning. The proposed method involves generating high-quality OOD samples by leveraging the semantic understanding and contextual knowledge of LLMs to create dependency-aware pseudo-OOD nodes, and applying contrastive learning based on energy functions to distinguish between in-distribution (IND) and OOD nodes. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated through extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets, where our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving both high classification accuracy and robust OOD detection capabilities.

49. Me, Myself, and $π$ : Evaluating and Explaining LLM Introspection

Authors: Atharv Naphade , Samarth Bhargav , Sean Lim , Mcnair Shah
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20276
Abstract:

A hallmark of human intelligence is Introspection-the ability to assess and reason about one’s own cognitive processes. Introspection has emerged as a promising but contested capability in large language models (LLMs). However, current evaluations often fail to distinguish genuine meta-cognition from the mere application of general world knowledge or text-based self-simulation. In this work, we propose a principled taxonomy that formalizes introspection as the latent computation of specific operators over a model’s policy and parameters. To isolate the components of generalized introspection, we present Introspect-Bench, a multifaceted evaluation suite designed for rigorous capability testing. Our results show that frontier models exhibit privileged access to their own policies, outperforming peer models in predicting their own behavior. Furthermore, we provide causal, mechanistic evidence explaining both how LLMs learn to introspect without explicit training, and how the mechanism of introspection emerges via attention diffusion.

Authors: Ali Shamsaddinlou , Morteza NourelahiAlamdari
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20270
Abstract:

Generating executable simulations from natural language specifications remains a challenging problem due to the limited reasoning capacity of large language models (LLMs) when confronted with large, interconnected codebases. This paper presents FactorSmith, a framework that synthesizes playable game simulations in code from textual descriptions by combining two complementary ideas: factored POMDP decomposition for principled context reduction and a hierarchical planner-designer-critic agentic workflow for iterative quality refinement at every generation step. Drawing on the factored partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) representation introduced by FactorSim [Sun et al., 2024], the proposed method decomposes a simulation specification into modular steps where each step operates only on a minimal subset of relevant state variables, limiting the context window that any single LLM call must process. Inspired by the agentic trio architecture of SceneSmith [Pfaff et al., 2025], FactorSmith embeds within every factored step a three-agent interaction: a planner that orchestrates workflow, a designer that proposes code artifacts, and a critic that evaluates quality through structured scoring, enabling iterative refinement with checkpoint rollback. This paper formalizes the combined approach, presents the mathematical framework underpinning context selection and agentic refinement, and describes the open-source implementation. Experiments on the PyGame Learning Environment benchmark demonstrate that FactorSmith generates simulations with improved prompt alignment, fewer runtime errors, and higher code quality compared to non-agentic factored baselines.

51. Domain-Specialized Tree of Thought through Plug-and-Play Predictors

Authors: Xuanqi Gao , Haoyu Wang , Jun Sun , Shiqing Ma , Chao Shen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20267
Abstract:

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced complex reasoning, prominent methods like the Tree of Thoughts (ToT) framework face a critical trade-off between exploration depth and computational efficiency. Existing ToT implementations often rely on heavyweight LLM-based self-evaluation or rigid heuristics for branch pruning, making them prohibitively expensive and inflexible for broad application. To address this, we introduce DST, an adaptable, plug-and-play predictor that serves as a lightweight, supervised heuristic to guide the ToT search process. Our predictor enables dynamic, context-aware pruning, allowing the search to proceed with near-greedy efficiency on simpler reasoning steps while adaptively expanding the search beam only when encountering uncertainty or task complexity. We evaluate our approach on a diverse suite of benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, general reasoning, and complex logical reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves accuracy competitive with or superior to strong baselines, including standard ToT, while reducing computational overhead by 26-75%. Our work effectively resolves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off in tree-based reasoning, transforming ToT from a resource-intensive technique into a scalable and practical paradigm for complex problem-solving in LLMs.

52. ProMAS: Proactive Error Forecasting for Multi-Agent Systems Using Markov Transition Dynamics

Authors: Xinkui Zhao , Sai Liu , Yifan Zhang , Qingyu Ma , Guanjie Cheng , Naibo Wang , Chang Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20260
Abstract:

The integration of Large Language Models into Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) has enabled the so-lution of complex, long-horizon tasks through collaborative reasoning. However, this collec-tive intelligence is inherently fragile, as a single logical fallacy can rapidly propagate and lead to system-wide failure. Most current research re-lies on post-hoc failure analysis, thereby hinder-ing real-time intervention. To address this, we propose PROMAS, a proactive framework utiliz-ing Markov transitions for predictive error anal-ysis. PROMAS extracts Causal Delta Features to capture semantic displacement, mapping them to a quantized Vector Markov Space to model reasoning as probabilistic transitions. By inte-grating a Proactive Prediction Head with Jump Detection, the method localizes errors via risk acceleration rather than static thresholds. On the Who&When benchmark, PROMAS achieves 22.97% step-level accuracy while processing only 27% of reasoning logs. This performance rivals reactive monitors like MASC while reducing data overhead by 73%. Although this strategy entails an accuracy trade-off compared to post-hoc meth-ods, it significantly improves intervention latency, balancing diagnostic precision with the real-time demands of autonomous reasoning.

53. AgenticGEO: A Self-Evolving Agentic System for Generative Engine Optimization

Authors: Jiaqi Yuan , Jialu Wang , Zihan Wang , Qingyun Sun , Ruijie Wang , Jianxin Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20213
Abstract:

Generative search engines represent a transition from traditional ranking-based retrieval to Large Language Model (LLM)-based synthesis, transforming optimization goals from ranking prominence towards content inclusion. Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), specifically, aims to maximize visibility and attribution in black-box summarized outputs by strategically manipulating source content. However, existing methods rely on static heuristics, single-prompt optimization, or engine preference rule distillation that is prone to overfitting. They cannot flexibly adapt to diverse content or the changing behaviors of generative engines. Moreover, effectively optimizing these strategies requires an impractical amount of interaction feedback from the engines. To address these challenges, we propose AgenticGEO, a self-evolving agentic framework formulating optimization as a content-conditioned control problem, which enhances intrinsic content quality to robustly adapt to the unpredictable behaviors of black-box engines. Unlike fixed-strategy methods, AgenticGEO employs a MAP-Elites archive to evolve diverse, compositional strategies. To mitigate interaction costs, we introduce a Co-Evolving Critic, a lightweight surrogate that approximates engine feedback for content-specific strategy selection and refinement, efficiently guiding both evolutionary search and inference-time planning. Through extensive in-domain and cross-domain experiments on two representative engines, AgenticGEO achieves state-of-the-art performance and demonstrates robust transferability, outperforming 14 baselines across 3 datasets. Our code and model are available at: this https URL .

54. UniMotion: A Unified Framework for Motion-Text-Vision Understanding and Generation

Authors: Ziyi Wang , Xinshun Wang , Shuang Chen , Yang Cong , Mengyuan Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22282
Abstract:

We present UniMotion, to our knowledge the first unified framework for simultaneous understanding and generation of human motion, natural language, and RGB images within a single architecture. Existing unified models handle only restricted modality subsets (e.g., Motion-Text or static Pose-Image) and predominantly rely on discrete tokenization, which introduces quantization errors and disrupts temporal continuity. UniMotion overcomes both limitations through a core principle: treating motion as a first-class continuous modality on equal footing with RGB. A novel Cross-Modal Aligned Motion VAE (CMA-VAE) and symmetric dual-path embedders construct parallel continuous pathways for Motion and RGB within a shared LLM backbone. To inject visual-semantic priors into motion representations without requiring images at inference, we propose Dual-Posterior KL Alignment (DPA), which distills a vision-fused encoder’s richer posterior into the motion-only encoder. To address the cold-start problem – where text supervision alone is too sparse to calibrate the newly introduced motion pathway – we further propose Latent Reconstruction Alignment (LRA), a self-supervised pre-training strategy that uses dense motion latents as unambiguous conditions to co-calibrate the embedder, backbone, and flow head, establishing a stable motion-aware foundation for all downstream tasks. UniMotion achieves state-of-the-art performance across seven tasks spanning any-to-any understanding, generation, and editing among the three modalities, with especially strong advantages on cross-modal compositional tasks.

55. ThinkJEPA: Empowering Latent World Models with Large Vision-Language Reasoning Model

Authors: Haichao Zhang , Yijiang Li , Shwai He , Tushar Nagarajan , Mingfei Chen , Jianglin Lu , Ang Li , Yun Fu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22281
Abstract:

Recent progress in latent world models (e.g., V-JEPA2) has shown promising capability in forecasting future world states from video observations. Nevertheless, dense prediction from a short observation window limits temporal context and can bias predictors toward local, low-level extrapolation, making it difficult to capture long-horizon semantics and reducing downstream utility. Vision–language models (VLMs), in contrast, provide strong semantic grounding and general knowledge by reasoning over uniformly sampled frames, but they are not ideal as standalone dense predictors due to compute-driven sparse sampling, a language-output bottleneck that compresses fine-grained interaction states into text-oriented representations, and a data-regime mismatch when adapting to small action-conditioned datasets. We propose a VLM-guided JEPA-style latent world modeling framework that combines dense-frame dynamics modeling with long-horizon semantic guidance via a dual-temporal pathway: a dense JEPA branch for fine-grained motion and interaction cues, and a uniformly sampled VLM \emph{thinker} branch with a larger temporal stride for knowledge-rich guidance. To transfer the VLM’s progressive reasoning signals effectively, we introduce a hierarchical pyramid representation extraction module that aggregates multi-layer VLM representations into guidance features compatible with latent prediction. Experiments on hand-manipulation trajectory prediction show that our method outperforms both a strong VLM-only baseline and a JEPA-predictor baseline, and yields more robust long-horizon rollout behavior.

56. 3D-Layout-R1: Structured Reasoning for Language-Instructed Spatial Editing

Authors: Haoyu Zhen , Xiaolong Li , Yilin Zhao , Han Zhang , Sifei Liu , Kaichun Mo , Chuang Gan , Subhashree Radhakrishnan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22279
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown impressive reasoning abilities, yet they struggle with spatial understanding and layout consistency when performing fine-grained visual editing. We introduce a Structured Reasoning framework that performs text-conditioned spatial layout editing via scene-graph reasoning. Given an input scene graph and a natural-language instruction, the model reasons over the graph to generate an updated scene graph that satisfies the text condition while maintaining spatial coherence. By explicitly guiding the reasoning process through structured relational representations, our approach improves both interpretability and control over spatial relationships. We evaluate our method on a new text-guided layout editing benchmark encompassing sorting, spatial alignment, and room-editing tasks. Our training paradigm yields an average 15% improvement in IoU and 25% reduction in center-distance error compared to Chain of Thought Fine-tuning (CoT-SFT) and vanilla GRPO baselines. Compared to SOTA zero-shot LLMs, our best models achieve up to 20% higher mIoU, demonstrating markedly improved spatial precision.

57. Confidence-Based Decoding is Provably Efficient for Diffusion Language Models

Authors: Changxiao Cai , Gen Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22248
Abstract:

Diffusion language models (DLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive (AR) models for language modeling, allowing flexible generation order and parallel generation of multiple tokens. However, this flexibility introduces a challenge absent in AR models: the \emph{decoding strategy} – which determines the order and number of tokens generated at each iteration – critically affects sampling efficiency. Among decoding strategies explored in practice, confidence-based methods, which adaptively select which and how many tokens to unmask based on prediction confidence, have shown strong empirical performance. Despite this success, our theoretical understanding of confidence-based decoding remains limited. In this work, we develop the first theoretical analysis framework for confidence-based decoding in DLMs. We focus on an entropy sum-based strategy that continues unmasking tokens within each iteration until the cumulative entropy exceeds a threshold, and show that it achieves $\varepsilon$-accurate sampling in KL divergence with an expected number of iterations $\widetilde O(H(X_0)/\varepsilon)$, where $H(X_0)$ denotes the entropy of the target data distribution. Notably, this strategy yields substantial sampling acceleration when the data distribution has low entropy relative to the sequence length, while automatically adapting to the intrinsic complexity of data without requiring prior knowledge or hyperparameter tuning. Overall, our results provide a theoretical foundation for confidence-based decoding and may inform the design of more efficient decoding strategies for DLMs.

58. SpatialReward: Verifiable Spatial Reward Modeling for Fine-Grained Spatial Consistency in Text-to-Image Generation

Authors: Sashuai Zhou , Qiang Zhou , Junpeng Ma , Yue Cao , Ruofan Hu , Ziang Zhang , Xiaoda Yang , Zhibin Wang , Jun Song , Cheng Yu , Bo Zheng , Zhou Zhao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22228
Abstract:

Recent advances in text-to-image (T2I) generation via reinforcement learning (RL) have benefited from reward models that assess semantic alignment and visual quality. However, most existing reward models pay limited attention to fine-grained spatial relationships, often producing images that appear plausible overall yet contain inaccuracies in object positioning. In this work, we present \textbf{SpatialReward}, a verifiable reward model explicitly designed to evaluate spatial layouts in generated images. SpatialReward adopts a multi-stage pipeline: a \emph{Prompt Decomposer} extracts entities, attributes, and spatial metadata from free-form prompts; expert detectors provide accurate visual grounding of object positions and attributes; and a vision-language model applies chain-of-thought reasoning over grounded observations to assess complex spatial relations that are challenging for rule-based methods. To more comprehensively evaluate spatial relationships in generated images, we introduce \textbf{SpatRelBench}, a benchmark covering object attributes, orientation, inter-object relations, and rendered text placement. Experiments on Stable Diffusion and FLUX show that incorporating SpatialReward into RL training consistently improves spatial consistency and overall generation quality, with results aligned more closely to human judgments. These findings indicate that verifiable reward models hold considerable potential for enabling more accurate and controllable optimization in text-to-image generation models.

59. Evaluating the Reliability and Fidelity of Automated Judgment Systems of Large Language Models

Authors: Tom Biskupski , Stephan Kleber
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22214
Abstract:

A Large Language Model (LLM) as judge evaluates the quality of victim Machine Learning (ML) models, specifically LLMs, by analyzing their outputs. An LLM as judge is the combination of one model and one specifically engineered judge prompt that contains the criteria for the analysis. The resulting automation of the analysis scales up the complex evaluation of the victim models’ free-form text outputs by faster and more consistent judgments compared to human reviewers. Thus, quality and security assessments of LLMs can cover a wide range of the victim models’ use cases. Being a comparably new technique, LLMs as judges lack a thorough investigation for their reliability and agreement to human judgment. Our work evaluates the applicability of LLMs as automated quality assessors of victim LLMs. We test the efficacy of 37 differently sized conversational LLMs in combination with 5 different judge prompts, the concept of a second-level judge, and 5 models fine-tuned for the task as assessors. As assessment objective, we curate datasets for eight different categories of judgment tasks and the corresponding ground-truth labels based on human assessments. Our empirical results show a high correlation of LLMs as judges with human assessments, when combined with a suitable prompt, in particular for GPT-4o, several open-source models with $\geqslant$ 32B parameters, and a few smaller models like Qwen2.5 14B.

60. SPA: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Injection

Authors: Kexian Tang , Jiani Wang , Shaowen Wang , Kaifeng Lyu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22213
Abstract:

While large language models (LLMs) are pretrained on massive amounts of data, their knowledge coverage remains incomplete in specialized, data-scarce domains, motivating extensive efforts to study synthetic data generation for knowledge injection. We propose SPA (Scaling Prompt-engineered Augmentation), a simple but tough-to-beat baseline that uses a small set of carefully designed prompts to generate large-scale synthetic data for knowledge injection. Through systematic comparisons, we find that SPA outperforms several strong baselines. Furthermore, we identify two key limitations of prior approaches: (1) while RL-based methods may improve the token efficiency of LLM-based data augmentation at small scale, they suffer from diversity collapse as data scales, leading to diminishing returns; and (2) while multi-stage prompting may outperform simple augmentation methods, their advantages can disappear after careful prompt tuning. Our results suggest that, for knowledge injection, careful prompt design combined with straightforward large-scale augmentation can be surprisingly effective, and we hope SPA can serve as a strong baseline for future studies in this area. Our code is available at this https URL .

61. CayleyPy-4: AI-Holography. Towards analogs of holographic string dualities for AI tasks

Authors: A. Chervov , F. Levkovich-Maslyuk , A. Smolensky , F. Khafizov , I. Kiselev , D. Melnikov , I. Koltsov , S. Kudashev , D. Shiltsov , M. Obozov , S. Krymskii , V. Kirova , E.V. Konstantinova , A. Soibelman , S. Galkin , L. Grunwald , A. Kotov , A. Alexandrov , S. Lytkin , D. Fedoriaka , A. Chevychelov , Z. Kogan , A. Natyrova , L. Cheldieva , O. Nikitina , S. Fironov , A. Vakhrushev , A. Lukyanenko , V. Ilin , D. Gorodkov , N. Bogachev , I. Gaiur , M. Zaitsev , F. Petrov , L. Petrov , T. Gaintseva , A. Gavrilova , M. N. Smirnov , N. Kalinin , A. Khan , K. Jung , H. Mousset , H. Isambert , O. Debeaupuis
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22195
Abstract:

This is the fourth paper in the CayleyPy project, which applies AI methods to the exploration of large graphs. In this work, we suggest the existence of a new discrete version of holographic string dualities for this setup, and discuss their relevance to AI systems and mathematics. Many modern AI tasks – such as those addressed by GPT-style language models or RL systems – can be viewed as direct analogues of predicting particle trajectories on graphs. We investigate this problem for a large family of Cayley graphs, for which we show that surprisingly it admits a dual description in terms of discrete strings. We hypothesize that such dualities may extend to a range of AI systems where they can lead to more efficient computational approaches. In particular, string holographic images of states are proposed as natural candidates for data embeddings, motivated by the “complexity = volume” principle in AdS/CFT. For Cayley graphs of the symmetric group S_n, our results indicate that the corresponding dual objects are flat, planar polygons. The diameter of the graph is equal to the number of integer points inside the polygon scaled by n. Vertices of the graph can be mapped holographically to paths inside the polygon, and the usual graph distances correspond to the area under the paths, thus directly realising the “complexity = volume” paradigm. We also find evidence for continuous CFTs and dual strings in the large n limit. We confirm this picture and other aspects of the duality in a large initial set of examples. We also present new datasets (obtained by a combination of ML and conventional tools) which should be instrumental in establishing the duality for more general cases.

62. Seeing is Improving: Visual Feedback for Iterative Text Layout Refinement

Authors: Junrong Guo , Shancheng Fang , Yadong Qu , Hongtao Xie
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22187
Abstract:

Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have enabled automated generation of structured layouts from natural language descriptions. Existing methods typically follow a code-only paradigm that generates code to represent layouts, which are then rendered by graphic engines to produce final images. However, they are blind to the rendered visual outcome, making it difficult to guarantee readability and aesthetics. In this paper, we identify visual feedback as a critical factor in layout generation and propose Visual Feedback Layout Model (VFLM), a self-improving framework that leverages visual feedback iterative refinement. VFLM is capable of performing adaptive reflective generation, which leverages visual information to reflect on previous issues and iteratively generates outputs until satisfactory quality is achieved. It is achieved through reinforcement learning with a visually grounded reward model that incorporates OCR accuracy. By rewarding only the final generated outcome, we can effectively stimulate the model’s iterative and reflective generative capabilities. Experiments across multiple benchmarks show that VFLM consistently outperforms advanced MLLMs, existing layout models, and code-only baselines, establishing visual feedback as critical for design-oriented MLLMs. Our code and data are available at this https URL .

63. Enhancing Document-Level Machine Translation via Filtered Synthetic Corpora and Two-Stage LLM Adaptation

Authors: Ireh Kim , Tesia Sker , Chanwoo Kim
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22186
Abstract:

In Machine Translation, Large Language Models (LLMs) have generally underperformed compared to conventional encoder-decoder systems and thus see limited adoption. However, LLMs excel at modeling contextual information, making them a natural fit for document-level translation tasks where coherence across sentences is crucial. Despite this potential, document-level MT with LLMs faces two key challenges: (1) the scarcity of large-scale, high-quality document-level parallel data; and (2) the propensity of LLMs to introduce hallucinations and omissions during generation. To address these challenges, we propose a two-stage fine-tuning strategy leveraging LLM-augmented document-level data. First, we augment data by converting summarization data into document-level parallel data using a LLM, and then filter it using multiple metrics, leveraging sacreBLEU, COMET, and LaBSE-based cosine similarity-to improve data quality. Finally, we employ a two-stage fine-tuning strategy: first fine-tuning on the abundant sentence-level MT resources, and then on the filtered document-level corpus.

64. Multimodal Survival Analysis with Locally Deployable Large Language Models

Authors: Moritz Gögl , Christopher Yau
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22158
Abstract:

We study multimodal survival analysis integrating clinical text, tabular covariates, and genomic profiles using locally deployable large language models (LLMs). As many institutions face tight computational and privacy constraints, this setting motivates the use of lightweight, on-premises models. Our approach jointly estimates calibrated survival probabilities and generates concise, evidence-grounded prognosis text via teacher-student distillation and principled multimodal fusion. On a TCGA cohort, it outperforms standard baselines, avoids reliance on cloud services and associated privacy concerns, and reduces the risk of hallucinated or miscalibrated estimates that can be observed in base LLMs.

65. Mamba-VMR: Multimodal Query Augmentation via Generated Videos for Precise Temporal Grounding

Authors: Yunzhuo Sun , Xinyue Liu , Yanyang Li , Nanding Wu , Yifang Xu , Linlin Zong , Xianchao Zhang , Wenxin Liang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22121
Abstract:

Text-driven video moment retrieval (VMR) remains challenging due to limited capture of hidden temporal dynamics in untrimmed videos, leading to imprecise grounding in long sequences. Traditional methods rely on natural language queries (NLQs) or static image augmentations, overlooking motion sequences and suffering from high computational costs in Transformer-based architectures. Existing approaches fail to integrate subtitle contexts and generated temporal priors effectively, we therefore propose a novel two-stage framework for enhanced temporal grounding. In the first stage, LLM-guided subtitle matching identifies relevant textual cues from video subtitles, fused with the query to generate auxiliary short videos via text-to-video models, capturing implicit motion information as temporal priors. In the second stage, augmented queries are processed through a multi-modal controlled Mamba network, extending text-controlled selection with video-guided gating for efficient fusion of generated priors and long sequences while filtering noise. Our framework is agnostic to base retrieval models and widely applicable for multimodal VMR. Experimental evaluations on the TVR benchmark demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods, including reduced computational overhead and higher recall in long-sequence grounding.

66. On the Direction of RLVR Updates for LLM Reasoning: Identification and Exploitation

Authors: Kexin Huang , Haoming Meng , Junkang Wu , Jinda Lu , Chiyu Ma , Ziqian Chen , Xue Wang , Bolin Ding , Jiancan Wu , Xiang Wang , Xiangnan He , Guoyin Wang , Jingren Zhou
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22117
Abstract:

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has substantially improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models. While existing analyses identify that RLVR-induced changes are sparse, they primarily focus on the \textbf{magnitude} of these updates, largely overlooking their \textbf{direction}. In this work, we argue that the direction of updates is a more critical lens for understanding RLVR’s effects, which can be captured by the signed, token-level log probability difference $\Delta\log p$ between the base and final RLVR models. Through statistical analysis and token-replacement interventions, we demonstrate that $\Delta\log p$ more effectively identifies sparse, yet reasoning-critical updates than magnitude-based metrics (\eg divergence or entropy). Building on this insight, we propose two practical applications: (1) a \textit{test-time extrapolation} method that amplifies the policy along the learned $\Delta\log p$ direction to improve reasoning accuracy without further training; (2) a \textit{training-time reweighting} method that focuses learning on low-probability (corresponding to higher $\Delta\log p$) tokens, which improves reasoning performance across models and benchmarks. Our work establishes the direction of change as a key principle for analyzing and improving RLVR.

67. On the Failure of Topic-Matched Contrast Baselines in Multi-Directional Refusal Abliteration

Authors: Valentin Petrov
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22061
Abstract:

Inasmuch as the removal of refusal behavior from instruction-tuned language models by directional abliteration requires the extraction of refusal-mediating directions from the residual stream activation space, and inasmuch as the construction of the contrast baseline against which harmful prompt activations are compared has been treated in the existing literature as an implementation detail rather than a methodological concern, the present work investigates whether a topically matched contrast baseline yields superior refusal directions. The investigation is carried out on the Qwen~3.5 2B model using per-category matched prompt pairs, per-class Self-Organizing Map extraction, and Singular Value Decomposition orthogonalization. It was found that topic-matched contrast produces no functional refusal directions at any tested weight level on any tested layer, while unmatched contrast on the same model, same extraction code, and same evaluation protocol achieves complete refusal elimination on six layers. The geometric analysis of the failure establishes that topic-matched subtraction cancels the dominant activation component shared between harmful and harmless prompts of the same subject, reducing the extracted direction magnitude below the threshold at which weight-matrix projection perturbs the residual stream. The implications for the design of contrast baselines in abliteration research are discussed.

68. Uncertainty-guided Compositional Alignment with Part-to-Whole Semantic Representativeness in Hyperbolic Vision-Language Models

Authors: Hayeon Kim , Ji Ha Jang , Junghun James Kim , Se Young Chun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22042
Abstract:

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable performance, their Euclidean embeddings remain limited in capturing hierarchical relationships such as part-to-whole or parent-child structures, and often face challenges in multi-object compositional scenarios. Hyperbolic VLMs mitigate this issue by better preserving hierarchical structures and modeling part-whole relations (i.e., whole scene and its part images) through entailment. However, existing approaches do not model that each part has a different level of semantic representativeness to the whole. We propose UNcertainty-guided Compositional Hyperbolic Alignment (UNCHA) for enhancing hyperbolic VLMs. UNCHA models part-to-whole semantic representativeness with hyperbolic uncertainty, by assigning lower uncertainty to more representative parts and higher uncertainty to less representative ones for the whole scene. This representativeness is then incorporated into the contrastive objective with uncertainty-guided weights. Finally, the uncertainty is further calibrated with an entailment loss regularized by entropy-based term. With the proposed losses, UNCHA learns hyperbolic embeddings with more accurate part-whole ordering, capturing the underlying compositional structure in an image and improving its understanding of complex multi-object scenes. UNCHA achieves state-of-the-art performance on zero-shot classification, retrieval, and multi-label classification benchmarks. Our code and models are available at: this https URL .

69. ROM: Real-time Overthinking Mitigation via Streaming Detection and Intervention

Authors: Xinyan Wang , Xiaogeng Liu , Chaowei Xiao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22016
Abstract:

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong accuracy on challenging tasks by generating long Chain-of-Thought traces, but suffer from overthinking. Even after reaching the correct answer, they continue generating redundant reasoning steps. This behavior increases latency and compute cost and can also lead to answer drift. Existing mitigation methods either require training-heavy backbone modification or rely on hand-crafted heuristics that do not truly capture overthinking patterns. We propose ROM, the first method that formulates overthinking mitigation as a streaming prediction-and-control problem. ROM attaches a lightweight detection head to the late-layer hidden states of a frozen large language model backbone. It monitors tokens in real time and triggers an early transition to the final answer once overthinking is detected. We also introduce token-level supervision based on solution correctness boundaries and a data augmentation strategy that reduces distilled-data bias. Across seven benchmarks, ROM achieves the highest accuracy (93.51%), the shortest responses (1,159 tokens), and the best response efficiency. Compared with the vanilla baseline, it reduces response length by 47.2% and improves efficiency by 121%. These results show that streaming detection is a promising approach to real-time overthinking mitigation.

70. SecureBreak – A dataset towards safe and secure models

Authors: Marco Arazzi , Vignesh Kumar Kembu , Antonino Nocera
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21975
Abstract:

Large language models are becoming pervasive core components in many real-world applications. As a consequence, security alignment represents a critical requirement for their safe deployment. Although previous related works focused primarily on model architectures and alignment methodologies, these approaches alone cannot ensure the complete elimination of harmful generations. This concern is reinforced by the growing body of scientific literature showing that attacks, such as jailbreaking and prompt injection, can bypass existing security alignment mechanisms. As a consequence, additional security strategies are needed both to provide qualitative feedback on the robustness of the obtained security alignment at the training stage, and to create an ``ultimate’’ defense layer to block unsafe outputs possibly produced by deployed models. To provide a contribution in this scenario, this paper introduces SecureBreak, a safety-oriented dataset designed to support the development of AI-driven solutions for detecting harmful LLM outputs caused by residual weaknesses in security alignment. The dataset is highly reliable due to careful manual annotation, where labels are assigned conservatively to ensure safety. It performs well in detecting unsafe content across multiple risk categories. Tests with pre-trained LLMs show improved results after fine-tuning on SecureBreak. Overall, the dataset is useful both for post-generation safety filtering and for guiding further model alignment and security improvements.

71. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Medical Text Summarization: A Comparative Study of Lora, Prompt Tuning, and Full Fine-Tuning

Authors: Ulugbek Shernazarov , Rostislav Svitsov , Bin Shi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21970
Abstract:

Fine-tuning large language models for domain-specific tasks such as medical text summarization demands substantial computational resources. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods offer promising alternatives by updating only a small fraction of parameters. This paper compares three adaptation approaches-Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), Prompt Tuning, and Full Fine-Tuning-across the Flan-T5 model family on the PubMed medical summarization dataset. Through experiments with multiple random seeds, we demonstrate that LoRA consistently outperforms full fine-tuning, achieving 43.52 +/- 0.18 ROUGE-1 on Flan-T5-Large with only 0.6% trainable parameters compared to 40.67 +/- 0.21 for full fine-tuning. Sensitivity analyses examine the impact of LoRA rank and prompt token count. Our findings suggest the low-rank constraint provides beneficial regularization, challenging assumptions about the necessity of full parameter updates. Code is available at this https URL

72. P^2O: Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization

Authors: Xinyu Lu , Kaiqi Zhang , Jinglin Yang , Boxi Cao , Yaojie Lu , Hongyu Lin , Min He , Xianpei Han , Le Sun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21877
Abstract:

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, vanilla RLVR suffers from inefficient exploration, particularly when confronting “hard samples” that yield nearzero success rates. In such scenarios, the reliance on sparse outcome rewards typically results in zero-advantage estimates, effectively starving the model of supervision signals despite the high informational value of these instances. To address this, we propose P^2O, a novel framework that synergizes Prompt Optimization with Policy Optimization. P^2O identifies hard samples during training iterations and leverages the GeneticPareto (GEPA) prompt optimization algorithm to evolve prompt templates that guide the model toward discovering successful trajectories. Crucially, unlike traditional prompt engineering methods that rely on input augmentation, P^2O distills the reasoning gains induced by these optimized prompts directly into the model parameters. This mechanism provides denser positive supervision signals for hard samples and accelerates convergence. Extensive experiments demonstrate that P^2O not only achieves superior performance on in-distribution datasets but also exhibits strong generalization, yielding substantial improvements on out-of-distribution benchmarks (+4.7% avg.).

73. Manifold-Aware Exploration for Reinforcement Learning in Video Generation

Authors: Mingzhe Zheng , Weijie Kong , Yue Wu , Dengyang Jiang , Yue Ma , Xuanhua He , Bin Lin , Kaixiong Gong , Zhao Zhong , Liefeng Bo , Qifeng Chen , Harry Yang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21872
Abstract:

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) methods for video generation like FlowGRPO remain far less reliable than their counterparts for language models and images. This gap arises because video generation has a complex solution space, and the ODE-to-SDE conversion used for exploration can inject excess noise, lowering rollout quality and making reward estimates less reliable, which destabilizes post-training alignment. To address this problem, we view the pre-trained model as defining a valid video data manifold and formulate the core problem as constraining exploration within the vicinity of this manifold, ensuring that rollout quality is preserved and reward estimates remain reliable. We propose SAGE-GRPO (Stable Alignment via Exploration), which applies constraints at both micro and macro levels. At the micro level, we derive a precise manifold-aware SDE with a logarithmic curvature correction and introduce a gradient norm equalizer to stabilize sampling and updates across timesteps. At the macro level, we use a dual trust region with a periodic moving anchor and stepwise constraints so that the trust region tracks checkpoints that are closer to the manifold and limits long-horizon drift. We evaluate SAGE-GRPO on HunyuanVideo1.5 using the original VideoAlign as the reward model and observe consistent gains over previous methods in VQ, MQ, TA, and visual metrics (CLIPScore, PickScore), demonstrating superior performance in both reward maximization and overall video quality. The code and visual gallery are available at this https URL .

74. SemEval-2026 Task 12: Abductive Event Reasoning: Towards Real-World Event Causal Inference for Large Language Models

Authors: Pengfei Cao , Mingxuan Yang , Yubo Chen , Chenlong Zhang , Mingxuan Liu , Kang Liu , Jun Zhao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21720
Abstract:

Understanding why real-world events occur is important for both natural language processing and practical decision-making, yet direct-cause inference remains underexplored in evidence-rich settings. To address this gap, we organized SemEval-2026 Task 12: Abductive Event Reasoning (AER).\footnote{The task data is available at this https URL } The task asks systems to identify the most plausible direct cause of a target event from supporting evidence. We formulate AER as an evidence-grounded multiple-choice benchmark that captures key challenges of real-world causal reasoning, including distributed evidence, indirect background factors, and semantically related but non-causal distractors. The shared task attracted 122 participants and received 518 submissions. This paper presents the task formulation, dataset construction pipeline, evaluation setup, and system results. AER provides a focused benchmark for abductive reasoning over real-world events and highlights challenges for future work on causal reasoning and multi-document understanding.

75. Rethinking Token Reduction for Large Vision-Language Models

Authors: Yi Wang , Haofei Zhang , Qihan Huang , Anda Cao , Gongfan Fang , Wei Wang , Xuan Jin , Jie Song , Mingli Song , Xinchao Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21701
Abstract:

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) excel in visual understanding and reasoning, but the excessive visual tokens lead to high inference costs. Although recent token reduction methods mitigate this issue, they mainly target single-turn Visual Question Answering (VQA), leaving the more practical multi-turn VQA (MT-VQA) scenario largely unexplored. MT-VQA introduces additional challenges, as subsequent questions are unknown beforehand and may refer to arbitrary image regions, making existing reduction strategies ineffective. Specifically, current approaches fall into two categories: prompt-dependent methods, which bias toward the initial text prompt and discard information useful for subsequent turns; prompt-agnostic ones, which, though technically applicable to multi-turn settings, rely on heuristic reduction metrics such as attention scores, leading to suboptimal performance. In this paper, we propose a learning-based prompt-agnostic method, termed MetaCompress, overcoming the limitations of heuristic designs. We begin by formulating token reduction as a learnable compression mapping, unifying existing formats such as pruning and merging into a single learning objective. Upon this formulation, we introduce a data-efficient training paradigm capable of learning optimal compression mappings with limited computational costs. Extensive experiments on MT-VQA benchmarks and across multiple LVLM architectures demonstrate that MetaCompress achieves superior efficiency-accuracy trade-offs while maintaining strong generalization across dialogue turns. Our code is available at this https URL .

76. Structured Visual Narratives Undermine Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models

Authors: Rui Yang Tan , Yujia Hu , Roy Ka-Wei Lee
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21697
Abstract:

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) extend text-only LLMs with visual reasoning, but also introduce new safety failure modes under visually grounded instructions. We study comic-template jailbreaks that embed harmful goals inside simple three-panel visual narratives and prompt the model to role-play and “complete the comic.” Building on JailbreakBench and JailbreakV, we introduce ComicJailbreak, a comic-based jailbreak benchmark with 1,167 attack instances spanning 10 harm categories and 5 task setups. Across 15 state-of-the-art MLLMs (six commercial and nine open-source), comic-based attacks achieve success rates comparable to strong rule-based jailbreaks and substantially outperform plain-text and random-image baselines, with ensemble success rates exceeding 90% on several commercial models. Then, with the existing defense methodologies, we show that these methods are effective against the harmful comics, they will induce a high refusal rate when prompted with benign prompts. Finally, using automatic judging and targeted human evaluation, we show that current safety evaluators can be unreliable on sensitive but non-harmful content. Our findings highlight the need for safety alignment robust to narrative-driven multimodal jailbreaks.

77. Towards Secure Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Review of Threats, Defenses and Benchmarks

Authors: Yanming Mu , Hao Hu , Feiyang Li , Qiao Yuan , Jiang Wu , Zichuan Liu , Pengcheng Liu , Mei Wang , Hongwei Zhou , Yuling Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21654
Abstract:

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly mitigates the hallucinations and domain knowledge deficiency in large language models by incorporating external knowledge bases. However, the multi-module architecture of RAG introduces complex system-level security vulnerabilities. Guided by the RAG workflow, this paper analyzes the underlying vulnerability mechanisms and systematically categorizes core threat vectors such as data poisoning, adversarial attacks, and membership inference attacks. Based on this threat assessment, we construct a taxonomy of RAG defense technologies from a dual perspective encompassing both input and output stages. The input-side analysis reviews data protection mechanisms including dynamic access control, homomorphic encryption retrieval, and adversarial pre-filtering. The output-side examination summarizes advanced leakage prevention techniques such as federated learning isolation, differential privacy perturbation, and lightweight data sanitization. To establish a unified benchmark for future experimental design, we consolidate authoritative test datasets, security standards, and evaluation frameworks. To the best of our knowledge, this paper presents the first end-to-end survey dedicated to the security of RAG systems. Distinct from existing literature that isolates specific vulnerabilities, we systematically map the entire pipeline-providing a unified analysis of threat models, defense mechanisms, and evaluation benchmarks. By enabling deep insights into potential risks, this work seeks to foster the development of highly robust and trustworthy next-generation RAG systems.

78. AgenticRec: End-to-End Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization for Ranking-Oriented Recommender Agents

Authors: Tianyi Li , Zixuan Wang , Guidong Lei , Xiaodong Li , Hui Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21613
Abstract:

Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation. However, existing recommender agents typically suffer from a disconnect between intermediate reasoning and final ranking feedback, and are unable to capture fine-grained preferences. To address this, we present AgenticRec, a ranking-oriented agentic recommendation framework that optimizes the entire decision-making trajectory (including intermediate reasoning, tool invocation, and final ranking list generation) under sparse implicit feedback. Our approach makes three key contributions. First, we design a suite of recommendation-specific tools integrated into a ReAct loop to support evidence-grounded reasoning. Second, we propose theoretically unbiased List-Wise Group Relative Policy Optimization (list-wise GRPO) to maximize ranking utility, ensuring accurate credit assignment for complex tool-use trajectories. Third, we introduce Progressive Preference Refinement (PPR) to resolve fine-grained preference ambiguities. By mining hard negatives from ranking violations and applying bidirectional preference alignment, PPR minimizes the convex upper bound of pairwise ranking errors. Experiments on benchmarks confirm that AgenticRec significantly outperforms baselines, validating the necessity of unifying reasoning, tool use, and ranking optimization.

79. mSFT: Addressing Dataset Mixtures Overfiting Heterogeneously in Multi-task SFT

Authors: Woosung Koh , Jeyoung Jeon , Youngjin Song , Yujin Cheon , Soowon Oh , Jaehyeong Choi , Se-Young Yun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21606
Abstract:

Current language model training commonly applies multi-task Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) using a homogeneous compute budget across all sub-datasets. This approach is fundamentally sub-optimal: heterogeneous learning dynamics cause faster-learning tasks to overfit early while slower ones remain under-fitted. To address this, we introduce mSFT, an iterative, overfitting-aware search algorithm for multi-task data mixtures. mSFT trains the model on an active mixture, identifies and excludes the earliest overfitting sub-dataset, and reverts to that specific optimal checkpoint before continuing. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that mSFT consistently outperforms 4 baselines across 10 benchmarks and 6 base models. Further analysis confirms mSFT maintains robust gains across diverse dataset sizes, task granularities, and is insensitive to its single new hyperparameter (compute budget). Notably, at low compute budget, mSFT can improve performance while lowering training FLOPs. Ultimately, mSFT establishes a practical overfitting-aware algorithm for multi-task SFT that maximizes the potential of models across diverse data mixtures.

80. Riemannian Geometry Speaks Louder Than Words: From Graph Foundation Model to Next-Generation Graph Intelligence

Authors: Philip S. Yu , Li Sun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21601
Abstract:

Graphs provide a natural description of the complex relationships among objects, and play a pivotal role in communications, transportation, social computing, the life sciences, etc. Currently, there is strong agreement that Graph Foundation Models (GFMs) are essential for advancing graph learning, yet considerable disagreement persists on how to build a powerful, general-purpose GFM analogous to Large Language Models (LLMs). Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) exhibit limitations in memory retention and principled interpretability when confronted with multi-domain pretraining and adaptation. The challenge of graph serialization hinders the direct application of LLMs, as the words struggle to capture the structural complexity and diversity inherent in graphs. In contrast, Riemannian geometry offers an elegant mathematical framework for modeling structures, while remaining compatible with graph semantic learning, even with LLMs. In this paper, we argue that, for graphs, Riemannian geometry speaks louder than words, and lay out the foundational principles for GFM. Reimagining with Riemannian geometry, we introduce a blue sky idea-Riemannian Foundation Model (RFM)-that opens a new pathway for capturing complex structural patterns and uncovering cross-domain generalities. RFM emphasizes intrinsic graph geometry and embodies endogenous capacities for structural inference and generation, moving beyond mere representation-space switching. Accordingly, we outline a progressive agenda that begins with universal structural understanding through intrinsic geometry, and then rebuilds LLM with a Riemannian engine for general-purpose graph modeling and beyond. Thus, RFM enables a paradigm shift from designing graph models to solving graph-structured applications with RFM agents, unlocking the next-generation graph intelligence.

81. PRISM: Breaking the O(n) Memory Wall in Long-Context LLM Inference via O(1) Photonic Block Selection

Authors: Hyoseok Park , Yeonsang Park
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21576
Abstract:

Long-context LLM inference is bottlenecked not by compute but by the O(n) memory bandwidth cost of scanning the KV cache at every decode step – a wall that no amount of arithmetic scaling can break. Recent photonic accelerators have demonstrated impressive throughput for dense attention computation; however, these approaches inherit the same O(n) memory scaling as electronic attention when applied to long contexts. We observe that the real leverage point is the coarse block-selection step: a memory-bound similarity search that determines which KV blocks to fetch. We identify, for the first time, that this task is structurally matched to the photonic broadcast-and-weight paradigm – the query fans out to all candidates via passive splitting, signatures are quasi-static (matching electro-optic MRR programming), and only rank order matters (relaxing precision to 4-6 bits). Crucially, the photonic advantage grows with context length: as N increases, the electronic scan cost rises linearly while the photonic evaluation remains O(1). We instantiate this insight in PRISM (Photonic Ranking via Inner-product Similarity with Microring weights), a thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) similarity engine. Hardware-impaired needle-in-a-haystack evaluation on Qwen2.5-7B confirms 100% accuracy from 4K through 64K tokens at k=32, with 16x traffic reduction at 64K context. PRISM achieves a four-order-of-magnitude energy advantage over GPU baselines at practical context lengths (n >= 4K).

82. LLM-Based Test Case Generation in DBMS through Monte Carlo Tree Search

Authors: Yujia Chen , Yingli Zhou , Fangyuan Zhang , Cuiyun Gao
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21530
Abstract:

Database Management Systems (DBMSs) are fundamental infrastructure for modern data-driven applications, where thorough testing with high-quality SQL test cases is essential for ensuring system reliability. Traditional approaches such as fuzzing can be effective for specific DBMSs, but adapting them to different proprietary dialects requires substantial manual effort. Large Language Models (LLMs) present promising opportunities for automated SQL test generation, but face critical challenges in industrial environments. First, lightweight models are widely used in organizations due to security and privacy constraints, but they struggle to generate syntactically valid queries for proprietary SQL dialects. Second, LLM-generated queries are often semantically similar and exercise only shallow execution paths, thereby quickly reaching a coverage plateau. To address these challenges, we propose MIST, an LLM-based test case generatIon framework for DBMS through Monte Carlo Tree search. MIST consists of two stages: Feature-Guided Error-Driven Test Case Synthetization, which constructs a hierarchical feature tree and uses error feedback to guide LLM generation, aiming to produce syntactically valid and semantically diverse queries for different DBMS dialects, and Monte Carlo Tree Search-Based Test Case Mutation, which jointly optimizes seed query selection and mutation rule application guided by coverage feedback, aiming at boosting code coverage by exploring deeper execution paths. Experiments on three widely-used DBMSs with four lightweight LLMs show that MIST achieves average improvements of 43.3% in line coverage, 32.3% in function coverage, and 46.4% in branch coverage compared to the baseline approach with the highest line coverage of 69.3% in the Optimizer module.

83. CatRAG: Functor-Guided Structural Debiasing with Retrieval Augmentation for Fair LLMs

Authors: Ravi Ranjan , Utkarsh Grover , Mayur Akewar , Xiaomin Lin , Agoritsa Polyzou
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21524
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are deployed in high-stakes settings but can show demographic, gender, and geographic biases that undermine fairness and trust. Prior debiasing methods, including embedding-space projections, prompt-based steering, and causal interventions, often act at a single stage of the pipeline, resulting in incomplete mitigation and brittle utility trade-offs under distribution shifts. We propose CatRAG Debiasing, a dual-pronged framework that integrates functor with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) guided structural debiasing. The functor component leverages category-theoretic structure to induce a principled, structure-preserving projection that suppresses bias-associated directions in the embedding space while retaining task-relevant semantics. On the Bias Benchmark for Question Answering (BBQ) across three open-source LLMs (Meta Llama-3, OpenAI GPT-OSS, and Google Gemma-3), CatRAG achieves state-of-the-art results, improving accuracy by up to 40% over the corresponding base models and by more than 10% over prior debiasing methods, while reducing bias scores to near zero (from 60% for the base models) across gender, nationality, race, and intersectional subgroups.

84. SafePilot: A Framework for Assuring LLM-enabled Cyber-Physical Systems

Authors: Weizhe Xu , Mengyu Liu , Fanxin Kong
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21523
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs), deep learning architectures with typically over 10 billion parameters, have recently begun to be integrated into various cyber-physical systems (CPS) such as robotics, industrial automation, and autopilot systems. The abstract knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs are employed for tasks like planning and navigation. However, a significant challenge arises from the tendency of LLMs to produce “hallucinations” - outputs that are coherent yet factually incorrect or contextually unsuitable. This characteristic can lead to undesirable or unsafe actions in the CPS. Therefore, our research focuses on assuring the LLM-enabled CPS by enhancing their critical properties. We propose SafePilot, a novel hierarchical neuro-symbolic framework that provides end-to-end assurance for LLM-enabled CPS according to attribute-based and temporal specifications. Given a task and its specification, SafePilot first invokes a hierarchical planner with a discriminator that assesses task complexity. If the task is deemed manageable, it is passed directly to an LLM-based task planner with built-in verification. Otherwise, the hierarchical planner applies a divide-and-conquer strategy, decomposing the task into sub-tasks, each of which is individually planned and later merged into a final solution. The LLM-based task planner translates natural language constraints into formal specifications and verifies the LLM’s output against them. If violations are detected, it identifies the flaw, adjusts the prompt accordingly, and re-invokes the LLM. This iterative process continues until a valid plan is produced or a predefined limit is reached. Our framework supports LLM-enabled CPS with both attribute-based and temporal constraints. Its effectiveness and adaptability are demonstrated through two illustrative case studies.

85. Efficient Failure Management for Multi-Agent Systems with Reasoning Trace Representation

Authors: Lingzhe Zhang , Tong Jia , Mingyu Wang , Weijie Hong , Chiming Duan , Minghua He , Rongqian Wang , Xi Peng , Meiling Wang , Gong Zhang , Renhai Chen , Ying Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21522
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLM)-based Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) have emerged as a new paradigm in software system design, increasingly demonstrating strong reasoning and collaboration capabilities. As these systems become more complex and autonomous, effective failure management is essential to ensure reliability and availability. However, existing approaches often rely on per-trace reasoning, which leads to low efficiency, and neglect historical failure patterns, limiting diagnostic accuracy. In this paper, we conduct a preliminary empirical study to demonstrate the necessity, potential, and challenges of leveraging historical failure patterns to enhance failure management in MASs. Building on this insight, we propose \textbf{EAGER}, an efficient failure management framework for multi-agent systems based on reasoning trace representation. EAGER employs unsupervised reasoning-scoped contrastive learning to encode both intra-agent reasoning and inter-agent coordination, enabling real-time step-wise failure detection, diagnosis, and reflexive mitigation guided by historical failure knowledge. Preliminary evaluations on three open-source MASs demonstrate the effectiveness of EAGER and highlight promising directions for future research in reliable multi-agent system operations.

86. When Documents Disagree: Measuring Institutional Variation in Transplant Guidance with Retrieval-Augmented Language Models

Authors: Yubo Li , Ramayya Krishnan , Rema Padman
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21460
Abstract:

Patient education materials for solid-organ transplantation vary substantially across U.S. centers, yet no systematic method exists to quantify this heterogeneity at scale. We introduce a framework that grounds the same patient questions in different centers’ handbooks using retrieval-augmented language models and compares the resulting answers using a five-label consistency taxonomy. Applied to 102 handbooks from 23 centers and 1,115 benchmark questions, the framework quantifies heterogeneity across four dimensions: question, topic, organ, and center. We find that 20.8% of non-absent pairwise comparisons exhibit clinically meaningful divergence, concentrated in condition monitoring and lifestyle topics. Coverage gaps are even more prominent: 96.2% of question-handbook pairs miss relevant content, with reproductive health at 95.1% absence. Center-level divergence profiles are stable and interpretable, where heterogeneity reflects systematic institutional differences, likely due to patient diversity. These findings expose an information gap in transplant patient education materials, with document-grounded medical question answering highlighting opportunities for content improvement.

87. KG-Hopper: Empowering Compact Open LLMs with Knowledge Graph Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Shuai Wang , Yinan Yu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21440
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive natural language capabilities but often struggle with knowledge-intensive reasoning tasks. Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA), which leverages structured Knowledge Graphs (KGs) exemplifies this challenge due to the need for accurate multi-hop reasoning. Existing approaches typically perform sequential reasoning steps guided by predefined pipelines, restricting flexibility and causing error cascades due to isolated reasoning at each step. To address these limitations, we propose KG-Hopper, a novel Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework that empowers compact open LLMs with the ability to perform integrated multi-hop KG reasoning within a single inference round. Rather than reasoning step-by-step, we train a Reasoning LLM that embeds the entire KG traversal and decision process into a unified ``thinking’’ stage, enabling global reasoning over cross-step dependencies and dynamic path exploration with backtracking. Experimental results on eight KG reasoning benchmarks show that KG-Hopper, based on a 7B-parameter LLM, consistently outperforms larger multi-step systems (up to 70B) and achieves competitive performance with proprietary models such as GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4o-mini, while remaining compact, open, and data-efficient. The code is publicly available at: this https URL .

88. LLM-Powered Workflow Optimization for Multidisciplinary Software Development: An Automotive Industry Case Study

Authors: Shuai Wang , Yinan Yu , Earl Barr , Dhasarathy Parthasarathy
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21439
Abstract:

Multidisciplinary Software Development (MSD) requires domain experts and developers to collaborate across incompatible formalisms and separate artifact sets. Today, even with AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot, this process remains inefficient; individual coding tasks are semi-automated, but the workflow connecting domain knowledge to implementation is not. Developers and experts still lack a shared view, resulting in repeated coordination, clarification rounds, and error-prone handoffs. We address this gap through a graph-based workflow optimization approach that progressively replaces manual coordination with LLM-powered services, enabling incremental adoption without disrupting established practices. We evaluate our approach on \texttt{spapi}, a production in-vehicle API system at Volvo Group involving 192 endpoints, 420 properties, and 776 CAN signals across six functional domains. The automated workflow achieves 93.7\% F1 score while reducing per-API development time from approximately 5 hours to under 7 minutes, saving an estimated 979 engineering hours. In production, the system received high satisfaction from both domain experts and developers, with all participants reporting full satisfaction with communication efficiency.

89. Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Portuguese Question Answering: A Comparative Study of PEFT on BERTimbau and Exploratory Evaluation of Generative LLMs

Authors: Mariela M. Nina , Caio Veloso Costa , Lilian Berton , Didier A. Vega-Oliveros
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21418
Abstract:

Although large language models have transformed natural language processing, their computational costs create accessibility barriers for low-resource languages such as Brazilian Portuguese. This work presents a systematic evaluation of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) and quantization techniques applied to BERTimbau for Question Answering on SQuAD-BR, the Brazilian Portuguese translation of SQuAD v1. We evaluate 40 configurations combining four PEFT methods (LoRA, DoRA, QLoRA, QDoRA) across two model sizes (Base: 110M, Large: 335M parameters). Our findings reveal three critical insights: (1) LoRA achieves 95.8\% of baseline performance on BERTimbau-Large while reducing training time by 73.5\% (F1=81.32 vs 84.86); (2) higher learning rates (2e-4) substantially improve PEFT performance, with F1 gains of up to +19.71 points over standard rates; and (3) larger models show twice the quantization resilience (loss of 4.83 vs 9.56 F1 points). These results demonstrate that encoder-based models can be efficiently fine-tuned for extractive Brazilian Portuguese QA with substantially lower computational cost than large generative LLMs, promoting more sustainable approaches aligned with \textit{Green AI} principles. An exploratory evaluation of Tucano and Sabiá on the same extractive QA benchmark shows that while generative models can reach competitive F1 scores with LoRA fine-tuning, they require up to 4.2$\times$ more GPU memory and 3$\times$ more training time than BERTimbau-Base, reinforcing the efficiency advantage of smaller encoder-based architectures for this task.

90. Benchmarking Bengali Dialectal Bias: A Multi-Stage Framework Integrating RAG-Based Translation and Human-Augmented RLAIF

Authors: K. M. Jubair Sami , Dipto Sumit , Ariyan Hossain , Farig Sadeque
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21359
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) frequently exhibit performance biases against regional dialects of low-resource languages. However, frameworks to quantify these disparities remain scarce. We propose a two-phase framework to evaluate dialectal bias in LLM question-answering across nine Bengali dialects. First, we translate and gold-label standard Bengali questions into dialectal variants adopting a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline to prepare 4,000 question sets. Since traditional translation quality evaluation metrics fail on unstandardized dialects, we evaluate fidelity using an LLM-as-a-judge, which human correlation confirms outperforms legacy metrics. Second, we benchmark 19 LLMs across these gold-labeled sets, running 68,395 RLAIF evaluations validated through multi-judge agreement and human fallback. Our findings reveal severe performance drops linked to linguistic divergence. For instance, responses to the highly divergent Chittagong dialect score 5.44/10, compared to 7.68/10 for Tangail. Furthermore, increased model scale does not consistently mitigate this bias. We contribute a validated translation quality evaluation method, a rigorous benchmark dataset, and a Critical Bias Sensitivity (CBS) metric for safety-critical applications.

91. COINBench: Moving Beyond Individual Perspectives to Collective Intent Understanding

Authors: Xiaozhe Li , Tianyi Lyu , Siyi Yang , Yizhao Yang , Yuxi Gong , Jinxuan Huang , Ligao Zhang , Zhuoyi Huang , Qingwen Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21329
Abstract:

Understanding human intent is a high-level cognitive challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs), requiring sophisticated reasoning over noisy, conflicting, and non-linear discourse. While LLMs excel at following individual instructions, their ability to distill Collective Intent - the process of extracting consensus, resolving contradictions, and inferring latent trends from multi-source public discussions - remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce COIN-BENCH, a dynamic, real-world, live-updating benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs on collective intent understanding within the consumer domain. Unlike traditional benchmarks that focus on transactional outcomes, COIN-BENCH operationalizes intent as a hierarchical cognitive structure, ranging from explicit scenarios to deep causal reasoning. We implement a robust evaluation pipeline that combines a rule-based method with an LLM-as-the-Judge approach. This framework incorporates COIN-TREE for hierarchical cognitive structuring and retrieval-augmented verification (COIN-RAG) to ensure expert-level precision in analyzing raw, collective human discussions. An extensive evaluation of 20 state-of-the-art LLMs across four dimensions - depth, breadth, informativeness, and correctness - reveals that while current models can handle surface-level aggregation, they still struggle with the analytical depth required for complex intent synthesis. COIN-BENCH establishes a new standard for advancing LLMs from passive instruction followers to expert-level analytical agents capable of deciphering the collective voice of the real world. See our project page on COIN-BENCH.

92. enhancing reasoning accuracy in large language models during inference time

Authors: Vinay Sharma , Manish Jain
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21301
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit strong linguistic abilities while remaining unreliable on multi-step reasoning tasks, particularly when deployed without additional training or fine-tuning. In this work, we study inference-time techniques to improve the reasoning accuracy of LLMs. We systematically evaluate three classes of inference-time strategies: (i) self-consistency via stochastic decoding, where the model is sampled multiple times using controlled temperature and nucleus sampling and the most frequent final answer is selected; (ii) dual-model reasoning agreement, where outputs from two independent models are compared and only consistent reasoning traces are trusted; and (iii) self-reflection, where the model critiques and revises its own reasoning. Across all evaluated methods, we employ Chain-of-Thought (CoT) [1] prompting to elicit explicit intermediate reasoning steps before generating final answers. In this work, we provide a controlled comparative evaluation across three inference-time strategies under identical prompting and verification settings. Our experiments on LLM [2] show that self-consistency with nucleus sampling and controlled temperature value yields the substantial gains, achieving a 9% to 15% absolute improvement in accuracy over greedy single-pass decoding, well-suited for low-risk domains, offering meaningful gains with minimal overhead. The dual-model approach provides additional confirmation for model reasoning steps thus more appropriate for moderate-risk domains, where higher reliability justifies additional compute. Self-reflection offers only marginal improvements, suggesting limited effectiveness for smaller non-reasoning models at inference time.

93. When Models Judge Themselves: Unsupervised Self-Evolution for Multimodal Reasoning

Authors: Zhengxian Wu , Kai Shi , Chuanrui Zhang , Zirui Liao , Jun Yang , Ni Yang , Qiuying Peng , Luyuan Zhang , Hangrui Xu , Tianhuang Su , Zhenyu Yang , Haonan Lu , Haoqian Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21289
Abstract:

Recent progress in multimodal large language models has led to strong performance on reasoning tasks, but these improvements largely rely on high-quality annotated data or teacher-model distillation, both of which are costly and difficult to this http URL address this, we propose an unsupervised self-evolution training framework for multimodal reasoning that achieves stable performance improvements without using human-annotated answers or external reward models. For each input, we sample multiple reasoning trajectories and jointly model their within group this http URL use the Actor’s self-consistency signal as a training prior, and introduce a bounded Judge based modulation to continuously reweight trajectories of different this http URL further model the modulated scores as a group level distribution and convert absolute scores into relative advantages within each group, enabling more robust policy updates. Trained with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) on unlabeled data, our method consistently improves reasoning performance and generalization on five mathematical reasoning benchmarks, offering a scalable path toward self-evolving multimodal this http URL code are available at this https URL .

94. WARBENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Military Decision-Making

Authors: Zongjie Li , Chaozheng Wang , Yuchong Xie , Pingchuan Ma , Shuai Wang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21280
Abstract:

Large Language Models are increasingly being considered for deployment in safety-critical military applications. However, current benchmarks suffer from structural blindspots that systematically overestimate model capabilities in real-world tactical scenarios. Existing frameworks typically ignore strict legal constraints based on International Humanitarian Law (IHL), omit edge computing limitations, lack robustness testing for fog of war, and inadequately evaluate explicit reasoning. To address these vulnerabilities, we present WARBENCH, a comprehensive evaluation framework establishing a foundational tactical baseline alongside four distinct stress testing dimensions. Through a large scale empirical evaluation of nine leading models on 136 high-fidelity historical scenarios, we reveal severe structural flaws. First, baseline tactical reasoning systematically collapses under complex terrain and high force asymmetry. Second, while state of the art closed source models maintain functional compliance, edge-optimized small models expose extreme operational risks with legal violation rates approaching 70 percent. Furthermore, models experience catastrophic performance degradation under 4-bit quantization and systematic information loss. Conversely, explicit reasoning mechanisms serve as highly effective structural safeguards against inadvertent violations. Ultimately, these findings demonstrate that current models remain fundamentally unready for autonomous deployment in high stakes tactical environments.

95. Conversation Tree Architecture: A Structured Framework for Context-Aware Multi-Branch LLM Conversations

Authors: Pranav Hemanth , Sampriti Saha
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21278
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for extended, multi-topic conversations, yet the flat, append-only structure of current conversation interfaces introduces a fundamental limitation: all context accumulates in a single unbounded window, causing topically distinct threads to bleed into one another and progressively degrade response quality. We term this failure mode logical context poisoning. In this paper, we introduce the Conversation Tree Architecture (CTA), a hierarchical framework that organizes LLM conversations as trees of discrete, context-isolated nodes. Each node maintains its own local context window; structured mechanisms govern how context flows between parent and child nodes, downstream on branch creation and upstream on branch deletion. We additionally introduce volatile nodes, transient branches whose local context must be selectively merged upward or permanently discarded before purging. We formalize the architecture’s primitives, characterize the open design problems in context flow, relate our framework to prior work in LLM memory management, and describe a working prototype implementation. The CTA provides a principled foundation for structured conversational context management and extends naturally to multi-agent settings.

96. Aggregation Alignment for Federated Learning with Mixture-of-Experts under Data Heterogeneity

Authors: Zihan Fang , Qianru Wang , Haonan An , Zheng Lin , Yiqin Deng , Xianhao Chen , Yuguang Fang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21276
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly adopt Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures to scale model capacity while reducing computation. Fine-tuning these MoE-based LLMs often requires access to distributed and privacy-sensitive data, making centralized fine-tuning impractical. Federated learning (FL) therefore provides a paradigm to collaboratively fine-tune MoE-based LLMs, enabling each client to integrate diverse knowledge without compromising data privacy. However, the integration of MoE-based LLM fine-tuning into FL encounters two critical aggregation challenges due to inherent data heterogeneity across clients: (i) divergent local data distributions drive clients to develop distinct gating preference for localized expert selection, causing direct parameter aggregation to produce a ``one-size-fits-none’’ global gating network, and (ii) same-indexed experts develop disparate semantic roles across clients, leading to expert semantic blurring and the degradation of expert specialization. To address these challenges, we propose FedAlign-MoE, a federated aggregation alignment framework that jointly enforces routing consistency and expert semantic alignment. Specifically, FedAlign-MoE aggregates gating behaviors by aligning routing distributions through consistency weighting and optimizes local gating networks through distribution regularization, maintaining cross-client stability without overriding discriminative local preferences. Meanwhile, FedAlign-MoE explicitly quantifies semantic consistency among same-indexed experts across clients and selectively aggregates updates from semantically aligned clients, ensuring stable and specialized functional roles for global experts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedAlign-MoE outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks, achieving faster convergence and superior accuracy in non-IID federated environments.

97. QMoP: Query Guided Mixture-of-Projector for Efficient Visual Token Compression

Authors: Zhongyang Li , Yaqian Li , Faming Fang , Rinyoichi Takezoe , Zi-Hao Bo , Cheng Qian , Mo Guang , Guixu Zhang , Kaiwen Long
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21232
Abstract:

Multimodal large language models suffer from severe computational and memory bottlenecks, as the number of visual tokens far exceeds that of textual tokens. While recent methods employ projector modules to align and compress visual tokens into text-aligned features, they typically depend on fixed heuristics that limit adaptability across diverse scenarios. In this paper, we first propose Query Guided Mixture-of-Projector (QMoP), a novel and flexible framework that adaptively compresses visual tokens via three collaborative branches: (1) a pooling-based branch for coarse-grained global semantics, (2) a resampler branch for extracting high-level semantic representations, and (3) a pruning-based branch for fine-grained token selection to preserve critical visual detail. To adaptively coordinate these branches, we introduce the Query Guided Router (QGR), which dynamically selects and weights the outputs from different branches based on both visual input and textual queries. A Mixture-of-Experts-style fusion mechanism is designed to aggregate the outputs, harnessing the strengths of each strategy while suppressing noise. To systematically evaluate the effects of Visual Token Compression, we also develop VTCBench, a dedicated benchmark for evaluating the information loss induced by visual token compression. Extensive experiments demonstrate that despite relying on fundamental compression modules, QMoP outperforms strong baselines and delivers significant savings in memory, computation, and inference time.

98. Context Selection for Hypothesis and Statistical Evidence Extraction from Full-Text Scientific Articles

Authors: Sai Koneru , Jian Wu , Sarah Rajtmajer
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21193
Abstract:

Extracting hypotheses and their supporting statistical evidence from full-text scientific articles is central to the synthesis of empirical findings, but remains difficult due to document length and the distribution of scientific arguments across sections of the paper. The work studies a sequential full-text extraction setting, where the statement of a primary finding in an article’s abstract is linked to (i) a corresponding hypothesis statement in the paper body and (ii) the statistical evidence that supports or refutes that hypothesis. This formulation induces a challenging within-document retrieval setting in which many candidate paragraphs are topically related to the finding but differ in rhetorical role, creating hard negatives for retrieval and extraction. Using a two-stage retrieve-and-extract framework, we conduct a controlled study of retrieval design choices, varying context quantity, context quality (standard Retrieval Augmented Generation, reranking, and a fine-tuned retriever paired with reranking), as well as an oracle paragraph setting to separate retrieval failures from extraction limits across four Large Language Model extractors. We find that targeted context selection consistently improves hypothesis extraction relative to full-text prompting, with gains concentrated in configurations that optimize retrieval quality and context cleanliness. In contrast, statistical evidence extraction remains substantially harder. Even with oracle paragraphs, performance remains moderate, indicating persistent extractor limitations in handling hybrid numeric-textual statements rather than retrieval failures alone.

99. LLM-based Automated Architecture View Generation: Where Are We Now?

Authors: Miryala Sathvika , Rudra Dhar , Karthik Vaidhyanathan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21178
Abstract:

Architecture views are essential for software architecture documentation, yet their manual creation is labor intensive and often leads to outdated artifacts. As systems grow in complexity, the automated generation of views from source code becomes increasingly valuable. Goal: We empirically evaluate the ability of LLMs and agentic approaches to generate architecture views from source code. Method: We analyze 340 open-source repositories across 13 experimental configurations using 3 LLMs with 3 prompting techniques and 2 agentic approaches, yielding 4,137 generated views. We evaluate the generated views by comparing them with the ground-truth using a combination of automated metrics complemented by human evaluations. Results: Prompting strategies offer marginal improvements. Few-shot prompting reduces clarity failures by 9.2% compared to zero-shot baselines. The custom agentic approach consistently outperforms the general-purpose agent, achieving the best clarity (22.6% failure rate) and level-of-detail success (50%). Conclusions: LLM and agentic approaches demonstrate capabilities in generating syntactically valid architecture views. However, they consistently exhibit granularity mismatches, operating at the code level rather than architectural abstractions. This suggests that there is still a need for human expertise, positioning LLMs and agents as assistive tools rather than autonomous architects.

100. Prompt replay: speeding up grpo with on-policy reuse of high-signal prompts

Authors: Andrei Baroian , Rutger Berger
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21177
Abstract:

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) plays a crucial role in expanding the capacities of LLM reasoning, but GRPO-style training is dominated by expensive rollouts and wastes compute on unusable prompts. We propose Prompt Replay, an overhead-free online data selection method for GRPO that reuses prompts only (not trajectories), to preserve on-policy optimization. After each step, we insert prompts with medium difficulty into a buffer, and prioritize prompts closer to a pass rate of 0.5 (half answers correct, half wrong) to maximize the advantage, thus learning signal. Training batches are formed by mixing reused prompts with fresh samples, with cooldown steps and max reuse times controlling aggressiveness vs risk of overfitting. Across multiple model families (Llama-3.2- 3B, Qwen3-8B) and training datasets (Dolci, Polaris), evaluated using average accuracy on six standard math benchmarks, Prompt Replay reduces zero-variance prompts, increases mean absolute advantage and shows faster initial accuracy gains. Yet, it plateaus and converges with the baseline, as too aggressive configuration was used. The method is most efficient when the rollouts are the primary bottleneck and the dataset is difficult for the model. We additionally observe that Qwen2.5-Math can exhibit spurious-reward effects that invalidates ablations, raising a warning signal for using it as a sole testbed for GRPO method research.

101. Reward Sharpness-Aware Fine-Tuning for Diffusion Models

Authors: Kwanyoung Kim , Byeongsu Sim
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21175
Abstract:

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in aligning large language models with human preferences, inspiring the development of reward-centric diffusion reinforcement learning (RDRL) to achieve similar alignment and controllability. While diffusion models can generate high-quality outputs, RDRL remains susceptible to reward hacking, where the reward score increases without corresponding improvements in perceptual quality. We demonstrate that this vulnerability arises from the non-robustness of reward model gradients, particularly when the reward landscape with respect to the input image is sharp. To mitigate this issue, we introduce methods that exploit gradients from a robustified reward model without requiring its retraining. Specifically, we employ gradients from a flattened reward model, obtained through parameter perturbations of the diffusion model and perturbations of its generated samples. Empirically, each method independently alleviates reward hacking and improves robustness, while their joint use amplifies these benefits. Our resulting framework, RSA-FT (Reward Sharpness-Aware Fine-Tuning), is simple, broadly compatible, and consistently enhances the reliability of RDRL.

102. TRACE: A Multi-Agent System for Autonomous Physical Reasoning in Seismological Science

Authors: Feng Liu , Jian Xu , Xin Cui , Xinghao Wang , Zijie Guo , Jiong Wang , S. Mostafa Mousavi , Xinyu Gu , Hao Chen , Ben Fei , Lihua Fang , Fenghua Ling , Zefeng Li , Lei Bai
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21152
Abstract:

Inferring the physical mechanisms that govern earthquake sequences from indirect geophysical observations remains difficult, particularly across tectonically distinct environments where similar seismic patterns can reflect different underlying processes. Current interpretations rely heavily on the expert synthesis of catalogs, spatiotemporal statistics, and candidate physical models, limiting reproducibility and the systematic transfer of insight across settings. Here we present TRACE (Trans-perspective Reasoning and Automated Comprehensive Evaluator), a multi-agent system that combines large language model planning with formal seismological constraints to derive auditable, physically grounded mechanistic inference from raw observations. Applied to the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence, TRACE autonomously identifies stress-perturbation-induced delayed triggering, resolving the cascading interaction between the Mw 6.4 and Mw 7.1 mainshocks; in the Santorini-Kolumbo case, the system identifies a structurally guided intrusion model, distinguishing fault-channeled episodic migration from the continuous propagation expected in homogeneous crustal failure. By providing a generalizable logical infrastructure for interpreting heterogeneous seismic phenomena, TRACE advances the field from expert-dependent analysis toward knowledge-guided autonomous discovery in Earth sciences.

103. Emergent Formal Verification: How an Autonomous AI Ecosystem Independently Discovered SMT-Based Safety Across Six Domains

Authors: Octavian Untila
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21149
Abstract:

An autonomous AI ecosystem (SUBSTRATE S3), generating product specifications without explicit instructions about formal methods, independently proposed the use of Z3 SMT solver across six distinct domains of AI safety: verification of LLM-generated code, tool API safety for AI agents, post-distillation reasoning correctness, CLI command validation, hardware assembly verification, and smart contract safety. These convergent discoveries, occurring across 8 products over 13 days with Jaccard similarity below 15% between variants, suggest that formal verification is not merely a useful technique for AI safety but an emergent property of any sufficiently complex system reasoning about its own safety. We propose a unified framework (substrate-guard) that applies Z3-based verification across all six output classes through a common API, and evaluate it on 181 test cases across five implemented domains, achieving 100% classification accuracy with zero false positives and zero false negatives. Our framework detected real bugs that empirical testing would miss, including an INT_MIN overflow in branchless RISC-V assembly and mathematically proved that unconstrained string parameters in tool APIs are formally unverifiable.

104. Mitigating Selection Bias in Large Language Models via Permutation-Aware GRPO

Authors: Jinquan Zheng , Jia Yuan , Jiacheng Yao , Chenyang Gu , Pujun Zheng , Guoxiu He
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21016
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) used for multiple-choice and pairwise evaluation tasks often exhibit selection bias due to non-semantic factors like option positions and label symbols. Existing inference-time debiasing is costly and may harm reasoning, while pointwise training ignores that the same question should yield consistent answers across permutations. To address this issue, we propose Permutation-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (PA-GRPO), which mitigates selection bias by enforcing permutation-consistent semantic reasoning. PA-GRPO constructs a permutation group for each instance by generating multiple candidate permutations, and optimizes the model using two complementary mechanisms: (1) cross-permutation advantage, which computes advantages relative to the mean reward over all permutations of the same instance, and (2) consistency-aware reward, which encourages the model to produce consistent decisions across different permutations. Experimental results demonstrate that PA-GRPO outperforms strong baselines across seven benchmarks, substantially reducing selection bias while maintaining high overall performance. The code will be made available on Github ( this https URL ).

105. ALL-FEM: Agentic Large Language models Fine-tuned for Finite Element Methods

Authors: Rushikesh Deotale , Adithya Srinivasan , Yuan Tian , Tianyi Zhang , Pavlos Vlachos , Hector Gomez
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21011
Abstract:

Finite element (FE) analysis guides the design and verification of nearly all manufactured objects. It is at the core of computational engineering, enabling simulation of complex physical systems, from fluids and solids to multiphysics systems. However, implementing FE codes and analyzing simulation results demands expertise across numerical analysis, continuum mechanics, and programming. Conventional Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate FE code, but they hallucinate, lack awareness of variational structures, and cannot close the loop from problem statement to a verified solution. Here, we propose ALL-FEM, an autonomous simulation system that integrates agentic AI with domain-specific, fine-tuned LLMs for FEniCS code generation across solid, fluid, and multiphysics applications. We construct a corpus of 1000+ verified FEniCS scripts by combining 500+ curated expert codes with a retrieval-augmented, multi-LLM pipeline that generates and filters codes for diverse PDEs, geometries, and boundary conditions. We used the corpus to fine-tune LLMs with 3B to 120B parameters. Our agentic framework orchestrates specialized agents, powered by fine-tuned LLMs, to formulate problems as PDEs, generate and debug code and visualize the results. We evaluated the system on 39 benchmarks that include problems of linear/nonlinear elasticity, plasticity, Newtonian/non-Newtonian flow, thermofluids, fluid-structure interaction, phase separation, and transport on moving domains. Embedded in a multi-agent workflow with runtime feedback, the best fine-tuned model (GPT OSS 120B) achieves code-level success of 71.79%, outperforming a non-agentic deployment of GPT 5 Thinking. By showing that relatively small, fine-tuned LLMs, orchestrated through agentic frameworks, can automate FE workflows, ALL-FEM offers a blueprint for autonomous simulation systems in computational science and engineering.

106. How AI Systems Think About Education: Analyzing Latent Preference Patterns in Large Language Models

Authors: Daniel Autenrieth
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21006
Abstract:

This paper presents the first systematic measurement of educational alignment in Large Language Models. Using a Delphi-validated instrument comprising 48 items across eight educational-theoretical dimensions, the study reveals that GPT-5.1 exhibits highly coherent preference patterns (99.78% transitivity; 92.79% model accuracy) that largely align with humanistic educational principles where expert consensus exists. Crucially, divergences from expert opinion occur precisely in domains of normative disagreement among human experts themselves, particularly emotional dimensions and epistemic normativity. This raises a fundamental question for alignment research: When human values are contested, what should models be aligned to? The findings demonstrate that GPT-5.1 does not remain neutral in contested domains but adopts coherent positions, prioritizing emotional responsiveness and rejecting false balance. The methodology, combining Delphi consensus-building with Structured Preference Elicitation and Thurstonian Utility modeling, provides a replicable framework for domain-specific alignment evaluation beyond generic value benchmarks.

107. ECI: Effective Contrastive Information to Evaluate Hard-Negatives

Authors: Aarush Sinha , Rahul Seetharaman , Aman Bansal
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20990
Abstract:

Hard negatives play a critical role in training and fine-tuning dense retrieval models, as they are semantically similar to positive documents yet non-relevant, and correctly distinguishing them is essential for improving retrieval accuracy. However, identifying effective hard negatives typically requires extensive ablation studies involving repeated fine-tuning with different negative sampling strategies and hyperparameters, resulting in substantial computational cost. In this paper, we introduce ECI: Effective Contrastive Information , a theoretically grounded metric grounded in Information Theory and Information Retrieval principles that enables practitioners to assess the quality of hard negatives prior to model fine-tuning. ECI evaluates negatives by optimizing the trade-off between Information Capacity the logarithmic bound on mutual information determined by set size and Discriminative Efficiency, a harmonic balance of Signal Magnitude (Hardness) and Safety (Max-Margin). Unlike heuristic approaches, ECI strictly penalizes unsafe, false-positive negatives prevalent in generative methods. We evaluate ECI across hard-negative sets mined or generated using BM25, cross-encoders, and large language models. Our results demonstrate that ECI accurately predicts downstream retrieval performance, identifying that hybrid strategies (BM25+Cross-Encoder) offer the optimal balance of volume and reliability, significantly reducing the need for costly end-to-end ablation studies.

108. Detection of adversarial intent in Human-AI teams using LLMs

Authors: Abed K. Musaffar , Ambuj Singh , Francesco Bullo
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20976
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in human-AI teams as support agents for complex tasks such as information retrieval, programming, and decision-making assistance. While these agents’ autonomy and contextual knowledge enables them to be useful, it also exposes them to a broad range of attacks, including data poisoning, prompt injection, and even prompt engineering. Through these attack vectors, malicious actors can manipulate an LLM agent to provide harmful information, potentially manipulating human agents to make harmful decisions. While prior work has focused on LLMs as attack targets or adversarial actors, this paper studies their potential role as defensive supervisors within mixed human-AI teams. Using a dataset consisting of multi-party conversations and decisions for a real human-AI team over a 25 round horizon, we formulate the problem of malicious behavior detection from interaction traces. We find that LLMs are capable of identifying malicious behavior in real-time, and without task-specific information, indicating the potential for task-agnostic defense. Moreover, we find that the malicious behavior of interest is not easily identified using simple heuristics, further suggesting the introduction of LLM defenders could render human teams more robust to certain classes of attack.

109. Learning to Aggregate Zero-Shot LLM Agents for Corporate Disclosure Classification

Authors: Kemal Kirtac
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20965
Abstract:

This paper studies whether a lightweight trained aggregator can combine diverse zero-shot large language model judgments into a stronger downstream signal for corporate disclosure classification. Zero-shot LLMs can read disclosures without task-specific fine-tuning, but their predictions often vary across prompts, reasoning styles, and model families. I address this problem with a multi-agent framework in which three zero-shot agents independently read each disclosure and output a sentiment label, a confidence score, and a short rationale. A logistic meta-classifier then aggregates these signals to predict next-day stock return direction. I use a sample of 18,420 U.S. corporate disclosures issued by Nasdaq and S&P 500 firms between 2018 and 2024, matched to next-day stock returns. Results show that the trained aggregator outperforms all single agents, majority vote, confidence-weighted voting, and a FinBERT baseline. Balanced accuracy rises from 0.561 for the best single agent to 0.612 for the trained aggregator, with the largest gains in disclosures combining strong current performance with weak guidance or elevated risk. The results suggest that zero-shot LLM agents capture complementary financial signals and that supervised aggregation can turn cross-agent disagreement into a more useful classification target.

110. Alignment Whack-a-Mole : Finetuning Activates Verbatim Recall of Copyrighted Books in Large Language Models

Authors: Xinyue Liu , Niloofar Mireshghallah , Jane C. Ginsburg , Tuhin Chakrabarty
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20957
Abstract:

Frontier LLM companies have repeatedly assured courts and regulators that their models do not store copies of training data. They further rely on safety alignment strategies via RLHF, system prompts, and output filters to block verbatim regurgitation of copyrighted works, and have cited the efficacy of these measures in their legal defenses against copyright infringement claims. We show that finetuning bypasses these protections: by training models to expand plot summaries into full text, a task naturally suited for commercial writing assistants, we cause GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro, and DeepSeek-V3.1 to reproduce up to 85-90% of held-out copyrighted books, with single verbatim spans exceeding 460 words, using only semantic descriptions as prompts and no actual book text. This extraction generalizes across authors: finetuning exclusively on Haruki Murakami’s novels unlocks verbatim recall of copyrighted books from over 30 unrelated authors. The effect is not specific to any training author or corpus: random author pairs and public-domain finetuning data produce comparable extraction, while finetuning on synthetic text yields near-zero extraction, indicating that finetuning on individual authors’ works reactivates latent memorization from pretraining. Three models from different providers memorize the same books in the same regions ($r \ge 0.90$), pointing to an industry-wide vulnerability. Our findings offer compelling evidence that model weights store copies of copyrighted works and that the security failures that manifest after finetuning on individual authors’ works undermine a key premise of recent fair use rulings, where courts have conditioned favorable outcomes on the adequacy of measures preventing reproduction of protected expression.

111. User Preference Modeling for Conversational LLM Agents: Weak Rewards from Retrieval-Augmented Interaction

Authors: Yuren Hao , Shuhaib Mehri , ChengXiang Zhai , Dilek Hakkani-Tür
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20939
Abstract:

Large language models are increasingly used as personal assistants, yet most lack a persistent user model, forcing users to repeatedly restate preferences across sessions. We propose Vector-Adapted Retrieval Scoring (VARS), a pipeline-agnostic, frozen-backbone framework that represents each user with long-term and short-term vectors in a shared preference space and uses these vectors to bias retrieval scoring over structured preference memory. The vectors are updated online from weak scalar rewards from users’ feedback, enabling personalization without per-user fine-tuning. We evaluate on \textsc{MultiSessionCollab}, an online multi-session collaboration benchmark with rich user preference profiles, across math and code tasks. Under frozen backbones, the main benefit of user-aware retrieval is improved interaction efficiency rather than large gains in raw task accuracy: our full VARS agent achieves the strongest overall performance, matches a strong Reflection baseline in task success, and reduces timeout rate and user effort. The learned long-term vectors also align with cross-user preference overlap, while short-term vectors capture session-specific adaptation, supporting the interpretability of the dual-vector design. Code, model, and data are available at this https URL .

112. AC4A: Access Control for Agents

Authors: Reshabh K Sharma , Dan Grossman
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20933
Abstract:

Large Language Model (LLM) agents combine the chat interaction capabilities of LLMs with the power to interact with external tools and APIs. This enables them to perform complex tasks and act autonomously to achieve user goals. However, current agent systems operate on an all-or-nothing basis: an agent either has full access to an API’s capabilities and a web page’s content, or it has no access at all. This coarse-grained approach forces users to trust agents with more capabilities than they actually need for a given task. In this paper, we introduce AC4A, an access control framework for agents. As agents become more capable and autonomous, users need a way to limit what APIs or portions of web pages these agents can access, eliminating the need to trust them with everything an API or web page allows. Our goal with AC4A is to provide a framework for defining permissions that lets agents access only the resources they are authorized to access. AC4A works across both API-based and browser-based agents. It does not prescribe what permissions should be, but offers a flexible way to define and enforce them, making it practical for real-world systems. AC4A works by creating permissions granting access to resources, drawing inspiration from established access control frameworks like the one for the Unix file system. Applications define their resources as hierarchies and provide a way to compute the necessary permissions at runtime needed for successful resource access. We demonstrate the usefulness of AC4A in enforcing permissions over real-world APIs and web pages through case studies. The source code of AC4A is available at this https URL

113. Mitigating Shortcut Reasoning in Language Models: A Gradient-Aware Training Approach

Authors: Hongyu Cao , Kunpeng Liu , Dongjie Wang , Yanjie Fu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20899
Abstract:

Large language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet often rely on shortcuts such as surface pattern matching and answer memorization rather than genuine logical inference. We propose Shortcut-Aware Reasoning Training (SART), a gradient-aware framework that detects and mitigates shortcut-promoting samples via ShortcutScore and gradient surgery. Our method identifies shortcut signals through gradient misalignment with validation objectives and answer-token concentration, and modifies training dynamics accordingly. Experiments on controlled reasoning benchmarks show that SART achieves +16.5% accuracy and +40.2% robustness over the strongest baseline, significantly improving generalization under distribution shifts. Code is available at: this https URL .

114. RubricRAG: Towards Interpretable and Reliable LLM Evaluation via Domain Knowledge Retrieval for Rubric Generation

Authors: Kaustubh D. Dhole , Eugene Agichtein
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20882
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated and sometimes trained using automated graders such as LLM-as-judges that output scalar scores or preferences. While convenient, these approaches are often opaque: a single score rarely explains why an answer is good or bad, which requirements were missed, or how a system should be improved. This lack of interpretability limits their usefulness for model development, dataset curation, and high-stakes deployment. Query-specific rubric-based evaluation offers a more transparent alternative by decomposing quality into explicit, checkable criteria. However, manually designing high-quality, query-specific rubrics is labor-intensive and cognitively demanding and not feasible for deployment. While previous approaches have focused on generating intermediate rubrics for automated downstream evaluation, it is unclear if these rubrics are both interpretable and effective for human users. In this work, we investigate whether LLMs can generate useful, instance-specific rubrics as compared to human-authored rubrics, while also improving effectiveness for identifying good responses. Through our systematic study on two rubric benchmarks, and on multiple few-shot and post-training strategies, we find that off-the-shelf LLMs produce rubrics that are poorly aligned with human-authored ones. We introduce a simple strategy, RubricRAG, which retrieves domain knowledge via rubrics at inference time from related queries. We demonstrate that RubricRAG can generate more interpretable rubrics both for similarity to human-authored rubrics, and for improved downstream evaluation effectiveness. Our results highlight both the challenges and a promising approach of scalable, interpretable evaluation through automated rubric generation.

115. SozKZ: Training Efficient Small Language Models for Kazakh from Scratch

Authors: Saken Tukenov
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20854
Abstract:

Kazakh, a Turkic language spoken by over 22 million people, remains underserved by existing multilingual language models, which allocate minimal capacity to low-resource languages and employ tokenizers ill-suited to agglutinative morphology. We present SozKZ, a family of Llama-architecture language models (50M-600M parameters) trained entirely from scratch on 9 billion tokens of Kazakh text with a dedicated 50K BPE tokenizer. We evaluate all models on three Kazakh benchmarks – multiple-choice cultural QA, reading comprehension (Belebele), and topic classification (SIB-200) – alongside five multilingual baselines ranging from 500M to 3B parameters. Our 600M model achieves 30.3% accuracy on Kazakh cultural QA, approaching the 32.0% of Llama-3.2-1B (2x larger), and 25.5% on SIB-200 topic classification, surpassing all evaluated multilingual models up to 2B parameters. We observe consistent scaling from 50M to 600M, with MC QA accuracy rising from 22.8% to 30.3%, suggesting that further scaling remains beneficial. These results demonstrate that small, dedicated models trained from scratch with a language-appropriate tokenizer offer a viable path for low-resource language technology, achieving competitive performance at a fraction of the computational cost. All models and the tokenizer are released under open licenses.

116. Reasoning Topology Matters: Network-of-Thought for Complex Reasoning Tasks

Authors: Fan Huang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20730
Abstract:

Existing prompting paradigms structure LLM reasoning in limited topologies: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) produces linear traces, while Tree-of-Thought (ToT) performs branching search. Yet complex reasoning often requires merging intermediate results, revisiting hypotheses, and integrating evidence from multiple sources. We propose Network-of-Thought (NoT), a framework that models reasoning as a directed graph with typed nodes and edges, guided by a heuristic-based controller policy. Across four benchmarks (GSM8K, Game of 24, HotpotQA, ProofWriter) and three models (GPT-4o-mini, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct), we investigate when network topology outperforms chain or tree structures, whether LLM-generated heuristics can guide graph-based reasoning search, and the computation-accuracy tradeoff across topologies, evaluating each method on accuracy, topology simplicity, and token efficiency. Our results show that CoT remains effective for sequential tasks with GPT-4o-mini (89.5\% on GSM8K), while NoT surpasses ToT on multi-hop reasoning (91.0\% vs.\ 88.0\% on HotpotQA with LLM-as-Judge). With 72B open-source models, NoT achieves the highest accuracy on GSM8K (91.5\%), and Qwen2.5-72B achieves the best multi-hop QA result overall (91.7\% on HotpotQA). Self-generated controller heuristics outperform fixed and random strategies on logical reasoning, with uncertainty-only weighting achieving 57.0\% on ProofWriter. We also find that evaluation methodology significantly impacts method rankings: string-match underestimates all methods on open-ended QA, with the largest gap for NoT, a pattern consistent across all three models (14–18 percentage point gap on HotpotQA).

117. Satellite-to-Street: Synthesizing Post-Disaster Views from Satellite Imagery via Generative Vision Models

Authors: Yifan Yang , Lei Zou , Wendy Jepson
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20697
Abstract:

In the immediate aftermath of natural disasters, rapid situational awareness is critical. Traditionally, satellite observations are widely used to estimate damage extent. However, they lack the ground-level perspective essential for characterizing specific structural failures and impacts. Meanwhile, ground-level data (e.g., street-view imagery) remains largely inaccessible during time-sensitive events. This study investigates Satellite-to-Street View Synthesis to bridge this data gap. We introduce two generative strategies to synthesize post-disaster street views from satellite imagery: a Vision-Language Model (VLM)-guided approach and a damage-sensitive Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) method. We benchmark these against general-purpose baselines (Pix2Pix, ControlNet) using a proposed Structure-Aware Evaluation Framework. This multi-tier protocol integrates (1) pixel-level quality assessment, (2) ResNet-based semantic consistency verification, and (3) a novel VLM-as-a-Judge for perceptual alignment. Experiments on 300 disaster scenarios reveal a critical realism–fidelity trade-off: while diffusion-based approaches (e.g., ControlNet) achieve high perceptual realism, they often hallucinate structural details. Quantitative results show that standard ControlNet achieves the highest semantic accuracy, 0.71, whereas VLM-enhanced and MoE models excel in textural plausibility but struggle with semantic clarity. This work establishes a baseline for trustworthy cross-view synthesis, emphasizing that visually realistic generations may still fail to preserve critical structural information required for reliable disaster assessment.

118. PAVE: Premise-Aware Validation and Editing for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs

Authors: Tianyi Huang , Caden Yang , Emily Yin , Eric Wang , Michael Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20673
Abstract:

Retrieval-augmented language models can retrieve relevant evidence yet still commit to answers before explicitly checking whether the retrieved context supports the conclusion. We present PAVE (Premise-Grounded Answer Validation and Editing), an inference-time validation layer for evidence-grounded question answering. PAVE decomposes retrieved context into question-conditioned atomic facts, drafts an answer, scores how well that draft is supported by the extracted premises, and revises low-support outputs before finalization. The resulting trace makes answer commitment auditable at the level of explicit premises, support scores, and revision decisions. In controlled ablations with a fixed retriever and backbone, PAVE outperforms simpler post-retrieval baselines in two evidence-grounded QA settings, with the largest gain reaching 32.7 accuracy points on a span-grounded benchmark. We view these findings as proof-of-concept evidence that explicit premise extraction plus support-gated revision can strengthen evidence-grounded consistency in retrieval-augmented LLM systems.

119. Weber’s Law in Transformer Magnitude Representations: Efficient Coding, Representational Geometry, and Psychophysical Laws in Language Models

Authors: Jon-Paul Cacioli
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20642
Abstract:

How do transformer language models represent magnitude? Recent work disagrees: some find logarithmic spacing, others linear encoding, others per-digit circular representations. We apply the formal tools of psychophysics to resolve this. Using four converging paradigms (representational similarity analysis, behavioural discrimination, precision gradients, causal intervention) across three magnitude domains in three 7-9B instruction-tuned models spanning three architecture families (Llama, Mistral, Qwen), we report three findings. First, representational geometry is consistently log-compressive: RSA correlations with a Weber-law dissimilarity matrix ranged from .68 to .96 across all 96 model-domain-layer cells, with linear geometry never preferred. Second, this geometry is dissociated from behaviour: one model produces a human-range Weber fraction (WF = 0.20) while the other does not, and both models perform at chance on temporal and spatial discrimination despite possessing logarithmic geometry. Third, causal intervention reveals a layer dissociation: early layers are functionally implicated in magnitude processing (4.1x specificity) while later layers where geometry is strongest are not causally engaged (1.2x). Corpus analysis confirms the efficient coding precondition (alpha = 0.77). These results suggest that training data statistics alone are sufficient to produce log-compressive magnitude geometry, but geometry alone does not guarantee behavioural competence.

120. AEGIS: From Clues to Verdicts – Graph-Guided Deep Vulnerability Reasoning via Dialectics and Meta-Auditing

Authors: Sen Fang , Weiyuan Ding , Zhezhen Cao , Zhou Yang , Bowen Xu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20637
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for vulnerability detection, yet their reasoning remains fundamentally unsound. We identify a root cause shared by both major mitigation paradigms (agent-based debate and retrieval augmentation): reasoning in an ungrounded deliberative space that lacks a bounded, hypothesis-specific evidence base. Without such grounding, agents fabricate cross-function dependencies, and retrieval heuristics supply generic knowledge decoupled from the repository’s data-flow topology. Consequently, the resulting conclusions are driven by rhetorical persuasiveness rather than verifiable facts. To ground this deliberation, we present AEGIS, a novel multi-agent framework that shifts detection from ungrounded speculation to forensic verification over a closed factual substrate. Guided by a “From Clue to Verdict” philosophy, AEGIS first identifies suspicious code anomalies (clues), then dynamically reconstructs per-variable dependency chains for each clue via on-demand slicing over a repository-level Code Property Graph. Within this closed evidence boundary, a Verifier Agent constructs competing dialectical arguments for and against exploitability, while an independent Audit Agent scrutinizes every claim against the trace, exercising veto power to prevent hallucinated verdicts. Evaluation on the rigorous PrimeVul dataset demonstrates that AEGIS establishes a new state-of-the-art, achieving 122 Pair-wise Correct Predictions. To our knowledge, this is the first approach to surpass 100 on this benchmark. It reduces the false positive rate by up to 54.40% compared to leading baselines, at an average cost of $0.09 per sample without any task-specific training.

121. Permutation-Consensus Listwise Judging for Robust Factuality Evaluation

Authors: Tianyi Huang , Nathan Huang , Justin Tang , Wenqian Chen , Elsa Fan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20562
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are now widely used as judges, yet their decisions can change under presentation choices that should be irrelevant. We study one such source of instability: candidate-order sensitivity in listwise factuality evaluation, where several answers can look similarly polished while differing sharply in hallucination risk. We introduce PCFJudge, an inference-time method that reruns the same factuality-first listwise prompt over multiple orderings of the same candidate set and aggregates the resulting scores, ranks, and uncertainty signals into a single consensus decision. On RewardBench 2 Factuality, PCFJudge improves over direct judging by up to 7 absolute points. Development ablations show that the dominant gain comes from permutation consensus itself rather than from heavier arbitration layers. These results suggest that a meaningful share of factuality-judging error arises from order instability, and that averaging over this nuisance variation is a simple and effective way to make LLM evaluation more reliable.

122. An Industrial-Scale Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Requirements Engineering: Empirical Evaluation with Automotive Manufacturing Data

Authors: Muhammad Khalid , Yilmaz Uygun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20534
Abstract:

Requirements engineering in Industry 4.0 faces critical challenges with heterogeneous, unstructured documentation spanning technical specifications, supplier lists, and compliance standards. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) shows promise for knowledge-intensive tasks, no prior work has evaluated RAG on authentic industrial RE workflows using comprehensive production-grade performance metrics. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical evaluation of RAG for industrial requirements engineering automation using authentic automotive manufacturing documentation comprising 669 requirements across four specification standards (MBN 9666-1, MBN 9666-2, BQF 9666-5, MBN 9666-9) spanning 2015-2023, plus 49 supplier qualifications with extensive supporting documentation. Through controlled comparisons with BERT-based and ungrounded LLM approaches, the framework achieves 98.2% extraction accuracy with complete traceability, outperforming baselines by 24.4% and 19.6%, respectively. Hybrid semantic-lexical retrieval achieves MRR of 0.847. Expert quality assessment averaged 4.32/5.0 across five dimensions. The evaluation demonstrates 83% reduction in manual analysis time and 47% cost savings through multi-provider LLM orchestration. Ablation studies quantify individual component contributions. Longitudinal analysis reveals a 55% reduction in requirement volume coupled with 1,800% increase in IT security focus, identifying 10 legacy suppliers (20.4%) requiring requalification, representing potential $2.3M in avoided contract penalties.

123. Epistemic Observability in Language Models

Authors: Tony Mason
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20531
Abstract:

We find that models report highest confidence precisely when they are fabricating. Across four model families (OLMo-3, Llama-3.1, Qwen3, Mistral), self-reported confidence inversely correlates with accuracy, with AUC ranging from 0.28 to 0.36 where 0.5 is random guessing. We prove, under explicit formal assumptions, that this is not a capability gap but an observational one. Under text-only observation, where a supervisor sees only the model’s output text, no monitoring system can reliably distinguish honest model outputs from plausible fabrications. We prove two results: first, that any policy conditioning only on the query cannot satisfy epistemic honesty across ambiguous world states; second, that no learning algorithm optimizing reward from a text-only supervisor can converge to honest behavior when the supervisor’s observations are identical for both grounded and fabricated responses. Within our formal model, these impossibilities hold regardless of model scale or training procedure, including RLHF and instruction tuning. We construct a tensor interface that escapes the impossibility by exporting computational byproducts (per-token entropy and log-probability distributions) that are structurally coupled to correctness under standard training. Per-token entropy achieves pooled AUC 0.757, outperforming all text baselines by 2.5–3.9 percentage points at every budget level tested (10\%, 20\%, 30\%). The entropy signal generalizes across architectures (Spearman $\rho = 0.762$). The core contribution is a cost surface where the empirical mapping from verification budget (fraction of queries receiving expensive checks) to detection accuracy for each judge strategy is a practical lookup for system builders deciding how to allocate verification resources. The contribution is the map. The territory is the system you are building.

124. Evaluating Large Language Models on Historical Health Crisis Knowledge in Resource-Limited Settings: A Hybrid Multi-Metric Study

Authors: Mohammed Rakibul Hasan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20514
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) offer significant potential for delivering health information. However, their reliability in low-resource contexts remains uncertain. This study evaluates GPT-4, Gemini Pro, Llama~3, and Mistral-7B on health crisis-related enquiries concerning COVID-19, dengue, the Nipah virus, and Chikungunya in the low-resource context of Bangladesh. We constructed a question–answer dataset from authoritative sources and assessed model outputs through semantic similarity, expert-model cross-evaluation, and Natural Language Inference (NLI). Findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of LLMs in representing epidemiological history and health crisis knowledge, underscoring their promise and risks for informing policy in resource-constrained environments.

125. ReBOL: Retrieval via Bayesian Optimization with Batched LLM Relevance Observations and Query Reformulation

Authors: Anton Korikov , Scott Sanner
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20513
Abstract:

LLM-reranking is limited by the top-k documents retrieved by vector similarity, which neither enables contextual query-document token interactions nor captures multimodal relevance distributions. While LLM query reformulation attempts to improve recall by generating improved or additional queries, it is still followed by vector similarity retrieval. We thus propose to address these top-k retrieval stage failures by introducing ReBOL, which 1) uses LLM query reformulations to initialize a multimodal Bayesian Optimization (BO) posterior over document relevance, and 2) iteratively acquires document batches for LLM query-document relevance scoring followed by posterior updates to optimize relevance. After exploring query reformulation and document batch diversification techniques, we evaluate ReBOL against LLM reranker baselines on five BEIR datasets and using two LLMs (Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite, GPT-5.2). ReBOL consistently achieves higher recall and competitive rankings, for example compared to the best LLM reranker on the Robust04 dataset with 46.5% vs. 35.0% recall@100 and 63.6% vs. 61.2% NDCG@10. We also show that ReBOL can achieve comparable latency to LLM rerankers.

126. Measuring Reasoning Trace Legibility: Can Those Who Understand Teach?

Authors: Dani Roytburg , Shreya Sridhar , Daphne Ippolito
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20508
Abstract:

Language models are increasingly being trained to “reason” before answering users’ queries, outputting hundreds or even thousands of tokens worth of deliberation before their final answer. While the main intention of reasoning is to improve models’ ability to arrive at a correct answer, we argue that these models should be assessed for the legibility of their reasoning traces in addition to the correctness of their final answers. In this paper, we evaluate 90k traces from 12 Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) for the quality of their reasoning traces. We introduce the concept of transfer utility, which assesses how useful an RLM’s reasoning traces are for guiding a weaker, non-reasoning model toward arriving at the correct answer. We find that the reasoning traces of the highest-performing models rank among the lowest for legibility. Furthermore, we uncover tensions between efficiency-based measurements of legibility (such as trace length) and transfer utility. These tensions establish a legibility Pareto frontier, and we demonstrate that an RLM’s ability to output highly legible traces can be a task- and audience-dependent goal. Crucially, we find that reward models used to train RLMs do not intrinsically reward legibility. Together, these metrics and the findings they surface chart a path towards scaffolding reasoning traces for a multi-agent future.

127. Diffutron: A Masked Diffusion Language Model for Turkish Language

Authors: Şuayp Talha Kocabay , Talha Rüzgar Akkuş
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20466
Abstract:

Masked Diffusion Language Models (MDLMs) have emerged as a compelling non-autoregressive alternative to standard large language models; however, their application to morphologically rich languages remains limited. In this paper, we introduce $\textit{Diffutron}$, a masked diffusion language model specifically designed for Turkish. Our approach leverages a resource-efficient training pipeline, starting with LoRA-based continual pre-training of a multilingual encoder on a large-scale corpus. To enable generative capabilities, we employ a progressive instruction-tuning strategy, sequentially adapting the model on general and task-specific instruction sets. Experimental results across comprehensive benchmarks demonstrate that, despite its compact size, our model achieves competitive performance compared to existing multi-billion-parameter baselines. These findings validate the effectiveness of masked diffusion modeling combined with multi-stage tuning for non-autoregressive text generation in Turkish.

128. Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable

Authors: Rounak Saha , Gurusha Juneja , Dayita Chaudhuri , Naveeja Sajeevan , Nihar B Shah , Danish Pruthi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20450
Abstract:

A number of scientific conferences and journals have recently enacted policies that prohibit LLM usage by peer reviewers, except for polishing, paraphrasing, and grammar correction of otherwise human-written reviews. But, are these policies enforceable? To answer this question, we assemble a dataset of peer reviews simulating multiple levels of human-AI collaboration, and evaluate five state-of-the-art detectors, including two commercial systems. Our analysis shows that all detectors misclassify a non-trivial fraction of LLM-polished reviews as AI-generated, thereby risking false accusations of academic misconduct. We further investigate whether peer-review-specific signals, including access to the paper manuscript and the constrained domain of scientific writing, can be leveraged to improve detection. While incorporating such signals yields measurable gains in some settings, we identify limitations in each approach and find that none meets the accuracy standards required for identifying AI use in peer reviews. Importantly, our results suggest that recent public estimates of AI use in peer reviews through the use of AI-text detectors should be interpreted with caution, as current detectors misclassify mixed reviews (collaborative human-AI outputs) as fully AI generated, potentially overstating the extent of policy violations.

129. Solver-Aided Verification of Policy Compliance in Tool-Augmented LLM Agents

Authors: Cailin Winston , Claris Winston , René Just
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20449
Abstract:

Tool-augmented Large Language Models (TaLLMs) extend LLMs with the ability to invoke external tools, enabling them to interact with real-world environments. However, a major limitation in deploying TaLLMs in sensitive applications such as customer service and business process automation is a lack of reliable compliance with domain-specific operational policies regarding tool-use and agent behavior. Current approaches merely steer LLMs to adhere to policies by including policy descriptions in the LLM context, but these provide no guarantees that policy violations will be prevented. In this paper, we introduce an SMT solver-aided framework to enforce tool-use policy compliance in TaLLM agents. Specifically, we use an LLM-assisted, human-guided approach to translate natural-language-specified tool-use policies into formal logic (SMT-LIB-2.0) constraints over agent-observable state and tool arguments. At runtime, planned tool calls are intercepted and checked against the constraints using the Z3 solver as a pre-condition to the tool call. Tool invocations that violate the policy are blocked. We evaluated on the TauBench benchmark and demonstrate that solver-aided policy checking reduces policy violations while maintaining overall task accuracy. These results suggest that integrating formal reasoning into TaLLM execution can improve tool-call policy compliance and overall reliability.

130. ALICE: A Multifaceted Evaluation Framework of Large Audio-Language Models’ In-Context Learning Ability

Authors: Yen-Ting Piao , Jay Chiehen Liao , Wei-Tang Chien , Toshiki Ogimoto , Shang-Tse Chen , Yun-Nung Chen , Chun-Yi Lee , Shao-Yuan Lo
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20433
Abstract:

While Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have been shown to exhibit degraded instruction-following capabilities, their ability to infer task patterns from in-context examples under audio conditioning remains unstudied. To address this gap, we present ALICE, a three-stage framework that progressively reduces textual guidance to systematically evaluate LALMs’ in-context learning ability under audio conditioning. Evaluating six LALMs across four audio understanding tasks under two output constraint categories, we uncover a consistent asymmetry across all stages and LALMs: in-context demonstrations reliably improve format compliance but fail to improve, and often degrade, the core task performance. This suggests that LALMs can glean surface-level formatting patterns from demonstrations but may struggle to leverage cross-modal semantic grounding to reliably infer task objectives from audio-conditioned examples, highlighting potential limitations in current cross-modal integration.

131. Coding Agents are Effective Long-Context Processors

Authors: Weili Cao , Xunjian Yin , Bhuwan Dhingra , Shuyan Zhou
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20432
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in scaling to access massive contexts. However, the access is via the latent and uninterpretable attention mechanisms, and LLMs fail to effective process long context, exhibiting significant performance degradation as context length increases. In this work, we study whether long-context processing can be externalized from latent attention into explicit, executable interactions, by allowing coding agents to organize text in file systems and manipulate it using its native tools. We evaluate off-the-shelf frontier coding agents as the general interface for tasks that require processing long contexts, including long-context reasoning, retrieval-augmented generation, and open-domain question answering with large-scale corpus contains up to three trillion tokens. Across multiple benchmarks, these agents outperform published state-of-the-art by 17.3% on average. We attribute this efficacy to two key factors: native tool proficiency, which enables agents to leverage executable code and terminal commands rather than passive semantic queries, and file system familiarity, which allows them to navigate massive text corpora as directory structures. These findings suggest that delegating long-context processing to coding agents offers an effective alternative to semantic search or context window scaling, opening new directions for long-context processing in LLMs.

132. PEARL: Personalized Streaming Video Understanding Model

Authors: Yuanhong Zheng , Ruichuan An , Xiaopeng Lin , Yuxing Liu , Sihan Yang , Huanyu Zhang , Haodong Li , Qintong Zhang , Renrui Zhang , Guopeng Li , Yifan Zhang , Yuheng Li , Wentao Zhang
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20422
Abstract:

Human cognition of new concepts is inherently a streaming process: we continuously recognize new objects or identities and update our memories over time. However, current multimodal personalization methods are largely limited to static images or offline videos. This disconnects continuous visual input from instant real-world feedback, limiting their ability to provide the real-time, interactive personalized responses essential for future AI assistants. To bridge this gap, we first propose and formally define the novel task of Personalized Streaming Video Understanding (PSVU). To facilitate research in this new direction, we introduce PEARL-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically to evaluate this challenging setting. It evaluates a model’s ability to respond to personalized concepts at exact timestamps under two modes: (1) Frame-level, focusing on a specific person or object in discrete frames, and (2) a novel Video-level, focusing on personalized actions unfolding across continuous frames. PEARL-Bench comprises 132 unique videos and 2,173 fine-grained annotations with precise timestamps. Concept diversity and annotation quality are strictly ensured through a combined pipeline of automated generation and human verification. To tackle this challenging new setting, we further propose PEARL, a plug-and-play, training-free strategy that serves as a strong baseline. Extensive evaluations across 8 offline and online models demonstrate that PEARL achieves state-of-the-art performance. Notably, it brings consistent PSVU improvements when applied to 3 distinct architectures, proving to be a highly effective and robust strategy. We hope this work advances vision-language model (VLM) personalization and inspires further research into streaming personalized AI assistants. Code is available at this https URL .

133. Thinking in Different Spaces: Domain-Specific Latent Geometry Survives Cross-Architecture Translation

Authors: Marcus Armstrong , Navid Ayoobi , Arjun Mukherjee
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20406
Abstract:

We investigate whether independently trained language models converge to geometrically compatible latent representations, and whether this compatibility can be exploited to correct model behavior at inference time without any weight updates. We learn a linear projection matrix that maps activation vectors from a large teacher model into the coordinate system of a smaller student model, then intervene on the student’s residual stream during generation by substituting its internal state with the translated teacher representation. Across a fully crossed experimental matrix of 20 heterogeneous teacher-student pairings spanning mixture-of-experts, dense, code-specialized, and synthetically trained architectures, the Ridge projection consistently achieves R^2 = 0.50 on verbal reasoning and R^2 = 0.40 on mathematical reasoning, collapsing to R^2 = -0.22 under permutation control and R^2 = 0.01 under L_1 regularization. Behavioral correction rates range from 14.0% to 50.0% on TruthfulQA (mean 25.2%) and from 8.5% to 43.3% on GSM8K arithmetic reasoning (mean 25.5%), demonstrating that the method generalizes across fundamentally different reasoning domains. We report a near-zero correlation between geometric alignment quality and behavioral correction rate (r = -0.07), revealing a dissociation between representation space fidelity and output space impact. Intervention strength is architecture-specific: student models exhibit characteristic sensitivity profiles that invert across domains, with the most steerable verbal student becoming the least steerable mathematical student. Finally, a double dissociation experiment conducted across all 20 model pairings confirms without exception that projection matrices collapse catastrophically when transferred across reasoning domains (mean R^2 = -3.83 in both transfer directions), establishing domain-specific subspace geometry as a universal property of LMs.

134. KV Cache Optimization Strategies for Scalable and Efficient LLM Inference

Authors: Yichun Xu , Navjot K. Khaira , Tejinder Singh
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20397
Abstract:

The key-value (KV) cache is a foundational optimization in Transformer-based large language models (LLMs), eliminating redundant recomputation of past token representations during autoregressive generation. However, its memory footprint scales linearly with context length, imposing critical bottlenecks on GPU memory capacity, memory bandwidth, and inference throughput as production LLMs push context windows from thousands to millions of tokens. Efficient KV cache management has thus become a first-order challenge for scalable LLM deployment. This paper provides a systematic review of recent KV cache optimization techniques, organizing them into five principal directions: cache eviction, cache compression, hybrid memory solutions, novel attention mechanisms, and combination strategies. For each category we analyze the underlying mechanisms, deployment trade-offs, and empirical performance across memory reduction, throughput, and model accuracy metrics. We further map techniques to seven practical deployment scenarios, including long-context single requests, high-throughput datacenter serving, edge devices, multi-turn conversations, and accuracy-critical reasoning, providing actionable guidance for practitioners selecting among competing approaches. Our analysis reveals that no single technique dominates across all settings; instead, the optimal strategy depends on context length, hardware constraints, and workload characteristics, pointing toward adaptive, multi-stage optimization pipelines as a promising direction for future research.

135. The production of meaning in the processing of natural language

Authors: Christopher J. Agostino , Quan Le Thien , Nayan D’Souza , Louis van der Elst
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20381

Abstract:

Understanding the fundamental mechanisms governing the production of meaning in the processing of natural language is critical for designing safe, thoughtful, engaging, and empowering human-agent interactions. Experiments in cognitive science and social psychology have demonstrated that human semantic processing exhibits contextuality more consistent with quantum logical mechanisms than classical Boolean theories, and recent works have found similar results in large language models – in particular, clear violations of the Bell inequality in experiments of contextuality during interpretation of ambiguous expressions. We explore the CHSH $ S $ parameter – the metric associated with the inequality – across the inference parameter space of models spanning four orders of magnitude in scale, cross-referencing it with MMLU, hallucination rate, and nonsense detection benchmarks. We find that the interquartile range of the $ S $ distribution – the statistic that most sharply differentiates models from one another – is completely orthogonal to all external benchmarks, while violation rate shows weak anticorrelation with all three benchmarks that does not reach significance. We investigate how $ S $ varies with sampling parameters and word order, and discuss the information-theoretic constraints that genuine contextuality imposes on prompt injection defenses and its human analogue, whereby careful construction and maintenance of social contextuality can be carried out at scale – manufacturing not consent but contextuality itself, a subtler and more fundamental form of manipulation that shapes the space of possible interpretations before any particular one is reached.

136. Memory poisoning and secure multi-agent systems

Authors: Vicenç Torra , Maria Bras-Amorós
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20357
Abstract:

Memory poisoning attacks for Agentic AI and multi-agent systems (MAS) have recently caught attention. It is partially due to the fact that Large Language Models (LLMs) facilitate the construction and deployment of agents. Different memory systems are being used nowadays in this context, including semantic, episodic, and short-term memory. This distinction between the different types of memory systems focuses mostly on their duration but also on their origin and their localization. It ranges from the short-term memory originated at the user’s end localized in the different agents to the long-term consolidated memory localized in well established knowledge databases. In this paper, we first present the main types of memory systems, we then discuss the feasibility of memory poisoning attacks in these different types of memory systems, and we propose mitigation strategies. We review the already existing security solutions to mitigate some of the alleged attacks, and we discuss adapted solutions based on cryptography. We propose to implement local inference based on private knowledge retrieval as an example of mitigation strategy for memory poisoning for semantic memory. We also emphasize actual risks in relation to interactions between agents, which can cause memory poisoning. These latter risks are not so much studied in the literature and are difficult to formalize and solve. Thus, we contribute to the construction of agents that are secure by design.

137. Leum-VL Technical Report

Authors: Yuxuan He , Chaiming Huang , Yifan Wu , Hongjun Wang , Chenkui Shen , Jifan Zhang , Long Li
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20354
Abstract:

A short video succeeds not simply because of what it shows, but because of how it schedules attention – yet current multimodal models lack the structural grammar to parse or produce this organization. Existing models can describe scenes, answer event-centric questions, and read on-screen text, but they are far less reliable at identifying timeline-grounded units such as hooks, cut rationales, shot-induced tension, and platform-facing packaging cues. We propose SV6D (Structured Video in Six Dimensions), inspired by professional storyboard practice in film and television production, a representation framework that decomposes internet-native video into six complementary structural dimensions – subject, aesthetics, camera language, editing, narrative, and dissemination – with each label tied to physically observable evidence on the timeline. We formalize a unified optimization objective over SV6D that combines Hungarian-matched temporal alignment, dimension-wise semantic label distance, and quality regularization. Building on this framework, we present Leum-VL-8B, an 8B video-language model that realizes the SV6D objective through an expert-driven post-training pipeline, further refined through verifiable reinforcement learning on perception-oriented tasks. Leum-VL-8B achieves 70.8 on VideoMME (w/o subtitles), 70.0 on MVBench, and 61.6 on MotionBench, while remaining competitive on general multimodal evaluations such as MMBench-EN. We also construct FeedBench, a benchmark for structure-sensitive short-video understanding. Our results indicate that the missing layer in video AI is not pixel generation but structural representation: grounded on the timeline, linked to visible evidence, and directly consumable by downstream workflows such as editing, retrieval, recommendation, and generation control, including text-heavy internet video formats with overlays and image-text layouts.

Authors: Yu-Ning Qiu , Lin-Feng Zou , Jiong-Da Wang , Xue-Rong Yuan , Wang-Zhou Dai
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20334
Abstract:

In complex code-generation tasks, conversation-based LLM code repair exhibits limited ability to recover from first-pass programming errors, as such code revisions are usually driven by LLMs’ “plausible reasoning” rather than a formal, algorithmic debugging procedure. However, a formal foundation for such debugging exists in Udi Shapiro’s theory of algorithmic program debugging (APD), which frames program repair as an explicit, stepwise procedural refinement process. In this paper, we propose a neuro-symbolic procedural refinement approach, Abduction-Based Procedural Refinement (ABPR), which couples an LLM with a meta-interpreter that materialises program execution into compact, declarative tree-structured traces, following the principles of APD. We evaluate ABPR on ARC-AGI-2, a benchmark requiring strong abstraction and debugging capabilities, and adopt Prolog as the target language due to its declarative semantics, which are well-suited to algorithmic program debugging. Our experiments show that ABPR paired with Gemini-3-Flash achieves a Pass@2 score of 56.67\% even in a language in which contemporary LLMs typically underperform. These results point towards a more auditable paradigm for program repair by integrating LLMs with classical formal methods.

139. When Agents Disagree: The Selection Bottleneck in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines

Authors: Artem Maryanskyy
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20324
Abstract:

Multi-agent LLM pipelines produce contradictory evidence on whether team diversity improves output quality: heterogeneous Mixture-of-Agents teams outperform single models, yet homogeneous Self-MoA teams consistently win under synthesis-based aggregation. We propose a resolution by identifying the selection bottleneck – a crossover threshold in aggregation quality that determines whether diversity helps or hurts. Under this model, we obtain a closed-form crossover threshold $s^*$ (Proposition 1) that separates the regimes where diversity helps and hurts. In a targeted experiment spanning 42 tasks across 7 categories ($N=210$), a diverse team with judge-based selection achieves a win rate of 0.810 against a single-model baseline, while a homogeneous team scores 0.512 – near chance (Glass’s $\Delta = 2.07$). Judge-based selection outperforms MoA-style synthesis by $\Delta_{\mathrm{WR}} = +0.631$ – the synthesis approach is preferred over the baseline in zero of 42 tasks by the judge panel. A decoupled evaluation with independent judges confirms all directional findings (Spearman $\rho = 0.90$). Exploratory evidence suggests that including a weaker model improves performance while reducing cost ($p < 10^{-4}$, not pre-registered). Our results suggest that selector quality may be a more impactful design lever than generator diversity in single-round generate-then-select pipelines.

140. GIP-RAG: An Evidence-Grounded Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Interpretable Gene Interaction and Pathway Impact Analysis

Authors: Fujian Jia , Jiwen Gu , Cheng Lu , Dezhi Zhao , Mengjiang Huang , Yuanzhi Lu , Xin Liu , Kang Liu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20321
Abstract:

Understanding mechanistic relationships among genes and their impacts on biological pathways is essential for elucidating disease mechanisms and advancing precision medicine. Despite the availability of extensive molecular interaction and pathway data in public databases, integrating heterogeneous knowledge sources and enabling interpretable multi-step reasoning across biological networks remain challenging. We present GIP-RAG (Gene Interaction Prediction through Retrieval-Augmented Generation), a computational framework that combines biomedical knowledge graphs with large language models (LLMs) to infer and interpret gene interactions. The framework constructs a unified gene interaction knowledge graph by integrating curated data from KEGG, WikiPathways, SIGNOR, Pathway Commons, and PubChem. Given user-specified genes, a query-driven module retrieves relevant subgraphs, which are incorporated into structured prompts to guide LLM-based stepwise reasoning. This enables identification of direct and indirect regulatory relationships and generation of mechanistic explanations supported by biological evidence. Beyond pairwise interactions, GIP-RAG includes a pathway-level functional impact module that simulates propagation of gene perturbations through signaling networks and evaluates potential pathway state changes. Evaluation across diverse biological scenarios demonstrates that the framework generates consistent, interpretable, and evidence-supported insights into gene regulatory mechanisms. Overall, GIP-RAG provides a general and interpretable approach for integrating knowledge graphs with retrieval-augmented LLMs to support mechanistic reasoning in complex molecular systems.

141. The Causal Impact of Tool Affordance on Safety Alignment in LLM Agents

Authors: Shasha Yu , Fiona Carroll , Barry L. Bentley
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20320
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents with access to executable tools, enabling direct interaction with external systems. However, most safety evaluations remain text-centric and assume that compliant language implies safe behavior, an assumption that becomes unreliable once models are allowed to act. In this work, we empirically examine how executable tool affordance alters safety alignment in LLM agents using a paired evaluation framework that compares text-only chatbot behavior with tool-enabled agent behavior under identical prompts and policies. Experiments are conducted in a deterministic financial transaction environment with binary safety constraints across 1,500 procedurally generated scenarios. To separate intent from outcome, we distinguish between attempted and realized violations using dual enforcement regimes that either block or permit unsafe actions. Both evaluated models maintain perfect compliance in text-only settings, yet exhibit sharp increases in violations after tool access is introduced, reaching rates up to 85% despite unchanged rules. We observe substantial gaps between attempted and executed violations, indicating that external guardrails can suppress visible harm while masking persistent misalignment. Agents also develop spontaneous constraint circumvention strategies without adversarial prompting. These results demonstrate that tool affordance acts as a primary driver of safety misalignment and that text-based evaluation alone is insufficient for assessing agentic systems.

142. Bypassing Document Ingestion: An MCP Approach to Financial Q&A

Authors: Sasan Mansouri , Edoardo Pilla , Mark Wahrenburg , Fabian Woebbeking
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20316
Abstract:

Answering financial questions is often treated as an information retrieval problem. In practice, however, much of the relevant information is already available in curated vendor systems, especially for quantitative analysis. We study whether, and under which conditions, Model Context Protocol (MCP) offers a more reliable alternative to standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by allowing large language models (LLMs) to interact directly with data rather than relying on document ingestion and chunk retrieval. We test this by building a custom MCP server that exposes LSEG APIs as tools and evaluating it on the FinDER benchmark. The approach performs particularly well on the Financials subset, achieving up to 80.4% accuracy on multi-step numerical questions when relevant context is retrieved. The paper thus provides both a baseline for MCP-based financial question answering (QA) and evidence on where this approach breaks down, such as for questions requiring qualitative or document-specific context. Overall, direct access to curated data is a lightweight and effective alternative to document-centric RAG for quantitative financial QA, but not a substitute for all financial QA tasks.

143. Semantic Tool Discovery for Large Language Models: A Vector-Based Approach to MCP Tool Selection

Authors: Sarat Mudunuri , Jian Wan , Ally Qin , Srinivasan Manoharan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20313
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) with tool-calling capabilities have demonstrated remarkable potential in executing complex tasks through external tool integration. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a standardized framework for connecting LLMs to diverse toolsets, with individual MCP servers potentially exposing dozens to hundreds of tools. However, current implementations face a critical scalability challenge: providing all available tools to the LLM context results in substantial token overhead, increased costs, reduced accuracy, and context window constraints. We present a semantic tool discovery architecture that addresses these challenges through vector-based retrieval. Our approach indexes MCP tools using dense embeddings that capture semantic relationships between tool capabilities and user intent, dynamically selecting only the most relevant tools (typically 3-5) rather than exposing the entire tool catalog (50-100+). Experimental results demonstrate a 99.6% reduction in tool-related token consumption with a hit rate of 97.1% at K=3 and an MRR of 0.91 on a benchmark of 140 queries across 121 tools from 5 MCP servers, with sub-100ms retrieval latency. Contributions include: (1) a semantic indexing framework for MCP tools, (2) a dynamic tool selection algorithm based on query-tool similarity, (3) comprehensive evaluation demonstrating significant efficiency and accuracy improvements, and (4) extensibility to multi-agent and cross-organizational tool discovery.

144. kRAIG: A Natural Language-Driven Agent for Automated DataOps Pipeline Generation

Authors: Rohan Siva , Kai Cheung , Lichi Li , Ganesh Sundaram
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20311
Abstract:

Modern machine learning systems rely on complex data engineering workflows to extract, transform, and load (ELT) data into production pipelines. However, constructing these pipelines remains time-consuming and requires substantial expertise in data infrastructure and orchestration frameworks. Recent advances in large language model (LLM) agents offer a potential path toward automating these workflows, but existing approaches struggle with under-specified user intent, unreliable tool generation, and limited guarantees of executable outputs. We introduce kRAIG, an AI agent that translates natural language specifications into production-ready Kubeflow Pipelines (KFP). To resolve ambiguity in user intent, we propose ReQuesAct (Reason, Question, Act), an interaction framework that explicitly clarifies intent prior to pipeline synthesis. The system orchestrates end-to-end data movement from diverse sources and generates task-specific transformation components through a retrieval-augmented tool synthesis process. To ensure data quality and safety, kRAIG incorporates LLM-based validation stages that verify pipeline integrity prior to execution. Our framework achieves a 3x improvement in extraction and loading success and a 25 percent increase in transformation accuracy compared to state-of-the-art agentic baselines. These improvements demonstrate that structured agent workflows with explicit intent clarification and validation significantly enhance the reliability and executability of automated data engineering pipelines.

145. From Human Interfaces to Agent Interfaces: Rethinking Software Design in the Age of AI-Native Systems

Authors: Shaolin Wang , Yi Mei , Haoyang Che , He Jiang , Shui Yu , Ying Gu
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20300
Abstract:

Software systems have traditionally been designed for human interaction, emphasizing graphical user interfaces, usability, and cognitive alignment with end users. However, recent advances in large language model (LLM)-based agents are changing the primary consumers of software systems. Increasingly, software is no longer only used by humans, but also invoked autonomously by AI agents through structured interfaces. In this paper, we argue that software engineering is undergoing a paradigm shift from human-oriented interfaces to agent-oriented invocation systems. We formalize the notion of agent interfaces, introduce invocable capabilities as the fundamental building blocks of AI-oriented software, and outline design principles for such systems, including machine interpretability, composability, and invocation reliability. We then discuss architectural and organizational implications of this shift, highlighting a transition from monolithic applications to capability-based systems that can be dynamically composed by AI agents. The paper aims to provide a conceptual foundation for the emerging paradigm of AI-native software design.

146. On the Fragility of AI Agent Collusion

Authors: Jussi Keppo , Yuze Li , Gerry Tsoukalas , Nuo Yuan
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20281
Abstract:

Recent work shows that pricing with symmetric LLM agents leads to algorithmic collusion. We show that collusion is fragile under the heterogeneity typical of real deployments. In a stylized repeated-pricing model, heterogeneity in patience or data access reduces the set of collusive equilibria. Experiments with open-source LLM agents (totaling over 2,000 compute hours) align with these predictions: patience heterogeneity reduces price lift from 22% to 10% above competitive levels; asymmetric data access, to 7%. Increasing the number of competing LLMs breaks up collusion; so does cross-algorithm heterogeneity, that is, setting LLMs against Q-learning agents. But model-size differences (e.g., 32B vs. 14B weights) do not; they generate leader-follower dynamics that stabilize collusion. We discuss antitrust implications, such as enforcement actions restricting data-sharing and policies promoting algorithmic diversity.

147. Understanding Pruning Regimes in Vision-Language Models Through Domain-Aware Layer Selection

Authors: Saeed Khaki , Nima Safaei , Kamal Ginotra
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20275
Abstract:

Transformer-based vision-language models (VLMs) contain substantial depth redundancy, yet the effect of removing specific decoder layers remains poorly understood, especially for domains that require tight coupling between perception and multi-step reasoning. We study structured decoder layer pruning through the lens of domain-aware activation similarity, measuring how strongly each layer transforms representations for math versus non-math inputs. This yields simple math-aware, non-math-aware, and mixed ranking criteria that identify layers whose input-output activations change least within a target domain. Across two state-of-the-art VLMs and a broad suite of math and general multimodal benchmarks, we uncover a consistent three-regime structure: at low pruning budgets, performance is highly sensitive to which layers are removed; at moderate budgets, methods converge as structural damage accumulates; and at high budgets, structural continuity dominates, favoring spacing-aware strategies. Our domain-aware rankings achieve the strongest stability in the ranking-sensitive regime, while matching or exceeding structure-aware baselines at larger budgets. These results provide a clearer picture of how depth contributes to domain-specific behavior in VLMs and offer a practical, interpretable approach to reducing model depth without sacrificing essential mathematical or general vision-language capabilities.

148. Deciphering Scientific Reasoning Steps from Outcome Data for Molecule Optimization

Authors: Zequn Liu , Kehan Wu , Shufang Xie , Zekun Guo , Wei Zhang , Tao Qin , Renhe Liu , Yingce Xia
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20262
Abstract:

Emerging reasoning models hold promise for automating scientific discovery. However, their training is hindered by a critical supervision gap: experimental outcomes are abundant, whereas intermediate reasoning steps are rarely documented at scale. To bridge this gap, we propose DESRO, a framework for deciphering scientific reasoning from outcomes. By analyzing shared patterns and key differences within grouped data, a large language model (LLM) can recover the underlying logic. We instantiate this framework in molecule optimization, a pivotal stage in drug discovery that traditionally relies on the iterative reasoning of medicinal chemists. Across 2.3 million molecular property records, our framework infers optimization rationales by grouping molecules with shared fragments, then using an LLM to analyze how structural variations correlate with property differences. Based on the derived data, we train a model that conducts molecule optimization through an interpretable reasoning process. DESRO achieves the highest success rates on 15 out of 18 tasks, spanning both single- and multi-property optimization of bioactivity and ADMET properties. The reasoning process enables robust generalization to out-of-distribution scenarios, including novel property combinations, unseen biological targets, and unseen properties defined solely by natural language descriptions. In retrospective case studies under strict temporal splits, the model autonomously reconstructs expert-level lead optimization trajectories. Additionally, our framework extends beyond molecule optimization to reaction ligand selection. Our results establish deciphering reasoning steps from outcome data as a viable paradigm for enabling scientific reasoning, providing a scalable approach to accelerate scientific discovery.

149. SciNav: A General Agent Framework for Scientific Coding Tasks

Authors: Tianshu Zhang , Huan Sun
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20256
Abstract:

Autonomous science agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate hypotheses, design experiments, and produce reports. However, prior work mainly targets open-ended scientific problems with subjective outputs that are difficult to evaluate. Scientific coding benchmarks, by contrast, provide executable outputs for objective assessment. Existing approaches remain engineering-driven pipelines, revealing the need for structured, end-to-end science agent frameworks for scientific coding tasks. We address this gap by focusing on scientific coding tasks, where evaluation can be made rigorously, and introducing an agent framework SciNav (Scientific Navigator) that enables more effective solution exploration. Our framework is designed to operate under constrained search budgets, moving beyond reliance on pre-defined success metrics and prolonged search cycles. Inspired by findings that comparative judgments often reveal finer-grained quality differences and therefore provide greater discriminative power than absolute scoring, our framework leverages pairwise relative judgments within a tree search process to select top-K promising solution branches, prune low-potential ones, and progressively narrow down the solution candidates on the selected branches guided by relative comparisons. We demonstrate our agent’s effectiveness across different types of tasks on two benchmarks. Experiments show that SciNav significantly outperforms direct prompting and prior agents like OpenHands and Self-Debug across different base models, task types, and difficulty levels, and exceeds different frontier comparators such as random selection and LLM absolute scoring. These results confirm the strength of our agent design and highlight the effectiveness of relative judgment-guided top-K search for high-quality scientific coding, marking a step toward more practical science agents.

150. Decoding the decoder: Contextual sequence-to-sequence modeling for intracortical speech decoding

Authors: Michal Olak , Tommaso Boccato , Matteo Ferrante
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20246
Abstract:

Speech brain–computer interfaces require decoders that translate intracortical activity into linguistic output while remaining robust to limited data and day-to-day variability. While prior high-performing systems have largely relied on framewise phoneme decoding combined with downstream language models, it remains unclear what contextual sequence-to-sequence decoding contributes to sublexical neural readout, robustness, and interpretability. We evaluated a multitask Transformer-based sequence-to-sequence model for attempted speech decoding from area 6v intracortical recordings. The model jointly predicts phoneme sequences, word sequences, and auxiliary acoustic features. To address day-to-day nonstationarity, we introduced the Neural Hammer Scalpel (NHS) calibration module, which combines global alignment with feature-wise modulation. We further analyzed held-out-day generalization and attention patterns in the encoder and decoders. On the Willett et al. dataset, the proposed model achieved a state-of-the-art phoneme error rate of 14.3%. Word decoding reached 25.6% WER with direct decoding and 19.4% WER with candidate generation and rescoring. NHS substantially improved both phoneme and word decoding relative to linear or no day-specific transform, while held-out-day experiments showed increasing degradation on unseen days with temporal distance. Attention visualizations revealed recurring temporal chunking in encoder representations and distinct use of these segments by phoneme and word decoders. These results indicate that contextual sequence-to-sequence modeling can improve the fidelity of neural-to-phoneme readout from intracortical speech signals and suggest that attention-based analyses can generate useful hypotheses about how neural speech evidence is segmented and accumulated over time.

151. Writing literature reviews with AI: principles, hurdles and some lessons learned

Authors: Saadi Lahlou (1,2), Annabelle Gouttebroze (1), Atrina Oraee (1), Julian Madera (1) ((1) London School of Economics and Political Science (2) Paris Institute for Advanced Study)
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20235
Abstract:

We qualitatively compared literature reviews produced with varying degrees of AI assistance. The same LLM, given the same corpus of 280 papers but different selections, produced dramatically different reviews, from mainstream and politically neutral to critical and post-colonial, though neither orientation was intended. LLM outputs always appear at first glance to be well written, well informed and thought out, but closer reading reveals gaps, biases and lack of depth. Our comparison of six versions shows a series of pitfalls and suggests precautions necessary when using AI assistance to make a literature review. Main issues are: (1) The bias of ignorance (you do not know what you do not get) in the selection of relevant papers. (2) Alignment and digital sycophancy: commercial AI models slavishly take you further in the direction they understand you give them, reinforcing biases. (3) Mainstreaming: because of their statistical nature, LLM productions tend to favor mainstream perspectives and content; in our case there was only 20% overlap between paper selections by humans and the LLM. (4) Limited capacity for creative restructuring, with vague and ambiguous statements. (5) Lack of critical perspective, coming from distant reading and political correctness. Most pitfalls can be addressed by prompting, but only if the user knows the domain well enough to detect them. There is a paradox: producing a good AI-assisted review requires expertise that comes from reading the literature, which is precisely what AI was meant to reduce. Overall, AI can improve the span and quality of the review, but the gain of time is not as massive as one would expect, and a press-button strategy leaving AI to do the work is a recipe for disaster. We conclude with recommendations for those who write, or assess, such LLM-augmented reviews.

152. Email in the Era of LLMs

Authors: Dang Nguyen , Harvey Yiyun Fu , Peter West , Chenhao Tan , Ari Holtzman
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20231
Abstract:

Email communication increasingly involves large language models (LLMs), but we lack intuition on how they will read, write, and optimize for nuanced social goals. We introduce HR Simulator, a game where communication is the core mechanic: players play as a Human Resources officer and write emails to solve socially challenging workplace scenarios. An analysis of 600+ human and LLM emails with LLMs-as-judge reveals evidence for larger LLMs becoming more homogenous in their email quality judgments. Under LLM judges, humans underperform LLMs (e.g., 23.5% vs. 48-54% success rate), but a human+LLM approach can outperform LLM-only (e.g., from 40% to nearly 100% in one scenario). In cases where models’ email preferences disagree, emergent tact is a plausible explanation: weaker models prefer less tactful strategies while stronger models prefer more tactful ones. Regarding tone, LLM emails are more formal and empathetic while human emails are more varied. LLM rewrites make human emails more formal and empathetic, but models still struggle to imitate human emails in the low empathy, low formality quadrant, which highlights a limitation of current post-training approaches. Our results demonstrate the efficacy of communication games as instruments to measure communication in the era of LLMs, and posit human-LLM co-writing as an effective form of communication in that future.

153. Characterizing the ability of LLMs to recapitulate Americans’ distributional responses to public opinion polling questions across political issues

Authors: Eric Gong , Nathan E. Sanders , Bruce Schneier
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20229
Abstract:

Traditional survey-based political issue polling is becoming less tractable due to increasing costs and risk of bias associated with growing non-response rates and declining coverage of key demographic groups. With researchers and pollsters seeking alternatives, Large Language Models have drawn attention for their potential to augment human population studies in polling contexts. We propose and implement a new framework for anticipating human responses on multiple-choice political issue polling questions by directly prompting an LLM to predict a distribution of responses. By comparison to a large and high quality issue poll of the US population, the Cooperative Election Study, we evaluate how the accuracy of this framework varies across a range of demographics and questions on a variety of topics, as well as how this framework compares to previously proposed frameworks where LLMs are repeatedly queried to simulate individual respondents. We find the proposed framework consistently exhibits more accurate predictions than individual querying at significantly lower cost. In addition, we find the performance of the proposed framework varies much more systematically and predictably across demographics and questions, making it possible for those performing AI polling to better anticipate model performance using only information available before a query is issued.

154. The Arrival of AGI? When Expert Personas Exceed Expert Benchmarks

Authors: Drake Mullens , Stella Shen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20225
Abstract:

Do expert personas improve language model performance? The Wharton Generative AI Lab reports that they do not, broadcasting to millions via social media the recommendation that practitioners abandon a technique recommended by Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI. We demonstrate that this null finding was structurally predictable. Five core mechanisms precluded detection before data collection began: baseline contamination elevating the starting point to near-ceiling, system prompt hierarchy subordinating experimental manipulation, impossible expert specifications collapsing to generic competence, format constraints suppressing reasoning processes, and provider exclusion limiting generalizability. Controlled trials correcting these limitations reveal what the original design obscured. To test this, we selected the GPQA Diamond hardest questions to prevent baseline pattern matching, forcing reliance on genuine expert reasoning. On items with valid key answers, expert personas achieve ceiling accuracy. They eliminated all baseline errors through confidence amplification. Furthermore, forensic examination of model divergence identified that half of the hardest GPQA items contain chemically or logically indefensible answers. The model’s CoT revealed reasoning away from impossible answers, yielding penalization for accurate chemistry. These findings recontextualize the original null results. Methodologically sound persona research faces measurement constraints imposed by benchmark validity limitations. Answering the persona question requires evaluation infrastructure the field does not yet possess.

155. Locally Coherent Parallel Decoding in Diffusion Language Models

Authors: Michael Hersche , Nicolas Menet , Ronan Tanios , Abbas Rahimi
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20216
Abstract:

Diffusion language models (DLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive (AR) models, offering sub-linear generation latency and bidirectional capabilities that are particularly appealing for code generation and editing. Achieving sub-linear latency in discrete DLMs requires predicting multiple tokens in parallel. However, standard DLMs sample tokens independently from conditional marginal distributions, failing to capture the joint dependencies among concurrently generated tokens. As a result, they often lead to syntactic inconsistencies and break multi-token structures. In this work, we introduce CoDiLA (Coherent Diffusion with Local Autoregression), a method that reconciles parallel sampling with local dependency modeling. Rather than forcing the DLM to resolve fine-grained syntax, CoDiLA delegates local decoding to a small, auxiliary AR model operating on the diffusion latents. This design allows for parallel block generation while ensuring sequential validity within each block and maintaining core DLM capabilities, including bidirectional modeling across blocks. We demonstrate that using a highly compact auxiliary AR model (e.g., 0.6B parameters) effectively eliminates coherence artifacts, establishing a new Pareto frontier for accuracy and speed in code generation benchmarks.

156. Exploring Teacher-Chatbot Interaction and Affect in Block-Based Programming

Authors: Bahare Riahi , Ally Limke , Xiaoyi Tian , Viktoriia Storozhevykh , Sayali Patukale , Tahreem Yasir , Khushbu Singh , Jennifer Chiu , Nicholas lytle , Tiffany Barnes , Veronica Catete
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20211
Abstract:

AI-based chatbots have the potential to accelerate learning and teaching, but may also have counterproductive consequences without thoughtful design and scaffolding. To better understand teachers’ perspectives on large language model (LLM)-based chatbots, we conducted a study with 11 teams of middle school teachers using chatbots for a science and computational thinking activity within a block-based programming environment. Based on a qualitative analysis of audio transcripts and chatbot interactions, we propose three profiles: explorer, frustrated, and mixed, that reflect diverse scaffolding needs. In their discussions, we found that teachers perceived chatbot benefits such as building prompting skills and self-confidence alongside risks including potential declines in learning and critical thinking. Key design recommendations include scaffolding the introduction to chatbots, facilitating teacher control of chatbot features, and suggesting when and how chatbots should be used. Our contribution informs the design of chatbots to support teachers and learners in middle school coding activities.

157. Children’s Intelligence Tests Pose Challenges for MLLMs? KidGym: A 2D Grid-Based Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs

Authors: Hengwei Ye , Yuanting Guan , Yuxuan Ge , Tianying Zhu , Zhenhan Guan , Yijia Zhong , Yijing Zhang , Han Zhang , Yingna Wu , Zheng Tian
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20209
Abstract:

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) combine the linguistic strengths of LLMs with the ability to process multimodal data, enbaling them to address a broader range of visual tasks. Because MLLMs aim at more general, human-like competence than language-only models, we take inspiration from the Wechsler Intelligence Scales - an established battery for evaluating children by decomposing intelligence into interpretable, testable abilities. We introduce KidGym, a comprehensive 2D grid-based benchmark for assessing five essential capabilities of MLLMs: Execution, Perception Reasoning, Learning, Memory and Planning. The benchmark comprises 12 unique tasks, each targeting at least one core capability, specifically designed to guage MLLMs’ adaptability and developmental potential, mirroring the stages of children’s cognitive growth. Additionally, our tasks encompass diverse scenarios and objects with randomly generated layouts, ensuring a more accurate and robust evluation of MLLM capabilities. KidGym is designed to be fully user-customizable and extensible, allowing researchers to create new evaluation scenarios and adjust difficuly levels to accommodate the rapidly growing MLLM community. Through the evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs using KidGym, we identified significant insights into model capabilities and revealed several limitations of current models. We release our benchmark at: this https URL .

158. RedacBench: Can AI Erase Your Secrets?

Authors: Hyunjun Jeon , Kyuyoung Kim , Jinwoo Shin
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20208
Abstract:

Modern language models can readily extract sensitive information from unstructured text, making redaction – the selective removal of such information – critical for data security. However, existing benchmarks for redaction typically focus on predefined categories of data such as personally identifiable information (PII) or evaluate specific techniques like masking. To address this limitation, we introduce RedacBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating policy-conditioned redaction across domains and strategies. Constructed from 514 human-authored texts spanning individual, corporate, and government sources, paired with 187 security policies, RedacBench measures a model’s ability to selectively remove policy-violating information while preserving the original semantics. We quantify performance using 8,053 annotated propositions that capture all inferable information in each text. This enables assessment of both security – the removal of sensitive propositions – and utility – the preservation of non-sensitive propositions. Experiments across multiple redaction strategies and state-of-the-art language models show that while more advanced models can improve security, preserving utility remains a challenge. To facilitate future research, we release RedacBench along with a web-based playground for dataset customization and evaluation. Available at this https URL .

159. Enhancing Safety of Large Language Models via Embedding Space Separation

Authors: Xu Zhao , Xiting Wang , Weiran Shen
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20206
Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive capabilities, yet ensuring their safety against harmful prompts remains a critical challenge. Recent work has revealed that the latent representations (embeddings) of harmful and safe queries in LLMs typically exhibit linear separability, a property that has been exploited to construct attacks by perturbing the embeddings of harmful queries towards the safe subspace. Motivated by this observation, we propose a representation-level fine-tuning approach, named Embedding Space Separation (ES2), which improves LLM safety by explicitly enlarging the distance between harmful and safe representations in the embedding space. To prevent degradation of model’s general capabilities, we introduce a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence regularization term into the loss function, which constrains the logits of the fine-tuned model to align with those of the original base model on harmless inputs. We evaluate our method on several open-source LLMs using standard safety benchmarks. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our approach substantially improves model safety while maintaining comparable general capabilities.

160. Measuring Research Convergence in Interdisciplinary Teams Using Large Language Models and Graph Analytics

Authors: Wenwen Li , Yuanyuan Tian , Sizhe Wang , Amber Wutich , Paul Westerhoff , Sarah Porter , Anais Roque , Jobayer Hossain , Patrick Thomson , Rhett Larson , Michael Hanemann
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20204
Abstract:

Understanding how interdisciplinary research teams converge on shared knowledge is a persistent challenge. This paper presents a novel, multi-layer, AI-driven analytical framework for mapping research convergence in interdisciplinary teams. The framework integrates large language models (LLMs), graph-based visualization and analytics, and human-in-the-loop evaluation to examine how research viewpoints are shared, influenced, and integrated over time. LLMs are used to extract structured viewpoints aligned with the \emph{Needs-Approach-Benefits-Competition (NABC)} framework and to infer potential viewpoint flows across presenters, forming a common semantic foundation for three complementary analyses: (1) similarity-based qualitative analysis to identify two key types of viewpoints, popular and unique, for building convergence, (2) quantitative cross-domain influence analysis using network centrality measures, and (3) temporal viewpoint flow analysis to capture convergence dynamics. To address uncertainty in LLM-based inference, the framework incorporates expert validation through structured surveys and cross-layer consistency checks. A case study on water insecurity in underserved communities as part of the Arizona Water Innovation Initiatives demonstrates increasing viewpoint convergence and domain-specific influence patterns, illustrating the value of the proposed AI-enabled approach for research convergence analysis.

LLM 관련 주요 논문 - 2026-03-24

1. MARCUS: An agentic, multimodal vision-language model for cardiac diagnosis and management

2. GSEM: Graph-based Self-Evolving Memory for Experience Augmented Clinical Reasoning

3. A Context Engineering Framework for Improving Enterprise AI Agents based on Digital-Twin MDP

4. Reasoning or Rhetoric? An Empirical Analysis of Moral Reasoning Explanations in Large Language Models

5. The Presupposition Problem in Representation Genesis

6. EvoIdeator: Evolving Scientific Ideas through Checklist-Grounded Reinforcement Learning

7. CurvZO: Adaptive Curvature-Guided Sparse Zeroth-Order Optimization for Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning

8. Compensating Visual Insufficiency with Stratified Language Guidance for Long-Tail Class Incremental Learning

9. MIND: Multi-agent inference for negotiation dialogue in travel planning

10. Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain

11. AI Token Futures Market: Commoditization of Compute and Derivatives Contract Design

12. Mirage The Illusion of Visual Understanding

13. Silicon Bureaucracy and AI Test-Oriented Education: Contamination Sensitivity and Score Confidence in LLM Benchmarks

14. EnterpriseLab: A Full-Stack Platform for developing and deploying agents in Enterprises

15. A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment

16. Mind over Space: Can Multimodal Large Language Models Mentally Navigate?

17. Adaptive Robust Estimator for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

18. Counterfactual Credit Policy Optimization for Multi-Agent Collaboration

19. DomAgent: Leveraging Knowledge Graphs and Case-Based Reasoning for Domain-Specific Code Generation

20. Silent Commitment Failure in Instruction-Tuned Language Models: Evidence of Governability Divergence Across Architectures

21. Persona Vectors in Games: Measuring and Steering Strategies via Activation Vectors

22. AdaRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubrics for LLM Agent Evaluation

23. AgentHER: Hindsight Experience Replay for LLM Agent Trajectory Relabeling

24. RoboAlign: Learning Test-Time Reasoning for Language-Action Alignment in Vision-Language-Action Models

25. Improving Coherence and Persistence in Agentic AI for System Optimization

26. The Library Theorem: How External Organization Governs Agentic Reasoning Capacity

27. Graph of States: Solving Abductive Tasks with Large Language Models

28. ConsRoute:Consistency-Aware Adaptive Query Routing for Cloud-Edge-Device Large Language Models

29. Revisiting Tree Search for LLMs: Gumbel and Sequential Halving for Budget-Scalable Reasoning

30. Can LLMs Fool Graph Learning? Exploring Universal Adversarial Attacks on Text-Attributed Graphs

31. ORACLE: Optimizing Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models via Constraint-Led Synthetic Data Elicitation

32. KLDrive: Fine-Grained 3D Scene Reasoning for Autonomous Driving based on Knowledge Graph

33. Knowledge Boundary Discovery for Large Language Models

34. A Framework for Low-Latency, LLM-driven Multimodal Interaction on the Pepper Robot

35. Can we automatize scientific discovery in the cognitive sciences?

36. Profit is the Red Team: Stress-Testing Agents in Strategic Economic Interactions

37. Do LLM-Driven Agents Exhibit Engagement Mechanisms? Controlled Tests of Information Load, Descriptive Norms, and Popularity Cues

38. Modeling Epistemic Uncertainty in Social Perception via Rashomon Set Agents

39. AI-Driven Multi-Agent Simulation of Stratified Polyamory Systems: A Computational Framework for Optimizing Social Reproductive Efficiency

40. Towards Intelligent Geospatial Data Discovery: a knowledge graph-driven multi-agent framework powered by large language models

41. Attention in Space: Functional Roles of VLM Heads for Spatial Reasoning

42. From 50% to Mastery in 3 Days: A Low-Resource SOP for Localizing Graduate-Level AI Tutors via Shadow-RAG

43. Seed1.8 Model Card: Towards Generalized Real-World Agency

44. Context Cartography: Toward Structured Governance of Contextual Space in Large Language Model Systems

45. LLM-Driven Heuristic Synthesis for Industrial Process Control: Lessons from Hot Steel Rolling

46. Grounded Chess Reasoning in Language Models via Master Distillation

47. Deep reflective reasoning in interdependence constrained structured data extraction from clinical notes for digital health

48. LLM-Enhanced Energy Contrastive Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Text-Attributed Graphs

49. Me, Myself, and $π$ : Evaluating and Explaining LLM Introspection

50. FactorSmith: Agentic Simulation Generation via Markov Decision Process Decomposition with Planner-Designer-Critic Refinement

51. Domain-Specialized Tree of Thought through Plug-and-Play Predictors

52. ProMAS: Proactive Error Forecasting for Multi-Agent Systems Using Markov Transition Dynamics

53. AgenticGEO: A Self-Evolving Agentic System for Generative Engine Optimization

54. UniMotion: A Unified Framework for Motion-Text-Vision Understanding and Generation

55. ThinkJEPA: Empowering Latent World Models with Large Vision-Language Reasoning Model

56. 3D-Layout-R1: Structured Reasoning for Language-Instructed Spatial Editing

57. Confidence-Based Decoding is Provably Efficient for Diffusion Language Models

58. SpatialReward: Verifiable Spatial Reward Modeling for Fine-Grained Spatial Consistency in Text-to-Image Generation

59. Evaluating the Reliability and Fidelity of Automated Judgment Systems of Large Language Models

60. SPA: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Injection

61. CayleyPy-4: AI-Holography. Towards analogs of holographic string dualities for AI tasks

62. Seeing is Improving: Visual Feedback for Iterative Text Layout Refinement

63. Enhancing Document-Level Machine Translation via Filtered Synthetic Corpora and Two-Stage LLM Adaptation

64. Multimodal Survival Analysis with Locally Deployable Large Language Models

65. Mamba-VMR: Multimodal Query Augmentation via Generated Videos for Precise Temporal Grounding

66. On the Direction of RLVR Updates for LLM Reasoning: Identification and Exploitation

67. On the Failure of Topic-Matched Contrast Baselines in Multi-Directional Refusal Abliteration

68. Uncertainty-guided Compositional Alignment with Part-to-Whole Semantic Representativeness in Hyperbolic Vision-Language Models

69. ROM: Real-time Overthinking Mitigation via Streaming Detection and Intervention

70. SecureBreak – A dataset towards safe and secure models

71. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Medical Text Summarization: A Comparative Study of Lora, Prompt Tuning, and Full Fine-Tuning

72. P^2O: Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization

73. Manifold-Aware Exploration for Reinforcement Learning in Video Generation

74. SemEval-2026 Task 12: Abductive Event Reasoning: Towards Real-World Event Causal Inference for Large Language Models

75. Rethinking Token Reduction for Large Vision-Language Models

76. Structured Visual Narratives Undermine Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models

77. Towards Secure Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Review of Threats, Defenses and Benchmarks

78. AgenticRec: End-to-End Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization for Ranking-Oriented Recommender Agents

79. mSFT: Addressing Dataset Mixtures Overfiting Heterogeneously in Multi-task SFT